Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Computer Science

ISSN 2095-2228

ISSN 2095-2236(Online)

CN 10-1014/TP

Postal Subscription Code 80-970

2018 Impact Factor: 1.129

Front. Comput. Sci.    2017, Vol. 11 Issue (3) : 408-418    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-016-6110-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Constrained minimum power combination for broadband beamformer design in the STFT domain
Zhong-Hua FU()
School of Computer Science, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
 Download: PDF(468 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Beamforming using sensor array is widely used in spatial signal processing since it offers better spatial focusing capability than single sensor. However, in practical applications for broadband signal, there always exists a trade-off issue between the directivity capability of an array and its robustness on system errors. In this paper, in order to combine merits of different beamformers instead of trade-off their performances, we propose a constrained minimum-power combination method. We firstly analyze two optimal beamformers that maximize Directivity Factor (DF) and White Noise Gain (WNG) respectively. Then we propose a non-linear combination method, which automatically selects the best beamformer that has the minimum output power, so as to control the unwanted white noise amplification and keep the maximum DF if possible. Two solutions to the proposed combination strategy are given. They do not need to determine the correct trade-off factor used in linear combination method, and avoid challenge estimations on noise and target statistics required in adaptive beamforming. The performance of the proposed beamformer is evaluated in ideal noise fields and complicated noise fields respectively. It is shown that the proposed beamformer integrates merits of different beamformers. It always achieves the best speech quality and biggest noise reduction compared to other popular beamformers.

Keywords robust beamforming      directivity index      white noise gain      broadband      STFT domain      speech enhancement     
Corresponding Author(s): Zhong-Hua FU   
Just Accepted Date: 19 July 2016   Online First Date: 23 May 2017    Issue Date: 25 May 2017
 Cite this article:   
Zhong-Hua FU. Constrained minimum power combination for broadband beamformer design in the STFT domain[J]. Front. Comput. Sci., 2017, 11(3): 408-418.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcs/EN/10.1007/s11704-016-6110-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcs/EN/Y2017/V11/I3/408
1 GayS L, Benesty J, . Acoustic Signal Processing for Telecommunication. Springer US, 2001
2 ElkoG W, MeyerJ. Microphone arrays. In: Benesty J, Sondhi M M, Huang Y, . Springer Handbook of Speech Processing. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2008
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49127-9_50
3 GannotS, CohenI. Adaptive beamforming and postfiltering. In: Benesty J, Sondhi M M, Huang Y, . Springer Handbook of Speech Processing. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2008
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49127-9_47
4 ElkoG W. Superdirectional microphone arrays. In: Gay S L, Benesty J, . Acoustic Signal Processing for Telecommunication. Hingham, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8644-3_10
5 CoxH. Resolving power and sensitivity to mismatch of optimum array processors. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1973, 54(3): 771–785
https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1913659
6 CoxH, Zeskind R, OwenM . Robust adaptive beamforming. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1987, 35(10): 1365–1376
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1987.1165054
7 DocloS, MoonenM. Design of broadband beamformers robust against gain and phase errors in the microphone array characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2003, 51(10): 2511–2526
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2003.816885
8 DocloS, MoonenM. Superdirective beamforming robust against microphone mismatch. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 2007, 15(2): 617–631
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2006.881676
9 MabandeE, SchadA, KellermannW . Design of robust superdirective beamformers as a convex optimization problem. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 2009, 77–80
https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp.2009.4959524
10 CroccoM, TruccoA. A computationally efficient procedure for the design of robust broadband beamformers. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2010, 58(10): 5420–5424
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2010.2053710
11 NongpiurR, ShpakD. L-infinity norm design of linear-phase robust broadband beamformers using constrained optimization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2013, 61(23): 6034–6046
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2013.2283463
12 YanS, MaY. Robust supergain beamforming for circular array via second-order cone programming. Applied Acoustics, 2005, 66(9): 1018–1032
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2005.01.003
13 BerkunR, CohenI, BenestyJ. Combined beamformers for robust broadband regularized superdirective beamforming. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 2015, 23(5): 877–886
14 MabandeE, Kellermann W. Design of robust polynomial beamformers as a convex optimization problem. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Acoustic Echo and Noise Control (IWAENC). 2010
15 MabandeE, Buerger M, KellermannW . Design of robust polynomial beamformers for symmetric arrays. In: Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 2012, 1–4
https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp.2012.6287802
16 CoxH, Zeskind R, KooijT . Practical supergain. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1986, 34(3): 393–398
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1986.1164847
17 VorobyovS, Gershman A, LuoZ Q . Robust adaptive beamforming using worst-case performance optimization: a solution to the signal mismatch problem. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2003, 51(2): 313–324
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2002.806865
18 GrantM, BoydS. CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1, March 2014. , 2011
19 FalkT, ZhengC, ChanW Y. A non-intrusive quality and intelligibility measure of reverberant and dereverberated speech. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 2010, 18(7): 1766–1774
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2010.2052247
20 RixA W, Beerends J, HollierM , HekstraA. Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (pesq): an objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrowband telephone networks and speech codecs. ITU-T Recommendation, 2001
21 BenestyJ, ChenJ, HabetsE A P . Speech Enhancement in the STFT Domain. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2011
22 CampbellD R, Palomaki K J, BrownG J . A matlab simulation of “shoebox” room acoustics for use in research and teaching. Journal of Computer Information Systems (JCIS), 2005, 9(3): 48–51
[1] FCS-0408-16110-ZHF_suppl_1 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed