Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Engineering Management

ISSN 2095-7513

ISSN 2096-0255(Online)

CN 10-1205/N

Postal Subscription Code 80-905

Front. Eng    2024, Vol. 11 Issue (3) : 413-429    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-024-3103-1
Industrial Engineering and Intelligent Manufacturing
Joint optimization of production, maintenance, and quality control considering the product quality variance of a degraded system
Xiaolei LV1, Liangxing SHI1, Yingdong HE1(), Zhen HE1, Dennis K.J. LIN2
1. College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; Laboratory of Computation and Analytics of Complex Management Systems (CACMS), Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2. Department of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
 Download: PDF(1955 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The joint optimization of production, maintenance, and quality control has shown effectiveness in reducing long-term operational costs in production systems. However, existing studies often assume that changes in the mean value of product quality characteristics in a deteriorating system follow a specific distribution while keeping variance constant. To address this limitation, we propose an innovative method based on the continuous ranking probability score (CRPS). This method enables the simultaneous detection of changes in mean and variance in nonconformities, thus removing the assumption of a specific distribution for quality characteristics. Our approach focuses on developing optimal strategies for production, maintenance, and quality control to minimize cost per unit of time. Additionally, we employ a stochastic model to optimize the production time allocated to the inventory buffer, resulting in significant cost reductions. The effectiveness of our proposed joint optimization method is demonstrated through comprehensive numerical experiments, sensitivity analysis, and a comparative study. The results show that our method can achieve cost reductions compared to several other related methods, highlighting its practical applicability for manufacturing companies aiming to reduce costs.

Keywords joint optimization      degraded system      CRPS control chart      uncertain buffer stocking time     
Corresponding Author(s): Yingdong HE   
Just Accepted Date: 02 July 2024   Online First Date: 26 July 2024    Issue Date: 26 September 2024
 Cite this article:   
Xiaolei LV,Liangxing SHI,Yingdong HE, et al. Joint optimization of production, maintenance, and quality control considering the product quality variance of a degraded system[J]. Front. Eng, 2024, 11(3): 413-429.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/10.1007/s42524-024-3103-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/Y2024/V11/I3/413
Fig.1  The process of joint production, maintenance, and quality control.
n (Decision variable) Sample number
k (Decision variable) Inspection frequency
h (Decision variable) Time interval between successive samples
UCL (Decision variable) Control chart’s limits
S (Decision variable) Safety stock levels in the buffer zone
X (Random variable) Transition time from the in-control state to the out-of-control state
f(x) Probability density function (PDF) of x
F(x) Cumulative distribution function (CDF) of x
F¯(x) 1 – F(x)
Y1 (Random variable) Time required for preventive maintenance
g1(y1) PDF of Y1
G1(y1) CDF of Y1
Y2 (Random variable) Time required for corrective maintenance
g2(y2) PDF of Y2
G2(y2) CDF of Y2
γ Set to zero when production halts during the false alarm analysis; otherwise, set to one
tf Analyze and rectify false alarm durations
ts Duration of time per sample inspection
ta Assignable cause analysis duration
q1 Productivity of normal production
q2 Replenishment rate of buffer zone inventory (q2 > q1)
Cf Fixed cost for sample inspection
Cv Variable cost for sample inspection
Cin Operational cost per time unit in the in-control state
Cout Operational cost per time unit in the out-of-control state
CI Cost of the false alarm analysis
Ch Inventory holding cost per unit item per time unit
Cs Cost of stockouts per time unit
CCM Corrective maintenance cost
CPM Preventive maintenance cost (CCM > CPM)
Qin Cost per unit of the quality lost when the production process is in the in-control state
Qout Cost per unit of the quality lost when the production process is in the out-of-control state
ARL0 Average run length when the production process is in the in-control state
ARL1 Average run length when the production process is in the out-of-control state
α Probability of occurrence of Type I errors
β Probability of occurrence of Type II errors
  
Fig.2  Graphical representation of the four scenarios.
Fig.3  The quality control strategy.
Fig.4  The maintenance strategy.
Fig.5  The production strategy.
Fig.6  The buffer stock holding state.
γ tf ts ta CCM CPM Ch CS Cin Cout Cf
1 1 0.01 1 5000 2400 0.5 3 100 300 1
Cv CI Qin Qout q1 q2 λ1 λ2 λ v1 v2 v
0.2 200 0 0 90 160 0.4 0.4 0.3 2 2 2
Tab.1  The parameters’ values.
n h k UCL S ECT
5 50 4.6518 0.5 347.4615 328.5618
Tab.2  The results of Case 1
Fig.7  The CRPS value range in Case 1.
Fig.8  The CRPS values in Case 2.
n h k UCL S ECT
5 50 49.7103 1.2 309.9749 303.2305
Tab.3  The results of Case 2
Fig.9  The CRPS values in Case 3.
n h k UCL S ECT
5 50 77.6591 0.7 1 302.5985
Tab.4  The results of Case 3
γ tf ts ta CCM CPM Ch CS Cin Cout Cf
1 1 0.01 1 5000 2400 0.5 3 100 300 1
Cv CI Qin Qout q1 q2 λ1 λ2 λ v1 v2 v
0.2 200 0 0 90 160 0.4 0.4 0.3 2 2 2
Tab.5  Parameter values
λ n h k UCL S ECT
0.2 5 50 4.6374 0.5 348.7862 328.6117
0.3 5 50 4.6518 0.5 347.4615 328.5618
0.4 5 50 4.6637 0.5 316.9654 328.4249
Tab.6  Sensitivity analysis results for λ
v n h k UCL S ECT
1 5 50 4.6170 0.5 339.0196 328.4801
2 5 50 4.6518 0.5 347.4615 328.5618
3 5 50 4.6223 0.5 342.2853 328.5144
Tab.7  Sensitivity analysis results for v
λ1 n h k UCL S ECT
0.3 5 50 4.6350 0.5 342.2019 328.5166
0.4 5 50 4.6518 0.5 347.4615 328.5618
0.5 5 50 4.6170 0.5 344.1313 328.5166
Tab.8  Sensitivity analysis results for λ1
v1 n h k UCL S ECT
1 5 50 4.6163 0.5 349.7860 328.5169
2 5 50 4.6518 0.5 347.4615 328.5618
3 5 50 5.6577 0.5 341.5521 328.5167
Tab.9  Sensitivity analysis results for v1
λ2 n h k UCL S ECT
0.3 5 50 4.5604 0.5 372.0660 329.6455
0.4 5 50 4.6518 0.5 347.4615 328.5618
0.5 5 50 4.6858 0.5 320.0389 327.7921
Tab.10  Sensitivity analysis results for λ2
v2 n h k UCL S ECT
1 5 50 4.6930 0.5 366.1123 328.8817
2 5 50 4.6518 0.5 347.4615 328.5618
3 5 50 4.6149 0.5 323.6984 328.5246
Tab.11  Sensitivity analysis results for v2
γ tf ts ta CCM CPM Ch CS Cin Cout Cf δ
1 1 0.01 1 5000 2400 0.5 3 100 300 1 1
Cv CI Qin Qout q1 q2 λ1 λ2 λ v1 v2 v
0.2 200 0 0 90 160 0.4 0.4 0.3 2 2 2
Tab.12  Data used in the comparative study
n h k l (UCL) S ECT
Hadian et al. (2021) 26 2.2604 27 3.1616 101.0751 315.9644
Shi et al. (2023) 1 10 100 3.5 205.8511 304.3147
This study 5 50 100 1 303.1824 301.0150
Tab.13  Comparison results of the three models
1 A, Ait-El-Cadi A, Gharbi K, Dhouib A, Artiba (2021b). Integrated production, maintenance and quality control policy for unreliable manufacturing systems under dynamic inspection. International Journal of Production Economics, 236: 108140
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108140
2 A, Ait El Cadi A, Gharbi K, Dhouib A, Artiba (2021a). Joint production and preventive maintenance controls for unreliable and imperfect manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 58: 263–279
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.12.003
3 Y, An X, Chen J, Hu L, Zhang Y, Li J, Jiang (2022). Joint optimization of preventive maintenance and production rescheduling with new machine insertion and processing speed selection. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 220: 108269
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108269
4 S, Azimpoor S, Taghipour (2021). Joint inspection and product quality optimization for a system with delayed failure. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 215: 107793
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107793
5 N, Bahria A, Chelbi H, Bouchriha I H, Dridi (2019). Integrated production, statistical process control, and maintenance policy for unreliable manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 57( 8): 2548–2570
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1530472
6 M, Ben-Daya M A, Rahim (2000). Effect of maintenance on the economic design of x̄-control chart. European Journal of Operational Research, 120( 1): 131–143
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00379-8
7 J, Bokrantz A, Skoogh C, Berlin J, Stahre (2020). Smart maintenance: instrument development, content validation and an empirical pilot. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40( 4): 481–506
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-11-2019-0746
8 B, Bouslah A, Gharbi R, Pellerin (2018). Joint production, quality and maintenance control of a two-machine line subject to operation-dependent and quality-dependent failures. International Journal of Production Economics, 195: 210–226
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.016
9 T, Chakraborty B C, Giri (2012). Joint determination of optimal safety stocks and production policy for an imperfect production system. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36( 2): 712–722
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.07.012
10 T, Chakraborty B C, Giri K S, Chaudhuri (2009). Production lot sizing with process deterioration and machine breakdown under inspection schedule. Omega, 37( 2): 257–271
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.12.001
11 G, Cheng L, Li (2020). Joint optimization of production, quality control and maintenance for serial-parallel multistage production systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 204: 107146
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107146
12 A H, Christer (1978). Refined asymptotic costs for renewal reward processes. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 29( 6): 577–583
https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1978.121
13 Vargas V C C, de Lopes L F, Dias Souza A, Mendonça (2004). Comparative study of the performance of the Cusum and EWMA control charts. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 46( 4): 707–724
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2004.05.025
14 S, Duffuaa A, Kolus U, Al-Turki A, El-Khalifa (2020). An integrated model of production scheduling, maintenance and quality for a single machine. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 142: 106239
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106239
15 H B, Fakher M, Nourelfath M, Gendreau (2018). Integrating production, maintenance and quality: A multi-period multi-product profit-maximization model. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 170: 191–201
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.10.024
16 A, Farahani H, Tohidi (2021). Integrated optimization of quality and maintenance: A literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 151: 106924
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106924
17 M C, Fitouhi M, Nourelfath (2012). Integrating noncyclical preventive maintenance scheduling and production planning for a single machine. International Journal of Production Economics, 136( 2): 344–351
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.12.021
18 S M, Hadian H, Farughi H, Rasay (2021). Joint planning of maintenance, buffer stock and quality control for unreliable, imperfect manufacturing systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 157: 107304
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107304
19 Z, Hajej A C, Nyoungue A S, Abubakar K, Mohamed Ali (2021). An integrated model of production, maintenance, and quality control with statistical process control chart of a supply chain. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 11( 9): 4192
https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094192
20 A, Hajji A, Gharbi R, Pellerin (2012). Joint production control and product quality decision making in a failure prone multiple-product manufacturing system. International Journal of Production Research, 50( 13): 3661–3672
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.671588
21 F, Harrou Y, Sun M, Madakyaru B, Bouyedou (2018). An improved multivariate chart using partial least squares with continuous ranked probability score. IEEE Sensors Journal, 18( 16): 6715–6726
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2018.2850804
22 Y, He Y, Zhao X, Han D, Zhou W, Wang (2020). Functional risk-oriented health prognosis approach for intelligent manufacturing systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 203: 107090
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107090
23 H, Hersbach (2000). Decomposition of the continuous ranked probability score for ensemble prediction systems. Weather and Forecasting, 15( 5): 559–570
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0559:DOTCRP>2.0.CO;2
24 S, Huang J, Yang M, Xie (2020). A double-sampling SPM scheme for simultaneously monitoring of location and scale shifts and its joint design with maintenance strategies. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 54: 94–102
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.11.009
25 S, Kumar B S, Purohit V, Manjrekar V, Singh B K, Lad (2018). Investigating the value of integrated operations planning: A case-based approach from automotive industry. International Journal of Production Research, 56( 22): 6971–6992
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1424367
26 M D, Le C M, Tan (2013). Optimal maintenance strategy of deteriorating system under imperfect maintenance and inspection using mixed inspection scheduling. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 113: 21–29
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.11.025
27 X, Liu Q, Sun Z S, Ye M, Yildirim (2021b). Optimal multi-type inspection policy for systems with imperfect online monitoring. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 207: 107335
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107335
28 Y, Liu Q, Zhang Z, Ouyang H Z, Huang (2021a). Integrated production planning and preventive maintenance scheduling for synchronized parallel machines. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 215: 107869
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107869
29 M, Mahmoudi A, Elwany K, Shahanaghi M R, Gholamian (2017). A delay time model with multiple defect types and multiple inspection methods. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 66( 4): 1073–1084
https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2017.2754519
30 Pongha P, Megoze G R, Kibouka J P, Kenné L A, Hof (2022). Production, maintenance and quality inspection planning of a hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system under production rate-dependent deterioration. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 121( 1-2): 1289–1314
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09078-3
31 A, Mohtashami (2014). A new hybrid method for buffer sizing and machine allocation in unreliable production and assembly lines with general distribution time-dependent parameters. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 74( 9-12): 1577–1593
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6098-7
32 M, Nourelfath N, Nahas M, Ben-Daya (2016). Integrated preventive maintenance and production decisions for imperfect processes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 148: 21–31
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.11.015
33 S, Obaidat H, Liao (2021). Integrated decision making for attributes sampling and proactive maintenance in a discrete manufacturing system. International Journal of Production Research, 59( 18): 5454–5476
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1781280
34 E, Pan Y, Jin S, Wang T, Cang (2012). An integrated EPQ model based on a control chart for an imperfect production process. International Journal of Production Research, 50( 23): 6999–7011
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.642822
35 S, Panagiotidou G, Tagaras (2007). Optimal preventive maintenance for equipment with two quality states and general failure time distributions. European Journal of Operational Research, 180( 1): 329–353
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.04.014
36 S, Panagiotidou G, Tagaras (2010). Statistical process control and condition-based maintenance: A meaningful relationship through data sharing. Production and Operations Management, 19( 2): 156–171
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01073.x
37 R, Peng X, He C, Zhong G, Kou H, Xiao (2022). Preventive maintenance for heterogeneous parallel systems with two failure modes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 220: 108310
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108310
38 P, Pinson G, Reikard J R, Bidlot (2012). Probabilistic forecasting of the wave energy flux. Applied Energy, 93: 364–370
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.040
39 M, Radhoui N, Rezg A, Chelbi (2009). Integrated model of preventive maintenance, quality control and buffer sizing for unreliable and imperfect production systems. International Journal of Production Research, 47( 2): 389–402
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802426201
40 H, Rivera-Gómez A, Gharbi J P, Kenné O, Montaño-Arango J R, Corona-Armenta (2020). Joint optimization of production and maintenance strategies considering a dynamic sampling strategy for a deteriorating system. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140: 106273
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106273
41 H, Rivera-Gómez A, Gharbi J P, Kenné R, Ortiz-Zarco J R, Corona-Armenta (2021). Joint production, inspection and maintenance control policies for deteriorating system under quality constraint. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 60: 585–607
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.07.018
42 A, Salmasnia B, Abdzadeh M, Namdar (2017). A joint design of production run length, maintenance policy and control chart with multiple assignable causes. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 42: 44–56
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.11.003
43 A, Salmasnia M, Kaveie M, Namdar (2018). An integrated production and maintenance planning model under VP-T2 Hotelling chart. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 118: 89–103
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.02.021
44 B K, Sett S, Sarkar B, Sarkar (2017). Optimal buffer inventory and inspection errors in an imperfect production system with preventive maintenance. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 90( 1–4): 545–560
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9359-9
45 L, Shi L, Gong D K J, Lin (2018). CRPS chart: Simultaneously monitoring location and scale under data-rich environment. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 34( 4): 681–697
https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2280
46 L, Shi X, Lv Y, He Z, He (2024). Optimizing production, maintenance, and quality control for imperfect manufacturing systems considering timely replenishment. International Journal of Production Research, 62( 10): 3504–3525
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2241563
47 L, Shi H, Ma D K J, Lin (2016). Process capability analysis via continuous ranked probability score. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32( 8): 2823–2834
https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1967
48 P P, Tambe M S, Kulkarni (2022). A reliability based integrated model of maintenance planning with quality control and production decision for improving operational performance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 226: 108681
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108681
49 K A, Tasias (2022). Integrated quality, maintenance and production model for multivariate processes: A Bayesian approach. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 63: 35–51
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.02.008
50 T L, Thorarinsdottir T, Gneiting (2010). Probabilistic forecasts of wind speed: Ensemble model output statistics by using heteroscedastic censored regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society), 173( 2): 371–388
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00616.x
51 W, Wang (2013). Models of inspection, routine service, and replacement for a serviceable one-component system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 116: 57–63
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.006
52 Y, Xiang (2013). Joint optimization of X ̄ control chart and preventive maintenance policies: A discrete-time Markov chain approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 229( 2): 382–390
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.041
53 R I, Zequeira B, Prida J E, Valdés (2004). Optimal buffer inventory and preventive maintenance for an imperfect production process. International Journal of Production Research, 42( 5): 959–974
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540310001631610
54 R I, Zequeira J E, Valdes C, Berenguer (2008). Optimal buffer inventory and opportunistic preventive maintenance under random production capacity availability. International Journal of Production Economics, 111( 2): 686–696
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.037
55 P P ZhouW WangK J Lin DennisY Liu (2023). Another look at run length distribution. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, (forthcoming)
56 Y W, Zhou J, Chen Y, Wu W, Zhou (2015). EPQ models for items with imperfect quality and one-time-only discount. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39( 3-4): 1000–1018
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.07.017
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed