Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Computer Science

ISSN 2095-2228

ISSN 2095-2236(Online)

CN 10-1014/TP

邮发代号 80-970

2019 Impact Factor: 1.275

Frontiers of Computer Science  2012, Vol. 6 Issue (3): 264-277   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-012-2014-1
  RESEARCH ARTICLE 本期目录
Composite recommendations: from items to packages
Composite recommendations: from items to packages
Min XIE1(), Laks V. S. LAKSHMANAN1, Peter T. WOOD2
1. Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada; 2. Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, Birkbeck, University of London, London,WC1E 7HX, UK
 全文: PDF(608 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Classical recommender systems provide users with a list of recommendations where each recommendation consists of a single item, e.g., a book or DVD. However, several applications can benefit from a system capable of recommending packages of items, in the form of sets. Sample applications include travel planning with a limited budget (price or time) and twitter users wanting to select worthwhile tweeters to follow, given that they can deal with only a bounded number of tweets. In these contexts, there is a need for a system that can recommend the top-k packages for the user to choose from.

Motivated by these applications, we consider composite recommendations, where each recommendation comprises a set of items. Each item has both a value (rating) and a cost associated with it, and the user specifies a maximum total cost (budget) for any recommended set of items. Our composite recommender system has access to one or more component recommender systems focusing on different domains, as well as to information sources which can provide the cost associated with each item. Because the problem of decidingwhether there is a recommendation (package)whose cost is under a given budget and whose value exceeds some threshold is NP-complete, we devise several approximation algorithms for generating the top-k packages as recommendations. We analyze the efficiency as well as approximation quality of these algorithms. Finally, using two real and two synthetic datasets, we subject our algorithms to thorough experimentation and empirical analysis. Our findings attest to the efficiency and quality of our approximation algorithms for the top-k packages compared to exact algorithms.

Key wordsrecommendation algorithms    optimization    top-k query processing
收稿日期: 2012-01-11      出版日期: 2012-06-01
Corresponding Author(s): XIE Min,Email:minxie@cs.ubc.ca   
 引用本文:   
. Composite recommendations: from items to packages[J]. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2012, 6(3): 264-277.
Min XIE, Laks V. S. LAKSHMANAN, Peter T. WOOD. Composite recommendations: from items to packages. Front Comput Sci, 2012, 6(3): 264-277.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcs/CN/10.1007/s11704-012-2014-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcs/CN/Y2012/V6/I3/264
1 Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , 2005, 17(6): 734-749
doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2005.99
2 Weng J, Lim E, Jiang J, He Q. Twitterrank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining . 2010, 261-270
doi: 10.1145/1718487.1718520
3 Kellerer H, Pferschy U, Pisinger D. Knapsack Problems. Berlin: Springer, 2004
4 Brodsky A, Morgan Henshaw S, Whittle J. CARD: a decisionguidance framework and application for recommending composite alternatives. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems . 2008, 171-178
doi: 10.1145/1454008.1454037
5 Koutrika G, Bercovitz B, Garcia-Molina H. FlexRecs: expressing and combining flexible recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 35th SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data . 2009, 745-758
doi: 10.1145/1559845.1559923
6 Angel A, Chaudhuri S, Das G, Koudas N. Ranking objects based on relationships and fixed associations. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology . 2009, 910-921
7 Parameswaran A, Garcia-Molina H. Recommendations with prerequisites. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems . 2009, 353-356
doi: 10.1145/1639714.1639786
8 Parameswaran A, Garcia-Molina H, Ullman J. Evaluating, combining and generalizing recommendations with prerequisites. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management . 2010, 919-928
9 Parameswaran A, Venetis P, Garcia-Molina H. Recommendation systems with complex constraints: A course recommendation perspective. ACM Transactions on Information Systems , 2011, 29(4): 1-33
doi: 10.1145/2037661.2037665
10 Lappas T, Liu K, Terzi E. Finding a team of experts in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining . 2009, 467-476
doi: 10.1145/1557019.1557074
11 Fagin R, Lotem A, Naor M. Optimal aggregation algorithms for middleware. Journal of Computer and System Sciences , 2003, 66(4): 614-656
doi: 10.1016/S0022-0000(03)00026-6
12 Xie M, Lakshmanan L, Wood P. Breaking out of the box of recommendations: from items to packages. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems . 2010, 151-158
doi: 10.1145/1864708.1864739
13 De Choudhury M, Feldman M, Amer-Yahia S, Golbandi N, Lempel R, Yu C. Automatic construction of travel itineraries using social breadcrumbs. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia . 2010, 35-44
doi: 10.1145/1810617.1810626
14 Finger J, Polyzotis N. Robust and efficient algorithms for rank join evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 35th SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data . 2009, 415-428
doi: 10.1145/1559845.1559890
15 Tran Q T, Chan C Y, Wang G. Evaluation of set-based queries with aggregation constraints. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management . 2011, 1495-1504
16 Roy S B, Amer-Yahia S, Chawla A, Das G, Yu C. Constructing and exploring composite items. In: Proceedings of the 36th SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data . 2010, 843-854
17 Papadimitriou C H. Computational Complexity. Chichester: Wiley, 1994
18 Ibarra O, Kim C. Fast approximation algorithms for the knapsack and sum of subset problems. Journal of the ACM , 1975, 22(4): 463-468
doi: 10.1145/321906.321909
19 Vazirani V. Approximation Algorithms. Berlin: Springer, 1999
20 Marchetti-Spaccamela A, Vercellis C. Stochastic on-line knapsack problems. Mathematical Programming , 1995, 68(1): 73-104
doi: 10.1007/BF01585758
21 Kimelfeld B, Sagiv Y.Finding and approximating top-k answers in keyword proximity search. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems . 2006, 173-182
22 Lawler E. A procedure for computing the k best solutions to discrete optimization problems and its application to the shortest path problem. Management Science , 1972, 401-405
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.18.7.401
23 J?velin K, Kek?l?inen J. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems , 2002, 20(4): 422-446
doi: 10.1145/582415.582418
24 Xie M, Lakshmanan L, Wood P. Efficient rank join with aggregation constraints. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment , 2011, 4(11): 1201-1212
25 Xie M, Lakshmanan L, Wood P. Comprec-trip: a composite recommendation system for travel planning. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Data Engineering . 2011, 1352-1355
26 Chekuri C, Pal M. A recursive greedy algorithm for walks in directed graphs. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science . 2005, 245-253
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed