Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Computer Science

ISSN 2095-2228

ISSN 2095-2236(Online)

CN 10-1014/TP

邮发代号 80-970

2019 Impact Factor: 1.275

Frontiers of Computer Science  2025, Vol. 19 Issue (1): 191703   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-024-3582-6
  本期目录
Adaptive network combination for single-image reflection removal: a domain generalization perspective
Ming LIU1,2, Jianan PAN1, Zifei YAN1, Wangmeng ZUO1(), Lei ZHANG2
. School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
. Department of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China
 全文: PDF(1253 KB)   HTML
收稿日期: 2023-07-20      出版日期: 2024-08-30
Corresponding Author(s): Wangmeng ZUO   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2025, 19(1): 191703.
Ming LIU, Jianan PAN, Zifei YAN, Wangmeng ZUO, Lei ZHANG. Adaptive network combination for single-image reflection removal: a domain generalization perspective. Front. Comput. Sci., 2025, 19(1): 191703.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcs/CN/10.1007/s11704-024-3582-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcs/CN/Y2025/V19/I1/191703
Fig.1  
Dataset Acquisition method Dataset partition Camera model Apertures range Camera/Glass angle Acquisition environment Piece of Glass (Thickness) # of Samples T (and I) Alignment of I and T
SynCEIL synthetic train ? ? front indoor + outdoor ? 7,643 (∞) perfect
Synzhang synthetic train ? ? front + oblique indoor + outdoor ? 13,700 (∞) perfect
Unaligned real-world train a DSLR ? front + oblique indoor + outdoor 1 (?) 250 ~20 pixels shift
Real89/20 real-world train/test Canon EOS 600D f/1.6 ? f/2 front + oblique indoor + outdoor 1 (?) 89/20 aligned
Nature200/20 real-world train/test Canon EOS 750D f/4 ? f/16 front + oblique indoor + outdoor 2 (3/8 mm) 200/20 aligned
SIR2 Wild real-world test Nikon D5300 unconstrained unconstrained indoor + outdoor 3 (3/5/10 mm) 55 aligned
Postcard f/11 ? f/32 controlled indoor 199
Solid 200
Tab.1  
Fig.2  
Method Real20 (20) Wild (55) Postcard (199) Solid (200) Nature20 (20) Average (474/494)
PSNR↑ SSIM↑ PSNR↑ SSIM↑ PSNR↑ SSIM↑ PSNR↑ SSIM↑ PSNR↑ SSIM↑ PSNR↑ SSIM↑
ERRNet [5] 22.07 0.781 25.13 0.889 22.76 0.864 24.62 0.898 20.86 0.757 23.79 0.877
ERRNetOF w/o wˉi 22.70 0.791 24.60 0.865 23.15 0.871 24.91 0.895 20.46 0.756 24.04 0.877
ERRNetOF 22.80 0.790 25.26 0.890 23.08 0.874 25.26 0.904 20.99 0.768 24.24 0.885
ERRNetNI w/o wˉi 22.37 0.787 24.63 0.865 23.14 0.874 24.75 0.894 20.53 0.757 23.96 0.878
ERRNetNI 22.81 0.791 25.69 0.895 23.56 0.884 25.13 0.902 21.20 0.771 24.44 0.889
IBCLN [4] 21.86 0.762 24.71 0.886 23.39 0.875 24.87 0.893 23.57 0.783 24.08 0.875
IBCLNOF w/o wˉi 22.53 0.794 25.44 0.888 24.19 0.888 25.05 0.899 24.59 0.818 24.63 0.886
IBCLNOF 22.52 0.789 25.77 0.897 24.27 0.889 25.24 0.900 24.74 0.820 24.78 0.888
IBLCNNI w/o wˉi 22.41 0.793 25.20 0.887 23.52 0.887 24.77 0.897 24.56 0.816 24.21 0.885
IBCLNNI 22.04 0.782 25.35 0.894 23.34 0.887 24.85 0.897 24.59 0.818 24.17 0.885
RAGNet [7] 22.95 0.793 25.52 0.880 23.67 0.879 26.15 0.903 21.21 0.765 24.90 0.886
RAGNetOF w/o wˉi 23.32 0.806 25.87 0.895 25.08 0.900 26.19 0.907 21.40 0.775 25.57 0.898
RAGNetOF 23.34 0.807 25.85 0.896 25.20 0.903 26.17 0.908 21.48 0.776 25.60 0.900
RAGNetNI w/o wˉi 23.43 0.810 25.52 0.887 23.91 0.884 26.26 0.906 21.31 0.770 25.07 0.891
RAGNetNI 23.18 0.802 26.25 0.899 24.90 0.906 25.66 0.903 21.44 0.777 25.31 0.900
Dong et al. [10] 23.34 0.812 25.73 0.902 23.72 0.903 24.36 0.898 23.45 0.808 24.21 0.897
YTMT [11] 23.26 0.806 25.48 0.890 22.91 0.884 24.87 0.896 20.94 0.778 24.05 0.886
DSRNet [12] 24.23 0.820 25.68 0.896 24.56 0.908 26.28 0.914 ? ? 25.40 0.905
Tab.2  
Fig.3  
1 R E Parkin . A note on the extinction coefficient and absorptivity of glass. Solar Energy, 2015, 114: 196–197
2 Q, Zheng B, Shi J, Chen X, Jiang L Y, Duan A C Kot . Single image reflection removal with absorption effect. In: Proceedings of 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2021, 13395−13404
3 X, Zhang R, Ng Q Chen . Single image reflection separation with perceptual losses. In: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2018, 4786−4794
4 C, Li Y, Yang K, He S, Lin J E Hopcroft . Single image reflection removal through cascaded refinement. In: Proceedings of 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2020, 3562−3571
5 K, Wei J, Yang Y, Fu D, Wipf H Huang . Single image reflection removal exploiting misaligned training data and network enhancements. In: Proceedings of 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2019, 8170−8179
6 R, Wan B, Shi L Y, Duan A H, Tan A C Kot . Benchmarking single-image reflection removal algorithms. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2017, 3942−3950
7 Y, Li M, Liu Y, Yi Q, Li D, Ren W Zuo . Two-stage single image reflection removal with reflection-aware guidance. Applied Intelligence, 2023, 53( 16): 19433–19448
8 I J Good . Rational decisions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 1952, 14( 1): 107–114
9 S, Mannor D, Peleg R Rubinstein . The cross entropy method for classification. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning. 2005, 561−568
10 Z, Dong K, Xu Y, Yang H, Bao W, Xu R W H Lau . Location-aware single image reflection removal. In: Proceedings of 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 2021, 4997−5006
11 Q, Hu X Guo . Trash or treasure? An interactive dual-stream strategy for single image reflection separation. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2021, 1890
12 Q, Hu X Guo . Single image reflection separation via component synergy. In: Proceedings of 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 2023, 13092−13101
[1] FCS-23582-OF-ML_suppl_1 Download
[2] FCS-23582-OF-ML_suppl_2 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed