| Energy and Environmental Systems |
|
|
|
A novel framework for the carbon reduction performance of power grids: A case study of provincial power grids within the China Central Power Grid |
Lei JIANG1, Chen LING1, Qing YANG2( ), Pietro BARTOCCI3, Shusong BA4, Shuangquan LIU5 |
1. China-EU Institute for Clean and Renewable Energy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China 2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China 3. RISE Processum AB, SE-89122 Örnsköldsvik, Sweden 4. HSBC Business School, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China 5. System Operation Department., Yunnan Power Grid Co., Ltd, Kunming 650011, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Power grids play a crucial role in connecting electricity suppliers and consumers. They facilitate efficient power transmission and energy management, significantly contributing to the transition toward low-carbon practices across both upstream and downstream sectors. Effectively managing carbon reduction in the power industry is essential for enhancing carbon reduction efficiency and achieving dual-carbon goals. Recent studies have focused on the outcomes of carbon reduction efforts rather than the management process. However, when power grids prioritize the process of carbon reduction in their management, they are more likely to achieve better results. To address this gap, we propose an evaluation model for managing carbon reduction activities in power grids, comprising the carbon management efficiency (CME) module based on the maturity model and the carbon reduction efficiency (CRE) module based on the entropy method. The CME module provides a scorecard corresponding to a detailed and continuous evaluation model for carbon management processes to calculate its performance. Simultaneously, the CRE module relates carbon reduction results to the development direction of the government and power grid, allowing for effective adjustments and updates based on actual situations. The evaluation model was applied to provincial power grids within the China Central Power Grid. The results reveal that despite some fluctuations in carbon reduction performance, provincial power grids within the China Central Power Grid have made continuous progress in carbon reduction efforts. According to the synergy model, there is evidence suggesting that power grids are steadily improving their carbon reduction performance, and a more organized approach would lead to a greater degree of synergy. The evaluation model applies to power grids, and its framework can be extended to other industries, providing a theoretical reference for evaluating their carbon reduction efforts.
|
| Keywords
power grid
carbon reduction
evaluation model
maturity model
synergy model
|
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Qing YANG
|
|
Just Accepted Date: 23 July 2024
Online First Date: 27 August 2024
Issue Date: 26 September 2024
|
|
| 1 |
F H, Aghdam N T, Kalantari S N, Ravadanegh (2020). Reconfiguration-based hierarchical energy management in multimicrogrid systems considering power losses, reliability index, and voltage enhancement. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 28( 5): 2433–2447
https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1907-114
|
| 2 |
R, Alizadeh R G, Beiragh L, Soltanisehat E, Soltanzadeh P D, Lund (2020). Performance evaluation of complex electricity generation systems: A dynamic network-based data envelopment analysis approach. Energy Economics, 91: 104894
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104894
|
| 3 |
P, Antunes P, Carreira M M, da Silva (2014). Towards an energy management maturity model. Energy Policy, 73: 803–814
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.011
|
| 4 |
C Fan (2018). The research on low-carbon performance evaluation of listed thermal power generation companies based on the DPSIR model. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Nanchang: East China Jiao Tong University (in Chinese)
|
| 5 |
V H, Hoffmann T, Busch (2008). Corporate carbon performance indicators. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12( 4): 505–520
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00066.x
|
| 6 |
Y H Jin (2022). The systematic evaluation methods for energy management performance in enterprises. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology (in Chinese)
|
| 7 |
R J, Kuo C W, Hsu Y L, Chen (2015). Integration of fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating carbon performance of suppliers. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12( 12): 3863–3876
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0819-9
|
| 8 |
H, Liu Y, Liu H, Wang J, Yang X, Zhou (2019). Research on the coordinated development of greenization and urbanization based on system dynamics and data envelopment analysis——A case study of Tianjin. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214: 195–208
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.046
|
| 9 |
J LiuW Liu L JinT Tu Y (2020) Ding. A performance evaluation framework of electricity markets in China. In: 5th Asia Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering (ACPEE): IEEE 2020: 1043–8
|
| 10 |
X Y, Luo (2018). The construction of a carbon performance evaluation index system for enterprises based on the “3E” triangle model. Communication of Finance and Accounting, 29: 61–64 (in Chinese)
|
| 11 |
M, Modak K, Pathak K K, Ghosh (2017). Performance evaluation of outsourcing decision using a BSC and fuzzy AHP approach: A case of the Indian coal mining organization. Resources Policy, 52: 181–191
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.03.002
|
| 12 |
J K, Myung H, An S, Lee (2019). Corporate competitiveness index of climate change: A balanced scorecard approach. Sustainability, 11( 5): 1445
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051445
|
| 13 |
V, Nakthong K, Kubaha (2019). Development of a sustainability index for an energy management system in Thailand. Sustainability, 11( 17): 4587
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174587
|
| 14 |
S, Qi M, Ju M, Duan M, Xing (2012). Research on low carbon management using a scientific classification method. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 6( 4): 524–530
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0333-3
|
| 15 |
M G, Rietbergen I J, Opstelten K, Blok (2017). Improving energy and carbon management in construction and civil engineering companies—Evaluating the impacts of the CO2 performance ladder. Energy Efficiency, 10( 1): 55–79
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9436-9
|
| 16 |
B P Statistics (2020). Statistical review of world energy 2020.
|
| 17 |
W, Tan W, Shen J, Zhao (2007). A methodology for dynamic enterprise process performance evaluation. Computers in Industry, 58( 5): 474–485
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.10.001
|
| 18 |
S, Yun R O, Hamburger C A, Cornell D A, Foutch (2002). Seismic performance evaluation for steel moment frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128( 4): 534–545
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(534)
|
| 19 |
C, Zhang T O, Randhir Y, Zhang (2018). Theory and practice of enterprise carbon asset management from the perspective of low-carbon transformation. Carbon Management, 9( 1): 87–94
https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1426329
|
| 20 |
Q, Zhang B, Gu H, Zhang Q, Ji (2023). Emission reduction mode of China’s provincial transportation sector: Based on “Energy+” carbon efficiency evaluation. Energy Policy, 177: 113556
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113556
|
| 21 |
Z, Zhou J, Liu H, Zeng M, Xu S, Li (2022). Carbon performance evaluation model from the perspective of circular economy—The case of Chinese thermal power enterprise. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 1: 1–15
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|