Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    2023, Vol. 17 Issue (3) : 691-700    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-022-1019-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Pore structure evolution of mudstone caprock under cyclic load-unload and its influence on breakthrough pressure
Junchang SUN1, Zhiqiang DONG2, Sinan ZHU3, Shifeng TIAN2, Junping ZHOU2()
1. Bohai Rim Energy Research Institute, Northeast Petroleum University, Qinghuangdao 066004, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
3. Sinopec Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Beijing 100083, China
 Download: PDF(3354 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The pore structure of caprock plays an important role in underground gas storage security, as it significantly influences the sealing capacity of caprock. However, the pore structure evolution of caprock with the cyclic stress perturbations triggered by the cyclic gas injection or extraction remains unclear. In this study, the pore structure changes of mudstone caprock under cyclic loading and unloading were obtained by the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tests system, then the influence of the changes on the breakthrough pressure of caprock was discussed. The results indicated that the pore structure changes are depending on the stress loading-unloading path and stress level. In the first cyclic, at the loading stage, with the increase of confining stress, the NMR T2 spectra curve moved to the left, the NMR signal amplitude of the first peak increased, while the amplitude of the second peak decreased gradually. This indicated that the larger pores of mudstone are compressed and transformed into smaller pores, then the number of macropores decreased and the number of micro- and meso-pores increased. For a certain loading-unloading cycle, the porosity curve of mudstone in the loading process is not coincide with that in the unloading process, the porosity curve in the loading process was located below that in the unloading process, which indicated that the pore structure change is stress path dependent. With the increase of cycle numbers, the total porosity shown an increasing trend, indicating that the damage of mudstone occurred under the cyclic stress load-unload effects. With the increase of porosity, the breakthrough pressure of mudstone decreased with the increase of the cyclic numbers, which may increase the gas leakage risk. The results can provide significant implication for the underground gas storage security evaluation.

Keywords underground gas storage      pore structure      nuclear magnetic resonance      cyclic loading-unloading      breakthrough pressure     
Corresponding Author(s): Junping ZHOU   
Online First Date: 17 May 2023    Issue Date: 12 December 2023
 Cite this article:   
Junchang SUN,Zhiqiang DONG,Sinan ZHU, et al. Pore structure evolution of mudstone caprock under cyclic load-unload and its influence on breakthrough pressure[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2023, 17(3): 691-700.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-022-1019-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2023/V17/I3/691
Core sampleThe X-ray diffraction analysisInitial porosity and permeability
Quartz/%Plagioclase/%Calcite/%Clay minerals/%Others/%Porosity/%Permeability/10?3 μm2
Mudstone33.216.20.937.212.50.780.00240
Tab.1  Mineral compositions, and initial porosity and permeability parameters of mudstone sample
Fig.1  The NMR measurement system.
Fig.2  Schematic of the experimental program (Cs = Confining stress).
Fig.3  T2 spectra of mudstone under the first cyclic loading and unloading.
Fig.4  T2 spectra of mudstone under different cycle numbers of loading and unloading.
Fig.5  T2 spectra of mudstone under max confining stress with different cyclic numbers.
Confining stress1st10th20th30th40th50th
loadunloadloadunloadloadunloadloadunloadloadunloadloadunload
2 MPaMicropore/%4.644.384.294.304.564.604.404.374.384.344.314.20
Mesopore/%94.0393.2793.9294.4094.0093.6593.8793.9994.3594.3094.4794.43
Macropore/%1.332.351.791.301.441.741.731.641.271.361.221.36
Porosity/%0.450.440.550.480.550.590.590.690.60.640.680.71
10 MPaMicropore/%4.474.584.394.364.374.364.304.376.464.284.424.23
Mesopore/%93.6693.9894.0594.2794.0394.3894.2394.2394.0392.2093.8694.33
Macropore/%1.861.441.561.371.601.261.471.601.351.871.251.30
Porosity/%0.430.450.510.590.540.610.580.620.620.740.650.79
18 MPaMicropore/%4.454.274.224.304.234.384.454.274.224.304.234.38
Mesopore/%94.6294.7794.9294.8594.2493.6094.6294.7794.9294.8594.2493.60
Macropore/%0.930.960.870.851.532.020.930.960.870.851.532.02
Porosity/%0.470.470.540.540.550.550.560.560.630.630.660.66
Tab.2  Variation of pore structure parameters of mudstone under cyclic loading-unloading
Fig.6  Variation of pore structure parameters in mudstone at multiple cyclic loading-unloading.
Fig.7  The relationship between relative breakthrough pressure and porosity (a) and permeability (b) of mudstone caprock.
Fig.8  Relationship between relative breakthrough pressure and confining stress and the cyclic loading numbers.
1 Garcia D, Astiaso F, Barbanera F, Cumo Matteo U, Di B Nastasi (2016). Expert opinion analysis on renewable hydrogen storage systems potential in Europe.Energies, 9(11): 963
https://doi.org/10.3390/en9110963
2 J F, Carneiro C R, Matos Gessel S van (2019). Opportunities for large scale energy storage in geological formations in mainland Portugal.Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 99: 201–211
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.036
3 Z, Chao H, Wang W, Xu H, Ji K Zhao (2017). Study on the evolution of permeability and porosity of columnar joint materials under cyclic loading and unloading. Chinese J Rock Mech Eng, 36(1): 124–141 (in Chinese)
4 L, Cheng D, Li W, Wang J Liu (2021). Heterogeneous transport of free ch4 and free CO2 in dual-porosity media controlled by anisotropic in situ stress during shale gas production by CO2 flooding: implications for CO2 geological storage and utilization.ACS Omega, 6(40): 26756–26765
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04220 pmid: 34661029
5 Z, Chu Z, Wu Q, Liu L, Weng Z, Wang Y Zhou (2021). Evaluating the microstructure evolution behaviors of saturated sandstone using NMR testing under uniaxial short-term and creep compression.Rock Mech Rock Eng, 54(9): 4905–4927
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02538-4
6 X, Cui R M Bustin (2005). Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams.AAPG Bull, 89(9): 1181–1202
https://doi.org/10.1306/05110504114
7 C, Fan H, Wen S, Li G, Bai L Zhou (2022). Coal seam gas extraction by integrated drillings and punchings from the floor roadway considering hydraulic-mechanical coupling effect.Geofluids, 2022: 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5198227
8 H, Gao H A Li (2016). Pore structure characterization, permeability evaluation and enhanced gas recovery techniques of tight gas sandstones.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 28: 536–547
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.12.018
9 A, Hildenbrand S, Schlömer B M, Krooss R Littke (2004). Gas breakthrough experiments on pelitic rocks: comparative study with N2, CO2 and CH4.Geofluids, 4(1): 61–80
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-8123.2004.00073.x
10 J, Hu Z, Dong S, Ma X, Qin X, Xiao D Zhuan (2021). Seepage characteristics of damaged rock under stress-seepage coupling.Gold Sci Tech, 29(3): 355–363
https://doi.org/10.11872/j.issn.1005-2518.2021.03.204
11 D W, Jayasekara P G, Ranjith W, Wanniarachchi T D Rathnaweera (2020). Understanding the chemico-mineralogical changes of caprock sealing in deep saline CO2 sequestration environments: a review study.J Supercrit Fluid, 161: 104819
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2020.104819
12 J, Jiang W, Yang Y, Cheng K, Zhao S Zheng (2019). Pore structure characterization of coal particles via MIP, N2 and CO2 adsorption: effect of coalification on nanopores evolution.Powder Technol, 354: 136–148
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.080
13 K, Kawaura K, Akaku M, Nakano D, Ito T, Takahashi S Kiriakehata (2013). Examination of methods to measure capillary threshold pressures of pelitic rock samples.Energy Procedia, 37: 5411–5418
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.459
14 X, Lv Y, Wang H, Yu Z Bai (2017). Major factors affecting the closure of marine carbonate caprock and their quantitative evaluation: a case study of Ordovician rocks on the northern slope of the Tazhong uplift in the Tarim Basin, western China.Ma Pet Geol, 83: 231–245
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.03.006
15 R, Lei Y, Wang L, Zhang B, Liu K, Long P, Luo Y K Wang (2019). The evolution of sandstone microstructure and mechanical properties with thermal damage.Energy Sci Eng, 7(6): 3058–3075
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.480
16 H, Li D, Yang Z, Zhong Y, Sheng X Liu (2018b). Experimental investigation on the micro damage evolution of chemical corroded limestone subjected to cyclic loads.Int J Fatigue, 113: 23–32
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.022
17 J, Li K, Zhou W, Liu H Deng (2016). NMR research on deterioration characteristics of microscopic structure of sandstones in freeze–thaw cycles.Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 26(11): 2997–3003
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64430-8
18 X, Li Y, Kang M Haghighi (2018a). Investigation of pore size distributions of coals with different structures by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP).Measurement, 116: 122–128
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.10.059
19 J, Liu L Z, Xie B, He Q, Gan P Zhao (2021). Influence of anisotropic and heterogeneous permeability coupled with in-situ stress on CO2 sequestration with simultaneous enhanced gas recovery in shale: quantitative modeling and case study.Int J Greenh Gas Control, 104: 103208
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103208
20 X, Ma B, Yu D, Ma S, Zhang Y, Cheng K, Wang Y Yang (2010). Project design and matching technologies for underground gas storage based on a depleted sandstone gas reservoir.Nat Gas Ind, 30(8): 67–71
https://doi.org/10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2010.08.018
21 C R, Matos J F, Carneiro P P Silva (2019). Overview of large-scale underground energy storage technologies for integration of renewable energies and criteria for reservoir identification.J Energy Storage, 21: 241–258
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2018.11.023
22 A, Paluszny C C, Graham K A, Daniels V, Tsaparli D, Xenias S, Salimzadeh L, Whitmarsh J F, Harrington R W Zimmerman (2020). Caprock integrity and public perception studies of carbon storage in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs.Int J Greenh Gas Control, 98: 103057
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103057
23 J, Pang G, Qian B, Wang Z, Yang Y, Wei Y Li (2012). Evaluation of sealing ability of underground gas storage converted from the Xinjiang H Gas Field.Nat Gas Ind, 32(2): 83–85
https://doi.org/10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.02.020
24 D, Parra L, Valverde F J, Pino M K Patel (2019). A review on the role, cost, and value of hydrogen energy systems for deep decarbonization.Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 101: 279–294
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.010
25 M, Schmitt C M, Poffo Lima J C, De C P, Fernandes Santos V S S Dos (2017). Application of photoacoustic spectroscopy to characterize thermal diffusivity and porosity of caprocks.Eng Geol, 220: 183–195
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.02.003
26 R, Shukla P, Ranjith A, Haque X Choi (2010). A review of studies on CO2 sequestration and caprock integrity.Fuel, 89(10): 2651–2664
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.05.012
27 K S W Sing (1985). Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity.Pure Appl Chem, 57(4): 603–619
https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198557040603
28 M, Takeda M Manaka (2018). Effects of confining stress on the semipermeability of siliceous mudstones: implications for identifying geologic membrane behaviors of argillaceous formations.Geophys Res Lett, 45(11): 5427–5435
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078591
29 Y, Tang K, Long J, Wang H, Xu Y, Wang Y, He L, Shi H Zhu (2021). Change of phase state during multi-cycle injection and production process of condensate gas reservoir based underground gas storage.Pet Explor Dev, 48(2): 395–406
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(21)60031-9
30 R Tarkowski (2019). Underground hydrogen storage: characteristics and prospects.Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 105: 86–94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.051
31 G, Wang D, Han X, Qin Z, Liu J Liu (2020). A comprehensive method for studying pore structure and seepage characteristics of coal mass based on 3D CT reconstruction and NMR.Fuel, 281: 118735
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118735
32 L, Wang N, Zhao L, Sima F, Meng Y Guo (2018). Pore structure characterization of the tight reservoir: systematic integration of mercury injection and nuclear magnetic resonance.Energy Fuels, 32(7): 7471–7484
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01369
33 X L, Wang M J Economides (2012). Purposefully built underground natural gas storage.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 9: 130–137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2012.06.003
34 Z, Wang H, Cui G, Wei T, Jia J, Guo X He (2021). Study on the quantitative characterization and seepage evolution characteristics of pores of loaded coal based on NMR.ACS Omega, 6(43): 28983–28991
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04004
35 T, Wu Z, Pan L D, Connell B, Liu X, Fu Z Xue (2020). Gas breakthrough pressure of tight rocks: a review of experimental methods and data.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 81: 103408
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103408
36 J, Xu X, Xian H, Wang w, Wang X Yang (2006). Experimental study on rock deformation characteristics under cycling loading and unloading conditions. Chinese J Rock Mech Eng, 25(1): 3040–3045 (in Chinese)
37 L, Xu Q, Li M, Myers Q, Chen X Li (2019). Application of nuclear magnetic resonance technology to carbon capture, utilization and storage: a review.J Rock Mech Geotech Eng, 11(4): 892–908
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.01.003
38 T, Xu H, Tian H, Zhu J Cai (2022). China actively promotes: CO2 capture, utilization and storage research to achieve carbon peak and carbon neutrality.Adv Geo-Energy Res, 6(1): 1–3
https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2022.01.01
39 Y, Yao D, Liu Y, Che D, Tang S, Tang W Huang (2010). Petrophysical characterization of coals by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).Fuel, 89(7): 1371–1380
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.11.005
40 C, Zhai L, Qin S, Liu J, Xu Z, Tang S Wu (2016). Pore structure in coal: pore evolution after cryogenic freezing with cyclic liquid nitrogen injection and its implication on coalbed methane extraction.Energy Fuels, 30(7): 6009–6020
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00920
41 C, Zhang M Wang (2022). A critical review of breakthrough pressure for tight rocks and relevant factors.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 100: 104456
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104456
42 F, Zhang Z, Jiang W, Sun Y, Li X, Zhang L, Zhu M Wen (2019a). A multiscale comprehensive study on pore structure of tight sandstone reservoir realized by nuclear magnetic resonance, high pressure mercury injection and constant-rate mercury injection penetration test.Mar Pet Geol, 109: 208–222
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.06.019
43 L, Zhang Y, Wang X, Miao M, Gan X Li (2019c). Geochemistry in geologic-CO2 utilization and storage: a brief review.Adv Geo-Energy Res, 3(3): 304–313
https://doi.org/10.26804/ager.2019.03.08
44 W, Zhang Z, Ning S, Gai J, Zhu F, Fan Z, Liu H Wang (2022). Fast and effective observations of the pore structure of tight sandstones at the same location by utilizing AFM and CF-SEM.J Petrol Sci Eng, 208: 109554
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109554
45 Z, Zhang X, Yu M Deng (2019b). Damage evolution of sandy mudstone mechanical properties under mining unloading conditions in gob-side entry retaining.Geotech Geol Eng, 37(4): 3535–3545
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-00840-1
46 P, Zhao B, He B, Zhang J Liu (2022). Porosity of gas shale: is the NMR-based measurement reliable?.Petrol Sci, 19(2): 509–517
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2021.12.013
47 S, Zheng Y, Yao D, Elsworth B, Wang Y Liu (2020). A novel pore size classification method of coals: investigation based on NMR relaxation.J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 81: 103466
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103466
48 X, Zhou X, Lu H, Quan W, Qian X, Mu K, Chen Z, Wang Z Bai (2019). Influence factors and an evaluation method about breakthrough pressure of carbonate rocks: an experimental study on the Ordovician of carbonate rock from the Kalpin area, Tarim Basin, China.Mar Pet Geol, 104: 313–330
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.03.034
[1] Dawei DONG, Jiaosheng YANG, Qiujia HU, Shitao CUI, Fenjin SUN, Jidong ZHANG, Xinrui CUI. Pore structure characteristics of low-rank coal reservoirs with different ash yields and their implications for recoverability of coalbed methane—a case study from the Erlian Basin, northeastern China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2023, 17(1): 18-29.
[2] Chen GUO, Jiang GOU, Dongmin MA, Yuan BAO, Qingmin SHI, Jiahao MENG, Junzhe GAO, Lingling LU. Adsorption and desorption behavior under coal–water–gas coupling conditions of high- and low-rank coal samples[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2023, 17(1): 145-157.
[3] Peng CHENG, Xianming XIAO, Hui TIAN, Jian SUN, Qizhang FAN, Haifeng GAI, Tengfei LI. Water-bearing characteristics and their effects on the nanopores of overmature coal-measure shales in the Wuxiang area of the Qinshui Basin, north China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2023, 17(1): 273-292.
[4] Guangyuan MU, Haihai HOU, Jiaqiang ZHANG, Yue TANG, Ya-nan LI, Bin SUN, Yong LI, Tim JONES, Yuan YUAN, Longyi SHAO. Fractal characterization of pore structure and its influence on CH4 adsorption and seepage capacity of low-rank coals[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2022, 16(4): 916-933.
[5] Qiang XU, Hangbing LIN, Yue ZHAO, Bo WANG, Bin MA, Rong DING, Jianxin WANG, Tao HOU. Evolution of pore structure in organic shale with type III kerogen and high kaolinite content in Ningwu Basin[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(4): 831-848.
[6] Xiaowei HOU, Yang WANG, Yanming ZHU, Jie XIANG. Pore structure complexity and its significance to the petrophysical properties of coal measure gas reservoirs in Qinshui Basin, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(4): 860-875.
[7] Aikuan WANG, Pei SHAO, Qinghui WANG. Biogenic gas generation effects on anthracite molecular structure and pore structure[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(2): 272-282.
[8] Weidong XIE, Meng WANG, Hua WANG, Ruying MA, Hongyue DUAN. Diagenesis of shale and its control on pore structure, a case study from typical marine, transitional and continental shales[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(2): 378-394.
[9] Wanchun ZHAO, Xin LI, Tingting WANG, Xuehai FU. Pore size distribution of high volatile bituminous coal of the southern Junggar Basin: a full-scale characterization applying multiple methods[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(2): 237-255.
[10] Xiangzeng WANG, Junping ZHOU, Xiao SUN, Shifeng TIAN, Jiren TANG, Feng SHEN, Jinqiao WU. The influences of composition and pore structure on the adsorption behavior of CH4 and CO2 on shale[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2021, 15(2): 283-300.
[11] Chang’an SHAN, Tingshan ZHANG, Xing LIANG, Dongchu SHU, Zhao ZHANG, Xiangfeng WEI, Kun ZHANG, Xuliang FENG, Haihua ZHU, Shengtao WANG, Yue CHEN. Effects of nano-pore system characteristics on CH4 adsorption capacity in anthracite[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(1): 75-91.
[12] Haihai HOU, Longyi SHAO, Yonghong LI, Zhen LI, Wenlong ZHANG, Huaijun WEN. The pore structure and fractal characteristics of shales with low thermal maturity from the Yuqia Coalfield, northern Qaidam Basin, northwestern China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(1): 148-159.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed