Chemical probe systems for assessing liquid–liquid mixing efficiencies of reactors

doi:10.1007/s11705-022-2275-7

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.

2023, Vol. 17

Issue (10) : 1323-1335 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-022-2275-7

REVIEW ARTICLE

Chemical probe systems for assessing liquid–liquid mixing efficiencies of reactors

Yi-Dong Zhang¹, Chun-Liu Zhang¹, Liang-Liang Zhang¹(

), Bao-Chang Sun¹, Guang-Wen Chu^1,², Jian-Feng Chen^1,²

¹. Research Center of the Ministry of Education for High Gravity Engineering and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
². State Key Laboratory of Organic–Inorganic Composites, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China

Download: PDF(2272 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

Liquid–liquid mixing, including homogeneous and heterogeneous mixing, widely exists in the chemical industry. How to quantitatively characterize the mixing performance is important for reactor assessment and development. As a convenient and direct method for mixing characterization, the chemical probe method uses some special test reactions to characterize the mixing results. Here, the working principle and selection requirements of this method are introduced, and some common chemical probe systems for homogeneous and heterogeneous mixing processes are reviewed. The characteristics and applications of these systems are illustrated. Finally, the development of the new system is proposed.

Keywords mixing chemical probe liquid–liquid heterogeneous

Corresponding Author(s): Liang-Liang Zhang

Online First Date: 21 March 2023 Issue Date: 07 October 2023

Cite this article:

Yi-Dong Zhang,Chun-Liu Zhang,Liang-Liang Zhang, et al. Chemical probe systems for assessing liquid–liquid mixing efficiencies of reactors[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(10): 1323-1335.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-022-2275-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2023/V17/I10/1323

Fig.1 Comparison of liquid–liquid heterogeneous mixing and homogeneous mixing.

Fig.2 Classification of chemical probe systems.

Fig.3 Classification of micromixing models.

Fig.4 Scheme of the incorporation model: V₁₀ and V₂₀ are the initial volumes of the environment and the aggregate, respectively, C_A10 is the initial concentration of A in the environment, and C_B0 is the initial concentration of B in the aggregate.

Fig.5 Scheme of the bromination of resorcin.

Fig.6 Scheme of the oxidation of 2-octanol to acid.

Fig.7 Scheme of the alkaline hydrolysis of acetylsalicylic acid.

1	D Cheng, X Feng, C Yang, Z S Mao. Modelling and experimental investigation of micromixing of single-feed semi-batch precipitation in a liquid–liquid stirred reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 293: 291–301 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.064
2	A Alexopoulos, D Maggioris, C Kiparissides. CFD analysis of turbulence non-homogeneity in mixing vessels: a two-compartment model. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(10): 1735–1752 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00053-2
3	J Baldyga, J Bourne, Y Yang. Influence of feed pipe diameter on mesomixing in stirred tank reactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 1993, 48(19): 3383–3390 https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(93)80155-J
4	B Marcant, R David. Experimental evidence for and prediction of micromixing effects in precipitation. AIChE Journal, 1991, 37(11): 1698–1710 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690371113
5	K Y Tung, C C Li, J T Yang. Mixing and hydrodynamic analysis of a droplet in a planar serpentine micromixer. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 2009, 7(4): 545–557 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-009-0415-8
6	S Maaß, N Paul, M Kraume. Influence of the dispersed phase fraction on experimental and predicted drop size distributions in breakage dominated stirred systems. Chemical Engineering Science, 2012, 76: 140–153 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2012.03.050
7	J R Bourne. Mixing and the selectivity of chemical reactions. Organic Process Research & Development, 2003, 7(4): 471–508 https://doi.org/10.1021/op020074q
8	L Zha, X Pu, M Shang, G Li, W Xu, Q Lu, Y Su. A study on the micromixing performance in microreactors for polymer solutions. AIChE Journal, 2018, 64(9): 3479–3490 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16188
9	S F Wright, I Zadrazil, C N Markides. A review of solid–fluid selection options for optical-based measurements in single-phase liquid, two-phase liquid–liquid and multiphase solid–liquid flows. Experiments in Fluids, 2017, 58(9): 1–39 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2386-y
10	M R Serial, T Nikolaeva, F J Vergeldt, J van Duynhoven, H van As. Selective oil-phase RHEO-MRI velocity profiles to monitor heterogeneous flow behavior of oil/water food emulsions. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, 2019, 57(9): 766–770 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.4811
11	F Maluta, G Montante, A Paglianti. Analysis of immiscible liquid–liquid mixing in stirred tanks by electrical resistance tomography. Chemical Engineering Science, 2020, 227: 115898 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.115898
12	S Chakraborty, P K Das. Characterisation and classification of gas–liquid two-phase flow using conductivity probe and multiple optical sensors. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2019, 124: 103193 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.103193
13	J Aubin, M Ferrando, V Jiricny. Current methods for characterising mixing and flow in microchannels. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65(6): 2065–2093 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2009.12.001
14	D R Unger, F J Muzzio. Laser-induced fluorescence technique for the quantification of mixing in impinging jets. AIChE Journal, 1999, 45(12): 2477–2486 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690451203
15	Z Liu, Y Cheng, Y Jin. Experimental study of reactive mixing in a mini-scale mixer by laser-induced fluorescence technique. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 150(2-3): 536–543 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.03.041
16	M Heniche, P A Tanguy, M F Reeder, J B Fasano. Numerical investigation of blade shape in static mixing. AIChE Journal, 2005, 51(1): 44–58 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.10341
17	X Duan, X Feng, C Yang, Z Mao. CFD modeling of turbulent reacting flow in a semi-batch stirred-tank reactor. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 26(4): 675–683 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2017.05.014
18	H Feng, M G Olsen, Y Liu, R O Fox, J C Hill. Investigation of turbulent mixing in a confined planar-jet reactor. AIChE Journal, 2005, 51(10): 2649–2664 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.10527
19	M Jasińska. Test reactions to study efficiency of mixing. Chemical & Process Engineering, 2015, 36(2): 171–208 https://doi.org/10.1515/cpe-2015-0013
20	Y Ouyang, M N Manzano, K Beirnaert, G J Heynderickx, K M van Geem. Micromixing in a gas–liquid vortex reactor. AIChE Journal, 2021, 67(7): e17264 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.17264
21	A J Nealon, R D O’Kennedy, N J Titchener-Hooker, G J Lye. Quantification and prediction of jet macro-mixing times in static microwell plates. Chemical Engineering Science, 2006, 61(15): 4860–4870 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.02.001
22	M Iguchi, K I Nakamura, R Tsujino. Mixing time and fluid flow phenomena in liquids of varying kinematic viscosities agitated by bottom gas injection. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B: Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 1998, 29(3): 569–575 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-998-0091-1
23	M Kordas, G Story, M Konopacki, R Rakoczy. Study of mixing time in a liquid vessel with rotating and reciprocating agitator. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(38): 13818–13828 https://doi.org/10.1021/ie303086r
24	L Manna. Comparison between physical and chemical methods for the measurement of mixing times. Chemical Engineering Journal, 1997, 67(3): 167–173 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(97)00059-4
25	P Vrábel, der Lans R G J M van, K C A M Luyben, L Boon, A W Nienow. Mixing in large-scale vessels stirred with multiple radial or radial and axial up-pumping impellers: modelling and measurements. Chemical Engineering Science, 2000, 55(23): 5881–5896 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00175-5
26	J Karcz, M Cudak, J Szoplik. Stirring of a liquid in a stirred tank with an eccentrically located impeller. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(8-9): 2369–2380 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.11.018
27	del Pozo D Fernandes, A Liné, Geem K M Van, Men C Le, I Nopens. Hydrodynamic analysis of an axial impeller in a non-Newtonian fluid through particle image velocimetry. AIChE Journal, 2020, 66(6): e16939 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16939
28	C Pan, J Min, X Liu, Z Gao. Investigation of fluid flow in a dual Rushton impeller stirred tank using particle image velocimetry. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2008, 16(5): 693–699 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(08)60142-1
29	L E Jardón-Pérez, A Amaro-Villeda, C González-Rivera, G Trápaga, A Conejo, M A Ramírez-Argáez. Introducing the planar laser-induced fluorescence technique (PLIF) to measure mixing time in gas-stirred ladles. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B: Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 2019, 50(5): 2121–2133 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-019-01631-y
30	P Holden, M Wang, R Mann, F Dickin, R Edwards. Imaging stirred-vessel macromixing using electrical resistance tomography. AIChE Journal, 1998, 44(4): 780–790 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690440403
31	G Ascanio, M Brito-Bazán, la Fuente E Brito-de, P J Carreau, P A Tanguy. Unconventional configuration studies to improve mixing times in stirred tanks. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2002, 80(4): 558–565 https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450800419
32	X Sun, Y Ji, Y Liu, J Chen, D Li. An engineering-purpose preparation strategy for ammonium-type ionic liquid with high purity. AIChE Journal, 2010, 56(4): 989–996
33	K W Norwood, A Metzner. Flow patterns and mixing rates in agitated vessels. AIChE Journal, 1960, 6(3): 432–437 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690060317
34	Y D Zhang, Z X Wang, L L Zhang, B C Sun, G W Chu, J F Chen. A consecutive−competitive reaction system for assessing homogeneous and heterogeneous liquid–liquid mixing efficiency. AIChE Journal, 2022, 68(11): e17824 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.17824
35	D Wang, B Zhu, H Tao. Preparation of Fe3O4/MnOOH core–shell nanoparticles by a high-frequency impinging stream reactor. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015, 23(4): 727–735 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2014.10.020
36	X Li, G Chen. The model and simulation for micromixing and fast chemical reaction——(I) the slice structure model and simplification. Computational Optimization and Applications, 1994, 3: 174–178
37	X Li, G Chen, J F Chen. Simplified framework for description of mixing with chemical reactions (I) physical picture of micro- and macromixing. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1996, 4(4): 311–321
38	J Chen, B Chen, G Chen. Visualization of meso- and micro-mixing status in flow system by high speed stroboscopic microscopic photography. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1993, 71(6): 967–970 https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450710619
39	J Ottino. Lamellar mixing models for structured chemical reactions and their relationship to statistical models; Macro- and micromixing and the problem of averages. Chemical Engineering Science, 1980, 35(6): 1377–1381 https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(80)85131-1
40	J Baldyga, J Bourne. Simplification of micromixing calculations-derivation and application of new model. Chemical Engineering Journal, 1989, 42(2): 83–92 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9467(89)85002-6
41	M C Fournier, L Falk, J Villermaux. A new parallel competing reaction system for assessing micromixing efficiency—determination of micromixing time by a simple mixing model. Chemical Engineering Science, 1996, 51(23): 5187–5192 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(96)00340-5
42	J Baldyga, J Bourne. Comparison of the engulfment and the interaction-by-exchange-with-the-mean micromixing models. Chemical Engineering Journal, 1990, 45(1): 25–31 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9467(90)80022-5
43	P Guichardon, L Falk. Characterisation of micromixing efficiency by the iodide−iodate reaction system. Part I: experimental procedure. Chemical Engineering Science, 2000, 55(19): 4233–4243 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00068-3
44	J Fang, D Lee. Micromixing efficiency in static mixer. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56(12): 3797–3802 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00098-7
45	T Lemenand, D D Valle, C Habchi, H Peerhossaini. Micro-mixing measurement by chemical probe in homogeneous and isotropic turbulence. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 314(Complete): 453–465
46	J Xu, J Tan, S Li, G Luo. Enhancement of mass transfer performance of liquid–liquid system by droplet flow in microchannels. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 141(1-3): 242–249 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.12.030
47	C Yao, Z Dong, Y Zhao, G Chen. An online method to measure mass transfer of slug flow in a microchannel. Chemical Engineering Science, 2014, 112: 15–24 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2014.03.016
48	M JasińskaJ BadygaM CookeA J Kowalski. Investigations of mass transfer and micromixing effects in two-phase liquid−liquid systems with chemical reaction. In: 14th European Conference on Mixing, Warszawa, 2012
49	L K DoraiswamyM M Sharma. Heterogeneous Reactions. New York: Wiley, 1984
50	S Hardt, H Pennemann, F Schönfeld. Theoretical and experimental characterization of a low-Reynolds number split-and-recombine mixer. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 2006, 2(3): 237–248 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-005-0071-6
51	K W Mao, H L Toor. Second-order chemical reactions with turbulent mixing. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 1971, 10(2): 192–197 https://doi.org/10.1021/i160038a002
52	O Miyawaki, H Tsujikawa, Y Uraguchi. Chemical reactions under incomplete mixing. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 1975, 8(1): 63–68 https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.8.63
53	M Takao, T Yamato, Y Murakami, Y Sato. Mixing effect on irreversible second order reaction in batch stirred tank reactor. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 1978, 11(6): 481–486 https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.11.481
54	R Chella, J M Ottino. Modelling of rapidly-mixed fast-crosslinking exothermic polymerizations. Part I: adiabatic temperature rise. AIChE Journal, 1983, 29(3): 373–382 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690290305
55	M C Fournier, L Falk, J Villermaux. A new parallel competing reaction system for assessing micromixing efficiency—experimental approach. Chemical Engineering Science, 1996, 51(22): 5053–5064 https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(96)00270-9
56	P Guichardon, L Falk, J Villermaux. Characterisation of micromixing efficiency by the iodide–iodate reaction system. Part II: kinetic study. Chemical Engineering Science, 2000, 55(19): 4245–4253 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00069-5
57	A Kölbl, M Kraut, K Schubert. The iodide iodate method to characterize microstructured mixing devices. AIChE Journal, 2008, 54(3): 639–645 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11408
58	H J Yang, G W Chu, Y Xiang, J F Chen. Characterization of micromixing efficiency in rotating packed beds by chemical methods. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2006, 121(2-3): 147–152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2006.04.010
59	A Kölbl, S Schmidt-Lehr. The iodide iodate reaction method: the choice of the acid. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65(5): 1897–1901 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2009.11.032
60	C Habchi, D D Valle, T Lemenand, Z Anxionnaz, P Tochon, M Cabassud, C Gourdon, H Peerhossaini. A new adaptive procedure for using chemical probes to characterize mixing. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(15): 3540–3550 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.04.019
61	J R Bourne, S Yu. An experimental study of micromixing using two parallel reactions. Fluid Mechanics of Mixing, 1992, 10: 207–215 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7973-5_24
62	J Baldyga, M Henczka, L Makowski. Effects of mixing on parallel chemical reactions in a continuous-flow stirred-tank reactor. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2001, 79(8): 895–900 https://doi.org/10.1205/02638760152721109
63	G J Nolan, E Amis. The rates of the alkaline hydrolyses of ethyl α-haloacetates in pure and mixed solvents. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1961, 65(9): 1556–1560 https://doi.org/10.1021/j100905a021
64	A Brucato, M Ciofalo, F Grisafi, R Tocco. On the simulation of stirred tank reactors via computational fluid dynamics. Chemical Engineering Science, 2000, 55(2): 291–302 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00324-3
65	D Zhao, H M Steinhagen, J M Smith. Micromixing in boiling and hot sparged systems: development of a new reaction pair. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2002, 80(8): 880–886 https://doi.org/10.1205/026387602321143426
66	J R Bourne, F Kozicki, P Rys. Mixing and fast chemical reaction—I: test reactions to determine segregation. Chemical Engineering Science, 1981, 36(10): 1643–1648 https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(81)80008-5
67	J R Bourne. The characterization of micromixing using fast multiple reactions. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1982, 16(1-6): 79–90 https://doi.org/10.1080/00986448208911087
68	J R Bourne, C H Tovstiga. Kinetics of the azo coupling reactions between 1-naphthol and diazotised sulphanilic acid. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1985, 37(1-6): 293–314 https://doi.org/10.1080/00986448508911287
69	E Schaer, P Guichardon, L Falk, E Plasari. Determination of local energy dissipation rates in impinging jets by a chemical reaction method. Chemical Engineering Journal, 1999, 72(2): 125–138 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(98)00152-1
70	P Guichardon, L Falk, M Andrieu. Experimental comparison of the iodide−iodate and the diazo coupling micromixing test reactions in stirred reactors. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2001, 79(8): 906–914 https://doi.org/10.1205/02638760152721433
71	J R Bourne, P Rys, K Suter. Mixing effects in the bromination of resorcin. Chemical Engineering Science, 1977, 32(7): 711–716 https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(77)80118-8
72	E Lobry, F Theron, C Gourdon, N Le Sauze, C Xuereb, T Lasuye. Turbulent liquid−liquid dispersion in SMV static mixer at high dispersed phase concentration. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(23): 5762–5774 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.06.073
73	M I I Z Abidin, A A A Raman, M I M Nor. Review on measurement techniques for drop size distribution in a stirred vessel. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(46): 16085–16094 https://doi.org/10.1021/ie401548z
74	M Sattari-Najafabadi, Esfahany M Nasr, Z Wu, B Sundén. The effect of the size of square microchannels on hydrodynamics and mass transfer during liquid–liquid slug flow. AIChE Journal, 2017, 63(11): 5019–5028 https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15822
75	M L Bender. Mechanisms of catalysis of nucleophilic reactions of carboxylic acid derivatives. Chemical Reviews, 1960, 60(1): 53–113 https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60203a005
76	J M Larner, R B Hochberg. The clearance and metabolism of estradiol and estradiol-17-esters in the rat. Endocrinology, 1985, 117(3): 1209–1214 https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-117-3-1209
77	D Pečar, A Goršek. Alkaline hydrolysis of an aromatic ester: kinetic studies using thermal power profiles. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2011, 34(12): 2033–2036 https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201100186
78	D Pečar, A Goršek. Saponification reaction system: a detailed mass transfer coefficient determination. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 2015, 62(1): 237–241 https://doi.org/10.17344/acsi.2014.1110
79	A M Dehkordi. Liquid–liquid extraction with an interphase chemical reaction in an air-driven two-impinging-streams reactor: effective interfacial area and overall mass-transfer coefficient. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2002, 41(16): 4085–4093 https://doi.org/10.1021/ie010750x
80	A Ghaini, M Kashid, D Agar. Effective interfacial area for mass transfer in the liquid–liquid slug flow capillary microreactors. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2010, 49(4): 358–366 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2010.03.009
81	S Hiraoka, I Yamada, Y Tada, H Mori, N Narita, H Suzuki, T Aragaki, Y T Park. Measurement of continuous-phase mass transfer coefficient at droplet surface in liquid−liquid mixing vessel by chemical reaction method. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 1990, 23(2): 166–170 https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.23.166
82	M Jasińska, J Bałdyga, M Cooke, A Kowalski. Investigations of mass transfer with chemical reactions in two-phase liquid−liquid systems. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2013, 91(11): 2169–2178 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2013.05.010
83	A N M Martinez, M Assivelli, J van der Schaaf. Droplet size and liquid–liquid mass transfer with reaction in a rotor–stator spinning disk reactor. Chemical Engineering Science, 2021, 242: 116706
84	B van Woezik, K Westerterp. The nitric acid oxidation of 2-octanol. A model reaction for multiple heterogeneous liquid–liquid reactions. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2000, 39(6): 521–537 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0255-2701(00)00099-4

[1]	Shengshuo Xu, Zhenying Lu, Jinling Wang, Guangtuan Huang, Hualin Wang, Xuejing Yang. Precursor-driven structural tailoring of iron oxychloride for enhanced heterogeneous Fenton activity[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(10): 1533-1543.
[2]	Fateme Abbasi, Javad Karimi-Sabet, Zeinab Abbasi, Cyrus Ghotbi. Conversion of CO into CO₂ by high active and stable PdNi nanoparticles supported on a metal-organic framework[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(7): 1139-1148.
[3]	Mengyuan Wu, Zhijie Yuan, Yuchao Niu, Yingshuang Meng, Gaohong He, Xiaobin Jiang. Interfacial induction and regulation for microscale crystallization process: a critical review[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 838-853.
[4]	Xiaoning Li, Lin Yang, Junheng Guo, Wei Li, Mingliang Zhou, Jinli Zhang. Micromixing performance of the teethed high shear mixer under semi-batch operation[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(4): 546-559.
[5]	Xiangsheng Liu, Hui Sun, Xueqing Wang, Huan Meng. Immunological effects of nano-enabled hyperthermia for solid tumors: opportunity and challenge[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(3): 333-344.
[6]	Giuseppe Sanzone, Jinlong Yin, Hailin Sun. Scaling up of cluster beam deposition technology for catalysis application[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 1360-1379.
[7]	Huaiwei Shi, Teng Zhou. Computational design of heterogeneous catalysts and gas separation materials for advanced chemical processing[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 49-59.
[8]	Eniko Haaz, Botond Szilagyi, Daniel Fozer, Andras Jozsef Toth. Combining extractive heterogeneous-azeotropic distillation and hydrophilic pervaporation for enhanced separation of non-ideal ternary mixtures[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 913-927.
[9]	M Helal Uddin, Nesrin Ozalp, Jens Heylen, Cedric Ophoff. A new approach for fuel injection into a solar receiver/reactor: Numerical and experimental investigation[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 683-696.
[10]	Si Hyung Jin, Jae-Hoon Jung, Seong-Geun Jeong, Jongmin Kim, Tae Jung Park, Chang-Soo Lee. Microfluidic dual loops reactor for conducting a multistep reaction[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(2): 239-246.
[11]	Cunyao Li, Wenlong Wang, Li Yan, Yunjie Ding. A mini review on strategies for heterogenization of rhodium-based hydroformylation catalysts[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 113-123.
[12]	Yanlong Hou, Wanni Xie, Zhenya Duan, Jingtao Wang. A conceptual methodology for simultaneous optimization of water and heat with non-isothermal mixing[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(2): 154-165.
[13]	Yinlong Hu,Shuang Zheng,Fumin Zhang. Fabrication of MIL-100(Fe)@SiO₂@Fe₃O₄ core-shell microspheres as a magnetically recyclable solid acidic catalyst for the acetalization of benzaldehyde and glycol[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 534-541.
[14]	Dongming QI, Xiaoli ZHAO, Zhijie CHEN, Peng HUANG, Jun CAO. Dispersion of a novel phenolic rigid organic filler in isotactic polypropylene matrix by solution-mixing and melt-mixing[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2012, 6(4): 395-402.
[15]	Guang WEN, Zifeng YAN. Transesterification of soybean oil to biodiesel over kalsilite catalyst[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(3): 325-329.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed