|
|
|
Ecosystem health assessment on the hill and gully area of Loess Plateau in lnner Mongolia, China |
| HUANG Heping1, YANG Jie2, SONG Bingyu3, BAO Tiejun3 |
| 1.The Cultivation Base for the State Key Laboratory-Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecology Laboratory, Inner Mongolia University, Huhhot 010021, China; School of Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China; 2.The Cultivation Base for the State Key Laboratory-Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecology Laboratory, Inner Mongolia University, Huhhot 010021, China; School of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Huhhot 010021, China; 3.The Cultivation Base for the State Key Laboratory-Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecology Laboratory, Inner Mongolia University, Huhhot 010021, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Maintenance of ecosystem health is the primary focus of a sound ecological restoration. Yet methods involved in quantifying and assessing the health level remain a challenge to the ecological community. In this study, we selected the hill and gully area of Loess Plateau, Inner Mongolia, China, as our study area. The soil and water erosions in this area continue to be responsible for many environmental problems in northern China because of its fragility and long disturbance history. In this study, we developed an assessment method of indicator system (AMIS) based on analytical hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy mathematics, and the theory of net-hierarchy. At ecosystem or catchment scale, three sample areas, that is (1) intact vegetation (i.e., Aguimiao Natural Reserve, 110º45 2E, 39º28 2N), (2) reconstructed vegetation (Wufendigou Soil and Water Conservation Experimental Area, 111º07 2E, 39º45 2N), and (3) severely degraded vegetation (Yangquangou Catchment, 111º06 2E, 39º45 2N) in the hill and gully area of Loess Plateau in Inner Mongolia, China, were selected to examine ecosystem vigor, organizational structure, service function, and soil health. We applied the AMIS for all three landscapes by categorizing each ecosystem into five health levels. We found that the health index for reconstructed vegetation were at levels of IV, II, IV, and III, while those of degraded vegetation were ranked at V, IV, V, and IV. Overall, the comprehensive ecosystem health index of reconstructed vegetation was lower than that of intact vegetation but higher than that of degraded vegetation. The health index for reconstructed vegetation was at level III, and that of degraded vegetation was still at level IV. The contributing values were: organization structure > soil health > vigor > service function. Based on our results and assessments, we proposed several management recommendations and methods for restoring the regional ecosystems.
|
|
Issue Date: 05 September 2006
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
