Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Engineering Management

ISSN 2095-7513

ISSN 2096-0255(Online)

CN 10-1205/N

Postal Subscription Code 80-905

Front. Eng    2021, Vol. 8 Issue (2) : 258-270    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0066-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Adaptability evolution of financing systems of mega projects
Xue YAN1, Longmiao GAO2, Huimin LIU2()
1. School of Finance, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211815, China
2. School of Management and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
 Download: PDF(828 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Mega projects require large funding, which often reaches tens or even hundreds of billions of yuan. In the state-oriented financing system, the huge fund gap has generally become an important factor restricting the development of mega projects worldwide. Since the 1980s, China’s long-span bridge projects have developed rapidly as typical mega projects as their financing systems have also undergone a series of changes and shown a high adaptability to complexity. However, the existing literature based on the perspective of evolution lacks focus on the complexity of mega project financing systems and its causes. Therefore, the complexity of the financing methods employed in the financing systems for China’s long-span bridges is analyzed in this work from the dimensions of time and regions through investigation and interviews. On the basis of the results and complex adaptive systems theory, the causes of the complexity are further explored in terms of the clustering effects of financing subjects and the deep uncertainty of financing environments. Then, the evolution rules of financing systems of mega projects are established from the aspect of financing subjects, financing environments, and financing methods. The research results can enrich decision-makers’ understanding of the essential attributes and formation mechanism of the financing systems of mega projects and provide powerful support for decision-making in financing.

Keywords adaptability evolution      financing methods      long-span bridges in China      mega projects     
Corresponding Author(s): Huimin LIU   
Just Accepted Date: 17 December 2019   Online First Date: 13 January 2020    Issue Date: 25 March 2021
 Cite this article:   
Xue YAN,Longmiao GAO,Huimin LIU. Adaptability evolution of financing systems of mega projects[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(2): 258-270.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/10.1007/s42524-019-0066-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/Y2021/V8/I2/258
Fig.1  Samples of long-span bridges and their geographical distributions.
Fig.2  Complexity of financing systems of mega projects.
Fig.3  Geographical distributions of financing methods for sample bridges.
Fig.4  Analysis of multiple subjects and their clustering in financing systems.
Fig.5  Evolution framework of complex adaptability of mega projects’ financing systems.
No. Project title Completion time Location Financing methods
1 Shengli Yellow River Bridge 1987 Shandong Market-oriented financing methods
2 Binzhou Yellow River Highway Bridge 1974 Shandong Government financing+ Bank loan
3 Jiyang Yellow River Highway Bridge 2008 Shandong Market-oriented financing methods
4 Jiaozhou Bay Bridge 2011 Shandong Market-oriented financing methods
5 Haicang Bridge 1999 Fujian Government financing
6 Langqi Minjiang?Bridge 2014 Fujian Government financing+ Bank loan
7 Xiazhang Bridge 2013 Fujian Government financing
8 Qingzhou Minjiang Bridge 2002 Fujian Market-oriented financing methods
9 Jiangyin Yangtze River ?Bridge 1999 Jiangsu Government financing+ Bank loan
10 The Nanjing Yangtze River Bridge 1968 Jiangsu Government financing
11 The Second Nanjing Yangtze River Bridge 2001 Jiangsu Market-oriented financing methods
12 The Third Nanjing Yangtze River Bridge 2005 Jiangsu Market-oriented financing methods
13 The Fourth Nanjing Yangtze River Bridge 2012 Jiangsu Government financing+ Bank loan
14 Runyang Bridge 2005 Jiangsu Government financing+ Bank loan
15 Sutong Yangtze River Highway Bridge 2008 Jiangsu Government financing+ Bank loan
16 Taizhou Yangtze River Bridge 2012 Jiangsu Government financing+ Bank loan
17 Cengang Bridge 2001 Zhejiang Government financing+ Bank loan
18 Xiangjiaomen Bridge 2002 Zhejiang
19 Taoyaomen Bridge 2003 Zhejiang
20 Jintang Bridge 2006 Zhejiang
21 Xihoumen Bridge 2007 Zhejiang
22 Hangzhou Bay Bridge 2007 Zhejiang Market-oriented financing methods
23 Jiashao Bridge 2013 Zhejiang Market-oriented financing methods
24 Panyu Bridge 1998 Guangdong Market-oriented financing methods
25 Humen Bridge 1997 Guangdong Market-oriented financing methods
26 Nansha Bridge 2019 Guangdong Market-oriented financing methods
27 Huangpu Bridge 2008 Guangdong Market-oriented financing methods
28 Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge 2018 Guangdong Government financing+ Bank loan
29 Songpu Bridge 1976 Shanghai City Government financing
30 Nanpu Bridge 1991 Shanghai City Government financing+ Bank loan
31 Yangpu Bridge 1993 Shanghai City Government financing+ Bank loan
32 Fengfu Bridge 1995 Shanghai City Market-oriented financing methods
33 Lupu Bridge 2003 Shanghai City Market-oriented financing methods
34 Xupu Bridge 1997 Shanghai City Market-oriented financing methods
35 Shanghai Yangtze River Tunnel & Bridge 2009 Shanghai City Market-oriented financing methods
36 Wangdong Yangtze River Bridge 2016 Anhui Market-oriented financing methods
37 Wuhu Yangtze River No. 2 Bridge 2017 Anhui Government financing+ Bank loan
38 Tongling Yangtze River Bridge 1995 Anhui Government financing
39 Wuhu Yangtze River Bridge 2000 Anhui Government financing
40 Anqing Yangtze River Highway Bridge 2004 Anhui Government financing+ Bank loan
41 Ma’anshan Yangtze River Highway Bridge 2012 Anhui Government financing+ Bank loan
42 Nanchang Bridge 1995 Jiangxi Government financing
43 Bayi Bridge 1997 Jiangxi Government financing
44 Yingxiong Bridge 2009 Jiangxi Government financing
45 The Second Jiujiang Bridge 2013 Jiangxi Government financing
46 Aizhai Bridge 2012 Hunan Government financing+ Bank loan
47 Chishi Bridge 2014 Hunan Government financing+ Bank loan
48 Dongting Lake Bridge 2000 Hunan Government financing+ Bank loan
49 Wenming Bridge 2012 Hunan Government financing+ Bank loan
50 Hanshou–Yuanshui Bridge 2008 Hunan Government financing+ Bank loan
51 Liancheng Bridge 2007 Hunan Market-oriented financing methods
52 Changling Bridge 2019 Hunan Government financing+ Bank loan
53 Huangshi Bridge 1995 Hubei Government financing+ Bank loan
54 Yangluo Bridge 2007 Hubei Government financing+ Bank loan
55 Tianxingzhou Bridge 2009 Hubei Market-oriented financing methods
56 Edong Bridge 2010 Hubei Market-oriented financing methods
57 Jingyue Bridge 2010 Hubei Government financing+ Bank loan
58 Longjiang Bridge 2016 Yunnan Government financing+ Bank loan
59 Puli Bridge 2015 Yunnan Government financing+ Bank loan
60 Niulan River Bridge 2015 Yunnan Government financing+ Bank loan
61 The First Beipan River Bridge 2016 Yunnan Government financing+ Bank loan
62 Wanzhou Bridge 1997 Chongqing City Government financing
63 Chaotianmen Bridge 2009 Chongqing City Market-oriented financing methods
64 Zhongxian Bridge 2001 Chongqing City Government financing+ Bank loan
65 Yunyang Yangtze River Bridge 2005 Chongqing City Government financing+ Bank loan
66 New Baishatuo Yangtze River Bridge 2018 Chongqing City Government financing+ Bank loan
67 Beipan River Bridge (Zhensheng) 2016 Guizhou Market-oriented financing methods
68 Balinghe Bridge 2009 Guizhou Government financing+ Bank loan
69 Liuchong Bridge 2013 Guizhou Market-oriented financing methods
70 Qingshuihe Bridge 2015 Guizhou Market-oriented financing methods
71 Yachihe Bridge 2016 Guizhou Market-oriented financing methods
72 Beipan River Bridge (Shuipan) 2013 Guizhou Market-oriented financing methods
73 Sanchahe Bridge (Xiarong) 2015 Guizhou Market-oriented financing methods
  The list of 73 long-span bridges
1 S Y Auyang (1998). Foundations of Complex-System Theories: In Economics, Evolutionary Biology, and Statistical Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2 C Berggren, J Järkvik, J Söderlund (2008). Lagomizing, organic integration, and systems emergency wards: Innovative practices in managing complex systems development projects. Project Management Journal, 39(1_suppl): S111–S122
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20065
3 O J Bosch (2011). Maternal nurturing is dependent on her innate anxiety: The behavioral roles of brain oxytocin and vasopressin. Hormones and Behavior, 59(2): 202–212
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.11.012 pmid: 21094649
4 R A Brealey, I A Cooper, M A Habib (1996). Using project finance to fund infrastructure investments. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9(3): 25–39
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1996.tb00296.x
5 A P Chan, R Osei-Kyei, Y Hu, L E Yun (2018). A fuzzy model for assessing the risk exposure of procuring infrastructure mega-projects through public-private partnership: The case of Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 5(1): 64–77
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2018067
6 C Chen (2009). Can the pilot BOT Project provide a template for future projects? A case study of the Chengdu No. 6 Water Plant B Project. International Journal of Project Management, 27(6): 573–583
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.10.006
7 T Y Choi, K J Dooley, M Rungtusanatham (2001). Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence. Journal of Operations Management, 19(3): 351–366
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00068-1
8 J G Combs, S C Michael, G J Castrogiovanni (2004). Franchising: A review and avenues to greater theoretical diversity. Journal of Management, 30(6): 907–931
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.006
9 Jr A Dias, P G Ioannou (1995). Debt capacity and optimal capital structure for privately financed infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(4): 404–414
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:4(404)
10 A Feltenstein, Z Farhadian (1987). Fiscal policy, monetary targets, and the price level in a centrally planned economy: An application to the case of China. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 19(2): 137–156
https://doi.org/10.2307/1992272
11 L Fleming, O Sorenson (2001). Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 30(7): 1019–1039
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00135-9
12 B Flyvbjerg (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2): 6–19
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409
13 J G Geraldi, G Adlbrecht (2007). On faith, fact, and interaction in projects. Project Management Journal, 38(1): 32–43
https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280703800104
14 R Hämäläinen, E Kettunen, M Marttunen, H Ehtamo (2001). Evaluating a framework for multi-stakeholder decision support in water resources management. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(4): 331–353
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011207207809
15 W J Henisz (2002). The institutional environment for infrastructure investment. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2): 355–389
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.2.355
16 J H Holland (1992). Complex adaptive systems. Daedalus, 121(1): 17–30
17 J E Innes, D E Booher (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4): 412–423
https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976071
18 M A Janssen, B H Walker, J Langridge, N Abel(1999). An adaptive agent model for analysing co-evolution of management and policies in a complex rangeland system. Ecological Modelling, 131(2): 249–268
19 S Jayanthi, K K Sinha (1998). Innovation implementation in high technology manufacturing: A chaos-theoretic empirical analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4): 471–494
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00025-4
20 G Jia, F Yang, G Wang, B Hong, R You (2011). A study of mega project from a perspective of social conflict theory. International Journal of Project Management, 29(7): 817–827
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.04.004
21 S Kauffman (1996). At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press
22 N Keshavarz, D Nutbeam, L Rowling, F Khavarpour (2010). Schools as social complex adaptive systems: A new way to understand the challenges of introducing the health promoting schools concept. Social Science & Medicine, 70(10): 1467–1474
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.034 pmid: 20207059
23 L Klerkx, N Aarts, C Leeuwis (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems, 103(6): 390–400
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.012
24 J Kujala, T Brady, J Putila (2014). Challenges of cost management in complex projects. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(11): 48–58
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n11p48
25 J S Lansing (2003). Complex adaptive systems. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32(1): 183–204
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093440
26 C W Li, S Y Ma, Y Ren, P N Zhang, X Li (2016). Research on financing method of public charging facilities based on cooperative game. In: 2016 the International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS). IEEE, 1–6
27 Y Li, Y Lu, L Ma, Y H Kwak (2018). Evolutionary governance for Mega-Event Projects (MEPs): A case study of the World Expo 2010 in China. Project Management Journal, 49(1): 57–78
https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281804900105
28 A W Lo, S V Naraharisetti (2013). New financing methods in the biopharma industry: A case study of Royalty Pharma, Inc. Journal of Investment Management, 12: 4–19
29 M J Mauboussin (2002). Revisiting market efficiency: The stock market as a complex adaptive system. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(4): 47–55
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2002.tb00448.x
30 P W G Morris (2013). Reconstructing project management reprised: A knowledge perspective. Project Management Journal, 44(5): 6–23
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21369
31 R Müller, J Geraldi, J R Turner (2012). Relationships between leadership and success in different types of project complexities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(1): 77–90
https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2011.2114350
32 R Osei-Kyei, A P C Chan (2015). Review of studies on the critical success factors for Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6): 1335–1346
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.008
33 S D Pathak, J M Day, A Nair, W J Sawaya, M M Kristal (2007). Complexity and adaptivity in supply networks: Building supply network theory using a complex adaptive systems perspective. Decision Sciences, 38(4): 547–580
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00170.x
34 A Pitsis, S Clegg, D Freeder, S Sankaran, S Burdon (2018). Megaprojects redefined—Complexity vs cost and social imperatives. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(1): 7–34
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-07-2017-0080
35 S F Railsback (2001). Concepts from complex adaptive systems as a framework for individual-based modelling. Ecological Modelling, 139(1): 47–62
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00228-9
36 J Rijke, S van Herk, C Zevenbergen, R Ashley, M Hertogh, E ten Heuvelhof (2014). Adaptive programme management through a balanced performance/strategy oriented focus. International Journal of Project Management, 32(7): 1197–1209
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.003
37 M Schneider, M Somers (2006). Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of complexity theory for leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 17(4): 351–365
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.006
38 L Shen, H Li, Q Li (2002). Alternative concession model for build operate transfer contract projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(4): 326–330
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:4(326)
39 Z H Sheng (2017). Fundamental Theories of Mega Infrastructure Construction Management: Theoretical Considerations from Chinese Practices. Berlin: Springer
40 Z H Sheng, H Lin (2018). From systematicness to complexity: Fundamental thinking of mega-project management. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 5(1): 125–127
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2018001
41 K Song, K An, G Yang, J Huang (2012). Risk-return relationship in a complex adaptive system. PLoS One, 7(3): e33588
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033588 pmid: 22479416
42 J Teller, B N Unger, A Kock, H G Gemünden (2012). Formalization of project portfolio management: The moderating role of project portfolio complexity. International Journal of Project Management, 30(5): 596–607
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.01.020
43 W T Walker (2004). Supply Chain Architecture: A Blueprint for Networking the Flow of Material, Information, and Cash. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press
44 D Wang, L Zhang, Z Zhang, S X Zhao (2011). Urban infrastructure financing in reform-era China. Urban Studies, 48(14): 2975–2998
https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010392079
45 T Wang, X Yang (2008). Decision model for infrastructure project financing based on interval entropy. In: 2008 International Conference on MultiMedia and Information Technology. IEEE, 180–183
46 W Wu (2010). Urban infrastructure financing and economic performance in China. Urban Geography, 31(5): 648–667
https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.31.5.648
47 W H Wu, J Wang (2011). China railway construction project financing model. In: 2011 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government. IEEE, 1–5
48 X Yan, H Y Chong, Z Sheng, X Y Wang (2017). Financing decision model for toll roads: Balancing economic and public attributes. Journal of Management Engineering, 33(4): 04017010
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000523
49 M Zeng, X M Liu, Y L Li, L L Peng (2014). Review of renewable energy investment and financing in China: Status, mode, issues and countermeasures. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31: 23–37
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.026
50 B Z Zhang, H D Guo, C X Yang, L Wang (2016). Research on evaluating the efficiency of the project financing of the energy service company. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 3(3): 252–257
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2016044
51 H Zhou, S Zhang, W Zhang, F Wang, Y Zhong, L Gu, Z Qu, D Tian (2015). Evaluation and mechanism for outcomes exploration of providing public health care in contract service in Rural China: A multiple-case study with complex adaptive systems design. BMC Public Health, 15(1): 199
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1540-9 pmid: 25880965
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed