Construction of digital 3D magic-cube organization structure for innovation-driven manufacturing

doi:10.1007/s42524-022-0237-x

Front. Eng

2023, Vol. 10

Issue (3) : 373-390 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-022-0237-x

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Construction of digital 3D magic-cube organization structure for innovation-driven manufacturing

Qiao XIANG¹, You ZHANG², Jie ZHONG², Guoxuan WANG³(

), Lirong LONG³

¹. Aero Engine Corporation of China (AECC), Beijing 100097, China
². Chengdu Holy Industry & Commerce Corp., Ltd. (Group), Pengzhou 611936, China
³. School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Download: PDF(3225 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

Owing to the heterogeneity between functional units and resource scarcity, manufacturing firms have been struggling with intra-organizational coordination for productivity and innovation. Traditional organizational structures, such as linear-functional and matrix, may cause responsibility division and independent goals (Shahani, 2020), and are more difficult to be adopted by large-sized innovative manufacturing firms for quantity production. This is based on a review of several new forms of organization (i.e., network organization, multiteam system, and platform organization) compared with the traditional forms of organization (i.e., linear, matrix, and business unit organization, among others). This study proposes a three-dimensional (3D) magic-cube organizational structure, considering the product dimensions, business, and administration. Moreover, the characteristics, propositions of system operation, system dynamic model, and working model of the 3D magic-cube organization are described. Finally, the 3D model is applied in a Chinese manufacturing firm to test its effectiveness. By redesigning the post and pay system, the pilot organization establishes a project-driven and cross-functional coordination mechanism, positively affecting the firm’s financial profit, output value, labor productivity, and income of per capita. The proposed 3D model can be adopted by large- or medium-sized manufacturing firms for product development and innovation. The implications of both practice and theory are also discussed in this study.

Keywords innovation manufacturing 3D magic-cube organization structure coordination

Corresponding Author(s): Guoxuan WANG

About author:

^* These authors contributed equally to this work.

Just Accepted Date: 07 December 2022 Online First Date: 25 December 2022 Issue Date: 29 August 2023

Cite this article:

Qiao XIANG,You ZHANG,Jie ZHONG, et al. Construction of digital 3D magic-cube organization structure for innovation-driven manufacturing[J]. Front. Eng, 2023, 10(3): 373-390.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/10.1007/s42524-022-0237-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/Y2023/V10/I3/373

Fig.1 Pyramid organizational structure.

Fig.2 Inverted pyramid organizational structure.

Fig.3 Network organization.

Fig.4 Multiteam system (MTS).

Fig.5 Platform organization.

Tab.1 Comparison of organizational structures

Fig.6 Geometric model of 3D magic-cube organization structure.

Fig.7 System dynamic model of 3D magic-cube organization structure.

Fig.8 System operation model of 3D magic-cube organization structure.

Fig.9 Implemented model of 3D magic-cube organization structure for the pilot firm.

Fig.10 Product dimension.

Fig.11 Business dimension.

Fig.12 Administration dimension.

Fig.13 Post system of the product dimension.

Fig.14 Post system of the business dimension.

Fig.15 Post system of the administration dimension.

Fig.16 Change effect of the implementation of 3D magic-cube organization structure (Note: The annotated data is the growth rate compared with the data in year 2014).

1	R Adler, T Hiromoto, (2012). Amoeba management: Lessons from Japan’s Kyocera. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54( 1): 83–89
2	R Adler, T Hiromoto, H Suzuki, (2020). Amoeba management and organizational ambidexterity: Similarities, differences, and implications for organizational fit and success. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69( 2): 405–427 https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2018-0254
3	M C AnnosiF (2017) Brunetta. New Organizational Forms, Controls, and Institutions: Understanding the Tensions in “Post-Bureaucratic” Organizations. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan
4	C Cennamo, J Santalo, (2013). Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal, 34( 11): 1331–1350 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2066
5	C U Ciborra, (1996). The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises. Organization Science, 7( 2): 103–118 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.2.103
6	J Clement, P Puranam, (2018). Searching for structure: Formal organization design as a guide to network evolution. Management Science, 64( 8): 3879–3895 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2807
7	R L Cross, A Yan, M R Louis, (2000). Boundary activities in “Boundaryless” organizations: A case study of a transformation to a team-based structure. Human Relations, 53( 6): 841–868 https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700536004
8	M A Cusumano, D B Yoffie, A Gawer, (2020). The future of platforms. MIT Sloan Management Review, 61( 3): 46–54
9	F Damanpour, (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34( 3): 555–590 https://doi.org/10.2307/256406
10	P J Daugherty, H Chen, B G Ferrin, (2011). Organizational structure and logistics service innovation. International Journal of Logistics Management, 22( 1): 26–51 https://doi.org/10.1108/09574091111127543
11	R B Davison, J R Hollenbeck, C M Barnes, D J Sleesman, D R Ilgen, (2012). Coordinated action in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97( 4): 808–824 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026682
12	T A de Vries, F Walter, G S van der Vegt, P J M D Essens, (2014). Antecedents of individuals’ interteam coordination: Broad functional experiences as a mixed blessing. Academy of Management Journal, 57( 5): 1334–1359 https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0360
13	R Duncan, (1979). What is the right organization structure? Decision tree analysis provides the answer. Organizational Dynamics, 7( 3): 59–80 https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(79)90027-5
14	A Gawer, (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43( 7): 1239–1249 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
15	G Ghislanzoni, R Penttinen, D Turnbull, (2008). The multilocal challenge: Managing cross-border functions. McKinsey Quarterly, 2: 70–81
16	M Iranmanesh, K M Kumar, B Foroughi, R K Mavi, N H Min, (2021). The impacts of organizational structure on operational performance through innovation capability: Innovative culture as moderator. Review of Managerial Science, 15( 7): 1885–1911 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00407-y
17	K C Kellogg, M A Valentine, A Christin, (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14( 1): 366–410 https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
18	B Kogut, U Zander, (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3( 3): 383–397 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
19	E E Lawler, C G Worley, (2006). Designing organizations that are built to change. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48( 1): 19–23
20	A Y Lewin, H W Volberda, (1999). Prolegomena on co-evolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10( 5): 519–534 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.519
21	C Li, Y Tao, (2016). How to obtain line manager’s identification with HR issues? The influence of HR manager’s on business department manager’s commitment. Human Resources Development of China, 360( 18): 42–50
22	D H Li, (2000). History, present and future for the change of enterprise organization structure. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 15( 3): 27–33
23	P Li, Z Y Yang, (2018). “Three platforms”: A future-oriented ecological organization paradigm. Business Review, ( 11): 92–105
24	R H Lin, W A Li, (2000). Network organization: An organization model well adapting to the environment. Nankai Business Review, ( 3): 4–7
25	Y Lu, K Ramamurthy, (2011). Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35( 4): 931–954 https://doi.org/10.2307/41409967
26	J E Mathieu, M A Marks, S J Zaccaro, (2001). Multi-team systems. In: Anderson N, Ones D S, Sinangil H K, Viswesvaran C, eds. Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology. London: Sage, 289–313
27	S E Mei, G Xie, (2013). Client-internal business/IT alignment, governance of IT outsourcing relationships and service quality. Management Review, 25( 7): 132–142
28	H (2007) Mintzberg. Tracking Strategies: Toward a General Theory. New York: Oxford University Press
29	J M Podolny, K L Page, (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24( 1): 57–76 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.57
30	J P Porck, F K Matta, J R Hollenbeck, J K Oh, K Lanaj, S M Lee, (2019). Social identification in multiteam systems: The role of depletion and task complexity. Academy of Management Journal, 62( 4): 1137–1162 https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0466
31	M E Porter, J E Heppelmann, (2015). How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Business Review, 93( 10): 96–114
32	H (2005) Ren. Modern Enterprise Organization Design. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press (in Chinese)
33	E Samimi, J Sydow, (2021). Human resource management in project-based organizations: Revisiting the permanency assumption. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32( 1): 49–83 https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1783346
34	S Sandhu, C T Kulik, (2019). Shaping and being shaped: How organizational structure and managerial discretion co-evolve in new managerial roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64( 3): 619–658 https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218778018
35	J (2020) Shahani. Limits and Opportunities of a Matrix Organization: A Study of Coordination Mechanisms within a Multiple Brand Organization. Wiesbaden: Springer
36	N Steigenberger, (2016). Organizing for the big one: A review of case studies and a research agenda for multi-agency disaster response. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 24( 2): 60–72 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12106
37	G Q Sun, (2001). The definition, characteristics and forming factors of network organization. Nankai Business Review, ( 4): 38–40
38	K D Thoben, S Wiesner, T Wuest, (2017). Industrie 4.0 and smart manufacturing: A review of research issues and application examples. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 11( 1): 4–16 https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2017.p0004
39	S G Turner, D R Utley, J D Westbrook, (1998). Project managers and functional managers: A case study of job satisfaction in a matrix organization. Project Management Journal, 29( 3): 11–19 https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289802900304
40	L van Bunderen, L L Greer, D van Knippenberg, (2018). When interteam conflict spirals into intrateam power struggles: The pivotal role of team power structures. Academy of Management Journal, 61( 3): 1100–1130 https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0182
41	E van Laar, A J A M van Deursen, J A G M van Dijk, J de Haan, (2019). Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 100: 93–104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.017
42	B Victor, R S Blackburn, (1987). Interdependence: An alternative conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 12( 3): 486–498 https://doi.org/10.2307/258515
43	Y Wei, S Samiee, R P Lee, (2014). The influence of organic organizational cultures, market responsiveness, and product strategy on firm performance in an emerging market. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42( 1): 49–70 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-013-0337-6
44	Q (2013a) Xiang. Aero-engine Maintenance Engineering Management. Beijing: China Machine Press (in Chinese)
45	Q Xiang, (2013b). Recognition and practice on remanufacturing engineering management of military aero-engines. Strategic Study of CAE, 15( 11): 67–73
46	Q Xiang, (2014). Building a new normal, upgraded China’s aviation MRO under the guidance of creative economy theory. Military Industry Culture, ( 12): 37–39
47	Q Xiang, (2015). Discussion on problem-based engineering management system. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2( 3): 249–260 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2015054
48	A Zanzi, (1987). How organic is your organization? Determinants of organic/mechanistic tendencies in a public accounting firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24( 2): 125–140 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00940.x
49	C Zhang, Z Hu, F F Gu, (2008). Intra- and inter-firm coordination of export manufacturers: A cluster analysis of indigenous Chinese exporters. Journal of International Marketing, 16( 3): 108–135 https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.16.3.108

[1]	Zhengang GUO, Yingfeng ZHANG, Sichao LIU, Xi Vincent WANG, Lihui WANG. Exploring self-organization and self-adaption for smart manufacturing complex networks[J]. Front. Eng, 2023, 10(2): 206-222.
[2]	Jiehan ZHOU, Shouhua ZHANG, Mu GU. Revisiting digital twins: Origins, fundamentals, and practices[J]. Front. Eng, 2022, 9(4): 668-676.
[3]	Jianhua LI, Xianjun DUAN, Hanchao LIU, Susu LEI, Zheng ZHANG, Zhenwei LI. Key technological innovations in the construction of the main terminal of Beijing Daxing International Airport[J]. Front. Eng, 2022, 9(4): 689-694.
[4]	Jiangjiang YANG, Jie WU, Xingchen LI, Qingyuan ZHU. Sustainability performance analysis of environment innovation systems using a two-stage network DEA model with shared resources[J]. Front. Eng, 2022, 9(3): 425-438.
[5]	Zhiqiang ZHANG, Sansan DING, Changlong ZHAO, Xin LIANG. Development progress of China’s 600 km/h high-speed magnetic levitation train[J]. Front. Eng, 2022, 9(3): 509-515.
[6]	Zicheng ZHOU, Luojia WANG, Kerui DU, Shuai SHAO. Energy rebound effect in China’s manufacturing sector: Fresh evidence from firm-level data[J]. Front. Eng, 2022, 9(3): 439-451.
[7]	Zhong-Zhong JIANG, Guangqi FENG, Zelong YI, Xiaolong GUO. Service-oriented manufacturing: A literature review and future research directions[J]. Front. Eng, 2022, 9(1): 71-88.
[8]	Kangzhou WANG, Zhibin JIANG, Bo PENG, Hui JING. Servitization of manufacturing in the new ICTs era: A survey on operations management[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(2): 223-235.
[9]	Dequn ZHOU, Hao DING, Qunwei WANG, Bin SU. Literature review on renewable energy development and China’s roadmap[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(2): 212-222.
[10]	Yan ZHANG, His-Hsien WEI, Dong ZHAO, Yilong HAN, Jiayu CHEN. Understanding innovation diffusion and adoption strategies in megaproject networks through a fuzzy system dynamic model[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(1): 32-47.
[11]	Jun DU, Fangwen WENG. Construction management and technology innovation for main projects of Quanzhou Bay Bridge[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(1): 151-155.
[12]	Qiang ZHANG, Baoyu LIAO, Shanlin YANG. Application of blockchain in the field of intelligent manufacturing: Theoretical basis, realistic plights, and development suggestions[J]. Front. Eng, 2020, 7(4): 578-591.
[13]	Jin CHEN, Ximing YIN, Jizhen LI. Firm innovation system: Paths for enhancing corporate indigenous innovation capability[J]. Front. Eng, 2020, 7(3): 404-412.
[14]	Zachary A. COLLIER, James H. LAMBERT. Managing obsolescence of embedded hardware and software in secure and trusted systems[J]. Front. Eng, 2020, 7(2): 172-181.
[15]	Xiaohong CHEN. The development trend and practical innovation of smart cities under the integration of new technologies[J]. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(4): 485-502.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed