Surface engineering with ionic polymers on membranes for boron removal
Xiting Zhang1, Chenyi Fang1, J Paul Chen2,3, Sui Zhang1()
1. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260, Singapore 3. College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
Removal of boric acid from seawater and wastewater using reverse osmosis membrane technologies is imperative and yet remains inadequately addressed by current commercial membranes. Existing research efforts performed post-modification of reverse osmosis membranes to enhance boron rejection, which is usually accompanied by substantial sacrifice in water permeability. This study delves into the surface engineering of low-pressure reverse osmosis membranes, aiming to elevate boron removal efficiency while maintaining optimal salt rejection and water permeability. Membranes were modified by the self-polymerization and co-deposition of dopamine and polystyrene sulfonate at varying ratios and concentrations. The surfaces became smoother and more hydrophilic after modification. The optimum membrane exhibited a water permeability of 9.2 ± 0.1 L·m−2·h−1·bar−1, NaCl rejection of 95.8% ± 0.3%, and boron rejection of 49.7% ± 0.1% and 99.6% ± 0.3% at neutral and alkaline pH, respectively. The water permeability is reduced by less than 15%, while the boron rejection is 3.7 times higher compared to the blank membrane. This research provides a promising avenue for enhancing boron removal in reverse osmosis membranes and addressing water quality concerns in the desalination process.
. [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2024, 18(5): 54.
Xiting Zhang, Chenyi Fang, J Paul Chen, Sui Zhang. Surface engineering with ionic polymers on membranes for boron removal. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(5): 54.
K P Lee , T C Arnot , D Mattia . A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination—development to date and future potential. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 370(1–2): 1–22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.036
2
M Kurihara . Current status and future trend of dominant commercial reverse osmosis membranes. Membranes, 2021, 11(11): 906 https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11110906
3
A Sanna , B Buchspies , M Ernst , M Kaltschmitt . Decentralized brackish water reverse osmosis desalination plant based on PV and pumped storage-technical analysis. Desalination, 2021, 516: 115232 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115232
4
S Wang , S Bing , H Zhang , Y Zhou , L Zhang , C Gao . Surface engineering design of polyamide membranes for enhanced boron removal in seawater desalination. Journal of Membrane Science, 2022, 651: 120425 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120425
5
Q Lyu , L C Lin . Rational design of reverse osmosis membranes for boron removal: a counter-intuitive relationship between boron rejection and pore size. Separation and Purification Technology, 2024, 331: 125699 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125699
6
X Liu , C Xu , P Chen , K Li , Q Zhou , M Ye , L Zhang , Y Lu . Advances in technologies for boron removal from water: a comprehensive review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(17): 10671 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710671
7
Y P Tang , L Luo , Z Thong , T S Chung . Recent advances in membrane materials and technologies for boron removal. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 541: 434–446 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.015
8
N Hadrup , M Frederiksen , A K Sharma . Toxicity of boric acid, borax and other boron containing compounds: a review. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2021, 121: 104873 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104873
9
M LumpkinM Williams. Toxicological Profile for Boron. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Agency. 2010
10
R Duan , X Lv , W Yan , Y Zhou , C Gao . Fabrication of high boron removal reverse osmosis membrane with broad industrial application prospect by introducing sulfonate groups through a polyvinyl alcohol coating. Journal of Membrane Science, 2022, 664: 121079 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2022.121079
11
S Mehanathan , J Jaafar , A M Nasir , R A Rahman , A F Ismail , R M Illias , M H D Othman , M A Rahman , M R Bilad , M N Naseer . Adsorptive membrane for boron removal: challenges and future prospects. Membranes, 2022, 12(8): 798 https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12080798
12
K Ushio , E Watanabe , T Kamiya , A Nagashima , T Furuta , G Imaizumi , T Fujiwara , M F Romero , A Kato . Boric acid transport activity of human aquaporins expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Physiological Reports, 2022, 10(1): e15164 https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15164
13
L Liu , X Xie , S Qi , R Li , X Zhang , X Song , C Gao . Thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane incorporated with UiO-66 nanoparticles for enhanced boron removal. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 580: 101–109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.02.072
14
Y Li , S Wang , X Song , Y Zhou , H Shen , X Cao , P Zhang , C Gao . High boron removal polyamide reverse osmosis membranes by swelling induced embedding of a sulfonyl molecular plug. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 597: 117716 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117716
15
S Shultz , V Freger . In situ modification of membrane elements for improved boron rejection in RO desalination. Desalination, 2018, 431: 66–72 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.08.021
16
M Di Vincenzo , M Barboiu , A Tiraferri , Y M Legrend . Polyol-functionalized thin-film composite membranes with improved transport properties and boron removal in reverse osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 540: 71–77 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.034
17
M Liu , Q He , Z Guo , K Zhang , S Yu , C Gao . Composite reverse osmosis membrane with a selective separation layer of double-layer structure for enhanced desalination, anti-fouling and durability properties. Desalination, 2021, 499: 114838 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114838
18
K C Kim , N I Kim , T Jiang , J C Kim , C I Kang . Boron recovery from salt lake brine, seawater, and wastewater—a review. Hydrometallurgy, 2023, 218: 106062 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2023.106062
19
G J Wang , B H Wu , Z K Xu , L S Wan . Janus polymer membranes prepared by single-side polydopamine deposition for dye adsorption and fine bubble aeration. Materials Chemistry Frontiers, 2019, 3(10): 2102–2109 https://doi.org/10.1039/C9QM00253G
20
H W Chien , H Y Lin , C Y Tsai , T Y Chen , W N Chen . Superhydrophilic coating with antibacterial and oil-repellent properties via NaIO4-triggered polydopamine/sulfobetaine methacrylate polymerization. Polymers, 2020, 12(9): 2008 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092008
21
N Voros , Z Maroulis , D Marinos-Kouris . Salt and water permeability in reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination, 1996, 104(3): 141–154 https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(96)00037-9
22
B Teychene , G Collet , H Gallard , J P Croue . A comparative study of boron and arsenic(III) rejection from brackish water by reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination, 2013, 310: 109–114 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.034
23
P Singh , A P Rao , P Ray , A Bhattacharya , K Singh , N K Saha , A V R Reddy . Techniques for characterization of polyamide thin film composite membranes. Desalination, 2011, 282: 78–86 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.039
24
M R De Guzman , C K A Andra , M B M Y Ang , G V C Dizon , A R Caparanga , S H Huang , K R Lee . Increased performance and antifouling of mixed-matrix membranes of cellulose acetate with hydrophilic nanoparticles of polydopamine-sulfobetaine methacrylate for oil-water separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 620: 118881 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118881
J Kheriji , B Hamrouni . Boron removal from brackish water by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes: application of Spiegler–Kedem model and optimization. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 2016, 16(3): 684–694 https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2015.178
