1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Trustworthy Computing, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China 2. Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Xiasha College Park, Hangzhou 310018, China
AADL (architecture analysis and design language) concentrates on the modeling and analysis of application system architectures. It is quite popular for its simple syntax, powerful functionality and extensibility and has been widely applied in embedded systems for its advantage. However, it is not enough for AADL to model cyber-physical systems (CPS) mainly because it cannot be used to model the continuous dynamic behaviors. This paper proposes an approach to construct a new sublanguage of AADL called AADL+, to facilitate the modeling of not only the discrete and continuous behavior of CPS, but also interaction between cyber components and physical components. The syntax and semantics of the sublanguage are provided to describe the behaviors of the systems. What’s more, we develop a plug-in to OSATE (open-source AADL tool environment) for the modeling of CPS. And the plug-in supports syntax checking and simulation of the system model through linking with modelica. Finally, the AADL+ annex is successfully applied to model a lunar rover control system.
E ALee, S ASeshia. Introduction to Embedded Systems: a Cyber-Physical Systems Approach. MA: The MIT Press, 2016
2
MDebbabi, F Hassaïne, YJarraya, ASoeanu, L Alawneh. Unified modeling language. Encyclopedia of Systems Biology, 2010, 20(1): 9
3
BSelic, SGerard. Modeling and Analysis of Real-Time and Embedded Systems with UML and MARTE: Developing Cyber-Physical Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013
4
YCao, Y SLiu, C J JParedis. System-level model integration of design and simulation for mechatronic systems based on SysML. Mechatronics, 2011, 21(6): 1063–1075 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2011.05.003
5
P HFeiler, B ALewis, SVestal. The SAE architecture analysis & design language (AADL) a standard for engineering performance critical systems. In: Proceedings of 2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, International Symposium on Intelligent Control. 2006, 1206–1211
6
SVestal. MetaH support for real-time multi-processor avionics. In: Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Real- Time Systems. 1997, 11–21 https://doi.org/10.1109/WPDRTS.1997.637858
7
E ALee. The past, present and future of cyber-physicalsystems: a focus on models. Sensors, 2015, 15(3): 4837–4869 https://doi.org/10.3390/s150304837
8
Z JWang, L LXie. Cyber-physical systems: a survey. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2011, 37(10): 1157–1166
9
P HFeiler, D PGluch. Model-based Eegineering with AADL: an Introduction to the SAE Architecture Analysis & Design Language. New Jexsey: Addison-Wesley, 2012
10
S A EAerospace. SAE AS5506 annex: behavior specification v1.6. New Jersey: SAE International, 2007
11
S A EAerospace. SAE AS5506a: architecture analysis and design language v2.0. Google Scholar, 2009
12
BØksendal. Stochastic Differential Equations- An Introduction with Applications. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2003
13
AssociationModelica. Modelica- a united object-oriented language for systems modeling-language specification version 3.3. PELAB, IDA, Linköpings Universitet, S-58183 Linköping, Sweden, 2014
14
ARajhans, S WCheng, BSchmerl, D Garlan, B HKrogh, CAgbi, ABhave. An architectural approach to the design and analysis of cyberphysical systems. Electronic Communications of the EASST, 2009, 21: 14–38
15
ABanerjee, S Kandula, TMukherjee, SGupta. BAND-AiDe: a tool for cyber-physical oriented analysis and design of body area networks and devices. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, 2012, 11(S2): 49 https://doi.org/10.1145/2331147.2331159
16
D BSmith, L WHanlen. Channel Modeling for Wireless Body Area Networks. Ultra-Low-Power Short-Range Radios. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2015, 25–55 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14714-7_2
17
FSinghoff, J Legrand, LNana, LMarcé. Cheddar:a flexible real time scheduling framework. ACM SIGAda Ada Letters, 2004, 24(4): 1–8 https://doi.org/10.1145/1046191.1032298
18
RAlur, RGrosu, YHur, V Kumar, ILee. Modular specification of hybrid systems in Charon. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control. 2000, 6–19 https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46430-1_5
19
OSokolsky. The montana toolset: OSATE plugins for analysis and code generation. In: Proceedings of AADL Workshop, 2005
20
Y CZhou, JBaras, S GWang. Hardware software co-design for automotive CPS using architecture analysis and design language. 2016, arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.05069
21
EPalachi, CCohen, STakashi. Simulation of cyber physical models using SysML and numerical solvers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Systems Conference. 2013, 671–675 https://doi.org/10.1109/SysCon.2013.6549954
22
RBehjati, TYue, SNejati, L Briand, BSelic. Extending SysML with AADL concepts for comprehensive system architecture modeling. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Modelling Foundations and Applications. 2011, 236–252 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21470-7_17
23
CBernardeschi, A Domenici, PMasci. A PVS-simulink integrated environment for model-based analysis of cyber-physical systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2018, 44(6): 512–533 https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2017.2694423
24
MPrist, AFreddi, SLonghi, A Monteriù. An integrated simulation module for wireless cyber-physical system. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering. 2015, 1397–1402 https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEIC.2015.7165374
25
KBhasin, PBarnes, JReinert, B Golden. Applying model based systems engineering to NASA’s space communications networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Systems Conference. 2013, 325–330 https://doi.org/10.1109/SysCon.2013.6549901
26
JLee, RCha, Y HHan, W Nam, J YChoi, W TKim, S MPark. Modeling autonomous military robots using hybrid system framework. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence. 2010, 429–430
27
OSokolsky, MPajic, NBezzo, I Lee. Architecture-centric software development for cyber-physical systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Cyber-Physical System Architectures and Design Methodologies. 2014
28
EAhmad, B RLarson, S CBarrett, N J Zhan, Y WDong. Hybrid annex: an AADL extension for continuous behavior and cyber-physical interaction modeling. ACM SIGAda Ada Letters, 2014, 34(3): 29–38 https://doi.org/10.1145/2692956.2663178
29
M CBujorianu, M L Bujorianu, HBarringer. A unifying specification logic for cyber-physical systems. In: Proceedings of Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation. 2009, 1166–1171 https://doi.org/10.1109/MED.2009.5164704
30
YZhang, Y WDong, FZhang, Y F Zhang. Research on modeling and analysis of CPS. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing. 2011, 92–105
31
RAlur. Formal verification of hybrid systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Software. 2011, 273–278 https://doi.org/10.1145/2038642.2038685
32
Z HSun, X SZhou. Extending and recompiling AADL for CPS modeling. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications. 2013, 1225–1230 https://doi.org/10.1109/GreenCom-iThings-CPSCom.2013.213
33
SDziwok, C Gerking, SBecker, SThiele, C Heinzemann, UPohlmann. A tool suite for the model-driven software engineering of cyberphysical systems. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering. 2014, 715–718
34
L CZhang. Aspect-oriented modeling of railway cyber physical systems based on the extension of AADL. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications & the 10th IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing. 2013, 2104–2111 https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCC.and.EUC.2013.302
35
AEhsan, Y WDong, LBrian, T Tang, J DLü, N JZhan. Behavior modeling and verification of movement authority scenario of Chinese train control system using AADL. Science China Information Sciences, 2015, 58(11): 1–20 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-015-5346-2
36
Z BYang, KHu, D FMa, L Pi. Towards a formal semantics for the AADL behavior annex. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe. 2009, 1166–1171
37
AKamandi, JHabibi. A survey of syntax and semantics frameworks of modeling languages. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and ITS Applications. 2009, 1–6 https://doi.org/10.1109/CSA.2009.5404220
38
ETorlak, M Taghdiri, GDennis, J PNear. Applications and extensions of Alloy: past, present and future. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 2013, 23(4): 915–933 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960129512000291
