Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agriculture in China

ISSN 1673-7334

ISSN 1673-744X(Online)

CN 11-5729/S

Frontiers of Agriculture in China  0, Vol. Issue (): 383-393   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-010-1044-4
  REVIEW 本期目录
Genetic bases of improved soybean cultivars released from 1923 to 2005 in China—A historical review
Genetic bases of improved soybean cultivars released from 1923 to 2005 in China—A historical review
Dongjin XIONG1,2, Tuanjie ZHAO1, Junyi GAI1()
1. School of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China; 2. Soybean Research Institute, Nanjing Agricultural University; National Center for Soybean Improvement; National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing 210095, China
 全文: PDF(156 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Improved soybean cultivars are cultivars released from a scientific breeding program in China in contrast to the historical landraces kept by farmers from their own seed lots. The pedigree data of 1300 soybean cultivars [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] released in China from 1923 to 2005 were collected, checked, and corrected. These cultivars traced back to 670 nuclear and 344 cytoplasmic ancestors; 45% (50%) of the nuclear (cytoplasmic) germplasms were from Eco-region I, 23% (26%) from II, 7% (10%) from III, 4% (5%) from IV, 1% (1%) from V, 1% (1%) from VI, 18% (7%) from foreign countries, and 0% (1%) from geographically unknown sources. Both nuclear and cytoplasmic germplasm from Eco-regions I, II, and III, and foreign countries accounted for most of the ancestry of the released cultivars. In each of the eco-regions, with the exception of region VI, but especially in region I, the local nuclear and cytoplasmic germplasm was dominant in the released cultivars. Exotic germplasm accounted for an increasing portion of the nuclear and cytoplasmic germplasm, especially in Eco-regions I and II. The genetic base of the released cultivars is relatively narrow but has been gradually broadened, especially in Eco-regions I and II; and the average number of ancestors per cultivar released between 1996 and 2005 in various eco-regions was approximately double the period between 1986 and 1995. Seventy-eight ancestors accounted for 12% of the total ancestors but explained that 64% of the nuclear contribution and 70% of the cytoplasmic contribution to the 1300 released cultivars. For broadening the genetic base of future cultivars, the utilization of germplasm from outside regions is emphasized.

Key wordssoybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]    ancestor    nuclear contribution    cytoplasmic contribution    genetic base broadening
收稿日期: 2010-05-26      出版日期: 2010-12-05
Corresponding Author(s): GAI Junyi,Email:sri@njau.edu.cn   
 引用本文:   
. Genetic bases of improved soybean cultivars released from 1923 to 2005 in China—A historical review[J]. Frontiers of Agriculture in China, 0, (): 383-393.
Dongjin XIONG, Tuanjie ZHAO, Junyi GAI. Genetic bases of improved soybean cultivars released from 1923 to 2005 in China—A historical review. Front Agric Chin, 0, (): 383-393.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/CN/10.1007/s11703-010-1044-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/CN/Y0/V/I/383
Fig.1  
periodeco-regionno. released CTVssource of ancestors and their genetic contribution to released cultivars
IIIIIIIVVVIFU
1923-2005 (83 years)I682537.15 (614)14.68 (10)0.16 (0)1.02 (0)1.00 (1)0.00 (0)123.68 (48)4.39 (9)
II39544.89 (31)257.82 (317)14.26 (17)0.02 (0)0.50 (2)0.00 (0)76.01 (26)1.50 (2)
III641.53 (0)11.41 (5)36.19 (51)1.00 (0)0.00 (0)2.75 (2)11.12 (6)0.00 (0)
IV1205.34 (2)14.00 (8)37.75 (49)45.75 (50)0.00 (0)0.50 (1)16.66 (10)0.00 (0)
V161.25 (0)1.25 (0)2.50 (4)0.25 (0)9.75 (12)0.00 (0)1.00 (0)0.00 (0)
VI230.50 (0)2.88 (2)4.38 (4)9.13 (10)0.00 (0)3.88 (6)2.25 (1)0.00 (0)
sum.1300590.66 (647)302.04 (342)95.23 (125)57.16 (60)11.25 (15)7.13 (9)230.71 (91)5.89 (11)
1996-2005 (10 years)I316223.15 (267)10.09 (5)0.16 (0)0.52 (0)1.00 (1)0.00 (0)77.77 (36)3.39 (7)
II17215.86 (14)103.10 (126)6.82 (10)0.02 (0)0.50 (2)0.00 (0)45.70 (20)0.00 (0)
III251.53 (0)3.85 (1)9.19 (16)1.00 (0)0.00 (0)2.75 (2)6.68 (6)0.00 (0)
IV632.97 (0)7.09 (3)21.44 (28)19.31 (23)0.00 (0)0.50 (1)11.69 (8)0.00 (0)
V60.25 (0)0.50 (0)1.25 (2)0.25 (0)2.75 (4)0.00 (0)1.00 (0)0.00 (0)
VI100.00 (0)1.13 (1)2.38 (2)2.88 (3)0.00 (0)2.88 (4)0.75 (0)0.00 (0)
sum.592243.76 (281)125.75 (136)41.23 (58)23.98 (26)4.25 (7)6.13 (7)143.59 (70)3.39 (7)
Tab.1  
type of ancestortotalIIIIIIIVVVIUF
improved cultivar4747
landrace3461109838459739
breeding line257143721393413
wild accession171421
uncertain type313
total67026717251551211399
Tab.2  
no. of ancestors123456-1011-1516-2021-2526-3031323435total
no. of released cultivars177172999894310201106191615111300
%13.6113.237.627.547.2323.8515.468.151.461.230.080.380.080.08100.00
Tab.3  
periodcountryIIIIIIIVVVI
1923-19551.20 (0.72)1.25 (0.65)1.00 (1.00)1.00 (1.00)0.00 (0.00)0.00 (0.00)0.00 (0.00)
1956-19651.82 (0.72)2.00 (0.67)1.36 (1.18)1.00 (0.67)0.00 (0.00)0.00 (0.00)1.00 (1.00)
1966-19752.49 (0.74)2.91 (0.63)2.17 (0.98)1.50 (1.50)1.40 (1.40)1.00 (1.00)1.00 (1.00)
1976-19853.78 (0.97)3.92 (0.89)4.07 (1.28)3.13 (1.63)2.00 (1.70)0.00 (0.00)1.00 (1.00)
1986-19956.32 (0.85)6.96 (0.94)7.39 (1.14)4.00 (1.82)3.95 (1.43)1.89 (1.89)2.63 (2.38)
1996-200510.88 (0.85)12.29 (0.89)11.42 (1.17)6.16 (2.56)5.90 (1.86)5.00 (3.50)3.60 (2.30)
1923-20057.44 (0.52)8.19 (0.53)7.90 (0.67)4.34 (1.27)4.77 (1.18)3.00 (1.88)2.70 (1.52)
Tab.4  
no. derived cultivarsancestorcontribution
no.%value%
1356 (238)53.13 (69.18)192.82 (238)14.83 (18.31)
2-5166 (69)24.79 (20.06)151.37 (185)11.64 (14.23)
6-1044 (11)6.57 (3.2)58.9 (78)4.53 (6.00)
11-2028 (12)4.18 (3.49)68.71 (176)5.29 (13.53)
21-3012 (8)1.79 (2.33)43.92 (203)3.38 (15.62)
31-4016 (1)2.39 (0.29)74.97 (38)5.77 (2.92)
41-6012 (3)1.79 (0.87)72.51 (163)5.58 (12.55)
61-1008 (1)1.19 (0.29)47.22 (83)3.63 (6.38)
101-1408 (1)1.19 (0.29)80.48 (136)6.19 (10.46)
141-18071.04117.89.06
181-320101.49221.9117.07
35710.1545.763.52
49710.1557.984.46
57710.1565.655.05
total670 (344)100 (100)1,300 (1300)100 (100)
Tab.5  
periodeco-regioncountryIIIIIIIVVVI
1923-1975 (53 years)mean1.802.241.201.000.711.001.00
min.0.250.250.250.500.501.001.00
max.24.5023.507.502.001.001.001.00
1976-1995 (20 years)Mean1.461.381.150.750.710.530.48
min.0.060.060.060.030.030.060.03
max.21.6919.2616.85.134.631.001.00
1996-2005 (10 years)mean1.181.120.860.390.540.290.43
min.0.010.010.020.000.010.060.03
max.25.6825.1811.892.067.941.001.75
1923-2005 (83 years)mean1.941.891.510.790.850.530.66
min.0.020.010.020.000.010.130.03
max.65.6560.3929.697.8112.562.001.88
Tab.6  
name of ancestorarea of major ancestor usedno. DCNC/%CC/%
I
JinyuanC,I (C,I)5775.051.46
Silihuang (A210)C,I (C,I)4974.4610.46
BaimeiC,I (C,I)3573.526.38
DuludouC,I (C,I)3132.843.62
TiejiasilihuangC,I (C,I)2812.280.08
KeshansilijiaC,I (C,I)2121.830.15
TiejiaziI (C,I)1691.552.00
XiongyuexiaohuangdouI (I)2501.290.00
Yongfengdou911.080.54
Yiwofeng (A256)1040.802.08
Xiaolidou 9 hao1010.894.62
Suoyiling870.780.00
Xiaojinhuang580.630.46
Silihuang (A211)1100.590.31
Xiaojinhuang1110.640.92
Xiaolihuang900.620.31
Dongnong 33320.401.38
Huinanqingpidou630.390.08
Wudingzhu180.230.92
II
BinhaidabaihuaC,II,III,IV (C,II,III,IV)1802.854.31
A295C,II (II)1181.632.23
JimoyoudouII,IV (II)1451.482.92
TongshantianedanII (II)1631.381.08
YidupingdinghuangII1320.770.31
Tiejiaohuang1290.640.00
DingtaopingdingdahuangdouII (II)300.571.23
Huaxiandalvdou440.520.00
Pixianruantiaozhi(II)640.490.08
Dabaima210.490.92
Shandongsijiaoqi580.432.08
Dahuapi360.380.00
Qinyangshuibaidou480.331.00
Guangpingniumaohuang170.310.62
Shandongxiaohuangdou170.250.31
Peixiandabaijiao190.250.54
Tongzhouxiaohuangdou260.260.62
Dabaiqi120.240.31
Yiwofeng (A257)40.190.15
Xiaopingding190.190.08
III
A291III, IV, VI (III, IV, VI)401.482.08
FenxianshuidaohuangIII, V,VI (III,VI) VVVVVVV,VI (III,VI)450.981.69
51-83III (III)410.771.15
ShanghailiuyuebaiIII, IV,V (III, IV,V)340.721.77
TaixingheidouIII (III)130.370.15
Pudongdahuangdou290.320.15
Houzimao80.150.15
Tongshanbaopihuangdou100.150.00
Wuyueba60.140.38
IV
MaopengqingIV (IV)80.460.46
Siyuebai(IV)190.290.00
Baijiadou40.230.31
PutiandahuangdouVI80.220.46
ShaodongliuyehuangIV70.200.38
Dahuangzhu30.150.08
GutiandouVI30.150.23
Caoqing30.130.15
LachenghuangdouVI (VI)30.130.15
Gongxianerjizao40.100.31
Huangmaodou40.100.31
V
MaoerhuiV20.150.15
A299V (V)30.150.23
DafangliuyuezaoV30.100.15
VI
JingxizaohuangdouVI (VI)30.070.08
F
A.K.C,I (C,I)2971.800.38
RichlandII (II)2411.140.00
Mandarin2420.940.08
Dunfield1900.610.00
Mukden1690.391.31
OtootanII (II)1690.710.00
Clemson1380.240.00
ShishengchangyeC, I (C, I)2873.130.35
LincolnII (II,V)1971.211.69
Mammoth YellowII(II)1690.710.00
Heilongjiang 41330.330.08
Ribendabaimei160.360.38
Yeqi 1 hao550.300.00
Magnolia320.280.00
Youbilie300.270.00
total63.6569.80
Tab.7  
1 Allen F L, Bhardwaj H L (1987) Genetic Relationship and Selected Pedigree Diagrams of North America Soybean Cultivars. Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin, No. 652, University of Tennessee
2 Bai Y N, Gai J Y (2005). Inheritance of male fertility restoration of the cytoplasmic-nuclear male-sterile line NJCMS1A of soybean [Glycine max (L) Merr.]. Euphytica , 145(1): 25-32
doi: 10.1007/s10681-005-8497-1
3 Bai Y N, Gai J Y (2006). Development of a new cytoplasmic-nuclear male-sterility line of soybean and inheritance of its male-fertility restorability. Plant Breeding , 125(1): 85-88
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2006.01191.x
4 Bernard R L, Juvik G A, Hartwig E E, Edwards C J (1988). Origins and Pedigrees of Public Soybean Varieties in the United States and Canada. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin, No. 1746
5 Carter T E, Gizlice Z, Burton J W (1993). Coefficient-of-parentage and Genetic Similarity Estimates for 258 North America Soybean Cultivars by Public Agencies During 1945-1988. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin, No. 1814
6 Chang R Z, Sun J Y (1991). A Catalog of Soybean Landraces in China (continued). Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press (in Chinese)
7 Committee on Genetic Vulnerability of Major Crops (1972). Genetic Vulnerability of Major Crops Washington. DC, National Academy of Science
8 Cui Z L, Carter T E, Gai J Y, Qiu J X, Nelson R L (1999). Origin, Description, and Pedigree of Chinese Soybean Cultivars Released from 1923 to 1995. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin, No. 1871
9 Cui Z L, Carter T E, Burton J W (2000). Genetic diversity patterns in Chinese soybean cultivars based on coefficient of parentage. Crop Sci , 40(6): 1780-1793
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2000.4061780x
10 Cui Z L, Gai J Y, Carter T E, Qiu J X, Zhao T J (1998). The Released Chinese Soybean Cultivars and their Pedigree Analysis (1923-1995). Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press (in Chinese)
11 Delannay X, Rodgers D M, Palmer R G (1983). Relative genetic contributions among ancestral lines to North American soybean cultivars. Crop Sci , 23(5): 944-949
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300050031x
12 Gai J Y (1984). The progress of soybean improvement and its potential direction in the United States. Soybean Science , 2(3): 225-231 (in Chinese)
13 Gai J Y (1984). The progress of soybean improvement and its potential direction in the United States (continued). Soybean Science , 2(4): 327-341 (in Chinese)
14 Gai J Y, Cui Z L (1994). Ancestral analysis of soybean cultivars released in China. J Nanjing Agri Univ , 17(3): 19-23 (in Chinese)
15 Gai J Y (2006). Plant Breeding: Crop Species. 2nd ed. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press (in Chinese)
16 Gai J Y, Qiu J X, Zhao T J (1997). An analysis of genetic relationship of Nannong 493-1 and Nannong 1138-2 with their derivative cultivars and their potential in future breeding. J Nanjing Agri Univ , 20(1): 1-8 (in Chinese)
17 Gai J Y, Wang Y S (2001). A study on the varietal eco-regions of soybeans in China. Sci Agric Sin , 34(2): 139-145 (in Chinese)
18 Gepts P, Hancock J (2006). The future of plant breeding. Crop Sci , 46(4): 1630-1634
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005-12-0497op
19 Gizlice Z, Carter, T E, Burton J W (1994). Genetic base for North American public soybean cultivars released between 1947 and 1988. Crop Sci , 34(5): 1143-1151
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400050001x
20 Hu M X, Tian P Z (1993). Annals of Chinese Soybean Cultivars (1978-1992). Beijing, Chinese Agriculture Press (in Chinese)
21 Peleman J D, Voort J R V D (2003). Breeding by design. Trends in Plant Sci , 18(7): 330-334
doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00134-1
22 Qian H J, Gai J Y, Yu D Y (2001). A study on the genotypic variation and inheritance of soymilk output, quality and processing traits. Acta Agronomica Sinica , 27(6): 880-885 (in Chinese)
23 Satyavathi C, Bhat K, Bharadwaj C, Tiwari S, Chaudhury V (2006). AFLP Analysis of genetic diversity in Indian soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] varieties. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution , 53(5): 1069-1079
doi: 10.1007/s10722-005-0779-x
24 Singh R J, Hymowitz T (1999). Soybean genetic resources and crop improvement. Genome , (42): 605-616
doi: 10.1139/gen-42-4-605
25 Specht J E, Williams J H (1984). Contribution of genetic technology to soybean production and retrospect and prospect. In: Fehr W R. Genetic contribution to grain yields of five major crop plants. Madison. WI, CASS and ASA , 49-74
26 Wang G X (1982). A Catalog of Soybean Landraces in China. Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press (in Chinese)
27 Wollenweber B, Porter J R, Lübberstedt T (2005). Need for multidisciplinary research towards a second green revolution. Curr Opin Plant Biol , 8(3): 337-341
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.03.001
28 Xiong D J, Zhao T J, Gai J Y (2008). Parental analysis of soybean cultivars released in China. Sci Agric Sin , 41(9): 2589-2598 (in Chinese)
29 Zhang Z J (1985). Annals of Chinese Soybean Cultivars. Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press (in Chinese)
30 Zhou X, Carter T E, Cui, Z L, Miyazaki J, Burton W (2000). Genetic base of Japanese soybean cultivars released during 1950 to 1988. Crop Sci , 40(6): 1794-1802
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2000.4061794x
31 Zhou X, Carter T E, Cui Z, Miyazaki J, Burton W (2000). Genetic diversity patterns in Japanese soybean cultivars based on Coefficient of Parentage. Crop Sci , 42(4): 1331-1342
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2002.1331
32 Zhao T J, Gai J Y (2006). Discovery of new male-sterile cytoplasm sources and development of a new cytoplasmic-nuclear male-sterile line NJCMS3A in soybean. Euphytica , 152(3): 387-396
doi: 10.1007/s10681-006-9226-0
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed