Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    2022, Vol. 16 Issue (1) : 206-219    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-021-0872-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Short-fetch high waves during the passage of 2019 Typhoon Faxai over Tokyo Bay
Hiroshi TAKAGI(), Atsuhei TAKAHASHI
School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan
 Download: PDF(4695 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The risk of wind waves in a bay is often overlooked, owing to the belief that peninsulas and islands will inhibit high waves. However, during the passage of a tropical cyclone, a semi-enclosed bay is exposed to two-directional waves: one generated inside the bay and the other propagated from the outer sea. Typhoon Faxai in 2019 resulted in the worst coastal disaster in Tokyo Bay in the last few decades. The authors conducted a post-disaster survey immediately after this typhoon. Numerical modeling was also performed to reveal the mechanisms of unusual high waves. No significant high-wave damage occurred on coasts facing the Pacific Ocean. By contrast, Fukuura-Yokohama, which faces Tokyo Bay, suffered overtopping waves that collapsed seawalls. To precisely reproduce multi-directional waves, the authors developed an extended parametric typhoon model, which was embedded in the JMA mesoscale meteorological model (JMA-MSM). The peak wave height was estimated to be 3.4 m off the coast of Fukuura, in which the contribution of the outer-sea waves was as low as 10%–20%. A fetch-limited wave developed over a short distance in the bay is considered the primary mechanism of the high wave. The maximum wave occurred on the left-hand side of the typhoon track in the bay, which appears to be contrary to the common understanding that it is safer within the semicircle of a storm than on the opposite side. Typhoon Faxai was a small typhoon; however, if the radius was tripled, it is estimated that the wave height would exceed 3 m over the entire bay and surpass 4 m off the coasts of Yokohama and Chiba.

Keywords Typhoon Faxai      Tokyo Bay      high waves      short fetch      overtopping      wave hindcasting      parametric typhoon      JMA-MSM      storm surge     
Corresponding Author(s): Hiroshi TAKAGI   
Online First Date: 02 June 2021    Issue Date: 04 March 2022
 Cite this article:   
Hiroshi TAKAGI,Atsuhei TAKAHASHI. Short-fetch high waves during the passage of 2019 Typhoon Faxai over Tokyo Bay[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2022, 16(1): 206-219.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-021-0872-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2022/V16/I1/206
Fig.1  (a): Failure of the coastal dike in Osaka, caused by high waves due to 2018 Typhoon Jebi (photo taken by the author); (b): Damage in Yokohama, due to 2019 Typhoon Faxai (photo courtesy of Port & Harbor Bureau, City of Yokohama).
# Year/Month/Day Case TY: typhoon
WS: winter storm
SS: spring storm
TY name Wave height/m Wave period/s Storm surge/m
Harumi Station, Tokyo
Landfall location from central bay axis Approach angle relative to coastline (degree in clockwise direction) Forward speed at landfall/(km·h?1) Radius of R50 at landfall/km Max 10-min sustained wind speed at landfall/(m·s?1)
1 2019/9/9 TY Faxai 3.39 7.1 1.01 Over Tokyo Bay 135 24 93 41
2 1985/7/1 TY Irma 3.09 4.2 1.2 80 km (southwest) 130 69 232 33
3 2001/9/11 TY Danas 3.09 7.4 1.12 Over Tokyo Bay 120 24 56 28
4 2004/12/5 WS --- 2.93 5.9 --- --- --- --- --- ---
5 2007/9/6 TY Fitow 2.55 4.7 1.04 50 km (south west) 110 23 167 33
6 2019/10/12 TY Hagibis 2.45 5.1 1.38 50 km (south west) 130 37 333 41
7 1990/4/8 SS --- 2.31 5.7 --- --- --- --- --- ---
Tab.1  Historical typhoons that hit Tokyo Bay
Fig.2  Survey locations along the coast of inner and outer Tokyo Bay. Monitoring stations of waves, sea-level pressure, and tides are indicated with different symbols. Wave-overtopping took place in many locations on the western shore of Tokyo Bay (on the left side of the track of Typhoon Faxai). The blue bars show the distribution of the inundation ~5.1 m above sea level (Suzuki et al., 2020).
Fig.3  Scenes after Typhoon Faxai in Kanagawa and Chiba prefecture (all photos taken by the authors). Minor damage: objects are scattered or adhered, but there is no noticeable damage to the building or structure caused by waves. Major damage: Partial or total damage to the building or structure caused by waves.
Fig.4  Flowchart of the wave hindcasting, coupled with meteorological and hydrodynamic models.
Fig.5  Comparison of atmospheric pressure at 2:00 Sep 9 (UTC+ 9): (a) only JMA-MSM, (b) JMA-MSM and TY Vortex combined model
Fig.6  (a)?(e):Sea-level pressure observed at five meteorological stations and comparisons with simulations from JMA-MSM+ TY Vortex and JMA-MSM alone. ST3, ST4, and ST7 are located on the left-hand side of the typhoon course, whereas ST5 and ST6 are on the right-hand side. In particular, the time-series of ST4, ST6, and ST7, nearby the typhoon track, demonstrates close proximity between the observation and JMA-MSM+ TY Vortex. (f)?(k): Comparison of significant wave height and period at three locations: inside Tokyo Bay (ST1, ST2) and outside (ST3). (l) Storm surge height at ST8 in Yokohama.
Fig.7  Simulation output of JMA-MSM+ TY Vortex. (a): wind speed: (b): significant wave height, (c): wave period. Date and time: Japan Standard Time.
Fig.8  Numerical experiment for quantifying the contribution of inner-bay waves and outer-sea waves. A hypothetical breakwater is placed in the bay mouth to prevent outer-sea waves from entering the bay. Date and time: Japan Standard Time
Fig.9  Percentage of wave energy propagating from the outer sea.
Fig.10  (a) Maximum wave height inside and outside Tokyo Bay during the passage of Faxai. The white line indicates the typhoon track. In the bay, the maximum wave occurred in the navigable semicircle (left-hand side of the track). (b) Bottom: hypothetical case, in which the size of Faxai was tripled.
Fig.11  Percentage of wave energy propagated from the offshore boundaries, where a 7 m and 12 s wave is imposed.
1 H Arakawa (1957). On typhoon storm tides. Geofis Pura Appl, 38(1): 231–249
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01996994
2 N Booij, R C Ris, L H Holthuijsen (1999). A third-generation wave model for coastal regions 1. Model description and validation. J Geophys Res, 104(C4): 7649–7666
https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC02622
3 P J Bowyer, A W MacAfee (2005). The theory of trapped-fetch waves with tropical cyclones—an operational perspective. Weather Forecast, 20(3): 229–244
https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF849.1
4 C L Bretschneider (1951). Revised wave forecasting relationship. Proc. Coastal Engineering Proceedings, 1(2)
5 W B Chen, H Chen, S C Hsiao, C H Chang, L W Lin (2019). Wind forcing effect on hindcasting of typhoon-driven extreme waves. Ocean Eng, 188: 106260
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106260
6 G P Cressman (1959). An operational objective analysis system. Mon Weather Rev, 87(10): 367–374
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1959)087<0367:AOOAS>2.0.CO;2
7 T U Delft (2000). SWAN Cycle III Version 40.11 User Manual. 2000
8 M Donelan, M Skafel, H Graber, P Liu, D Schwab, S Venkatesh(1992). On the growth rate of wind-generated waves. Amosphere-Ocean, 30(3): 457–478
9 K F Hasselmann, T P Barnett, E Bouws, H Carlson, D E Cartwright, K Eake, J A Euring, A Gicnapp, D E Hasselmann, P Kruseman, A Meerburg (1973). Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP). J German Hydrogr, Reihe A (in German)
10 M Heidarzadeh, A B Rabinovich (2020) Natural hazards, combined hazard of typhoon-generated meteorological tsunamis and storm surges along the coast of Japan. Nat Hazards, (2020): 1–34
11 M Heidarzadeh, T Takagawa, T Iwamoto, T Takagi (2021). Field surveys and numerical modeling of the August 2016 typhoon Lionrock along the northeastern coast of Japan: the first typhoon making landfall in Tohoku region. Nat Hazards 105(1): 1–19
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04112-7
12 S Hoshino, M Esteban, T Mikami, H Takagi, T Shibayama (2016). Estimation of increase in storm surge damage due to climate change and sea level rise in the Greater Tokyo area. Nat Hazards, 80(1): 539–565
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1983-4
13 S C Hsiao, H Chen, H L Wu, W B Cehn, C H Chang, W D Guo, Y M Chen, L Y Lin (2020). Numerical simulation of large wave heights from Super Typhoon Nepartak (2016) in the eastern waters. J Mar Sci Eng, 8(3): 217
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8030217
14 P A Hwang, E J Walsh (2018). Estimating maximum significant wave height and dominant wave period inside tropical cyclones. Weather and Forecasting, 33(4): 955–966
15 R. Islam, H Takagi (2020a). Typhoon parameter sensitivity of storm surge in the semi-enclosed Tokyo Bay. Front Earth Sci, 14 (3): 553–567
16 R Islam, H Takagi (2020b). Statistical significance of tropical cyclone forward speed on storm surge generation: retrospective analysis of best track and tidal data in Japan. Georisk
17 R Islam, H Takagi, L T Anh, A Takahashi, B Ke (2018). 2017 Typhoon Lan reconnaissance field survey in coasts of Kanto Region, Japan. J Japan Soc of Civil Eng, Ser. B3. Ocean Eng, 74(2): 593–598
18 JMA (2019). Outline of the operational numerical weather prediction.
19 G J Komen, L Cavaleri, M Donelan, K Hasselmann, S Hasselmann, P A E M ( Janssen 1994). Dynamics and Modelling of Ocean Waves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
20 T A Le, H Takagi, M Heidarzadeh, Y Takata, A Takahashi (2019). Field Surveys and numerical simulation of the 2018 Typhoon Jebi: impact of high waves and storm surge in semi-enclosed Osaka Bay, Japan. Pure Appl Geophys, 176(10): 4139–4160
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02295-0
21 H Mitsuyasu (1972). The one-dimensional wave spectra at limited fetch.In: Proceedings of 13th Conference on Coastal Engineering, Vancouver, Canada
22 D A Molitor (1935). Wave pressures on sea walls and breakwaters. Trans ASCE, 100: 984
23 N Mori, T Yasuda, T Arikawa, T Kataoka, S Nakajo, K Suzuki, Y Yamanaka, A Webb (2019). Typhoon Jebi post-event survey of coastal damage in the Kansai region, Japan. Coast Eng J, 61(3): 278–294
24 V A ( Myers 1954). Characteristics of United States Hurricanes Pertinent to Levee Design for Lake Okeechobee, Florida. Hydrometeorological Report, 32. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office
25 F Omori (1918). Tsunami in Tokyo Bay. Earthquake Investiga, 89: 19–48 (in Japanese)
26 W J Pierson Jr, L A Moskowitz (1964). Proposed spectral form for fully developed wind seas based on the similarity theory of S. A. Kitaigorodskii. J Geophys Res, 69(24): 5181–5190
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ069i024p05181
27 R W Schloemer (1954). Analysis and Synthesis of Hurricane Wind Patterns over Lake Okeechobee, Florida. Hydrometerorological Report No.31. Washington DC: US Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau
28 R Solomon (2016).Tokyo Bay at risk to tsunami. Beacon Reports
29 T Stevenson (1874). The Design and Construction of Harbours. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
30 T Suzuki, Y Tajima, M Watanabe, N Tsuruta, H Takagi, T Takabatake, K Suzuki, T Shimozono, Y Shigihara, T Shibayama, S Kawaguchi, T Arikawa (2020). Post-event survey of locally concentrated disaster due to 2019 Typhoon Faxai along the western shore of Tokyo Bay, Japan. Coast Eng J, 62(2): 146–158
https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2020.1738620
31 H U Sverdrup, W H Munk (1947). Wind, Sea and Swell: Theory of Relations for Forecasting. Washington: U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office
32 T Takabatake, M Mäll, M Esteban, R Nakamura, T O Kyaw, H Ishii, J Valdez, Y Nishida, F Noya, T Shibayama (2018). Field survey of 2018 Typhoon Jebi in Japan: Lessons for disaster risk management. Geosciences (Basel), 8(11): 412
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8110412
33 H Takagi, S Li, M de Leon, M Esteban, T Mikami, R Matsumaru, T Shibayama, R Nakamura (2016). Storm surge and evacuation in urban areas during the peak of a storm. Coast Eng, 108: 1–9
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.11.002
34 H Takagi, W Wu (2016). Maximum wind radius estimated by the 50 kt radius: improvement of storm surge forecasting over the western North Pacific. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 16(3): 705–717
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-705-2016
35 H Takagi, M Esteban, T Shibayama, T Mikami, R Matsumaru, M D Leon, N D Thao, T Oyama, R Nakamura (2017). Track analysis, simulation, and field survey of the 2013 Typhoon Haiyan storm surge. J Flood Risk Manag, 10(1): 42–52
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12136
36 H Takagi, Y Xiong, F Furukawa (2018). Track analysis and storm surge investigation of 2017 Typhoon Hato: were the warning signals issued in Macau and Hong Kong timed appropriately? Georisk, 12(4): 297–307
37 H Takagi, M R Islam, L T Anh, A Takahashi, T Sugiu, F Furukawa (2020a). Investigation of high wave damage caused by 2019 Typhoon Faxai in Kanto region and wave hindcast in Tokyo Bay, J Japan Soc Civil Eng, Ser. B3. Ocean Eng, 76(1): 12–21
38 H Takagi, R Tomiyasu, T Oyake, T Araki, K Mori, Y Matsubara, Y Ninomiya, Y Takata (2020b). Tsunami intrusion through port breakwaters enclosed with self-elevating seawalls. Ocean Eng, 199: 107028
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107028
39 T Uji (1975). Numerical estimation of sea wave in a typhoon are. Rep Meteorol Geophys, 26(4): 199–217
https://doi.org/10.2467/mripapers1950.26.4_199
40 United Nations (2018). 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. Available at United Nations website
41 B W Wilson (1965). Numerical prediction of ocean waves in the North Atlantic for December, 1959. Deutsche Hydrographische Z, 18(3): 114–130
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333333
42 H Yamamoto, N Kanemitsu, Y Miyake, Y Ohtani, Y Watanabe, K Sakamoto, K Iwaya (2020). Damage investigation of gust wind and storm surges disasters in Tokyo Bay area by Typhoon No.15 (Faxai) in 2019. J Nat Disaster Sci, 39(2): 113–136
43 I R Young, L A Verhagen (1996). The growth of fetch limited waves in water of finite depth. Part 1: total energy and peak frequency. Coast Eng, 29(1‒2): 47‒78
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3839(96)00006-3
[1] Md. Rezuanul ISLAM, Hiroshi TAKAGI. Typhoon parameter sensitivity of storm surge in the semi-enclosed Tokyo Bay[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(3): 553-567.
[2] Yuexia ZHANG,Jing GUO,Zhumei CHE. Discussion on evaluating the vulnerability of storm surge hazard bearing bodies in the coastal areas of Wenzhou[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2015, 9(2): 300-307.
[3] Liang WANG, Xiaodong ZHAO, Yongming SHEN. Coupling hydrodynamic models with GIS for storm surge simulation: application to the Yangtze Estuary and the Hangzhou Bay, China[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2012, 6(3): 261-275.
[4] Bin CHEN, Zhongyuan CHEN. Huayanpeng boulder beach of Putuo Island, southeast coast of China: characteristics and explanation[J]. Front Earth Sci Chin, 2009, 3(3): 286-290.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed