Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2018, Vol. 12 Issue (4) : 630-642    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1747-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Automated retrofit targeting of heat exchanger networks
Timothy G. Walmsley1(), Nathan S. Lal2, Petar S. Varbanov1, Jiří J. Klemeš1
1. Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory – SPIL, NETME Centre, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Brno 60190, Czech Republic
2. Energy Research Centre, School of Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
 Download: PDF(771 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop a novel heat exchanger network (HEN) retrofit method based on a new automated retrofit targeting (ART) algorithm. ART uses the heat surplus-deficit table (HSDT) in combination with the Bridge Retrofit concepts to generate retrofit bridges option, from which a retrofit design may be formulated. The HSDT is a tabular tool that shows potential for improved re-integration of heat source and sink streams within a HEN. Using the HSDT, retrofit bridges—a set of modifications that links a cooler to a heater to save energy—may be identified, quantified, and compared. The novel retrofit method including the ART algorithm has been successfully implemented in Microsoft ExcelTM to enable analysis of large-scale HENs. A refinery case study with 27 streams and 46 existing heat exchangers demonstrated the retrofit method’s potential. For the case study, the ART algorithm found 68903 feasible unique retrofit opportunities with a minimum 400 kW·unit−1 threshold for heat recovery divided by the number of new units. The most promising retrofit project required 3 new heat exchanger units to achieve a heat savings of 4.24 MW with a favorable annualised profit and a reasonable payback period.

Keywords process retrofit      pinch analysis      heat exchanger network      heat recovery     
Corresponding Author(s): Timothy G. Walmsley   
Just Accepted Date: 18 May 2018   Online First Date: 31 October 2018    Issue Date: 03 January 2019
 Cite this article:   
Timothy G. Walmsley,Nathan S. Lal,Petar S. Varbanov, et al. Automated retrofit targeting of heat exchanger networks[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 630-642.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-018-1747-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2018/V12/I4/630
Fig.1  The relationship between (a) heat exchanger T-DH plot, (b) EGCC, and (c) E-PTA
Fig.2  Using the HSTD for retrofit bridge identification and quantification from Lal et al. [27]
Fig.3  Novel HEN retrofit targeting method incorporating the ART algorithm and the HSDT
T*/°C DT*/°C CPnet/kW?°C?1 DH/kW
T1
T1 ? T2 (CPh ? CPc)1–2 (DT· CPnet)1–2
T2
T2 ? T3 (CPh ? CPc)2–3 (DT· CPnet)2–3
Tn–1 ? Tn (CPh ? CPc)[n–1]–n (DT ·CPnet)[n–1]–n
Tn
Tab.1  E-PTA
T*/°C DH(C)/kW ··· DH(R)/kW ··· DH(H)/kW
T1
DH1–2(C) ··· DH1-2(R) ··· DH1-2(H)
T2
DH2–3(C) ··· DH2-3(R) DH2-3(H)
DH[n–1]–n(C) ··· DH[n–1]–n(R) ··· DH[n–1]–n(H)
Tn
Tab.2  HSDT
Fig.4  HEN grid diagram for the refinery case study
Fig.5  (a) SCC and (b) GCC of the refinery, using PA
Fig.6  METD (a) with and (b) without recovery exchangers
Fig.7  Simplified HSDT. C: coolers; R: recovery exchangers; H: heaters; Red shade: heat surplus; Blue shade: heat deficit.
Threshold, qthres/kW?unit?1 Solution Time a)/s Number of feasible retrofit bridges
Eq. (1) ? 1.67 × 1018 b)
≥100 2661478 c) 99322377130 c)
≥200 2304 83453438
≥300 38.61 1177355
≥400 2.01 68903
≥500 0.48 11793
≥600 0.17 3789
≥700 0.06 1144
≥800 0.03 418
≥900 0.02 138
≥1000 0.01 73
≥1100 <0.01 21
≥1200 <0.01 16
≥1300 <0.01 6
≥1400 <0.01 6
≥1,413 <0.01 6
Tab.3  Automated retrofit bridge search statistics
Fig.8  Retrofit bridge search results evaluated based on (a) energy savings and exchanger area, (b) the new performance metrics, and (c) total retrofit profit and payback.
Fig.9  HEN grid diagram representing the network after applying the retrofit bridge
1 ŽZore, L Čuček, ZKravanja. Syntheses of sustainable supply networks with a new composite criterion—Sustainability profit. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2017, 102: 139–155 doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.12.003
2 J JKlemeš, ed. Handbook of Process Integration (PI): Minimisation of Energy and Water Use, Waste and Emissions.Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2013, 3–27
3 A HTarighaleslami, T GWalmsley, M JAtkins, M R WWalmsley, J RNeale. Total site heat integration: Utility selection and optimisation using cost and exergy derivative analysis. Energy, 2017, 141: 949–963
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.148
4 SPerry, J J Klemeš, I Bulatov. Integrating waste and renewable energy to reduce the carbon footprint of locally integrated energy sectors. Energy, 2008, 33(10): 1489–1497
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.03.008
5 B H YOng, T GWalmsley, M JAtkins, M R WWalmsley. Total site mass, heat and power integration using process integration and process graph. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 167: 32–43
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.035
6 M OAkpomiemie, RSmith. Cost-effective strategy for heat exchanger network retrofit. Energy, 2018, 146: 82–97
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.005
7 T GWalmsley, M J Atkins, M R W Walmsley, M Philipp, R HPeesel. Process and utility systems integration and optimisation for ultra-low energy milk powder production. Energy, 2018, 146: 67–81
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.142
8 NVan Duc Long, MLee. Debottlenecking the retrofitted thermally coupled distillation sequence. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(35): 12635–12645
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie401140v
9 RSmith, M Jobson, LChen. Recent development in the retrofit of heat exchanger networks. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(16): 2281–2289
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.06.006
10 B KSreepathi, G PRangaiah. Review of heat exchanger network retrofitting methodologies and their applications. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014, 53(28): 11205–11220
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie403075c
11 MBagajewicz, G Valtinson, DNguyen Thanh. Retrofit of crude units preheating trains: Mathematical programming versus pinch technology. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(42): 14913–14926
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie401675k
12 NJiang, J D Shelley, S Doyle, RSmith. Heat exchanger network retrofit with a fixed network structure. Applied Energy, 2014, 127: 25–33
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.028
13 M OAkpomiemie, RSmith. Retrofit of heat exchanger networks without topology modifications and additional heat transfer area. Applied Energy, 2015, 159: 381–390
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.017
14 M OAkpomiemie, RSmith. Retrofit of heat exchanger networks with heat transfer enhancement based on an area ratio approach. Applied Energy, 2016, 165: 22–35
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.056
15 MPan, I Bulatov, RSmith. Exploiting tube inserts to intensify heat transfer for the retrofit of heat exchanger networks considering fouling mitigation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(8): 2925–2943
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie303020m
16 MPan, I Bulatov, RSmith. Improving heat recovery in retrofitting heat exchanger networks with heat transfer intensification, pressure drop constraint and fouling mitigation. Applied Energy, 2016, 161: 611–626
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.073
17 B HLi, C T Chang. Retrofitting heat exchanger networks based on simple pinch analysis. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(8): 3967–3971
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9016607
18 BBakhtiari, S Bedard. Retrofitting heat exchanger networks using a modified network pinch approach. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 51(1–2): 973–979
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.10.045
19 RNordman, T Berntsson. Use of advanced composite curves for assessing cost-effective HEN retrofit I: Theory and concepts. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, 29(2–3): 275–281
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.02.021
20 RNordman, T Berntsson. Use of advanced composite curves for assessing cost-effective HEN retrofit II. Case studies. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, 29(2–3): 282–289
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.02.022
21 D AKamel, M A Gadalla, O Y Abdelaziz, M A Labib, F H Ashour. Temperature driving force (TDF) curves for heat exchanger network retrofit—A case study and implications. Energy, 2017, 123: 283–295
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.013
22 Y QLai, Z A Manan, S R Wan Alwi. Heat exchanger network retrofit using individual stream temperature vs enthalpy plot. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2017, 61: 1651–1656
23 J CBonhivers, MKorbel, MSorin, LSavulescu, P RStuart. Energy transfer diagram for improving integration of industrial systems. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 63(1): 468–479
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.10.046
24 J CBonhivers, BSrinivasan, P RStuart. New analysis method to reduce the industrial energy requirements by heat-exchanger network retrofit: Part 1—Concepts. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 119: 659–669
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.04.078
25 J CBonhivers, AAlva-Argaez, BSrinivasan, P RStuart. New analysis method to reduce the industrial energy requirements by heat-exchanger network retrofit: Part 2—Stepwise and graphical approach. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 119: 670–686
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.05.085
26 M R WWalmsley, NLal, T G Walmsley, M J Atkins. A modified energy transfer diagram for improved retrofit bridge analysis. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2017, 61: 907–912
27 N SLal, T G Walmsley, M R W Walmsley, M J Atkins, J R Neale. A novel heat exchanger network bridge retrofit method using the modified energy transfer diagram. Energy, 2018, 155: 190–204
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.019
28 J YYong, P S Varbanov, J J Klemeš. Heat exchanger network retrofit supported by extended grid diagram and heat path development. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 89: 1033–1045
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.04.025
29 N KAbbood, Z A Manan, S R Wan Alwi. A combined numerical and visualization tool for utility targeting and heat exchanger network retrofitting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 23(1): 1–7
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.020
30 ANemet, J J Klemeš, P S Varbanov, V Mantelli. Heat integration retrofit analysis—an oil refinery case study by retrofit tracing grid diagram. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 163–182
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-015-1520-8
31 LČuček, ZKravanja. Retrofit of total site heat exchanger networks by mathematical programming approach. In: Martín M, ed. Alternative Energy Sources and Technologies.New Jersey: Springer International Publishing, 2016, 297–340
32 LČuček, VMantelli, J YYong, P SVarbanov, J JKlemeš, ZKravanja. A procedure for the retrofitting of large-scale heat exchanger networks for fixed and flexible designs applied to existing refinery total site. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2015, 45: 109–114
33 EAyotte-Sauvé, OAshrafi, SBédard, NRohani. Optimal retrofit of heat exchanger networks: A stepwise approach. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2017, 106: 243–268
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.06.008
34 SKakaç, H Liu. Heat exchangers: Selection, rating, and thermal design.London: CRC, 2002, 57–66
35 RTurton, R C Bailie, W B Whiting, J A Shaeiwitz. Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes. Pearson Education, 2008, 186–193
[1] FCE-18024-OF-WT_suppl_1 Download
[1] Andreja NEMET, Jiří Jaromír KLEMEŠ, Petar Sabev VARBANOV, Valter MANTELLI. Heat Integration retrofit analysis—an oil refinery case study by Retrofit Tracing Grid Diagram[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(2): 163-182.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed