Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front Earth Sci Chin    2010, Vol. 4 Issue (4) : 471-480    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-010-0138-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Influence of using rice husk ash in soil stabilization method with lime
A. J. CHOOBBASTI1, H. GHODRAT2, M. J. VAHDATIRAD1(), S. FIROUZIAN1, A. BARARI3, M. TORABI4, A. BAGHERIAN1
1. Department of Civil Engineering, Babol University of Technology, Babol 4714871167, Iran; 2. Faculty of Engineering, Tarbiat Moallem University, Tehran 15614, Iran; 3. Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg 9000, Denmark; 4. Faculty of Mining, Geophysics and Petroleum, Shahroud University of Technology, Shahroud 3619995161, Iran
 Download: PDF(450 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

In clayey lands, swelling problem causes vertical displacements on road subbase, and finally, failure in pavement occurs due to lack of appropriate drainage systems. One popular and inexpensive method of soil stabilization is using lime. Investigations indicate that based on environmental and atmospheric conditions, the chemical reaction of lime and clayey soil is not accomplished well, owning to low temperature and high humidity. This paper aims to investigate the influence of adding rice husk ash on the reaction between soil and lime and lime reaction and determine soil physical and mechanical characteristics. Therefore, sufficient laboratory soil tests, such as Atterberg limits, compaction, California bearing ratio (CBR), and direct shear test are carried out, and the results are analyzed. The results generally indicate that adding lime and rice husk ash (RHA) causes a decrease in dry density and an increase in optimum water content. Increasing lime and RHA causes a decreasing rate in soil liquid limit and plastic limit. Adding lime and RHA to the soil causes a decrease in deformability of soil samples and gives more brittle materials. Also, this action causes an increase in shear strength. Moreover, increasing in CBR amount under the influence of increasing RHA is one of the main results of this paper.

Keywords rice husk ash (RHA)      lime      soil laboratory tests      additives      soil stabilization     
Corresponding Author(s): VAHDATIRAD M. J.,Email:j_vahdati@yahoo.com   
Issue Date: 05 December 2010
 Cite this article:   
A. J. CHOOBBASTI,H. GHODRAT,M. J. VAHDATIRAD, et al. Influence of using rice husk ash in soil stabilization method with lime[J]. Front Earth Sci Chin, 2010, 4(4): 471-480.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-010-0138-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2010/V4/I4/471
pHShrinkage limit/%Plasticity index/%Plastic limit/%Liquid limit/%Specific gravity (Gs)
6.519821292.79
Tab.1  Technical specifications of investigated soil
ParameterClMgOCaOFe2O3Al2O3SiO2
Amount0.012871555
Tab.2  Chemical analysis of investigated soil /%
Fig.1  Produced RHA
ParameterP/(×10-6)Mg2+/(×10-6)Ca2+/(×10-6)K/(×10-6)Na/(×10-6)SiO2/(×10-6)
Amount24.766.10.0160.1240.11483.7
Tab.3  Chemical characteristics of produced ash/%
ParameterDensity/(kg·m-3)Matter size/μmSpecial surface/(m2·g-1)
Amount2000-23004.8-8.960-130
Tab.4  Physical characteristics of produced ash
MatterNon hydrated caoNon hydrated mgoCO2Ca(OH)2
Percent1.710.8093.69
Tab.5  Characteristics of used lime
IndexMix design
SSoil without additive
S+ 4LSoil+ 4% lime
S+ 4L+3RSoil+ 4% lime+ 3% ash
S+ 4L+5RSoil+ 4% lime+ 5% ash
S+ 4L+7RSoil+ 4% lime+ 7% ash
S+ 6L+3RSoil+ 6% lime+ 3% ash
S+ 6L+5RSoil+ 6% lime+ 5% ash
S+ 6L+7RSoil+ 6% lime+ 7% ash
Tab.6  Investigated mixtures and mentioned indexes
Fig.2  Influence of RHA on maximum specific gravity
Fig.3  Influence of RHA on optimum water content parameter
Fig.4  Influence of RHA and lime on liquid limit parameter
Fig.5  Influence of RHA and lime on plastic limit parameter
Fig.6  Influence of RHA and lime on plasticity index parameter
Fig.7  Stress-strain curves of 0-d samples with normal load equal to 100 kPa
Fig.8  Stress-strain curves of 0-d samples with normal load equal to 200 kPa
Fig.9  Stress-strain curves of 0-d samples with normal load equal to 300 kPa
Fig.10  Influence of lime and RHA on cohesion parameter of 0-d samples
Fig.11  Influence of lime and RHA on internal friction angle parameter of 0-d samples
Fig.12  Stress-strain curves of 28-d samples with normal load equal to 100 kPa
Fig.13  Stress-strain curves of 28-d samples with normal load equal to 200 kPa
Fig.14  Stress-strain curves of 28-d samples with normal load equal to 300 kPa
Fig.15  Influence of lime and RHA on cohesion of 28-d soil samples
Fig.16  Influence of lime and RHA on internal friction angle of 28-d soil samples
Fig.17  Influence of lime and RHA on maximum shear strength (normal load= 100 kPa)
Fig.18  Influence of lime and RHA on maximum shear strength (normal load= 200 kPa)
Fig.19  Influence of lime and RHA on maximum shear strength (normal load= 300 kPa)
Fig.20  Influence of sample caring on maximum shear strength (normal load= 100 kPa)
Fig.21  Influence of lime and RHA on dilation parameter of 0-d samples (normal load= 200 kPa)
Fig.22  Influence of lime and RHA on dilation of 28-d soil samples (normal load= 200 kPa)
Fig.23  Influence of lime and RHA on CBR test results of the soil (optimum water content)
Fig.24  Influence of lime and RHA on CBR test results of the soil (saturated condition)
1 Alhassan M (2008). Permeability of lateritic soil treated with lime and rice husk ash. Assumption University Journal of Thailand , 12(2): 115–120
2 Ali F H, Adnan A, Choy C K (1992). Geotechnical properties of a chemically stabilized soil from Malaysia with rice husk ash as an additive. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Journal , 10(2): 117–134
doi: 10.1007/BF00881147
3 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (1986). Standard Specifications for Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures for Highway Construction Purposes (M145). Washington D C, USA
4 American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM) (2002). Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (D0698-07E01). Annual Books of ASTM Standard, Section 4 Vol. 0408 USA
5 American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM) (2002). Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils (D4318-05). Annual Books of ASTM Standard, Section 4 Vol. 0408 USA
6 American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM) (2002). Test Methods for Direct Shear Test of Soils under Consolidated Drained Conditions (D3080-04). Annual Books of ASTM Standard, Section 4 Vol. 0408 USA
7 American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM) (2002). Test Methods for Expansion Index of Soils (D4829-08A). Annual Books of ASTM Standard, Section 4 Vol. 0408 USA
8 American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM) (2002). Test Methods for CBR (California Bearing Ratio) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils (D1883-07). Annual Books of ASTM Standard, Section 4 Vol. 0408 USA
9 Balasubramaniam A S, Lin D G, Acharya S S S, Kamruzzaman A H M (1999). Behavior of soft Bangkok clay treated with additives. The 11th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanic and Geotechnical Engineering, Seoul , 1: 11–14
10 Basha E A, Hashim R, Mahmud H B, Muntohar A S (2005). Stabilization of residual soil with rice husk ash and cement. Journal of Construction and Building Materials , 19(6): 448–453
doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.08.001
11 Chang Y, Shao C, Yi-Guang W (2009). On the enhancement of electroosmotic soil improvement by the injection of saline solutions. Journal of Applied Clay Science , 44(1-2): 130–136
12 Jha J N, Gill K G (2006). Effect of rice husk ash on lime stabilization. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India) , 87: 33–39
13 Ladd C C, Moh Z C, Lambe T W (1960). Recent Soil—Lime Research At The Massachusetts Institute Of Technology. 39th Annual Meeting, Highway Research Board . Washington D C, USA, 64–84
14 Lazaro R C, Moh Z C (1970). Stabilization of deltaic clays with lime-rice husk ash admixtures. The 2nd Southeast Asian Conference on Soil Engineering, Singapore , 215–223
15 Marks B D, Haliburton T A (1970). Effect Of Sodium Chloride And Sodium Chloride—Lime Admixtures On Cohesive Oklahoma Soils. 49th Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board , Washington D C, USA
16 Mehta P K (1992). Rice Husk Ash—A Unique Supplementary Cementing Material. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Advances in Concrete Technology, Athens, Greece , 407–430
17 Muntohar A S (2004). Uses of RHA to Enhanced Lime-Stabilized Clay Soil. International Conference of Geotechnical Engineering, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirate
18 Muntohar A S, Hantoro G (2000). Influence of the rice husk ash and lime on engineering properties of clayey subgrade. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 5: 1–19
19 Muntohar A S, Hashim R (2002) Silica Waste Utilisation In Ground Improvement: A Study Of Expansive Clay Treated With LRHA. The 4th International Conference on Environmental Geotechnics, Rio de Janeiro , 1: 515–519
20 Mustapha A M, Alhassan M (2005). Effect of Bagasse ash on cement stabilized laterite. Seminar presented in the Department of Civil Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
21 Mylavarapu R S, Zinati G M (2009). Improvement of soil properties using compost for optimum parsley production in sandy soils. Journal of Scientia Horticulturae , 120(3): 426–430
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.11.038
22 Nair D G, Fraaij A, Klaassen A K, Kentgens P M (2008). A structural investigation relating to the pozzolanic activity of rice husk ashes. Journal of Cement and Concrete Research , 38(6): 861–869
doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.10.004
23 Neville A M (2000). Properties of Concrete. 4th ed. Pearson Education Asia Ltd., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
24 Noor M, Abdol Aziz A, Suhadi R (1990). Effects of cement rice husk ash mixtures on compaction, strength and durability of Melaka Series lateritic soil. Journal of Institution of Engineers Malaysia , 47: 61–64
25 O’Flaherty C A (1974). Highway Engineering, Vol. 2. London: Edward Arnold
26 Ola S A (1983). Permeability of some compacted Nigerian soils. Balkema, the Netherlands , 155–171
27 Osinubi K J (1998). Permeability of lime-treated lateritic soil. Transp Engrg J , 124(5): 465–469
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:5(465)
28 Osula D O A (1991). Lime modification of problem laterite. Journal of Engineering Geology , 30(2): 141–154
doi: 10.1016/0013-7952(91)90040-R
29 Oyetola E B, Abdullahi M (2006). The use of rice husk ash in low-cost sandcrete block production. Leonardo Electronic Journal of Practice and Technology , 5(8): 58–70
30 Rahman M A (1987). Effect of cement—rice husk ash mixtures on geotechnical properties of lateritic soils. Journal of Soils and Foundations , 27(2): 61–65
31 Rogers C D F, Glendinning S (1997). Improvement of clay soils in situ using lime piles in the UK. Journal of Engineering Geology , 47(3): 243–257
doi: 10.1016/S0013-7952(97)00022-7
[1] Zhoujie CHENG, Ming WEI, Yaping ZHU, Jie BAI, Xiaoguang SUN, Li GAO. Cloud type identification for a landfalling typhoon based on millimeter-wave radar range-height-indicator data[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(4): 829-835.
[2] Khelifa HARICHANE, Mohamed GHRICI, Hanifi MISSOUM. Influence of natural pozzolana and lime additives on the temporal variation of soil compaction and shear strength[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2011, 5(2): 162-169.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed