Effects of chromosome substitution on the utilization efficiency of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in wheat

doi:10.1007/s11703-011-1069-3

Frontiers of Agriculture in China

2011, Vol. 5

Issue (3): 253-261 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-011-1069-3

RESEARCH ARTICLE

本期目录

Effects of chromosome substitution on the utilization efficiency of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in wheat

Chengjin GUO¹, Jincai LI², Wensuo CHANG¹, Lijun ZHANG¹, Xirong CUI¹, Shuwen LI³, Kai XIAO¹(

)

1. College of Agronomy, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071001, China; 2. Administration Office of Science and Technology, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071001, China; 3. College of Resource and Environment, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071001, China

全文: PDF(306 KB) HTML

Abstract：

A complete set of chromosome substitution lines with genetic background of Chinese Spring (CS) were used to determine the effects of each chromosome on utilization efficiencies of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). In each line, only one pair of chromosomes in CS genome was substituted by the corresponding one of donor Synthetic 6x. Under normal growth conditions supplied with enough inorganic nutrients, the dry mass per plant and the utilization efficiencies of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) in plants varied largely among CS, Synthetic 6x, and the chromosome substitution lines (1A–7A, 1B–7B, and 1D–7D). Of these, 1A substituted by the chromosome 1A of Synthetic 6x (other lines are the same as 1A hereafter) had the highest plant dry mass and the accumulative amount of N and K, and 1B behaved to have the highest plant accumulative P amount. 1D and 4D had the lowest accumulative P amount and plant dry mass, respectively. 4B showed the lowest plant accumulative N and K. Thus, chromosome 1A of Synthetic 6x contains major genes endowing plant capacities of higher dry mass, accumulative N and K, whereas chromosome 1B of Synthetic 6x carries major genes improving plant accumulative P capacities. The lines, together with CS and the donor, could be classified into three groups including high-efficiency, mid-efficiency, and low-efficiency based on plant dry mass. Regression analysis suggested that there are significantly positive correlations between plant dry mass and the accumulated amount of N, P, and K. Further, there are positively significant correlations among the plant accumulative N amount and some plant traits and physiological parameters, as well as positively significant correlations between the accumulative amount of P and K and the photosynthetic rate (P_n).

Key words： wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) chromosome substitution line nitrogen efficiency phosphorus efficiency potassium efficiency plant growth trait photosynthetic parameter

收稿日期: 2010-09-19 出版日期: 2011-09-05

Corresponding Author(s): XIAO Kai,Email:xiaokai@hebau.edu.cn

引用本文:

. Effects of chromosome substitution on the utilization efficiency of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in wheat[J]. Frontiers of Agriculture in China, 2011, 5(3): 253-261.
Chengjin GUO, Jincai LI, Wensuo CHANG, Lijun ZHANG, Xirong CUI, Shuwen LI, Kai XIAO. Effects of chromosome substitution on the utilization efficiency of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in wheat. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(3): 253-261.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/CN/10.1007/s11703-011-1069-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/CN/Y2011/V5/I3/253

Fig.1

Fig.2

Lines	Dry mass (mg per plant)	N content (%)	P content (%)	K content (%)	Accumulative N (mg per plant)	Accumulative P (mg per plant)	Accumulative K (mg per plant)	N efficiency (mg per mg N)	P efficiency (mg per mg P)	K efficiency (mg per mg K)
CS	89a	5.64b	0.89bc	0.78a	5.02a	0.79b	0.70a	17.73a	112.66b	127.14c
Synthetic 6x	68b	6.47a	1.91a	0.69b	4.40b	1.29a	0.46b	15.45b	52.71c	147.83ab
1A	84	5.71	1.01	0.75	4.80	0.84	0.63	17.50	100.00	133.33
2A	72	6.05	0.90	0.68	4.35	0.64	0.49	16.55	112.50	146.94
3A	72	5.48	0.97	0.69	3.94	0.70	0.50	18.27	102.86	144.00
4A	59	5.48	0.92	0.66	3.23	0.54	0.39	18.27	109.26	151.28
5A	64	5.75	0.89	0.73	3.68	0.57	0.46	17.39	112.28	139.13
6A	62	5.59	1.08	0.73	3.46	0.67	0.45	17.92	92.54	137.78
7A	71	5.46	1.01	0.75	3.87	0.71	0.53	18.35	100.00	133.96
1B	71	5.45	1.49	0.75	3.87	1.06	0.53	18.35	66.98	133.96
2B	79	4.97	1.08	0.68	3.93	0.85	0.54	20.10	92.94	146.30
3B	75	5.54	0.95	0.69	4.15	0.71	0.52	18.07	105.63	144.23
4B	57	4.97	0.85	0.64	2.83	0.48	0.36	20.14	118.75	158.33
5B	62	5.8	0.79	0.67	3.59	0.49	0.41	17.27	126.53	151.22
6B	73	5.43	0.85	0.71	3.96	0.62	0.52	18.43	117.74	140.38
7B	64	5.79	0.84	0.72	3.7	0.53	0.46	17.30	120.75	139.13
1D	64	5.79	0.59	0.72	3.71	0.37	0.46	17.25	172.97	139.13
2D	65	4.87	0.84	0.67	3.1685	0.545	0.43	20.51	119.27	151.16
3D	62	5.27	0.88	0.70	3.27	0.54	0.43	18.96	114.81	144.19
4D	54	5.39	0.84	0.59	2.91	0.45	0.31	18.56	120.00	174.19
5D	75	5.65	0.78	0.67	4.23	0.59	0.50	17.73	127.12	150.00
6D	82	5.64	0.80	0.65	4.63	0.65	0.53	17.71	126.15	154.72
7D	75	5.56	0.83	0.65	4.17	0.62	0.49	17.99	120.97	153.06
A-D Ave	68.67b	5.51b	0.91bc	0.69b	3.78c	0.63b	0.47b	18.22a	113.34b	146.02ab
A-D SE	8.21	0.30	0.17	0.04	0.52	0.15	0.07	1.01	19.84	9.68
A-DCV (%)	11.96	5.38	18.87	6.00	13.77	24.64	14.96	5.57	17.50	6.63
A Ave	69.14b	5.65b	0.97b	0.71b	3.90c	0.67b	0.49b	17.75a	104.20b	140.92b
A SE	8.38	0.21	0.07	0.04	0.53	0.10	0.07	0.65	7.45	6.73
A CV (%)	12.11	3.76	7.19	5.04	13.66	14.88	15.22	3.67	7.15	4.78
B Ave	68.71b	5.42b	0.98b	0.69b	3.72c	0.68b	0.48b	18.52a	107.05b	144.79ab
B SE	7.89	0.34	0.25	0.04	0.43	0.21	0.07	1.19	20.92	8.12
B CV (%)	11.48	6.31	25.05	5.18	11.61	31.69	14.56	6.40	19.54	5.61
D Ave	68.14b	5.45b	0.79c	0.66b	3.73c	0.54c	0.45b	18.39a	128.76a	152.35a
D SE	9.58	0.31	0.10	0.04	0.64	0.10	0.07	1.10	19.94	11.04
D CV (%)	14.06	5.68	12.03	6.26	17.16	18.28	15.97	5.97	15.49	7.25

Tab.1

Lines	Plant height (cm)	Leaf age	Root number	Leaf area (cm² per plant)	SP (mg/g FW)	Chla (mg/g FW)	Chlb (mg/g FW)	Chla+Chlb (mg/g FW)	Caro (mg/g FW)	Fv/Fm	P_n (μmol/(m²·s)
CS	33.1a	3.6a	4.8a	22.6a	49.48b	1.36a	0.40a	1.76a	0.29a	0.861a	21.03a
Synthetic 6x	26.1b	3.2b	3.7c	15.1c	58.90a	1.39a	0.37a	1.76a	0.27a	0.855a	16.12b
1A	31.7	3.7	4	19.1	46.79	1.3	0.35	1.65	0.26	0.851	17.67
2A	33.5	3.5	4.2	19.3	46.62	1.39	0.37	1.76	0.29	0.852	22
3A	34.8	3.8	4.3	22.1	48.69	1.4	0.36	1.76	0.27	0.856	17.17
4A	31.2	3.6	3.8	18.9	49.72	1.43	0.4	1.83	0.31	0.847	18.84
5A	31.7	3.7	3.2	19.6	39.99	1.32	0.35	1.67	0.26	0.869	17.17
6A	30.5	3.6	3.2	17.6	34.94	1.29	0.41	1.7	0.29	0.843	16.03
7A	34.1	3.4	4.5	18.6	36.4	1.18	0.33	1.51	0.24	0.850	16.16
1B	32.2	3.5	4.2	20.2	46.44	1.29	0.36	1.65	0.25	0.861	17.15
2B	32.9	3.7	4.8	22.8	55.19	1.36	0.37	1.73	0.27	0.852	17.5
3B	35.8	3.7	4.8	23.0	50.11	1.42	0.38	1.8	0.29	0.874	21.03
4B	31.2	3.6	3.5	18.3	42.64	1.14	0.36	1.5	0.27	0.839	12.33
5B	29.1	3.7	1.8	16.6	52.21	1.45	0.41	1.86	0.3	0.851	18.16
6B	35.5	3.5	4.7	19.4	50.6	1.38	0.38	1.76	0.27	0.861	17.83
7B	34.2	3.4	4.2	19.4	45.98	1.35	0.36	1.71	0.27	0.851	18.33
1D	32.9	3.5	4.5	18.6	42.36	1.28	0.35	1.63	0.26	0.863	15.5
2D	32.7	3.6	3.7	19.5	50.98	1.31	0.34	1.65	0.26	0.864	13.03
3D	29.6	3.6	4	15.4	51.39	1.2	0.31	1.51	0.23	0.854	16.16
4D	30.6	3.5	3.2	16.4	44.58	1.09	0.25	1.34	0.25	0.852	18.1
5D	31.5	3.9	4.7	21.9	46.8	1.42	0.38	1.8	0.29	0.865	17.16
6D	38.9	3.5	4.5	23.9	48.05	1.47	0.4	1.87	0.28	0.862	18.33
7D	32.1	3.9	3.2	22.7	61.4	1.38	0.35	1.73	0.27	0.858	15.16
A-D Ave	32.70a	3.61a	3.95b	19.68b	47.23c	1.33a	0.36ab	1.69a	0.27a	0.856 a	17.18b
A-D Se	2.30	0.14	0.74	2.31	6.02	0.10	0.04	0.13	0.02	0.008	2.20
A-DCV (%)	7.03	5.45	18.72	11.76	12.74	7.82	9.98	7.90	7.35	0.966	12.82
A Ave	32.50a	3.61a	3.89bc	19.31b	43.31d	1.33a	0.37a	1.70a	0.27a	0.856a	17.86b
A Se	1.62	0.13	0.52	1.38	6.08	0.09	0.03	0.10	0.02	0.007	2.05
A CV (%)	5.00	5.15	13.33	7.17	14.04	6.41	7.82	6.06	8.64	0.849	11.50
B Ave	32.99a	3.59a	4.00b	19.96b	49.02b	1.34a	0.37a	1.72a	0.27a	0.853a	17.48b
B Se	2.40	0.12	1.08	2.31	4.25	0.10	0.02	0.12	0.02	0.011	2.60
B CV (%)	7.28	4.70	26.89	11.58	8.68	7.64	4.84	6.77	5.90	1.291	14.87
D Ave	32.61a	3.64a	3.97b	19.77b	49.37b	1.31a	0.34b	1.65b	0.26a	0.860a	16.21b
D Se	3.01	0.18	0.63	3.22	6.22	0.13	0.05	0.18	0.02	0.005	1.86
D CV (%)	9.22	6.86	15.77	16.27	12.59	10.07	14.41	10.90	7.52	0.596	11.46

Tab.2

Tab.3

1	Atienza S G, Ramírez C M, Hernández P, Martin A (2004). Chromosomal location of genes for carotenoid pigments in Hordeum chilense. Plant Breed , 123(3): 303-304 doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2004.00918.x
2	Bai Z Y, Li C D, Feng L X, Sun H C (2007). Chromosomal localization of genes associated with spikelet differentiation and drought tolerance in Chinese Spring (recipient)/Synthetic 6x (donor). Scientica Agricultua Sinaca , 40(10): 2136-2144 (in Chinese)
3	Clua A A, Castro A M, Gimenez D O, Tacaliti M S, Worland A J (2002). Chromosomal effects in the endogenous contents of non-structural carbohydrates and proteins measured in wheat substitution lines. Plant Breed , 121(2): 141-145 doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00692.x
4	Delauney A J, Verma D P S (1993). Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant J , 4(2): 215-223 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.04020215.x
5	Foulkes M J, Sylvester-Bradley R, Scott R K (1998). Evidence for differences between wheat cultivars in acquisition of soil mineral nitrogen. J Agric Sci , 130: 29-44 doi: 10.1017/S0021859697005029
6	Galiba G, Kocsy G, Kaur-sawhney R, Sutka J, Galston A W (1993). Chromosomal localization of osmotic and salt stress-induced differential alterations in polyamine content in wheat. Plant Sci , 92(2): 203-211 doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(93)90207-G
7	Galiba G, Simon-Sarkadi L, Kocsy G, Salgo A, Sutka J (1992). Possible chromosomal location of genes determining the osmoregulation of wheat. Theor Appl Genet , 85(4): 415-418 doi: 10.1007/BF00222322
8	Glass A D M, Siddiqi M Y, Giles K I (1981). Correlations between potassium uptake and hydrogen efflux in barley varieties. Plant Physiol , 68: 457-459
9	Guo L, Long S X, Zhao F H, Bao J X, Guo C J, Xiao K (2008). Comparison and evaluation of biochemical criteria for phosphorus efficiency in wheat. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources , 9(4): 506-510 (in Chinese)
10	Han Y L, Liu X H, Wang Y L, Tan J F (2006). Potassium nutrition characteristics of different wheat varieties. Journal of Triticeae Crops , 26(1): 99-103 (in Chinese)
11	Karrou A, Maranville J W (1994). Response of wheat cultivars to different soil nitrogen and moisture regimes: II. Nitrogen uptake, partitioning and influx. J Plant Nutr , 17(5): 745-761 doi: 10.1080/01904169409364764
12	Law C N, Wang J (1997). Study on inter-varietal chromosome substitutions lines of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Triticeae Crops , 17(2): 20-24 (in Chinese)
13	Li S W, Wen H D, Zhou Y Z, Li Y H, Xiao K (2006). Characterization of nitrogen uptake and dry matter production in wheat varieties with different N efficiency. Scientia Agricultura Sinica , 39(10): 1992-2000 (in Chinese)
14	Liu B H, Wang H S, Yang L (1998). Study and realization on chromosome substitutions lines of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Bulletin of Biology , 33(4): 26-27 (in Chinese)
15	Morgan J M (1991). A gene controlling differences in osmoregulation in wheat. Aust J Plant Physiol , 18(3): 249-257 doi: 10.1071/PP9910249
16	Muurinen S, Slafer G A, Peltonen-Sainio P (2006). Breeding effects on nitrogen use efficiency of spring cereals under northern conditions. Crop Sci , 46(2): 561-568 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005-05-0046
17	Read S M, Northcote D H (1981). Minimization of variation in the response to different proteins of the Coomassie blue G dye-binding assay for proteins. Anal Biochem , 116(1): 53-64 doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90321-3 pmid:7304986
18	Sivamani E, Bahieldin A, Wraith J M, Al-Niemi T, Dyer W E, Ho T H D, Qu R (2000). Improved biomass productivity and water use efficiency under water deficit conditions in transgenic wheat constitutively expressing the barley HVA1 gene. Plant Sci , 155(1): 1-9
19	Sun C F, Dai T B, Jing Q, Jiang D, Cao W X (2004). Nitrogen use efficiency and its relationship with nitrogen nutrition characteristics of wheat varieties. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology , 15(6): 983-987 (in Chinese) pmid:15362620
20	Sun Q X, Quick J S (1991). Chromosomal locations of genes for heat tolerance in tetraploid wheat. Cereal Res Commun , 19(4): 431-437
21	Trehan S P (2005). Nutrient management by exploiting genetic diversity of potato—A review. Potato Journal , 32(1-2): 1-15
22	Trehan S P (2009). Improving nutrient use efficiency by exploiting genetic diversity of potato. Potato Journal , 36(3-4): 121-135
23	Wang Q R, Li J Y, Li Z S (1999). Studies on the critical values of phosphorus in wheat genotypes with phosphorus efficiencies. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin , 19(3): 363-370
24	Yang K, Chang X P, Hu R H, Jia J Z (2001a). Chromosomal positioning of the genes of water use efficiency and concerned physiological traits in wheat leaves. Acta Agron Sin , 27(3): 363-366 (in Chinese)
25	Yang K, Chang X P, Hu R H, Jia J Z (2001b). Chromosomal localization of genes associated with proline accumulation under drought stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Acta Agron Sin , 27(3): 363-366 (in Chinese)
26	Zhang J, Zhang Z B, Xie H M, Dong B D, Hu M Y, Xu P (2005). Chromosomal positioning of the genes of water use efficiency and concerned physiological traits in wheat leaves. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin , 25(8): 1521-1527 (in Chinese)
27	Zhang Y, Wang D S, Zhang Y, He Z H (2007). Variation of major mineral elements concentration and their relationships in grains of Chinese wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica , 40(9): 1871-1876 (in Chinese)

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed