Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Business Research in China

ISSN 1673-7326

ISSN 1673-7431(Online)

CN 11-5746/F

Postal Subscription Code 80-977

Front Bus Res Chin    2009, Vol. 3 Issue (2) : 224-241    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-009-0012-4
research-article
Firm characteristics, industry characteristics and acquisition strategy: An empirical study of Chinese listed firms
LI Shanmin1(), ZHOU Xiaochun2()
1. School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; 2. College of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
 Download: PDF(249 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This paper studies 148 related and 169 unrelated acquisition cases conducted by Chinese listed firms from 2001 to 2004 and explores firm and industry characteristics of these firms prior to their acquisition. Results show that there are significant pre-acquisition differences between firms pursuing related acquisition and firms pursuing unrelated acquisition in terms of firm performance, business risk, firm size, proportion of state shares and degree of diversification profile. Except for differences in internal capital as represented by undistributed profit per share, there is no significant difference in other aspects of available resources and industry performance.

Keywords firm performance      industry performance      acquisition type      diversification acquisition     
Corresponding Author(s): LI Shanmin,Email:mnslsm@mail.sysu.edu.cn; ZHOU Xiaochun,Email:Luckyzoezhou@yahoo.com.cn   
Issue Date: 05 June 2009
 Cite this article:   
LI Shanmin,ZHOU Xiaochun. Firm characteristics, industry characteristics and acquisition strategy: An empirical study of Chinese listed firms[J]. Front Bus Res Chin, 2009, 3(2): 224-241.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fbr/EN/10.1007/s11782-009-0012-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fbr/EN/Y2009/V3/I2/224
[1] Ting Ren, Youzhi Xiao, Xinguo Yu, Hongyan Yang, Jianmei Ge. Resignation of officials as independent directors and firm performance[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2020, 14(4): 498-518.
[2] Bing Guo, Jing Wang, Steven X. Wei. R&D spending, strategic position and firm performance[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2018, 12(3): 277-295.
[3] Zhengping Fu, Wei Peng. Effect of Alliance Orientation on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study on High-Technology Firms in China[J]. Front Bus Res Chin, 2012, 6(3): 375-397.
[4] Yungchih George Wang, Wen-Hsi Lydia Hsu, Kuang-Wen Chang. The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: An Application of Quantile Regression[J]. Front Bus Res Chin, 2012, 6(2): 218-244.
[5] Kangtao Ye, Hang Liu. State Ownership and Firm Performance: A Revisit[J]. Front Bus Res Chin, 2012, 6(2): 201-217.
[6] Yujun Lian, Zhi Su, Yuedong Gu. Evaluating the Effects of Equity Incentives Using PSM: Evidence from China[J]. Front Bus Res Chin, 2011, 5(2): 266-290.
[7] YAO Xianguo, WEN Weixiang, REN Zhouqi, . Corporate entrepreneurship in the enterprise clusters environment —Influence of network resources and entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance[J]. Front. Bus. Res. China, 2009, 3(4): 566-582.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed