|
|
|
Landscape pattern and eco-hydrological characteristics at the upstream of Minjiang River, China |
| LI Chongwei1, GE Jianping2, LIU Shirong3, SUN Pengsen3 |
| 1.College of Life Sciences, Bejing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; College of Urban and Environment Sciences, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300384, China; 2.College of Life Sciences, Bejing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 3.Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on three scenes of Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) satellite images acquired on June 26, 1994, 12 land cover types were identified by the supervised classification techniques. The precipitation, runoff, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data of six catchments were accumulated from April to September in 1992, 1993, and 1995. A new eco-hydrological index, expressed by the difference between precipitation and runoff divided by the product of precipitation and NDVI, was used in this study to represent the eco-hydrological functions of different catchments. The results were: (1) The selected six catchments at the upstream of Minjiang River, China were different in landscape patterns in terms of landscape type and cover. There were higher contagion, lower edge density and diversity index in the Shouxi catchments and lower contagion, higher edge density and diversity index in the Zagunao catchments. (2) Eco-hydrological indexes had remarkable differences among different catchments. The highest eco-hydrological index was found in the Shouxi catchments, which indicated higher precipitation holding capacity of vegetation therein. While the lower eco-hydrological index was found in the Zagunao catchments, which indicated its lower precipitation holding capacity of vegetation. (3) High correlation was detected between the landscape indexes and eco-hydrological indexes. Eco-hydrological index was positively correlated with landscape contagion in contrast with the negative correlation with landscape diversity and edge density.
|
|
Issue Date: 05 December 2006
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
