Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

邮发代号 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering  2022, Vol. 16 Issue (9): 118   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-022-1550-7
  本期目录
Design of nanofibre interlayer supported forward osmosis composite membranes and its evaluation in fouling study with cleaning
Tao Ma1, Haiqing Hui1, Xiaofei You2, Zhiqiang Pei3, Miao Tian1(), Bing Wu4
1. School of Ecology and Environment, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
2. Singapore Membrane Technology Centre, Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637141, Singapore
3. Beijing Origin Water Membrane Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 101407, China
4. Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iceland, Reykjavik IS-107, Iceland
 全文: PDF(6952 KB)   HTML
Abstract

• A fine fibre (40–60 nm diameter) interlayer (~1 µm thickness) was electrospun.

• Fine fibre interlayer promoted formation of defect-free dense polyamide layer.

• FO membrane with dual-layer substrate had less organic fouling potential.

• High reverse salt flux accelerated organic fouling on FO membrane.

Nanofibre-supported forward osmosis (FO) membranes have gained popularity owing to their low structural parameters and high water flux. However, the nanofibrous membranes are less stable in long-term use, and their fouling behaviours with foulants in both feed solution (FS) and draw solution (DS) is less studied. This study developed a nanofibrous thin-film composite (TFC) FO membrane by designing a tiered dual-layer nanofibrous substrate to enhance membrane stability during long-term usage and cleaning. Various characterisation methods were used to study the effect of the electrospun nanofibre interlayer and drying time, which is the interval after removing the M-phenylenediamine (MPD) solution and before reacting with trimesoyl chloride (TMC) solution, on the intrinsic separation FO performance. The separation performance of the dual-layer nanofibrous FO membranes was examined using model foulants (sodium alginate and bovine serum albumin) in both the FS and DS. The dual-layer nanofibrous substrate was superior to the single-layer nanofibrous substrate and showed a flux of 30.2 L/m2/h (LMH) when using 1.5 mol/L NaCl against deionised (DI) water in the active layer facing draw solution (AL-DS) mode. In the fouling test, the water flux was effectively improved without sacrificing the water/solute selectivity under the condition that foulants existed in both the FS and DS. In addition, the dual-layer nanofibrous TFC FO membrane was more robust during the fouling test and cleaning.

Key wordsForward osmosis    Electro-spinning    Interfacial polymerisation    Fouling    Polyvinylidene fluoride
收稿日期: 2021-10-06      出版日期: 2022-03-02
Corresponding Author(s): Miao Tian   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2022, 16(9): 118.
Tao Ma, Haiqing Hui, Xiaofei You, Zhiqiang Pei, Miao Tian, Bing Wu. Design of nanofibre interlayer supported forward osmosis composite membranes and its evaluation in fouling study with cleaning. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(9): 118.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/CN/10.1007/s11783-022-1550-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/CN/Y2022/V16/I9/118
Parameters Sub-S Sub-D
Homogeneous Top Bottom
PVDF (wt%) 8 5 8
Solvent DMF/acetone DMF/acetone DMF/acetone
Flow rate (µL/min) 80 50 80
Applied voltage (kV) 19±1 21±1 19±1
Working distance (cm) 12 12 12
Humidity (%) 60±2 50±2 60±2
Tab.1  
Fig.1  
Parameter Sub-S Sub-D
Membrane thickness (µm) 33.8±0.3 31.1±0.6
Contact angle (°) 122.7±3.3 121.8±6.3
Porosity (%) 70.5±2.2 60.2±5.0
Mean pore size (µm) 0.92±0.01 0.54±0.06
Max pore size (µm) 1.35±0.14 0.81±0.04
Tab.2  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Membrane
type
Water permeability
coefficient, A
(L/m2/h/bar)
Salt
permeability
coefficient, B
(L/m2/h)
Salt
rejection,
R (%)
Structure
parameter, S
(µm)
TFC-S-1 0.93±0.21 1.87±0.70 40±1 553.3±43.0
TFC-S-2 0.56±0.0 0.52±0.03 59±1 375.7±7.9
TFC-D-1 0.40±0.08 0.21±0.02 71±3 1075.4±151.0
TFC-D-2 0.52±0.04 0.21±0.08 77±6 1370.7±187.2
HTI 0.12 0.19 46 1112.3
Tab.3  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Sample code ρ(TOC) (mg/cm2)
SA (HTI) 0.004
SA (TFC-S) 0.037
SA (TFC-D) 0.011
BSA (HTI) 0.004
BSA (TFC-D) 0.003
Tab.4  
1 N Abdullah, N Yusof, A F Ismail, W J Lau (2021). Insights into metal-organic frameworks-integrated membranes for desalination process: A review. Desalination, 500: 114867
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114867
2 A Ali, R A Tufa, F Macedonio, E Curcio, E Drioli (2018). Membrane technology in renewable-energy-driven desalination. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81: 1–21
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.047
3 G Blandin, F Ferrari, G Lesage, P Le-Clech, M Héran, X Martinez-Lladó (2020). Forward osmosis as concentration process: Review of opportunities and challenges. Membranes (Basel), 10(10): 284
https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10100284 pmid: 33066490
4 T Cath, A Childress, M Elimelech (2006). Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments. Journal of Membrane Science, 281(1–2): 70–87
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.048
5 L Deng, Q Wang, X An, Z Li, Y Hu (2020). Towards enhanced antifouling and flux performances of thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane via constructing a sandwich-like carbon nanotubes-coated support. Desalination, 479: 114311
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114311
6 C W Extrand (2002). Water contact angles and hysteresis of polyamide surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 248(1): 136–142
https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2001.8172 pmid: 16290514
7 C W Extrand (2004). Contact angles and their hysteresis as a measure of liquid-solid adhesion. Langmuir, 20(10): 4017–4021
https://doi.org/10.1021/la0354988 pmid: 15969393
8 F Gao, J Wang, H Zhang, M A Hang, Z Cui, G Yang (2017). Interaction energy and competitive adsorption evaluation of different NOM fractions on aged membrane surfaces. Journal of Membrane Science, 542: 195–207
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.08.020
9 S R Holmes-Farley, R H Reamey, T J Mccarthy, J Deutch, G M Whitesides (1985). Acid-base behavior of carboxylic acid groups covalently attached at the surface of polyethylene: The usefulness of contact angle in following the ionization of surface functionality. Langmuir, 1(6): 725–740
https://doi.org/10.1021/la00066a016
10 E Jones, M Qadir, M T H van Vliet, V Smakhtin, S M Kang (2019). The state of desalination and brine production: A global outlook. Science of the Total Environment, 657: 1343–1356
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.076 pmid: 30677901
11 L H Kim, S S Bucs, G J Witkamp, J S Vrouwenvelder (2020). Organic composition in feed solution of forward osmosis membrane systems has no impact on the boron and water flux but reduces scaling. Journal of Membrane Science, 611: 118306
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118306
12 C Klaysom, S Hermans, A Gahlaut, S Van Craenenbroeck, I F J Vankelecom (2013). Polyamide/Polyacrylonitrile (PA/PAN) thin film composite osmosis membranes: Film optimization, characterization and performance evaluation. Journal of Membrane Science, 445: 25–33
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.037
13 W J Lau, A F Ismail, N Misdan, M A Kassim (2012). A recent progress in thin film composite membrane: A review. Desalination, 287: 190–199
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.004
14 H Li, M Fu, S Q Wang, X Zheng, M Zhao, F Yang, C Y Tang, Y Dong (2021a). Stable Zr-based metal-organic framework nanoporous membrane for efficient desalination of hypersaline water. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(21): 14917–14927
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06105 pmid: 34661395
15 R Li, J Li, L Rao, H Lin, L Shen, Y Xu, J Chen, B Q Liao (2021b). Inkjet printing of dopamine followed by UV light irradiation to modify mussel-inspired PVDF membrane for efficient oil-water separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 619: 118790
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118790
16 Q Liu, J Li, Z Zhou, J Xie, J Y Lee (2016). Hydrophilic mineral coating of membrane substrate for reducing internal concentration polarization (ICP) in forward osmosis. Scientific Reports, 6(1): 19593
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19593 pmid: 26796675
17 F Luo, J Wang, Z Yao, L Zhang, H Chen (2021). Polydopamine nanoparticles modified nanofiber supported thin film composite membrane with enhanced adhesion strength for forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science, 618: 118673
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118673
18 S Manju, N Sagar (2017). Renewable energy integrated desalination: A sustainable solution to overcome future fresh-water scarcity in India. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73: 594–609
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.164
19 C R Martinetti, A E Childress, T Y Cath (2009). High recovery of concentrated RO brines using forward osmosis and membrane distillation. Journal of Membrane Science, 331(1–2): 31–39
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.01.003
20 J R McCutcheon, M Elimelech (2006). Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science, 284(1–2): 237–247
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.049
21 B Mi, M Elimelech (2008). Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 320(1–2): 292–302
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.036
22 A Nasrul, A Bastian, M Sri, O Yoshikage, M Hideto (2011). Improved fouling reduction of PES hollow fiber membranes by incorporation with non-ionic surfactant. Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment, 15(2): 212–216
23 M J Park, R R Gonzales, A Abdel-Wahab, S Phuntsho, H K Shon (2018). Hydrophilic polyvinyl alcohol coating on hydrophobic electrospun nanofiber membrane for high performance thin film composite forward osmosis membrane. Desalination, 426: 50–59
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.042
24 L E Peng, Z Yao, Z Yang, H Guo, C Y Tang (2020). Dissecting the role of substrate on the morphology and separation properties of thin film composite polyamide membranes: seeing is believing. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(11): 6978–6986
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01427 pmid: 32396337
25 M Qasim, N A Darwish, S Sarp, N Hilal (2015). Water desalination by forward (direct) osmosis phenomenon: A comprehensive review. Desalination, 374: 47–69
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.07.016
26 H Saleem, L Trabzon, A Kilic, S J Zaidi (2020). Recent advances in nanofibrous membranes: Production and applications in water treatment and desalination. Desalination, 478: 114178
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.114178
27 I Sreedhar, S Khaitan, R Gupta, B M Reddy, A Venugopal (2018). An odyssey of process and engineering trends in forward osmosis. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 4(2): 129–168
https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EW00507E
28 W Suwaileh, D Johnson, N Hilal (2020). Membrane desalination and water re-use for agriculture: State of the art and future outlook. Desalination, 491: 114559
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114559
29 C Y Tang, Z Yang, H Guo, J J Wen, L D Nghiem, E Cornelissen (2018). Potable water reuse through advanced membrane technology. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(18): 10215–10223
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00562 pmid: 30137968
30 J H Teng, H M Zhang, C Y Tang, H J Lin (2021). Novel molecular level insights into forward osmosis membrane fouling affected by reverse diffusion of draw solutions based on thermodynamic mechanisms. Journal of Membrane Science, 620: 118815
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118815
31 M Tian, C Qiu, Y Liao, S Chou, R Wang (2013). Preparation of polyamide thin film composite forward osmosis membranes using electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) nanofibers as substrates. Separation and Purification Technology, 118: 727–736
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.08.021
32 M Tian, R Wang, K Goh, Y Liao, A G Fane (2015). Synthesis and characterization of high-performance novel thin film nanocomposite PRO membranes with tiered nanofiber support reinforced by functionalized carbon nanotubes. Journal of Membrane Science, 486: 151–160
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.054
33 M Tian, Y N Wang, R Wang, A G Fane (2017). Synthesis and characterization of thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membranes supported by silica nanoparticle incorporated nanofibrous substrate. Desalination, 401: 142–150
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.04.003
34 H Wang, B Gao, L A Hou, H K Shon, Q Yue, Z Wang (2021). Fertilizer drawn forward osmosis as an alternative to 2nd pass seawater reverse osmosis: Estimation of boron removal and energy consumption. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(6): 135
35 J Wang, D S Dlamini, A K Mishra, M T M Pendergast, M C Y Wong, B B Mamba, V Freger, A R D Verliefde, E M V Hoek (2014). A critical review of transport through osmotic membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 454: 516–537
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.034
36 R Wang, L Shi, C Y Y Tang, S R Chou, C Qiu, A G Fane (2010). Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 355(1–2): 158–167
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.017
37 Y Wang, M K Zhang, Y Q Liu, Q Q Xiao, S C Xu (2016). Quantitative evaluation of concentration polarization under different operating conditions for forward osmosis process. Desalination, 398: 106–113
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.07.015
38 R N Wenzel (1949). Surface roughness and contact angle. Journal of Physical and Colloid Chemistry, 53(9): 1466–1467
https://doi.org/10.1021/j150474a015
39 K Xiao, S Liang, X Wang, C Chen, X Huang (2019). Current state and challenges of full-scale membrane bioreactor applications: A critical review. Bioresource Technology, 271: 473–481
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.061 pmid: 30245197
40 W X Xu, Q Z Chen, Q C Ge (2017). Recent advances in forward osmosis (FO) membrane: Chemical modifications on membranes for FO processes. Desalination, 419: 101–116
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.06.007
41 W Xue, M Zaw, X An, Y Hu, A S Tabucanon (2020). Sea salt bittern-driven forward osmosis for nutrient recovery from black water: A dual waste-to-resource innovation via the osmotic membrane process. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(2): 32
42 S Yadav, H Saleem, I Ibrar, O Naji, A A Hawari, A A Alanezi, S J Zaidi, A Altaee, J Zhou (2020). Recent developments in forward osmosis membranes using carbon-based nanomaterials. Desalination, 482: 114375
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114375
43 Z Yang, H Guo, C Y Y Tang (2019). The upper bound of thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide membranes for desalination. Journal of Membrane Science, 590: 117297
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117297
44 Z Yang, P F Sun, X Li, B Gan, L Wang, X Song, H D Park, C Y Tang (2020). A critical review on thin-film nanocomposite membranes with interlayered structure: mechanisms, recent developments, and environmental applications. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(24): 15563–15583
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05377 pmid: 33213143
45 F Y Yu, H T Shi, J Shi, K Y Teng, Z W Xu, X M Qian (2020). High-performance forward osmosis membrane with ultra-fast water transport channel and ultra-thin polyamide layer. Journal of Membrane Science, 616: 118611
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118611
46 K M Zhang, X C An, Y Bai, C Shen, Y P Jiang, Y X Hu (2021). Exploration of food preservatives as draw solutes in the forward osmosis process for juice concentration. Journal of Membrane Science, 635: 119495
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119495
47 M Zhang, W Jin, F Yang, M Duke, Y Dong, C Y Y Tang (2020). Engineering a nanocomposite interlayer for a novel ceramic-based forward osmosis membrane with enhanced performance. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(12): 7715–7724
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02809 pmid: 32401501
48 S Zhang, K Y Wang, T S Chung, H M Chen, Y C Jean, G Amy (2010). Well-constructed cellulose acetate membranes for forward osmosis: Minimized internal concentration polarization with an ultra-thin selective layer. Journal of Membrane Science, 360(1–2): 522–535
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.05.056
49 X Zhang, S Xiong, C X Liu, L Shen, C Ding, C Y Guan, Y Wang (2019). Confining migration of amine monomer during interfacial polymerization for constructing thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane with low fouling propensity. Chemical Engineering Science, 207: 54–68
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2019.06.010
50 Z Y Zhou, Y X Hu, C Boo, Z Y Liu, J Q Li, L Y Deng, X C An (2018). High-performance thin-film composite membrane with an ultrathin spray-coated carbon nanotube interlayer. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 5(5): 243–248
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00169
[1] FSE-21129-OF-MT_suppl_1 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed