1. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China 2. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
A novel hybrid anaerobic-contact oxidation biofilm baffled reactor (HAOBR) was developed to simultaneously remove nitrogenous and carbonaceous organic pollutants from decentralized molasses wastewater in the study. The study was based on the inoculation of anaerobic granule sludge in anaerobic compartments and the installation of combination filler in aerobic compartments. The performance of reactor system was studied regarding the hydraulic retention time (HRT), microbial characteristics and the gas water ratio (GWR). When the HRT was 24h and the GWR was 20:1, total ammonia and chemical oxygen demand (COD) of the effluent were reduced by 99% and 91.8%, respectively. The reactor performed stably for treating decentralized molasses wastewater. The good performance of the reactor can be attributed to the high resistance of COD and hydraulic shock loads. In addition, the high solid retention time of contact oxidation biofilm contributed to stable performance of the reactor.
ZhuG F, LiJ Z, WuP, JinH Z, WangZ. The performance and phase separated characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor treating soybean protein processing wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(17): 8027-8033 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.046
2
BarberW P, StuckeyD C. The use of the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for wastewater treatment: a review. Water Research, 1999, 33(7): 1559-1578 doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00371-6
3
SetiadiT, Husaini, DjajadiningratA. Palm oil mill effluent treatment by anaerobic baffled reactors: recycle effects and biokinetic parameters. Water Science and Technology, 1996, 34(11): 59-66 doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(96)00821-9
4
GroverR, MarwahaS S, KennedyJ F. Studies on the use of anaerobic baffled reactor for the continuous anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill black liquors. Process Biochemistry (Barking, London, England), 1999, 34(6-7): 653-657 doi: 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00138-1
5
WelanderU, HenryssonT, WelanderT. Biological nitrogen removal from municipal landfill leachate in a pilot scale suspended carrier biofilm process. Water Research,1998, 32(5): 1564-1570 doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00351-5β
6
Ramaraj Boopathy. Biological treatment of swine waste using anaerobic baffled reactors. Bioresource Technology, 1998, 64(1): 1-6 doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00178-8
MVossoughi, MShakeri, IAlemzadeh. Performance of anaerobic baffled reactor treating synthetic wastewater influenced by decreasing COD/SO4 ratios. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intersification, 2003, 42(10): 811-816 doi: 10.1016/S0255-2701(02)00107-1
9
BodíkI, KratochvílK, GasparikováE, HutnanM. Nitrogen removal in an anaerobic baffled filter reactor with aerobic post-treatment. Bioresource Technology, 2003, 86(1): 79-84 doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00109-8 pmid: 12421013
10
NachaiyasitS, StuckeyD C. The effect of shock loads on the performance of an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR).1.Step changes in feed concentration at constant retention time. Water Research, 1997, 31(11): 2737-2746 doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00133-4
11
WangJ, HuangY, ZhaoX. Performance and characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor. Bioresource Technology, 2004, 93(2): 205-208 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2003.06.004 pmid: 15051083
12
Maya-AltamiraL, BaunA, AngelidakiI, SchmidtJ E. Influence of wastewater characteristics on methane potential in food-processing industry wastewaters. Water Research, 2008, 42(8): 2195-2203 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.11.033
13
EntürkE S, InceM, Onkal-EnginG. Treatment efficiency and VFA composition of a thermophilic anaerobic contact reactor treating food industry wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 176(1): 843-848 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.113
14
AbbottM S R., HarveyA P, Perez, ValenteG. Biological processing in oscillatory baffled reactors: operation, advantages and potential. Interface Focus, 2013, 3(1): 32-36 doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2012.0036
15
ThanwisedP, WirojanagudW, ReungS. Effect of hydraulic retention time on hydrogen production and chemical oxygen demand removal from tapioca wastewater using anaerobic mixed cultures in anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(20): 15503-15510 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.068
Ayaz-SelmaC, AkcaL, AktasO. Pilot-scale anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater in upflow anaerobic sludge bed and anaerobic baffled reactors at ambient temperatures. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2012, 46(1-3): 60-67 doi: 10.1080/19443994.2012.677504
18
TawfikA, El-QelishM. Continuous hydrogen production from co-digestion of municipal food waste and kitchen wastewater in mesophilic anaerobic baffled reactor. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 114: 270-274 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.016
19
JiG D, SunT H, NiJ R. Anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for treating heavy oil produced water with high concentrations of salt and poor nutrient. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(3): 1108-1114 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.08.015 pmid: 18793845
20
BarberW P, StuckeyD C. Nitrogen removal in a modified anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR): 2, nitrification. Water Research, 2000, 34(9): 2423-2432 doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00426-1
21
KimY M, ParkD, LeeD S. Sudden failure of biological nitrogen and carbon removal in the full-scale pre-denitrification process treating cokes wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(19): 4340-4347 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.014 pmid: 19427199
22
HadjivassilisI, GajdosS, VancoD. Treatment of wastewater from the potato chips and snacks manufacturing industry. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 36(2-3): 329-335 doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00405-8
