Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    2022, Vol. 16 Issue (4) : 1040-1051    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-022-0973-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Exploring complex urban growth and land use efficiency in China’s developed regions: implications for territorial spatial planning
Xiaolu TANG1, Li SHENG2, Yinkang ZHOU1()
1. School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
2. Institute of Digital Agriculture, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
 Download: PDF(9326 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Developed regions in China have experienced rapid urban expansion and have consequently induced a series of challenging environmental issues since its economic reform and opening-up. Taking Zhejiang as a case study area, the present paper explores the complex types of urban growth over the last four decades as well as land use efficiency. Moreover, it discusses the implications of the aforementioned on China National territorial spatial planning (TSP). The acquired results have shown that: 1) urban expansion has slowed down, exhibiting a three-stage trend of “slight increase (1980−1990)—dramatic growth (1990−2010)—slow growth (after 2010)”; 2) the complex types of urban growth reveal that the urban diffusion has been gradually controlled and the urban form tends to be more condensed; and 3) the mean values for pure technical efficiency (PTE) and scale efficiency (SE) of urban land use are 0.83 and 0.95 respectively, indicating PTE as the main factor restricting the improvement of urban land use. Based on these results, some beneficial policy implications and suggestions for TSP are provided. First, it is suggested that “Inventory Planning” will be the main direction of TSP other than “Incremental Planning”. Secondly, we should pay more attention to the protection of cultivated land and ecological resources. Lastly, TSP should guide the economic growth away from simply relying on resource inputs and steer it toward technology and capital investment.

Keywords urban expansion      urban growth types      land use efficiency      Zhejiang      territorial spatial planning     
Corresponding Author(s): Yinkang ZHOU   
Online First Date: 19 September 2022    Issue Date: 11 January 2023
 Cite this article:   
Xiaolu TANG,Li SHENG,Yinkang ZHOU. Exploring complex urban growth and land use efficiency in China’s developed regions: implications for territorial spatial planning[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2022, 16(4): 1040-1051.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-022-0973-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2022/V16/I4/1040
Fig.1  Location of the study area DEM of Zhejiang.
Fig.2  Schematic representation of the urban area delimitation method.
1980?1990 1990?2000 2000?2010 2010?2017
Expansion rate 23% 100% 89% 22%
Annual expansion area/km2 31.9 172.9 307.9 209.6
Tab.1  The expansion rate and annual expansion area of Zhejiang’s urban area in the four periods
Fig.3  Zhejiang’s land-urbanization rate and population-urbanization rate over the last four decades.
Metrics 1980 1990 2000 2010 2017
TA/km2 1410 1729 3458 6537 8004
NP 298 351 548 782 894
MPA/km2 4.73 4.92 6.31 8.36 8.95
SHAPE_AM 2.61 2.66 3.50 3.48 3.55
ENN_AM/km 2.85 2.89 1.64 1.06 0.93
Tab.2  The five selected metrics of urban areas for Zhejiang from 1980 to 2017
Fig.4  Spatial distribution of the complex types of urban growth for Zhejiang in the four periods. (a) 1980?1990, (b) 1990?2000, (c) 2000?2010 and (d) 2010?2017.
Fig.5  Composition ratio of patch number (PN) and patch area (PA) for the complex types of urban growth during the four periods: (a) PA and (b) PN.
Fig.6  Distribution of land input-output technical efficiency (TE), pure technical efficiency (PTE), and scale efficiency (SE) of Zhejiang’s 63 county-level cities in 2017.
Fig.7  The scatter diagram of land input-output pure technical efficiency (PTE) and scale efficiency (SE). (PTE and SE are divided into low-efficiency (0.55?0.70], medium-efficiency (0.70?0.85] and high-efficiency (0.85?1.0]. Correspondingly, 63 county level cities located in five zones).
Zones Cities Number Explanation
High-High Hangzhou, Ningbo, Shaoxing, Chunan, Jinyun, Longquan, Ninghai, Panan, Pujiang, Qintian, Ruian, Shensi, Songyang, Suichang, Taishun, Wencheng, Wuyi, Xinchang, Yongjia, Yongkang, Yuhuan, Yunhe 22/63 Both PTE and SE are the highest, reflecting these cities have relatively efficient urban land use
Medium-High Jinhua, Zhoushan, Lishui, Anji, Cangnan, Deqing, Dongyang, Jiashan, Jiande, Jiangshan, Lanxi, Yueqing, Linhai, Longyou, Pinghu, Pingyang, Sanmen, Shenzhou, Tiantai, Tonglu, Tongxiang, Wenling, Xianju, Xiangshan, Zhuji 25/63 SE is the highest, indicating these cities operate on the most appropriate scale. However, the PTE is at the medium level, reflecting the resource allocation needs to be further optimized.
Low-High Huzhou, Jiaxing, Quzhou, Taizhou, Wenzhou, Daishan, Haining, Yuyao, Changxin 9/63 PTE is the lowest while SE is the highest, indicating these cities have highly considered the development of urban incremental space while ignoring the integration and optimization of urban stock space.
High-Medium Haiyan, Jingning, Kaihua, Qinyuan, Yiwu 5/63 PTE is at a high level, indicating these cities allocate reasonable resources into urban land use. However, SE is at a relative low level, illustrating that these cities do not operate on the most appropriate scale.
Medium-Medium Cixi, Changshan 2/63 Both the PTE and SE need to be improved.
Tab.3  Explanations for land input-output efficiency zones
Fig.8  Slack of urban land, capital and labor in 63 county-level cities.
Fig.9  The relationship between the urban areas per capita and GDP per capita.
1 B, Ai, C, Ma, J, Zhao, R Zhang. ( 2020). The impact of rapid urban expansion on coastal mangroves: a case study in Guangdong Province, China. Front Earth Sci, 14( 1): 37– 49
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-019-0768-6
2 T C, Bailey A C Gatrell ( 1995). Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. Essex: Longman Scientific & Technical
3 C, Birch S P, Oom J A Beecham ( 2007). Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology. Ecol Modell, 206( 3−4): 347− 359
4 N, Brenner, C Schmid. ( 2014). The ‘urban age’ in question. Int J Urban Reg Res, 38( 3): 731– 755
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12115
5 J, Chen, J, Chen, A, Liao, X, Cao, L, Chen, X, Chen, C, He, G, Han, S, Peng, M, Lu, W, Zhang, X, Tong, J Mills. ( 2015). Global land cover mapping at 30m resolution: a POK-based operational approach. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 103: 7– 27
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.09.002
6 Y, Chen, Z, Chen, G, Xu, Z Tian. ( 2016). Built-up land efficiency in urban China: insights from the general land use plan (2006–2020). Habitat Int, 51: 31– 38
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.10.014
7 C, Corbane, M, Pesaresi, T, Kemper, P, Politis, A, Florczyk, V, Syrris, M, Melchiorri, F, Sabo, P Soille. ( 2019). Automated global delineation of human settlements from 40 years of Landsat satellite data archives. Big Earth Data, 3( 2): 140– 169
https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2019.1625528
8 X, Cui, S, Li, X, Wang, X Xue. ( 2019). Driving factors of urban land growth in Guangzhou and its implications for sustainable development. Front Earth Sci, 13( 3): 464– 477
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-018-0692-1
9 R S, DeFries, T K, Rudel, M, Uriarte, M Hansen. ( 2010). Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat Geosci, 3( 3): 178– 181
https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo756
10 J, Du, Q, Fu, S, Fang, J, Wu, P, He, Z Quan. ( 2019). Effects of rapid urbanization on vegetation cover in the metropolises of China over the last four decades. Ecol Indic, 107: 105458
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105458
11 R, Färe, S Grosskopf. ( 1997). Intertemporal production frontiers: with dynamic DEA. J Oper Res Soc, 48( 6): 656
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600779
12 Y, Feng, S, Wu, P, Wu, S, Su, M, Weng, M Bian. ( 2018). Spatiotemporal characterization of megaregional poly-centrality: evidence for new urban hypotheses and implications for polycentric policies. Land Use Policy, 77: 712– 731
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.022
13 J V Henderson. ( 2003). The urbanization process and economic growth: the so-what question. J Econ Growth, 8( 1): 47– 71
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022860800744
14 Y, Hu, F, Wang, C, Guin, H Zhu. ( 2018). A spatio-temporal kernel density estimation framework for predictive crime hotspot mapping and evaluation. Appl Geogr, 99: 89– 97
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.08.001
15 Z, Huo, S Guo. ( 2020). Research on spatial mismatch and optimal allocation of basic education facilities under the perspective of inventory planning: take Anshan city as an example. Urban Develop Studies, 27( 6): 1– 6
16 S, Jia, C, Wang, Y, Li, F, Zhang, W Liu. ( 2017). The urbanization efficiency in Chengdu City: an estimation based on a three-stage DEA model. Phys Chem Earth Parts ABC, 101: 59– 69
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2017.05.003
17 Y, Jin, J, Liang, J, Wang, M, Song, J Shen. ( 2019). Study on the multi-land use and functional complex in country parks under inventory planning development background—taking Shanghai suburban regulation unit as an example. Chin Landscape Architect, 35( 02): 33– 38
18 B, Kew, B Lee. ( 2013). Measuring sprawl across the urban rural continuum using an amalgamated sprawl index. Sustainability, 5( 5): 1806– 1828
https://doi.org/10.3390/su5051806
19 H, Li, X, Xu, X, Li, S, Ma, H Zhang. ( 2021). Characterizing the urban spatial structure using taxi trip big data and implications for urban planning. Front Earth Sci, 15( 1): 70– 80
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-020-0844-y
20 X, Li, P Gong. ( 2016). Urban growth models: progress and perspective. Sci Bull (Beijing), 61( 21): 1637– 1650
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-016-1111-1
21 Y, Li, J Song. ( 2020). Effects of stock-based planning from the perspective of multistakeholder governance: a case study on the regeneration project of Hubei Village in Shenzhen. City Plan Rev, 44( 9): 120– 124
22 S, Liu, W, Xiao, L, Li, Y, Ye, X Song. ( 2020). Urban land use efficiency and improvement potential in China: a stochastic frontier analysis. Land Use Policy, 99: 105046
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105046
23 X, Liu, X, Li, Y, Chen, Z, Tan, S, Li, B Ai. ( 2010). A new landscape index for quantifying urban expansion using multi-temporal remotely sensed data. Landsc Ecol, 25( 5): 671– 682
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9454-5
24 Y, Liu, Y Zhou. ( 2021). Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China. Land Use Policy, 102: 105288
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105288
25 R M Northam ( 1975). Urban Geography. New York: John Wiley & Sons
26 J, Peng, Y, Hu, Y, Liu, J, Ma, S Zhao. ( 2018). A new approach for urban-rural fringe identification: integrating impervious surface area and spatial continuous wavelet transform. Landsc Urban Plan, 175: 72– 79
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.008
27 W, Qiao, Y, Hu, K, Jia, T, He, Y Wang. ( 2020). Dynamic modes and ecological effects of salt field utilization in the Weifang coastal area, China: implications for territorial spatial planning. Land Use Policy, 99: 104952
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104952
28 L, Qiu, Y, Pan, J, Zhu, G S, Amable, B Xu. ( 2019). Integrated analysis of urbanization-triggered land use change trajectory and implications for ecological land management: a case study in Fuyang, China. Sci Total Environ, 660: 209– 217
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.320 pmid: 30640089
29 T, Richards, J, Gallego, F Achard. ( 2000). Sampling for forest cover change assessment at the pan-tropical scale. Int J Remote Sens, 21( 6−7): 1473– 1490
https://doi.org/10.1080/014311600210272
30 A, Schneider, M A, Friedl, D Potere. ( 2010). Mapping global urban areas using MODIS 500-m data: new methods and datasets based on ‘urban ecoregions’. Remote Sens Environ, 114( 8): 1733– 1746
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.03.003
31 S, Su, Y, Wang, F, Luo, G, Mai, J Pu. ( 2014). Peri-urban vegetated landscape pattern changes in relation to socioeconomic development. Ecol Indic, 46: 477– 486
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.044
32 K, Tan, S, Zhou, E, Li, P Du. ( 2015). Assessing the impact of urbanization on net primary productivity using multi-scale remote sensing data: a case study of Xuzhou, China. Front Earth Sci, 9( 2): 319– 329
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-014-0454-7
33 S, Tan, B, Hu, B, Kuang, M Zhou. ( 2021). Regional differences and dynamic evolution of urban land green use efficiency within the Yangtze River Delta, China. Land Use Policy, 106: 105449
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105449
34 M P, Timmer, B Los. ( 2005). Localized innovation and productivity growth in Asia: an intertemporal DEA approach. J Prod Anal, 23( 1): 47– 64
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-004-8547-z
35 Nations United ( 2019). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. New York
36 P, Wang, C, Zeng, Y, Song, L, Guo, W, Liu, W Zhang. ( 2021). The spatial effect of administrative division on land-use intensity. Land (Basel), 10( 5): 543
https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050543
37 W, Wu, H, Zhao, S Jiang. ( 2018). A Zipf’s Law-Based method for mapping urban areas using NPP-VIIRS nighttime light data. Remote Sens, 10( 1): 130
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10010130
38 Agency Xinhua ( 2019a). Opinions of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on the establishment and supervision of territorial space planning system. Available at Xinhuanet website
39 Agency Xinhua ( 2019b). Guiding opinions of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on the overall delimitation and implementation of three control lines in territorial space planning. Available at the State Council website
40 J, Zeng, R, Zhang, J, Tang, J, Liang, J, Li, Y, Zeng, Y, Li, Q, Zhang, W, Shui, Q Wang. ( 2021). Ecological sustainability assessment of the carbon footprint in Fujian Province, southeast China. Front Earth Sci, 15( 1): 12– 22
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-020-0815-3
41 W, Zhang, H Xu. ( 2017). Effects of land urbanization and land finance on carbon emission: a panel data analysis for Chinese provinces. Land Use Policy, 63: 493– 500
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.006
42 Z, Zhao, X, Zheng, H, Fan, M Sun. ( 2021). Urban spatial structure analysis: quantitative identification of urban social functions using building footprints. Front Earth Sci, 15( 3): 507– 525
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-021-0904-y
43 Z, Zheng, Z, Wu, Y, Chen, Z, Yang, F Marinello. ( 2020). Detection of city integration processes in rapidly urbanizing areas based on remote sensing imagery. Land (Basel), 9( 10): 378
https://doi.org/10.3390/land9100378
44 T, Zhong, X, Huang, B Wang. ( 2010). On the degrees of decoupling and re-coupling of economic growth and expansion of construction land in China from 2002 to 2007. J Nat Resourc, 25: 18– 31
https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182000add
45 X, Zhu, Y, Li, P, Zhang, Y, Wei, X, Zheng, L Xie. ( 2019). Temporal–spatial characteristics of urban land use efficiency of China’s 35 mega cities based on DEA: decomposing technology and scale efficiency. Land Use Policy, 88: 104083
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104083
[1] Cong ZHOU, Peiyan CHEN, Shifang YANG, Feng ZHENG, Hui YU, Jie TANG, Yi LU, Guoming CHEN, Xiaoqing LU, Xiping ZHANG, Jing SUN. The impact of Typhoon Lekima (2019) on East China: a postevent survey in Wenzhou City and Taizhou City[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2022, 16(1): 109-120.
[2] Bin AI, Chunlei MA, Jun ZHAO, Rui ZHANG. The impact of rapid urban expansion on coastal mangroves: a case study in Guangdong Province, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(1): 37-49.
[3] Chong PENG, Hao XIAO, Yu LIU, Jingjing ZHANG. Economic structure and environmental quality and their impact on changing land use efficiency in China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2017, 11(2): 372-384.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed