Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agriculture in China

ISSN 1673-7334

ISSN 1673-744X(Online)

CN 11-5729/S

Front Agric Chin    2011, Vol. 5 Issue (4) : 618-623    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-011-1136-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Co-culture of roughskin sculpin (Trachidermis fasciatus) with common carp, medaka and freshwater shrimp
Yufeng LIU, Huiguang FU()
Ocean College, Agricultural University of Hebei, Qinhuangdao 066003, China
 Download: PDF(97 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Co-culture of roughskin sculpin and common carp, roughskin sculpin and medaka, and roughskin sculpin and freshwater shrimp were carried out in three earthen ponds from late May till late October of 2009 in a suburb of Qinhuangdao, Hebei Province, China. In the sculpin/medaka and sculpin/shrimp co-culture ponds, aquatic plants (cattail and reed) composing approximately 25% of the pond area were settled. Commercial feed was administered in all the three ponds for the three forage animals: common carp, medaka and freshwater shrimp. In the sculpin/carp co-culture pond, though common carp grew properly with a yield of 4550 kg per hm2, the sculpin gradually decreased in number, and eventually only a few were left. In the sculpin/medaka co-culture pond, the pelagic medaka and benthic roughskin sculpin made full use of the water column of the pond, with the former breeding continuously to provide fry and juveniles for the latter to prey on, yielding 61.4 kg roughskin sculpin per hm2 and 1550 kg medaka per hm2. In the sculpin/shrimp co-culture, adult freshwater shrimp were also bred to supply fry and juveniles for the growing roughskin sculpin to prey on, yielding 46.4 kg roughskin sculpin per hm2 and 304 kg shrimp per hm2, less than that in the sculpin/medaka co-culture, as both freshwater shrimp and roughskin sculpin lived in the same niches, i.e. the pond bottom and the plant stems and leaves, with the open water column left vacant. Further improvements were also proposed.

Keywords co-culture      roughskin sculpin      forage fishes      medaka      common carp      freshwater shrimp     
Corresponding Author(s): FU Huiguang,Email:fuhuiguang@yeah.net   
Issue Date: 05 December 2011
 Cite this article:   
Huiguang FU,Yufeng LIU. Co-culture of roughskin sculpin (Trachidermis fasciatus) with common carp, medaka and freshwater shrimp[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(4): 618-623.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/EN/10.1007/s11703-011-1136-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/EN/Y2011/V5/I4/618
TreatmentsMay 5-20May 21–June 10June 11-30July 1–Aug. 5Aug. 6–Oct. 5Oct. 6–Oct. 15
Pond 1305060606050
Pond 2307585858560
Pond 3Soybean milk90909070
Tab.1  Feeding rates (kg per hm daily) in the three ponds during the whole cultural period
TreatmentsSampling timeRoughskin sculpinCommon carpFreshwater shrimpMedaka
Pond 1June 162.3±0.46.9±2.4
July 23.5±0.91.9±1.1
August 15.9±1.32.9±1.3
September 28.2±2.33.2±2.0
October 310.6±4.53.4±2.4
October 2511.4±5.33.8±2.3
Pond 2June 162.2±0.53.1±1.1
July 23.4±0.71.1±1.3
August 16.1±1.71.8±1.2
September 27.8±2.51.5±1.2
October 310.1±4.11.5±1.9
October 2510.9±5.42.1±0.8
Pond 3June 162.2±0.40.9±0.2
July 23.4±0.62.3±0.6
August 1-3.8±1.1
September 2-4.5±1.9
October 3-5.9±2.4
October 25-6.4±3.7
Tab.2  Body length (cm) of farmed roughskin sculpin, medaka and freshwater shrimp during the experimental period.
TreatmentsTransparencyAmmonia/ammoniumNitrateNitriteSulfide
Pond 124-470.1-0.50.1-0.80-0.0010-0.001
Pond 225-430.1-0.60.1-0.80-0.0010-0.001
Pond 318-300.1-1.10.1-0.90-0.0150-0.010
Tab.3  Water physicochemical parameters in different ponds during the culture period.
TreatmentsRoughskin sculpinCommon carpMedakaFreshwater shrimp
Pond 146.2 kg/ hm2, 13.2%, 23.2g in mean bodyweight304 kg/ hm2, 3.7 g in mean bodyweight
Pond 261.4 kg/ hm2, 18.0%, 22.8 g in mean bodyweight1500 kg/ hm2, 2.2 g in mean bodyweight
Pond 3Only 7 individuals left, 0.0%, 13.9g in mean bodyweight4550 kg/ hm2, 19.1%, 20.8 g in mean bodyweight
Tab.4  Yields, survivals and mean bodyweights of roughskin sculpin, common carp, medaka, and freshwater shrimp harvested in the three coculture ponds.
1 Cao J (2004). Techniques for the Production of Nuisanceless Agricultural Commodities: Aquaculture. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Science-technology Press, 247-258 (in Chinese)
2 Fu H, Shen H, Liu Y, Xu Z (2010). Methods of production of roughskin sculpin juveniles. Patent Administration of People’s Republic of China, Chinese invention patent ZL 2006 1 0048263.5 (in Chinese)
3 Islam M, Hibino M, Tanaka M (2007). Distribution and diet of the roughskin sculpin, Trachidermus fasciatus, larvae and juveniles in the Chikugo River estuary, Ariake Bay, Japan. Ichthyol Res , 54(2): 160-167
doi: 10.1007/s10228-006-0387-6
4 Li Z, Fu H (2009). Ecological studies on medaka in a remained habitat in Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China. Front Agric China , 3(2): 216-220
doi: 10.1007/s11703-009-0044-8
5 Liu Z, Qin K, (1987). Fauna in Liaoning Province: Fishes. Shenyang: Liaoning Science-technology Press, 406-407 (in Chinese)
6 Mao J, Xu S (1991). Fauna in Zhejiang Province: Freshwater Fishes. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Science-technology Press, 218-219 (in Chinese)
7 Onikura N, Takeshita N, Matsui S, Kimura S (1999). Distribution area and optimum salinity of larvae and juveniles of Trachidermus fasciatus, Cottidae. Nippon Suisan Gakkai Shi , 65(1): 42-47
8 Onikura N, Takeshita N, Matsui S, Kimura S (2002). Spawning grounds and nests of Trachidermus fasciatus (Cottidae) in the Kashima and Shiota estuaries system facing Ariake Bay, Japan. Ichthyol Res , 49(2): 198-201
doi: 10.1007/s102280200027
9 Onikura N, Takeshita N, Matsui S, Kumura S (2007). Short Paper: Estimation of the frequency of maturity and sexual differences in the maturation period of the roughskin sculpin Trachidermus fasciatus. Fish Sci , 73(3): 735-737
doi: 10.1111/j.1444-2906.2007.01388.x
10 Shanghai Fishery Office (1975). Active capture of roughskin sculpin fry in the suburbs of Shanghai. Fisheries Science & Technology Information , (7): 8 (in Chinese)
11 Shao B, Tang Z, Sun G, Qiu Y, Shao Y, Xue Z (1980). On the breeding habit of Trachidermis fasciatus Heckel. J Fish China , 4: 81-85 (in Chinese)
12 Takeshita N, Onikura N, Matsui S, Kimura S (1997). Embryonic, larval and juvenile development of the roughskin sculpin, Trachidermus fasciatus (Scorpaeniformes: Cottidae). Ichthyol Res , 44(3): 257-266
doi: 10.1007/BF02678705
13 Takita T, Chikamoto H (1994). Distribution and life history of Trachidermus fasciatus in rivers around Ariake sound, Kyushu, Japan. Jpn J Ichthyol , 41(2): 123-129
14 Wang J, Cheng G, Tang Z (2001). The distribution of roughskin sculpin (Trachidermis fasciatus Heckel) in Yalu River Basin, China. J Fudan Univ Nat Sci , 40(5): 471-476 (in Chinese)
15 Wang Y (1994) Roughskin sculpin, Trachidermis fasciatus. In: Wang Xiaoyan, ed. The Important Protected Aquatic Animals in China . Beijing: Chinese Science-technology Press, 136-139 (in Chinese)
16 Ye R (1999). Biological traits and cultural technique of roughskin sculpin. Fishery Guide to Be Rich , 17: 19-20 (in Chinese)
17 Zhang S (2006). Resource protection and exploitation prospects of roughskin sculpin in Yalujiang River. China Fisheris , (10): 68-69 (in Chinese)
[1] Zhiguo LI, Huiguang FU. Ecological studies on medaka in a remained habitat in Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2009, 3(2): 216-220.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed