Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Engineering Management

ISSN 2095-7513

ISSN 2096-0255(Online)

CN 10-1205/N

Postal Subscription Code 80-905

Front. Eng    0, Vol. Issue () : 187-196    https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2016038
LARGE-SCALE PROJECTS MANAGEMENT
Silk Roads for the 21st Century: Engineering Mega-Infrastructure for Development and Sustainability
Tony Marjoram()
UNESCO Centre for Problem-Based Learning in Engineering Science and Sustainability, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
 Download: PDF(1219 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Infrastructure facilitates the movement of people, the production and distribution of goods and services, and underpins development. Infrastructure is expensive and long-lasting, and needs long-term policy, planning and management, in terms of design, construction, operation and maintenance. Infrastructure relates particularly to engineering and technology. All technological change brings economic, social, cultural and environmental change, planned and unpredicted. Mega levels of technology bring mega levels of change, effects and impacts. Mega infrastructure such as the Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st Century Maritime Silk Road, the “One Belt, One Road” (OBOR) initiative, announced by President Xi Jinping in 2013, will require equally mega policy, planning and management. This paper will discuss policy, planning and management issues relating to mega infrastructure and the OBOR initiative, with particular reference to energy, communications, transportation, health, emergency preparedness and response, and less predictable areas of change, for example in disease prevention and control, within the overall need for economic, environmental and ecological sustainability. The paper will discuss associated needs for education, training and capacity building in engineering. The paper will also refer to lessons learnt from the original Silk Road in the context of the development of civilizations and intercultural dialogue through the transfer of goods, services, technologies, ideas, knowledge, customs, cultures and philosophies, less predictable and unwanted transfers, for example of disease, and the need for awareness, policy, planning and management of such wider issues.

Keywords infrastructure      growth      development      sustainability      change      new Silk Roads     
Corresponding Author(s): Tony Marjoram   
Online First Date: 24 November 2016    Issue Date: 22 December 2016
 Cite this article:   
Tony Marjoram. Silk Roads for the 21st Century: Engineering Mega-Infrastructure for Development and Sustainability[J]. Front. Eng, 0, (): 187-196.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/10.15302/J-FEM-2016038
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/Y0/V/I/187
Fig.1  Global infrastructure investment 2013–2030.
Fig.2  Waves of innovation—Kondratiev waves.
Fig.3  Published in English (2010) and Chinese (2015), translated at Tsinghua University.
Fig.4  The Silk Road.
Fig.5  Social, economic, environmental change.
1 Beanland, D., & Hadgraft, R. (2014). Engineering education: Innovation and transformation. Melbourne: RMIT Publications.
2 De Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2007). Management of change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
3 Dobbs, R., Pohl, H., Lin, D., Mischke, J., Garemo, N., Hexter, J., Matzinger, S., Palter, R., & Nanavatty, R. (2013). Infrastructure productivity: How to save $1 trillion a year. McKinsey Global Institute.
4 Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5–24.
5 Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
6 IPCC. (2007). Synthesis report, intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: IPCC.
7 Lin, J., Wang, S., Yu, S., & Qiao, W. (2015). PETOE: A new multi-sector collaboration mechanism for engineering training in China. International Journal of Chinese Education, 4, 234–249.
https://doi.org/10.1163/22125868-12340054
8 Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National innovation systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Pub Ltd.
9 Mackenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (1985). The social shaping of technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
10 Marjoram, T. (2014a). Engineering education—Innovate and transform, for innovation and development. In Christensen, S. H., Didier, C., & Jamison, A. (Eds.), International Perspectives on Engineering Education: Engineering Education and Practice in Context. Germany: Springer.
11 Marjoram, T. (2014b). Identifying engineering: Developing indicators, epistemology and engineering studies. In Christensen, S. H., Didier, C., & Jamison, A. (Eds.), Engineering practice in context: Engineering identities, epistemologies and values: Engineering education and practice in context. Germany: Springer.
12 Morton, O. (2009). Wanted: Green Engineers. The Economist.
13 OECD. (2016). Integrity framework for public investment. Paris: OECD.
14 Pianin, E. (2014, <Date>December 5</Date>). Obama says China’s infrastructure puts the U.S. to shame. The Fiscal Times. Retrieved from
15 Standard and Poor’s. (2014, <Date>January</Date>). Global Infrastructure: How to fill a $500 billion hole. Ratings Direct.
16 UNEP. (2016). World Environment Day, background information. New York: UNEP.
17 Wall, K . (2010). Engineering: Issues, challenges and opportunities for development. Paris: UNESCO.
18 Von Weizsäcker, E. U., Hargroves, K., Smith, M. H., Desha, C., & Stasinopoulos, P. (2009). Factor five: Transforming the global economy through 80% improvements in resource productivity. In Von Weizsäcker, E. U. (Ed.), Eanst Ulrich von Weizsächer. Springer International Publishing.
19 World Bank. (2016a). Logistics performance index, global rankings, 2016. Washington: World Bank.
20 World Bank. (2016b). China country overview. Washington DC: World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/china/overview#1
21 Xue, L. (2006). Universities in China’s national innovation system. UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge, UNESCO, Paris, 29 November-1 December, 2006.
[1] Yan LIU, Erik-Jan HOUWING, Marcel HERTOGH, Hans BAKKER. Project-based learning principles: Insights from the development of large infrastructure[J]. Front. Eng, 2024, 11(3): 501-515.
[2] Zongrun WANG, Xuxin CAO, Xiaohang REN. Green development and economic resilience: Evidence from Chinese resource-based cities[J]. Front. Eng, 2024, 11(2): 194-206.
[3] Xiaohong CHEN, Chunfang LU, Weihua LIU, Siyu WANG, Shangsong LONG, Jingcheng QIU, Yujie WANG. Supporting factors model for the sustainable step development of supply chain: An empirical study from China with grounded theory[J]. Front. Eng, 2024, 11(2): 311-325.
[4] Liang MA, Yangyang HU, Liuying ZHU, Yongjian KE. Are public‒private partnerships still an answer for social infrastructure? A systematic literature review[J]. Front. Eng, 2023, 10(3): 467-482.
[5] Xiaohong CHEN, Xiangbo TANG, Xuanhua XU. Digital technology-driven smart society governance mechanism and practice exploration[J]. Front. Eng, 2023, 10(2): 319-338.
[6] Shuangshuang ZHANG, Hongfeng WANG, Guo LI, Junwei WANG. Modeling of the resilient supply chain system from a perspective of production design changes[J]. Front. Eng, 2023, 10(1): 96-106.
[7] Hong-Bin YAN, Ziyu LI. Review of sentiment analysis: An emotional product development view[J]. Front. Eng, 2022, 9(4): 592-609.
[8] Zhiqiang ZHANG, Sansan DING, Changlong ZHAO, Xin LIANG. Development progress of China’s 600 km/h high-speed magnetic levitation train[J]. Front. Eng, 2022, 9(3): 509-515.
[9] Lu ZHEN, Haolin LI. A literature review of smart warehouse operations management[J]. Front. Eng, 2022, 9(1): 31-55.
[10] Guanwen ZENG, Zhiyuan SUN, Shiyan LIU, Xiaoqi CHEN, Daqing LI, Jianjun WU, Ziyou GAO. Percolation-based health management of complex traffic systems[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(4): 557-571.
[11] Dequn ZHOU, Hao DING, Qunwei WANG, Bin SU. Literature review on renewable energy development and China’s roadmap[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(2): 212-222.
[12] Jinbo SONG, Chen QIAN, Zhuo FENG, Liang MA. Measuring residents’ anxiety under urban redevelopment in China: An investigation of demographic variables[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(1): 48-59.
[13] Yamuna KALUARACHCHI. Potential advantages in combining smart and green infrastructure over silo approaches for future cities[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(1): 98-108.
[14] Pengfei ZHANG, Samuel T. ARIARATNAM. Life cycle cost savings analysis on traditional drainage systems from low impact development strategies[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(1): 88-97.
[15] Yifeng TIAN, Zheng LU, Peter ADRIAENS, R. Edward MINCHIN, Alastair CAITHNESS, Junghoon WOO. Finance infrastructure through blockchain-based tokenization[J]. Front. Eng, 2020, 7(4): 485-499.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed