Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    2022, Vol. 16 Issue (3) : 657-670    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-021-0963-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Determination of representative elementary volume of digital coal based on fractal theory with X-ray CT data and its application in fractal permeability predication model
Huihuang FANG1,2,3(), Shuxun SANG4,5,6, Shiqi LIU4,5,6, Huihu LIU1,2,3, Hongjie XU1,2,3, Yanhui HUANG7,1,2
1. State Key Laboratory of Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control in Deep Coal Mines, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
2. School of Earth and Environment, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
3. Institute of Energy, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center, Hefei 230000, China
4. Low Carbon Energy Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
5. School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
6. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Coal-based Greenhouse Gas Control and Utilization, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
7. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
 Download: PDF(46541 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Representative elementary volume (REV) is the key to study the heterogeneity of digital coal and characterize its macroscopic and microscopic properties. The permeability evolution law of digital coal based on REV analysis can provide theoretical support for the application of permeability prediction model in multi-scale reservoirs. This study takes typical coal samples from Bofang and Sihe coal mines in Qinshui basin as research object. First, the nondestructive information of two samples is scanned and visualized. Secondly, the calculation methods of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) fractal dimensions of pores and fractures are illustrated. Then, the determination methods of REV based on porosity and fractal dimension are compared. Finally, the distribution pattern of fractal dimension and porosity curves is studied, the relationship between 2D and 3D fractal dimension is characterized, and the application of fractal permeability model in permeability analysis of multi-scale reservoir is further discussed. The REV size varies greatly in different vertex directions of the same sample and between samples, so REV analysis can only be performed in specific directions. When the REV based on fractal dimension is determined, the porosity curve continues to maintain a downward trend and then tends to be stable. The 2D fractal dimension has a positive linear correlation with the 3D fractal dimension, and the porosity can be expressed as a linear function of the fractal dimension. The permeability through REV analysis domain is mainly affected by fractal dimension, dip angle, azimuth angle and maximum fracture length, which is of great significance for exploring permeability evolution law of coal reservoir at different scales. This study is of great significance for enriching the determination methods of REV in digital coal and exploring the permeability evolution law of multi-scale reservoirs.

Keywords representative elementary volume      fractal dimension      permeability      digital coal      X-ray CT      Qinshui Basin     
Corresponding Author(s): Huihuang FANG   
Online First Date: 03 August 2022    Issue Date: 29 December 2022
 Cite this article:   
Huihuang FANG,Shuxun SANG,Shiqi LIU, et al. Determination of representative elementary volume of digital coal based on fractal theory with X-ray CT data and its application in fractal permeability predication model[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2022, 16(3): 657-670.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-021-0963-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2022/V16/I3/657
Fig.1  Change in attribute value as a function of sample size to define REV.
Fig.2  Geological setting of the Qinshui basin (Modified from Fang et al., 2017). (a) Four uplift belts in the Qinshui basin, and (b) vertical sequences of the sedimentary system of the Shanxi formation.
Fig.3  Sampling point distribution. (a) Location of the Qinshui basin in China and the distribution of sampling point, and (b) Anti-oxidation treatment of coal sample.
Sampling location Ro,max/% Proximate analysis /wt.% Macerals analysis /vol.%
Mad Aad Vdaf FCad Vit Ine Min
BF 2.83 2.05 9.40 9.86 81.67 2.42 91.82 3.85
SH 3.33 1.48 13.12 6.32 81.39 79.84 18.36 1.80
Tab.1  Key properties of coal sample used in this study.
Fig.4  X-ray CT scanning system using the BF sample as an example. (a) Preparation of sample; (b) imaging system components; (c) typical 2D CT slices of BF sample.
Fig.5  Image processing flow diagram using the BF sample as an example. (a) Original section; (b) median filtering processing; (c) binarization processing.
Fig.6  Schematic diagram of fractal dimension calculation based on the digital coal images.
Fig.7  Schematic diagram of sub-analysis domain selection. (a) Eight vertex directions of A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H in analysis area; and (b) An example of 3 different 3D images that initialized from position B are highlighted with different color.
Fig.8  Results of porosity-based REV and fractal dimension-based REV of BF sample.
Fig.9  Results of porosity-based REV and fractal dimension-based REV of SH sample.
Sample Parameter A B C D E F G H
BF Df,3D 270 325 245 280 210 239 232 195 325
Df,2D 295 325 268 293 295 278 265 221 370
Porosity 345 225 398 215 462 278 172 251 462
SH Df,2D 245 295 346 249 345 339 232 382 382
Df,3D 295 309 379 299 350 365 309 335 365
Porosity 395 392 379 --- --- 365 386 --- 395
Tab.2  Porosity-based REV and fractal dimension-based REV with different vertexes of BF and SH samples
Fig.10  Pore and fracture structures of digital coal based on the selected REV. (a)?(c) are BF sample; and (d)?(f) are SH sample.
Fig.11  Distribution pattern of curve between porosity and fractal dimension after REV determined. (a) Vertex direction A of BF sample; (b) vertex direction C of SH sample; (c) vertex direction D of BF sample; (d) vertex direction H of BF sample.
Case 1 2 3 4 No REV
Number 6 3 3 1 3
Tab.3  Statistical results of curve distribution patterns of fractal dimension and porosity in BF and SH samples
Fig.12  Relationship between 2D and 3D fractal dimension. A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H are the data of 8 vertex directions, and I is all the data from A to H.
Sample Parameter A B C D E F G H Ave.
BF Mi 1.2164 1.2304 1.1720 1.2000 1.2103 1.1832 1.2160 1.1952 1.202938
Ni 0.6273 0.6512 0.7401 0.6992 0.6993 0.7215 0.6747 0.7056 0.689863
SH Mi 1.2029 1.1783 1.1827 1.1653 1.1647 1.1798 1.1919 1.1625 1.178513
Ni 0.7486 0.7808 0.7759 0.8016 0.8024 0.7810 0.7654 0.8037 0.782425
Tab.4  Data statistics of parameters Mi and Ni between 2D and 3D fractal dimension of BF and SH samples
Fig.13  Relationship between 2D/3D fractal dimension and porosity of BF sample.
Fig.14  Relationship between 2D/3D fractal dimension and porosity of SH sample.
Fig.15  Schematic diagram of inclination angle (α) and azimuth angle (β) of fracture (Modified from Miao et al., 2015). (a) Diagram of fracture distribution and fluid migration direction; (b) fracture distribution within REV, whereri is the length of REV, r is the fracture trace length,h is the fracture aperture, α is the fracture plane dip angle with respect to the fluid flow direction at β = 0.
1 T, Ai, R, Zhang, H, Zhou, J Pei. ( 2014). Box-counting methods to directly estimate the fractal dimension of a rock surface. Appl Surf Sci, 314: 610– 621
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.152
2 J Bear ( 1972). Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. New York: Elsevier
3 F, Bertrand, O, Buzzi, F Collin. ( 2019). Cleat-scale modelling of the coal permeability evolution due to sorption-induced strain. Int J Coal Geol, 216: 103320
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2019.103320
4 N, Fan, J, Wang, C, Deng, Y, Fan, T, Wang, X Guo. ( 2020). Quantitative characterization of coal microstructure and visualization seepage of macropores using CT-based 3D reconstruction. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 81: 103384
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103384
5 H, Fang, S, Sang, J, Wang, S, Liu, W Ju. ( 2017). Simulation of paleotectonic stress fields and distribution prediction of tectonic fractures at the Hudi coal mine, Qinshui Basin. Acta Geol Sin-Eng, 91( 6): 2007– 2023
https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.13447
6 H, Fang, S, Sang, S, Liu, S Liu. ( 2019). Experimental simulation of replacing and displacing CH4 by injecting supercritical CO2 and its geological significance. Int J Greenh Gas Control, 81: 115– 125
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.12.015
7 H, Fang, S, Sang, S Liu. ( 2020). Three-dimensional spatial structure of the macro-pores and flow simulation in anthracite coal based on X-ray μ-CT scanning data. Petrol Sci, 17( 5): 1221– 1236
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-020-00485-3
8 H, Fang, S, Sang, Y, Du, H, Liu, H Xu. ( 2021). Visualization characterization of minerals touched by interconnected pores and fractures and its demineralization effect on coal permeability during CO2-ECBM process based on X-ray CT data. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 95: 104213
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104213
9 Q, He F, Li A, Shi B, He J, Chen L Xie ( 2021). Fractal characterization of complex hydraulic fracture networks of oil shale via 3D CT reconstruction. Petrol Geo Recov Effi, 28( 5): 116− 123 (in Chinese)
10 S, Huang, D, Liu, Y, Cai, Q Gan. ( 2019). In situ stress distribution and its impact on CBM reservoir properties in the Zhengzhuang area, southern Qinshui Basin, north China. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 61: 83– 96
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2018.11.005
11 A J, Katz, A H Thompson. ( 1985). Fractal sandstone pores: implications for conductivity and pore formation. Phys Rev Lett, 54( 12): 1325– 1328
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1325 pmid: 10030996
12 C, Klimczak, R, Schultz, R, Parashar, D Reeves. ( 2010). Cubic law with aperture length correlation: implications for network scale fluid flow. Hydrogeol J, 18( 4): 851– 862
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-009-0572-6
13 Y, Li, Y, Zhao, Y, Jiang, B, Zhang, H, Song, B Liu. ( 2020). Characteristics of pore and fracture of coal with bursting proneness based on DIC and fractal theory. Energies, 13( 20): 5404
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13205404
14 Q, Li, D, Liu, Y, Cai, B, Zhao, Y, Lu, Y Zhou. ( 2021). Effects of natural micro-fracture morphology, temperature and pressure on fluid flow in coals through fractal theory combined with lattice Boltzmann method. Fuel, 286( 2): 119468
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119468
15 S, Liu, S, Sang, G, Wang, J, Ma, T, Wang, W, Wang, Y, Du, T Wang. ( 2017). FIB-SEM and X-ray CT characterization of interconnected pores in high-rank coal formed from regional metamorphism. J Petrol Sci Eng, 148: 21– 31
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.10.006
16 R, Liu, Z, Ren, P, Yang, H, He, T, Smith, W, Guo, L Wu. ( 2021). Mesozoic tectono-thermal event of the Qinshui Basin, central north China craton: insights from illite crystallinity and vitrinite reflectance. Front Earth Sci, 9: 765497
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.765497
17 T, Miao, B, Yu, Y, Duan, Q Fang. ( 2015a). A fractal analysis of permeability for fractured rocks. Int J Heat Mass Transf, 81: 75– 80
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.10.010
18 T, Miao, S, Yang, Z, Long, B Yu. ( 2015b). Fractal analysis of permeability of dual-porosity media embedded with random fractures. Int J Heat Mass Transf, 88: 814– 821
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.05.004
19 T, Miao, A, Chen, Y, Xu, S, Cheng, K Wang. ( 2018). A Permeability model for water-gas phase flow in fractal fracture networks. Fractals, 26( 6): 1850087
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X18500871
20 Z, Miao, S, Li, J, Xie, R, Huo, F, Ding, H, Zhu, X, Yang, X Li. ( 2021). Three-dimensional reconstruction and numerical simulation analysis of acid-corroded sandstone based on CT. Shock Vib, 2021: 5582781
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5582781
21 K, Nazridoust, G, Ahmadi, D Smith. ( 2006). A new friction factor correlation for laminar, single-phase flows through rock fractures. J Hydrol (Amst), 329( 1−2): 315– 328
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.02.032
22 X, Ni, J, Miao, R, Lv, X Lin. ( 2017). Quantitative 3D spatial characterization and flow simulation of coal macropores based on μCT technology. Fuel, 200: 199– 207
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.03.068
23 X, Ni, Z, Zhao, Y, Wang, L Wang. ( 2020). Optimisation and application of well types for ground development of coalbed methane from No. 3 coal seam in shizhuang south block in Qinshui Basin, Shanxi Province, China. J Petrol Sci Eng, 193: 107453
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107453
24 H, Taud, R, Martinez-Angeles, J, Parrot, L Hernandez-Escobedo. ( 2005). Porosity estimation method by X-ray computed tomography. J Petrol Sci Eng, 47( 3−4): 209– 217
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.03.009
25 G, Wang, X, Qin, J, Shen, Z, Zhang, D, Han, C Jiang. ( 2019a). Quantitative analysis of microscopic structure and gas seepage characteristics of low-rank coal based on CT three-dimensional reconstruction of CT images and fractal theory. Fuel, 256: 115900
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115900
26 X, Wang, X, Wang, Z, Pan, X, Yin, P, Chai, S, Pan, Q Yang. ( 2019b). Abundance and distribution pattern of rare earth elements and yttrium in vitrain band of high-rank coal from the Qinshui Basin, northern China. Fuel, 248: 93– 103
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.054
27 Y, Wang, C Mao. ( 2021). Nano/micro pore structure and fractal characteristics of Baliancheng coalfield in Hunchun Basin. J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 21( 1): 682– 692
https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2021.18729 pmid: 33213668
28 G, Wang, X, Qin, D, Han, Z Liu. ( 2021a). Study on seepage and deformation characteristics of coal microstructure by 3D reconstruction of CT images at high temperatures. Int J Min Sci Technol, 31( 2): 175– 185
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.11.003
29 H, Wang, Y, Yao, C, Huang, D, Liu, Y Cai. ( 2021b). Fault development characteristics and their effects on current gas content and productivity of No.3 coal seam in the Zhengzhuang field, southern Qinshui Basin, north China. Energy Fuels, 35( 3): 2268– 2281
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04149
30 M, Wei, J, Liu, D, Elsworth, Y, Liu, J, Zeng, Z He. ( 2021). Impact of equilibration time lag between matrix and fractures on the evolution of coal permeability. Fuel, 290: 120029
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.120029
31 H, Wu, Y, Yao, Y, Zhou, F Qiu. ( 2019a). Analyses of representative elementary volume for coal using X-ray μ-CT and FIB-SEM and its application in permeability predication model. Fuel, 254: 115563
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.146
32 H, Wu, Y, Zhou, Y, Yao, K Wu. ( 2019b). Imaged based fractal characterization of microfracture structure in coal. Fuel, 239: 53– 62
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.117
33 Y, Yang H, Yang L, Tao J, Yao W, Wang K, Zhang L Luquot ( 2019). Microscopic determination of remaining oil distribution in sandstones with different permeability scales using computed tomography scanning. J Energy Resour Technol, 141( 9): 092903, 092903− 092911
34 B, Yu, J Li. ( 2001). Some fractal characters of porous media. Fractals, 9( 03): 365– 372
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X01000804
35 G, Zhang, J, Guo, B, Xu, L, Xu, Z, Dai, S, Yin, M Soltanian. ( 2021a). Quantitative analysis and evaluation of coal mine geological structures based on fractal theory. Energies, 14( 7): 1925
https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071925
36 K, Zhang, S, Sang, X, Zhou, C, Liu, M, Ma, Q Niu. ( 2021b). Influence of supercritical CO2-H2O-caprock interactions on the sealing capability of deep coal seam caprocks related to CO2 geological storage: a case study of the silty mudstone caprock of coal seam no. 3 in the Qinshui Basin, China. Int J Greenh Gas Control, 106: 103282
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103282
37 P, Zhang, C, Zhang, B, Liu, Y Wu. ( 2022). Leveraging local and global descriptors in parallel to search correspondences for visual localization. Pattern Recognit, 122: 108344
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108344
38 W, Zhao, K, Wang, L, Wang, Y, Cheng, H, Dong, B, Li, L Dai. ( 2021). Influence of matrix size and pore damage path on the size dependence of gas adsorption capacity of coal. Fuel, 283: 119289
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119289
39 Y, Zhao, C, Wang, L, Ning, H, Zhao, J Bi. ( 2022). Pore and fracture development in coal under stress conditions based on nuclear magnetic resonance and fractal theory. Fuel, 309: 122112
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122112
40 G, Zhou, Q, Zhang, R, Bai, G Ni. ( 2016). Characterization of coal micro-pore structure and simulation on the seepage rules of low-pressure water based on CT scanning data. Minerals (Basel), 6( 3): 78
https://doi.org/10.3390/min6030078
41 X, Zhou, S, Sang, Q, Niu, K, Zhang, F, Liu, W, Wang, J Chang. ( 2021). Changes of multiscale surface morphology and pore structure of mudstone associated with supercritical CO2-water exposure at different times. Energ Fuel, 35( 5): 4212– 4223
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03920
[1] Huihuang FANG, Hongjie XU, Shuxun SANG, Shiqi Liu, Shuailiang SONG, Huihu LIU. 3D reconstruction of coal pore network and its application in CO2-ECBM process simulation at laboratory scale[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2022, 16(2): 523-539.
[2] Wancai NIE, Tingshan ZHANG, Xiaopeng ZHENG, Jun LIU. Pressure transient analysis for a fractured well in a stress-sensitive tight multi-medium oil reservoir[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(4): 719-736.
[3] Xiaowei HOU, Yang WANG, Yanming ZHU, Jie XIANG. Pore structure complexity and its significance to the petrophysical properties of coal measure gas reservoirs in Qinshui Basin, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(4): 860-875.
[4] Qifeng JIA, Dameng LIU, Yidong CAI, Xianglong FANG, Lijing LI. Petrophysics characteristics of coalbed methane reservoir: a comprehensive review[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(2): 202-223.
[5] Xiangzeng WANG, Junping ZHOU, Xiao SUN, Shifeng TIAN, Jiren TANG, Feng SHEN, Jinqiao WU. The influences of composition and pore structure on the adsorption behavior of CH4 and CO2 on shale[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(2): 283-300.
[6] Minfang YANG, Zhaobiao YANG, Bin SUN, Zhengguang ZHANG, Honglin LIU, Junlong ZHAO. A study on the flowability of gas displacing water in low-permeability coal reservoir based on NMR technology[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(4): 673-683.
[7] Wei JU, Jian SHEN, Yong QIN, Shangzhi MENG, Chao LI, Guozhang LI, Guang YANG. In-situ stress distribution and coalbed methane reservoir permeability in the Linxing area, eastern Ordos Basin, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(3): 545-554.
[8] Hongchun ZHU, Yipeng ZHAO, Haiying LIU. Scale characters analysis for gully structure in the watersheds of loess landforms based on digital elevation models[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(2): 431-443.
[9] Haihai HOU, Longyi SHAO, Yonghong LI, Zhen LI, Wenlong ZHANG, Huaijun WEN. The pore structure and fractal characteristics of shales with low thermal maturity from the Yuqia Coalfield, northern Qaidam Basin, northwestern China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(1): 148-159.
[10] S. ÖZTÜRK. Earthquake hazard potential in the Eastern Anatolian Region of Turkey: seismotectonic b and Dc-values and precursory quiescence Z-value[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(1): 215-236.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed