Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    2018, Vol. 12 Issue (3) : 545-554    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-017-0676-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
In-situ stress distribution and coalbed methane reservoir permeability in the Linxing area, eastern Ordos Basin, China
Wei JU1,2(), Jian SHEN1,2, Yong QIN1,2, Shangzhi MENG3, Chao LI2, Guozhang LI2, Guang YANG2
1. Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources and Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
2. School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
3. China United Coalbed Methane Corporation, Ltd., Beijing 100011, China
 Download: PDF(2172 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Understanding the distribution of in-situ stresses is extremely important in a wide range of fields such as oil and gas exploration and development, CO2 sequestration, borehole stability, and stress-related geohazards assessment. In the present study, the in-situ stress distribution in the Linxing area of eastern Ordos Basin, China, was analyzed based on well tested parameters. The maximum horizontal principal stress (SHmax), minimum horizontal principal stress (Shmin), and vertical stress (Sv) were calculated, and they were linearly correlated with burial depth. In general, two types of in-situ stress fields were determined in the Linxing area: (i) the in-situ stress state followed the relation Sv>SHmax>Shmin in shallow layers with burial depths of less than about 940 m, indicating a normal faulting stress regime; (ii) the SHmax magnitude increased conspicuously and was greater than the Sv magnitude in deep layers with depths more than about 940 m, and the in-situ stress state followed the relation SHmax>Sv>Shmin, demonstrating a strike-slip faulting stress regime. The horizontal differential stress (SHmaxShmin) increased with burial depth, indicating that wellbore instability may be a potentially significant problem when drilling deep vertical wells. The lateral stress coefficient ranged from 0.73 to 1.08 with an average of 0.93 in the Linxing area. The coalbed methane (CBM) reservoir permeability was also analyzed. No obvious exponential relationship was found between coal permeability and effective in-situ stress magnitude. Coal permeability was relatively high under a larger effective in-situ stress magnitude. Multiple factors, including fracture development, contribute to the variation of CBM reservoir permeability in the Linxing area of eastern Ordos Basin.

Keywords in-situ stress      coalbed methane      permeability      lateral stress coefficient      Linxing area      Ordos Basin     
Corresponding Author(s): Wei JU   
Just Accepted Date: 27 September 2017   Online First Date: 14 November 2017    Issue Date: 05 September 2018
 Cite this article:   
Wei JU,Jian SHEN,Yong QIN, et al. In-situ stress distribution and coalbed methane reservoir permeability in the Linxing area, eastern Ordos Basin, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(3): 545-554.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-017-0676-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2018/V12/I3/545
Fig.1  Geologic conditions in the Linxing area of eastern Ordos Basin, China. (a) coal thickness in the Benxi Formation; (b) generalized stratigraphic column of the Benxi Formation, Taiyuan Formation and Shanxi Formation.
Fig.2  Schematic illustration showing the Andersonian tectonic classification (after Brooke-Barnett et al., 2015). The pink plane represents the orientation of a propagated hydraulic fracture in the associated tectonic classification.
Fig.3  Relationships among the Po, Pf, Pr, and Pc and burial depth in the Linxing area. (a) Relationship between the Po and burial depth, (b) relationship between the Pf and burial depth, (c) relationship between the Pr and burial depth, and (d) relationship between the Pc and burial depth.
WellTest interval/(m, bgl)Po /(MPa)Pf /(MPa)Pr/ (MPa)Pc /(MPa)SHmax /(MPa)Shmin /(MPa)Sv /(MPa)
TopBottomAverage
L-31411.301417.201414.2512.7531.3331.3028.7142.0828.7138.18
1495.901500.801498.3513.6835.0834.6130.1242.0730.1240.46
L-41300.101317.401308.7512.9732.7429.0626.7538.2226.7535.34
L-81466.601472.101469.3014.9032.0431.7026.0531.5526.0539.67
L-121473.201480.101476.6514.0636.5736.4929.8739.0629.8739.87
1514.801519.201517.0015.2143.6140.4936.0452.4236.0440.96
1611.701616.701614.2015.7453.8849.4433.9136.5533.9143.58
1700.001717.001708.5017.4347.8446.2939.9156.0139.9146.13
L-131737.801752.001744.9017.2047.0841.7437.6353.9637.6347.11
L-161368.701387.801378.2513.6235.0333.2731.4047.3231.4037.21
1709.401715.501712.4515.5342.9435.5633.9850.8533.9846.24
Tab.1  In-situ stress magnitudes in the Linxing area
Fig.4  The Sv, SHmax and Shmin magnitude in the Linxing area. (a) distribution of calculated in-situ stress magnitudes, (b) distribution pattern of in-situ stress magnitudes.
Fig.5  Scatter diagrams showing lateral stress coefficient variation with burial depth (a) in the world (after Brown and Hoek, 1978; Hoek and Brown, 1980) and (b) in China (after Yang et al., 2012).
Fig.6  The relationship between lateral stress coefficient and burial depth in the Linxing area.
Fig.7  Scatter diagrams showing the relationship between in-situ stress ratio and burial depth in the Linxing area. (a) Relationship between the SHmax/Shmin ratio and burial depth, (b) relationship between the Sv/SHmax ratio and burial depth, and (c) relationship between the Sv/Shmin ratio and burial depth.
Fig.8  The relationship between effective Shmin and effective Sv in the Linxing area.
Coal
seam
Number of measured coal plugsDepth/(m)Permeability
/(mD)
Effective SHmax/(MPa)Effective Shmin/(MPa)Effective Sv/(MPa)
  Min–MaxAverageMin–MaxAverageMin–MaxAverageMin–MaxAverageMin–MaxAverage
No. 4+571635.00–1886.901723.60.036–9.6201.99932.190–37.90834.20119.092–22.89620.4328.366–32.69929.89
No. 8+971769.20–1930.201831.890.080–9.8602.3135.236–38.89136.65921.079–23.55022.06530.675–33.44431.753
Tab.2  Coal permeability and effective in-situ stress magnitudes in the Linxing area
Fig.9  Photos showing the development of fractures in coal seams in the Linxing area. (a) Well L-4, No. 8+9 coal seam, –1823.00 m; (b) Well L-4, No. 8+9 coal seam, –1827.10 m.
1 Altmann J B, Muller T M, Muller B I R, Tingay M R P, Heidbach O (2010). Poroelastic contribution to the reservoir stress path. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 47(7): 1104–1113
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.08.001
2 Anderson E M (1951). The Dynamics of Faulting and Dyke Formation with Applications to Britain (2nd ed). Edinburgh: Oliver
3 Bell J S (2006). In-situ stress and coal bed methane potential in Western Canada. Bull Can Pet Geol, 54(3): 197–220
https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.54.3.197
4 Bell J S, Bachu S (2003). In situ stress magnitude and orientation estimates for Cretaceous coal-bearing strata beneath the plains area of central and southern Alberta. Bull Can Pet Geol, 51(1): 1–28
https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.51.1.1
5 Binh N T T, Tokunaga T, Son H P, Van Binh M (2007). Present-day stress and pore pressure fields in the Cuu Long and Nam Con Son Basins, offshore Vietnam. Mar Pet Geol, 24(10): 607–615
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.04.002
6 Bredehoeft J D, Wolff R G, Keys W S, Shuter E (1976). Hydraulic fracturing to determine regional in situ stress field, Piceance Basin, Colorado. Geol Soc Am Bull, 87(2): 250–258
https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1976)87<250:HFTDTR>2.0.CO;2
7 Brooke-Barnett S, Flottmann T, Paul P K, Busetti S, Hennings P, Reid R, Rosenbaum G (2015). Influence of basement structures on in situ stresses over the Surat Basin, southeast Queensland. J Geophys Res Solid Earth, 120(7): 4946–4965
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB011964
8 Brown E T, Hoek E (1978). Trends in relationships between measured in situ stresses and depth. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 15(4): 211–215
https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(78)91227-5
9 Bustin R M, Cui X, Chikatamarla L (2008). Impacts of volumetric strain on CO2 sequestration in coals and enhanced CH4 recovery. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull, 92: 15–29
10 Chen G, Ding C, Xu L M, Zhang H R, Hu Y X, Yang F, Li N, Mao X N (2012). Analysis on the thermal history and uplift process of Zijinshan intrusive complex in the eastern Ordos Basin. Chin J Geophys, 55(11): 3731–3741 (in Chinese)
11 Enever J R, Yassir N, Willoughby D R, Addis M A (1996). Recent experience with extended leak-off tests for in-situ stress measurement in Australia. The APPEA Journal, 36(1): 528–535
12 Finkbeiner T, Zoback M, Flemings P, Stump B (2001). Stress, pore pressure, and dynamically constrained hydrocarbon columns in the South Eugene Island 330 field, northern Gulf of Mexico. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull, 85: 1007–1031
13 Gentzis T (2009). Stability analysis of horizontal coalbed methane well in the Rocky Mountain Front Ranges of southeast British Columbia, Canada. Int J Coal Geol, 77(3–4): 328–337
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2008.05.016
14 Gu J Y, Zhang B, Guo M Q (2016). Deep coalbed methane enrichment rules and its exploration and development prospect in Linxing block. Journal of China Coal Society, 41(1): 72–79 (in Chinese)
15 Guo B G, Xu H, Meng S Z, Zhang W Z, Liu Y N, Luo H H, Li Y, Shen W M (2012). Geology condition analysis for unconventional gas co-exploration and concurrent production in Linxing area. China Coalbed Methane, 9(4): 3–6 (in Chinese)
16 Hillis R R (2001). Coupled changes in pore pressure and stress in oil fields and sedimentary basins. Petrol Geosci, 7(4): 419–425
https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.7.4.419
17 Hoek E, Brown E T(1980). Underground Excavations in Rock. London: The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy
18 Hubbert M K, Willis D G (1957). Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing. Petroleum Transactions, the American Institute of Mining. Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 210: 153–168
19 Jones S C (1972). A rapid accurate unsteady-state klinkenberg permeameter. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 12(5): 383–397
https://doi.org/10.2118/3535-PA
20 Ju W, Shen J, Qin Y, Meng S Z, Wu C F, Shen Y L, Yang Z B, Li G Z, Li C (2017). In-situ stress state in the Linxing region, eastern Ordos Basin, China: implications for unconventional gas exploration and production. Mar Pet Geol, 86: 66–78
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.05.026
21 Ju W, Sun W F (2016). Tectonic fractures in the Lower Cretaceous Xiagou Formation of Qingxi Oilfield, Jiuxi Basin, NW China. Part two: numerical simulation of tectonic stress field and prediction of tectonic fractures. J Petrol Sci Eng, 146: 626–636
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.05.002
22 Ju W, Sun W F, Hou G T (2015). Insights into the tectonic fractures in the Yanchang Formation interbedded sandstone-mudstone of the Ordos Basin based on core data and geomechanical models. Acta Geol Sin, 89(6): 1986–1997
https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.12612
23 Kang H, Zhang X, Si L, Wu Y, Gao F (2010). In-situ stress measurements and stress distribution characteristics in underground coal mines in China. Eng Geol, 116(3–4): 333–345
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.09.015
24 Konstantinovskaya E, Malo M, Castillo D A (2012). Present-day stress analysis of the St. Lawrence Lowlands sedimentary basin (Canada) and implications for caprock integrity during CO2 injection operations. Tectonophysics, 518: 119–137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.11.022
25 Li Y, Tang D Z, Xu H, Yu T X (2014). In-situ stress distribution and its implication on coalbed methane development in Liulin area, eastern Ordos Basin, China. J Petrol Sci Eng, 122: 488–496
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.08.010
26 Matthews W R, Kelly J (1967). How to predict formation pressure and fracture gradient. Oil Gas J, 65: 92–106
27 McKee C R, Bumb A C, Koenig R A (1988). Stress-dependent permeability and porosity of coal and other geologic formations. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 3(1): 81–91
https://doi.org/10.2118/12858-PA
28 Meng Z P, Zhang J C, Wang R (2011). In-situ stress, pore pressure and stress-dependent permeability in the Southern Qinshui Basin. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 48(1): 122–131
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.10.003
29 Nian T, Wang G W, Xiao C W, Zhou L, Deng L, Li R J (2016). The in situ stress determination from borehole image logs in the Kuqa Depression. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 34: 1077–1084
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.08.005
30 Paul S, Chatterjee R (2011). Determination of in situ stress direction from cleat orientation mapping for coal bed methane exploration in south-eastern part of Jharia coalfield, India. Int J Coal Geol, 87(2): 87–96
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2011.05.003
31 Rajabi M, Tingay M R P, Heidbach O (2016). The present-day state of tectonic stress in the Darling Basin, Australia: implications for exploration and production. Mar Pet Geol, 77: 776–790
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.07.021
32 Ritts B D, Hanson A D, Darby B J, Nanson L, Berry A (2004). Sedimentary record of Triassic intraplate extension in North China: evidence from the nonmarine NW Ordos Basin, Helan Shan and Zhuozi Shan. Tectonophysics, 386(3–4): 177–202
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2004.06.003
33 Seidle J P, Jeansonne M W, Erickson D J (1992). Application of matchstick geometry to stress dependent permeability in coals. In: SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Casper.
https://doi.org/10.2118/24361-MS
34 Sibson R (1994). Crustal stress, faulting and fluid flow. In: Parnell J, ed. Geofluids: Origin, Migration and Evolution of Fluids in Sedimentary Basins. Geological Society of London, Special Publication 78: 69–84
35 Somerton W H, Soylemezoglu I M, Dudley R C (1975). Effect of stress on permeability of coal. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 12(5–6): 129–145/0148-9062(75)91244-9
https://doi.org/10.1016
36 Sun L Z, Kang Y S, Wang J, Jiang S Y, Zhang B, Gu J Y, Ye J P, Zhang S R(2017). Vertical transformation of in-situ stress types and its control on coalbed reservoir permeability. Geological Journal of China Universities, 23(1): 148–156 (in Chinese)
37 Tingay M R P, Hills R R, Morley C K, King R C, Swarbrick R E, Damit A R (2009). Present-day stress and neotectonics of Brunei: implications for petroleum exploration and production. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull, 93(1): 75–100
38 Tingay M R P, Morley C K, Hillis R R, Meyer J (2010). Present-day stress orientation in Thailand’s basins. J Struct Geol, 32(2): 235–248
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2009.11.008
39 White A J, Traugott M O, Swarbrick R E (2002). The use of leak-off tests as means of predicting minimum in-situ stress. Petrol Geosci, 8(2): 189–193
https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.8.2.189
40 White C M, Smith D H, Jones K L, Goodman A L, Jikich S A, LaCount R B, DuBose S B, Ozdemir E, Morsi B I, Schroeder K T (2005). Sequestration of carbon dioxide in coal with enhanced coalbed methane recovery: a review. Energy Fuels, 19(3): 659–724
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef040047w
41 Yang J J (2002). Tectonic Evolution and Oil-gas Reservoirs Distribution in Ordos Basin. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press (in Chinese)
42 Yang S X, Yao R, Cui X F, Chen Q C, Huang L Z (2012). Analysis of the characteristics of measured stress in Chinese mainland and its active blocks and North-South seismic belt. Chin J Geophys, 55(12): 4207–4217 (in Chinese)
43 Ye J P, Shi B S, Zhang C C (1999). Coal reservoir permeability and its controlled factors in China. Journal of China Coal Society, 24(2): 118–122 (in Chinese)
44 Zhang J, Standifird W B, Lenamond C (2008). Casing ultradeep, ultralong salt sections in deep water: a case study for failure diagnosis and risk mitigation in record-depth well. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 114273
45 Zhang J, Standifird W B, Roegiers J C, Zhang Y (2007). Stress-dependent permeability in fractured media: from lab experiments to engineering applications. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 40(1): 3–21/s00603-006-0103-x
https://doi.org/10.1007
46 Zhao J L, Tang D Z, Xu H, Li Y, Li S, Tao S, Lin W J, Liu Z X (2016). Characteristic of in situ stress and its control on the coalbed methane reservoir permeability in the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin, China. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 49(8): 3307–3322
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-0969-1
47 Zhao Q B (1997). Potential evaluation parameters and exploration direction in a coalbed gas region. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 24(1): 6–10 (in Chinese)
48 Zhou X J, Burbey T J (2016). The mechanism of faulting regimes change over depths in the sedimentary layers in an intracratonic basin. Arab J Geosci, 9(1): 1–11/s12517-015-2053-7
https://doi.org/10.1007
49 Zoback M D (2007). Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
50 Zoback M D, Barton C A, Brudy M, Castillo D A, Finkbeiner T, Grollimund B R, Moos D B, Peska P, Ward C D, Wiprut D J (2003). Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 40(7–8): 1049–1076
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.07.001
[1] Wei JU, Jian SHEN, Chao LI, Kun YU, Hui YANG. Natural fractures within unconventional reservoirs of Linxing Block, eastern Ordos Basin, central China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(4): 770-782.
[2] Minfang YANG, Zhaobiao YANG, Bin SUN, Zhengguang ZHANG, Honglin LIU, Junlong ZHAO. A study on the flowability of gas displacing water in low-permeability coal reservoir based on NMR technology[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(4): 673-683.
[3] Haihai HOU, Longyi SHAO, Shuai WANG, Zhenghui XIAO, Xuetian WANG, Zhen LI, Guangyuan MU. Influence of depositional environment on coalbed methane accumulation in the Carboniferous-Permian coal of the Qinshui Basin, northern China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(3): 535-550.
[4] Nan WANG, Shanshan ZHAO, Jian HUI, Qiming QIN. Passive Super-Low Frequency electromagnetic prospecting technique[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2017, 11(2): 248-267.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed