Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2024, Vol. 18 Issue (2) : 18    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-024-1778-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Drinking water quality & health risk assessment of secondary water supply systems in residential neighborhoods
Yating Wei1, Dong Hu2, Chengsong Ye1, Heng Zhang1, Haoran Li1, Xin Yu1()
1. College of the Environment & Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
2. School of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
 Download: PDF(6780 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● Most water samples had excellent quality and negligible or acceptable health risks.

● One summer sample’ quality was extremely poor due to the total bacterial count.

● Samples showed higher carcinogenic risk (7.63×10−5 ± 3.29×10−6) for children0–5.

● Arsenic was the major substance contributing to carcinogenic risk.

● Summer samples’ poor water quality and higher health risks deserve attention.

Secondary water supply systems (SWSSs) are important components of the water supply infrastructure that ensure residents’ drinking water safety. SWSSs are characterized by long detention time, warm temperature, and unreasonable management, which may trigger the deterioration of water quality and increase risks. In this study, drinking water quality index (DWQI) and health risk assessment (HRA) were selected and modified to quantitatively assess the water quality and health risks of SWSSs in residential neighborhoods. In total, 121 seasonal water samples were selected. It was observed that the water quality was excellent with the DWQI of 0.14 ± 0.04, excluding one sample, which was extremely poor owing to its excessive total bacterial count. The HRA results revealed that the health risks were low: negligible non-carcinogenic risk for any population; negligible and acceptable carcinogenic risk for children aged 6–17 and adults. However, samples revealed higher carcinogenic risk (7.63 × 10−5 ± 3.29 × 10−6) for children aged 0–5, and arsenic was the major substance. Summer samples had poor water quality and higher health risks, which called for attention. To further investigate the water quality and health risks of SWSSs, monthly sampling was conducted during summer. All 24 water samples were qualified in Chinese standard (GB 5749-2022) and characterized as excellent quality. Their HRA results were consistent with the seasonal samples’ and the health risks were mainly concentrated in May. Overall, our study provides a suitable framework for water quality security, advice for managers, and references for administrators in other cities.

Keywords Drinking water quality      Water quality index      Health risk assessment      Secondary water supply systems      Heavy metals     
Corresponding Author(s): Xin Yu   
Issue Date: 18 October 2023
 Cite this article:   
Yating Wei,Dong Hu,Chengsong Ye, et al. Drinking water quality & health risk assessment of secondary water supply systems in residential neighborhoods[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(2): 18.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-024-1778-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2024/V18/I2/18
Fig.1  Boxplots of water quality assessment results of seasonal water samples. (a) Drinking water quality index (DWQI), (b) sensory and chemical indices (WQI1), (c) organic pollution indices (WQI2), (d) carcinogen indices (WQI3), (e) generally toxic indices (WQI4), (f) enteric infection indices (WQI5). Groups of boxplots without common letters (a–d) were significantly different (p < 0.05, N = 110). The scatter dot plot displayed all the data (N = 121), where the culled data was marked with the solid dots.
Fig.2  Boxplots of seasonal samples’ carcinogenic risk assessment results. Boxplots of population groups (a) depict carcinogenic risks of all samples for all population groups (N = 363) and other classifications’ boxplots (b–d) depict carcinogenic risks for children0–5 alone (N = 121). In the boxplots of material contribution (e), several outliers were removed and some suitable data (75 samples, N = 225) were left. Boxplots displayed all the data, and their whiskers were 10–90 percentile, where groups without common letters (a–f) were significantly different (p < 0.05).
Category Number of categorical samples Total carcinogenic risk (TCR) Total non-carcinogenic risk (HI) The proportion of samples for each carcinogenic risk class
Mean SD Mean SD I II
Population groups Children0–5 121 7.63×10–5 3.29×10–6 0.251 0.008 0.83% 21.49% 51.24% 26.45%
Children6–17 121 3.54×10–5 1.53×10–6 0.115 0.004 2.48% 75.21% 22.31% 0.00%
Adults 121 3.85×10–5 1.66×10–6 0.126 0.004 1.65% 70.25% 28.10% 0.00%
Samples types a) Input water 41 7.89×10–5 6.59×10–6 0.251 0.016 2.44% 24.39% 46.34% 26.83%
Tank water 43 8.28×10–5 5.91×10–6 0.261 0.015 0.00% 20.93% 51.16% 27.91%
Tap water 37 8.23×10–5 6.40×10–6 0.248 0.017 0.00% 18.92% 56.76% 24.32%
Seasons a) Autumn 32 5.70×10–5 4.08×10–6 0.256 0.014 0.00% 40.63% 56.25% 3.13%
Winter 18 4.45×10–5 8.63×10–6 0.175 0.030 5.56% 55.56% 38.89% 0.00%
Spring 34 8.54×10–5 5.91×10–6 0.259 0.015 0.00% 8.82% 58.82% 32.35%
Summer 37 1.00×10–4 4.30×10–6 0.275 0.012 0.00% 0.00% 45.95% 54.05%
Districts a) SM 18 1.01×10–4 6.89×10–6 0.292 0.015 0.00% 0.00% 55.56% 44.44%
HL 20 9.42×10–5 5.79×10–6 0.328 0.005 0.00% 0.00% 45.00% 55.00%
HC 24 1.04×10–4 5.34×10–6 0.327 0.009 0.00% 0.00% 50.00% 50.00%
JM 15 4.89×10–5 6.54×10–6 0.245 0.020 0.00% 60.00% 33.33% 6.67%
TA 22 5.87×10–5 4.01×10–6 0.169 0.007 0.00% 36.36% 63.64% 0.00%
XA 22 4.66×10–5 6.98×10–6 0.153 0.014 4.55% 40.91% 54.55% 0.00%
Tab.1  The results of HRA and classification of seasonal samples
Fig.3  Boxplots of seasonal samples’ non-carcinogenic risk assessment results. Boxplots of population groups (a) reveal non-carcinogenic risks of all samples for all population groups (N = 363) and other classifications’ boxplots (b–d) depict non-carcinogenic risks for children0–5 alone (N = 121). In the boxplots of material contribution (e), several outliers were removed and some suitable data (72 samples, N = 300) were left. Boxplots display all the data, and their whiskers were 10–90 percentile, where groups without common letters (a–d) were significantly different (p < 0.05).
Fig.4  Bar graphs of water quality assessment results of monthly summer samples. (a) Drinking water quality index (DWQI), (b) sensory and chemical indices (WQI1), (c) organic pollution indices (WQI2), (d) carcinogen indices (WQI3), (e) generally toxic indices (WQI4), (f) enteric infection indices (WQI5). Groups without common letters (a–c) were significantly different (p < 0.05, N = 24).
Exposure routes Population groups Carcinogenic risk Non-carcinogenic risk The proportion of samples for each carcinogenic risk class
Mean SD Mean SD I II
Total (TC or HI) Children0–5 8.95×10–5 7.96×10–6 0.374 0.020 0.00% 4.17% 70.83% 25.00%
Children6–17 4.16×10–5 3.67×10–6 0.177 0.009 0.00% 75.00% 25.00% 0.00%
Adults 4.52×10–5 4.01×10–6 0.190 0.010 0.00% 75.00% 25.00% 0.00%
Oral ingestion (CRoral or HQoral) Children0–5 8.87×10–5 7.92×10–6 0.366 0.020 0.00% 4.17% 70.83% 25.00%
Children6–17 4.06×10–5 3.63×10–6 0.167 0.009 0.00% 75.00% 25.00% 0.00%
Adults 4.46×10–5 3.99×10–6 0.184 0.010 0.00% 75.00% 25.00% 0.00%
Dermal exposure (CRdermal or HQdermal) Children0–5 7.34×10–7 7.10×10–8 0.008 0.000 79.17% 20.83% 0.00% 0.00%
Children6–17 9.47×10–7 8.65×10–8 0.010 0.000 58.33% 41.67% 0.00% 0.00%
Adults 5.72×10–7 5.23×10–8 0.006 0.000 91.67% 8.33% 0.00% 0.00%
Tab.2  The results of HRA and classification of monthly summer samples
Fig.5  Stacked bar graphs of carcinogenic risk assessment results of monthly summer samples. (a) Total carcinogenic risk (TCR), (b) carcinogenic risk through oral ingestion (CRoral), (c) carcinogenic risk through dermal exposure (CRdermal). Groups without common letters (a and b) were significantly different (p < 0.05, N = 24) in the additive values of carcinogenic risks contributed by all substances.
Fig.6  Stacked bar graphs of non-carcinogenic risk assessment results of monthly summer samples. (a) Hazard index (HI), (b) hazard quotient through oral ingestion (HQoral), (c) hazard quotient through dermal exposure (HQdermal). Groups without common letters (a–c) were significantly different (p < 0.05, N = 24) in the additive values of carcinogenic risks contributed by all substances.
1 R Aghlmand, S Rasi Nezami, A Abbasi. (2021). Evaluation of chemical parameters of urban drinking water quality along with health risk assessment: a case study of Ardabil Province, Iran. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10): 5179
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105179
2 A Al-Omran, F Al-Barakah, A Altuquq, A Aly, M Nadeem. (2015). Drinking water quality assessment and water quality index of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 50(3): 287–296
https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrjc.2015.039
3 A Alver. (2019). Evaluation of conventional drinking water treatment plant efficiency according to water quality index and health risk assessment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(26): 27225–27238
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05801-y
4 H Amjad, I Hashmi, M S U Rehman, M Ali Awan, S Ghaffar, Z Khan. (2013). Cancer and non-cancer risk assessment of trihalomethanes in urban drinking water supplies of Pakistan. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 91: 25–31
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.01.008
5 L Cui, J Li, X Y Gao, B Tian, J W Zhang, X N Wang, Z T Liu. (2022). Human health ambient water quality criteria for 13 heavy metals and health risk assessment in Taihu Lake. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(4): 41
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1475-6
6 D D’Ippoliti, E Santelli, Sario M De, M Scortichini, M Davoli, P Michelozzi. (2015). Arsenic in drinking water and mortality for cancer and chronic diseases in central Italy, 1990–2010. PLoS One, 10(9): e0138182
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138182
7 M Geng, H Qi, X Liu, B Gao, Z Yang, W Lu, R Sun. (2016). Occurrence and health risk assessment of selected metals in drinking water from two typical remote areas in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23(9): 8462–8469
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-6021-2
8 H Haider, M H Alkhowaiter, M Shafiquzzaman, S S Alsaleem, M Almoshaogeh, F Alharbi. (2019). Spatiotemporal water quality variations in smaller water supply systems: using modified CCME WQI from groundwater source to distribution networks. Water (Basel), 11(9): 1884
https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091884
9 R K Horton. (1965). An index number system for rating water quality. Journal–Water Pollution Control Federation, 37: 300–306
10 D Hu, H Hong, B Rong, Y Wei, J Zeng, J Zhu, L Bai, F Guo, X Yu. (2021). A comprehensive investigation of the microbial risk of secondary water supply systems in residential neighborhoods in a large city. Water Research, 205: 117690
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117690
11 D Hu, J Zeng, J Chen, W Lin, X Xiao, M Feng, X Yu. (2023). Microbiological quality of roof tank water in an urban village in southeastern China. Journal of Environmental Sciences–China, 125: 148–159
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.01.036
12 D Hu, J Zeng, Y Hu, X Fei, X Xiao, M Feng, X Yu. (2022). A survey on heavy metal concentrations in residential neighborhoods: the influence of secondary water supply systems. Journal of Environmental Sciences–China, 117: 37–45
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.12.032
13 U Imran, M Khan, R Jamal, S Q Sahulka, R Goel, R Mahar, J Weidhaas. (2020). Probabilistic risk assessment of water distribution system in Hyderabad, Pakistan reveals unacceptable health hazards and areas for rehabilitation. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 191(15): 110233
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110233
14 Y Ji, J Wu, Y Wang, V Elumalai, T Subramani. (2020). Seasonal variation of drinking water quality and human health risk assessment in Hancheng City of Guanzhong Plain, China. Exposure and Health, 12(3): 469–485
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-020-00357-6
15 Z Karim. (2011). Risk assessment of dissolved trace metals in drinking water of Karachi, Pakistan. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 86(6): 676–678
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-0261-8
16 H Li, S Li, W Tang, Y Yang, J Zhao, S Xia, W Zhang, H Wang. (2018a). Influence of secondary water supply systems on microbial community structure and opportunistic pathogen gene markers. Water Research, 136: 160–168
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.031
17 W Li, J Zhang, F Wang, L Qian, Y Y Zhou, W Q Qi, J P Chen. (2018b). Effect of disinfectant residual on the interaction between bacterial growth and assimilable organic carbon in a drinking water distribution system. Chemosphere, 202: 586–597
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.056
18 W Y Li, Y Tian, J P Chen, X M Wang, Y Zhou, N Shi. (2022). Synergistic effects of sodium hypochlorite disinfection and iron-oxidizing bacteria on early corrosion in cast iron pipes. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(6): 72
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1506-3
19 M T Mahmoud, M A Hamouda, R R Al Kendi, M M Mohamed. (2018). Health risk assessment of household drinking water in a district in the UAE. Water (Basel), 10(12): 1726
https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121726
20 MEP (2013). Exposure Factors Handbook of Chinese Population (0–5 years). Exposure Factors Handbook of Chinese Population (6–17 years). Exposure Factors Handbook of Chinese Population (Adults). Bejing: China Environmental Science Press (in Chinese)
21 K Miyagi, K Sano, I Hirai. (2017). Sanitary evaluation of domestic water supply facilities with storage tanks and detection of Aeromonas, enteric and related bacteria in domestic water facilities in Okinawa Prefecture of Japan. Water Research, 119: 171–177
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.002
22 A Mohammadi, M Faraji, A A Ebrahimi, S Nemati, A Abdolahnejad, M Miri. (2020). Comparing THMs level in old and new water distribution systems: seasonal variation and probabilistic risk assessment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 192: 110286
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110286
23 N Naveedullah, M Z Hashmi, C N Yu, C F Shen, N Muhammad, H Shen, Y X Chen. (2016). Water quality characterization of the Siling Reservoir (Zhejiang, China) using water quality index. Clean (Weinheim), 44(5): 553–562
https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201400126
24 Y J Pan, Y L Li, H X Peng, Y P Yang, M Zeng, Y Xie, Y Lu, H Yuan. (2023). Relationship between groundwater cadmium and vicinity resident urine cadmium levels in the non-ferrous metal smelting area, China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(5): 56
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1656-6
25 V P Ulniković, S M Kurilic. (2020). Heavy metal and metalloid contamination and health risk assessment in spring water on the territory of Belgrade City, Serbia. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 42(11): 3731–3751
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-020-00617-z
26 C O Unigwe, J C Egbueri. (2023). Drinking water quality assessment based on statistical analysis and three water quality indices (MWQI, IWQI and EWQI): a case study. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(1): 686–707
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02076-7
27 D Wang, X Chen, J Zhang, Y Zhong, R Liu, P Ding. (2021). Geographic information system-based health risk assessment of rural drinking water in Central China: a case study of You County, Hunan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(2): 89
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-08870-0
28 F Wang, W Li, Y Li, J Zhang, J Chen, W Zhang, X Wu. (2018). Molecular analysis of bacterial community in the tap water with different water ages of a drinking water distribution system. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(3): 6
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1020-4
29 R Wang, J Yao, J Qian, H Zhu (2015). Application of modified comprehensive index method to drinking water quality assessment. China Water & Wastewater, 31(19): 108–112(in Chinese)
30 J Wu, P Li, D Wang, X Ren, M Wei. (2020). Statistical and multivariate statistical techniques to trace the sources and affecting factors of groundwater pollution in a rapidly growing city on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 26(6): 1603–1621
https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2019.1594156
31 J Wu, Y Man, G Sun, L Shang. (2018). Occurrence and health-risk assessment of trace metals in raw and boiled drinking water from rural areas of China. Water (Basel), 10(5): 641
https://doi.org/10.3390/w10050641
32 D Yuan, R Chen, H Qian, H Kan (2010). An integrated index approach established and its application to evaluate drinking water quality in Shanghai. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 27(5): 257–260 (in Chinese)
33 H Zhang, X Zhou, K Wang, W D Wang. (2017). Health risk assessment of arsenic from blended water in distribution systems. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part A, Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 52(14): 1322–1329
https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2017.1362296
34 Q Zhang, P Xu, H Qian. (2020). Groundwater quality assessment using improved water quality index (WQI) and human health risk (HHR) evaluation in a semi-arid region of northwest China. Exposure and Health, 12(3): 487–500
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-020-00345-w
35 Y Zhang, R Jia, J Wu, H Wang, Z Luo. (2022a). Uncertain in WQI-based groundwater quality assessment methods: a case study in east of Beijing, China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81(7): 202
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10311-1
36 Z Zhang, Y Guo, J Wu, F Su. (2022b). Surface water quality and health risk assessment in Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province (China). Exposure and Health, 14(1): 1–16
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-021-00408-6
37 J Zhou, X Dong, G Li, Y Wang, X Guo. (2010). Evaluation of groundwater quality in the Xinjiang Plain area. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 4(2): 183–186
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-010-0021-8
[1] FSE-23073-OF-WYT_suppl_1 Download
[1] Xian Zhou, Zhengfu Zhang, Hui Yang. Stabilization/solidification mechanisms of tin tailings and fuming slag-based geopolymers for different heavy metals[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(5): 56-.
[2] Chengjun Li, Riqing Yu, Wenjing Ning, Huan Zhong, Christian Sonne. Embracing digital mindsets to ensure a sustainable future[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(3): 39-.
[3] Xinwan Zhang, Guangyuan Meng, Jinwen Hu, Wanzi Xiao, Tong Li, Lehua Zhang, Peng Chen. Electroreduction of hexavalent chromium using a porous titanium flow-through electrode and intelligent prediction based on a back propagation neural network[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(8): 97-.
[4] Junmei Guo, Yuexing Wei, Junxing Yang, Tongbin Chen, Guodi Zheng, Tianwei Qian, Xiaona Liu, Xiaofei Meng, Mengke He. Cultivars and oil extraction techniques affect Cd/Pb contents and health risks in oil of rapeseed grown on Cd/Pb-contaminated farmland[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(7): 87-.
[5] Shijin Wu, Zijing Xiang, Daohui Lin, Lizhong Zhu. Multimedia distribution and health risk assessment of typical organic pollutants in a retired industrial park[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(11): 142-.
[6] Qian Li, Zhaoping Zhong, Haoran Du, Xiang Zheng, Bo Zhang, Baosheng Jin. Co-pyrolysis of sludge and kaolin/zeolite in a rotary kiln: Analysis of stabilizing heavy metals[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(7): 85-.
[7] Lihui Gao, Yijun Cao, Lizhang Wang, Shulei Li. A review on sustainable reuse applications of Fenton sludge during wastewater treatment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 77-.
[8] Liang Cui, Ji Li, Xiangyun Gao, Biao Tian, Jiawen Zhang, Xiaonan Wang, Zhengtao Liu. Human health ambient water quality criteria for 13 heavy metals and health risk assessment in Taihu Lake[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(4): 41-.
[9] Yanfeng Yang, Ruina Zhang, Ziyang Lou. Bioaerosol emissions variations in large-scale landfill region and their health risk impacts[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(12): 158-.
[10] Yunpeng Xing, Boyuan Xue, Yongshu Lin, Xueqi Wu, Fang Fang, Peishi Qi, Jinsong Guo, Xiaohong Zhou. A cellphone-based colorimetric multi-channel sensor for water environmental monitoring[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(12): 155-.
[11] Xianke Lin, Xiaohong Chen, Sichang Li, Yangmei Chen, Zebin Wei, Qitang Wu. Sewage sludge ditch for recovering heavy metals can improve crop yield and soil environmental quality[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 22-.
[12] Wenzhong Tang, Liu Sun, Limin Shu, Chuang Wang. Evaluating heavy metal contamination of riverine sediment cores in different land-use areas[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 104-.
[13] Marzieh Mokarram, Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, Huichun Zhang. Predicting non-carcinogenic hazard quotients of heavy metals in pepper (Capsicum annum L.) utilizing electromagnetic waves[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 114-.
[14] Sana Ullah, Xuejun Guo, Xiaoyan Luo, Xiangyuan Zhang, Siwen Leng, Na Ma, Palwasha Faiz. Rapid and long-effective removal of broad-spectrum pollutants from aqueous system by ZVI/oxidants[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 89-.
[15] Nan Wu, Weiyu Zhang, Shiyu Xie, Ming Zeng, Haixue Liu, Jinghui Yang, Xinyuan Liu, Fan Yang. Increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in manured agricultural soils in northern China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 1-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed