Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

邮发代号 80-972

2019 Impact Factor: 2.657

Frontiers in Energy  0, Vol. Issue (): 358-372   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-013-0257-7
  RESEARCH ARTICLE 本期目录
Optimal placement of PMUs for the smart grid implementation in Indian power grid—A case study
Optimal placement of PMUs for the smart grid implementation in Indian power grid—A case study
Pathirikkat GOPAKUMAR1(), G. Surya CHANDRA1, M. Jaya Bharata REDDY1, Dusmata Kumar MOHANTA2
1. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, 620015, Tamil Nadu, India; 2. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, 835215, Ranchi, India
 全文: PDF(934 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Efficient utilization of energy resources is essential for a developing country like India. The concept of smart grid (SG) can provide a highly reliable power system with optimized utilization of available resources. The present Indian power grid requires revolutionary changes to meet the growing demands and to make the grid smarter and reliable. One of the important requirements for SG is the instantaneous monitoring of the voltage, current and power flows at all buses in the grid. The traditional monitoring system cannot satisfy this requirement since they are based on nonlinear power flow equations. Synchro-phasor-measurement devices like phasor measurement units (PMUs) can measure the phasor values of voltages at installed buses. Consequently, the currents passing through all branches connected to that bus can be computed. Since the voltage phasor values at the neighboring buses of a bus containing the PMU can be estimated using Ohm’s law, it is redundant to install PMUs at all the buses in a power grid for its complete observability. This paper proposes the optimal geographical locations for the PMUs in southern region Indian power grid for the implementation of SG, using Integer Linear Programming. The proposed optimal geographical locations for PMU placement can be a stepping stone for the implementation of SG in India.

Key wordsphasor measurement units (PMUs)    smart grid (SG)    southern region Indian power grid (SRIPG)    integer linear programming (ILP)
收稿日期: 2012-10-23      出版日期: 2013-09-05
Corresponding Author(s): GOPAKUMAR Pathirikkat,Email:gopuvattekkat@gmail.com   
 引用本文:   
. Optimal placement of PMUs for the smart grid implementation in Indian power grid—A case study[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 0, (): 358-372.
Pathirikkat GOPAKUMAR, G. Surya CHANDRA, M. Jaya Bharata REDDY, Dusmata Kumar MOHANTA. Optimal placement of PMUs for the smart grid implementation in Indian power grid—A case study. Front Energ, 0, (): 358-372.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-013-0257-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y0/V/I/358
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
No.Bus nameNo.Bus nameNo.Bus nameNo.Bus name
1Chennai23Villupuram45Nallur67Madurai
2G.Poondi24TV Malai46Ingur68Pasumalai
3Almathy25Singarapettai47Pugalur69Paramkudi
4Ennore26Cuddalore48Trichy70Theni
5Monali27Neyveli TS149Thanjavur71Kadamparai
6Tondiarpet28Mettur50Thiruvarur72Sipcot
7Mosur29D. Kurchi51Pudukottai73Tuticorin
8Thiruvalam30NeyveliTS252Alagarkoil74Sathur
9Korattur31STCMS53RGPuram75Kayathur
10Mylapore32SAIL54Arasur76Viranam
11Koyambedu33Salem55Pykara77Kodikurchi
12Budur34M.Tunnel56Kundah378Sterlite
13Kadperi35Mettur TPS57Kundah279Auto
14Hyundai36Bahoor58Kundah180Udayathur
15Tharamani37Villianur59Valthur81Thirunelveli
16SP Koil38Eachengadu60Karaikudi82S.R.Pudur
17Arni39Peranbalur61Thudiyalur83Sankaneri
18V. Mangalam40Unjanai62O.K.Mandabam
19Hosur41Gobi63Udumalpet
20Kalpakkam42P.Chandai64Ponnapuram
21Karimangalam43Samaypuram65Sembatti
22Acharapakkam44Kdalangudu66Myvadi
Tab.1  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
SlTest systemPMU locations for complete observabilityPMU locations for depth of one un-observability
1Tamil Nadu6, 7, 9, 12, 19, 22, 27, 30, 33, 35, 47, 48, 50, 54, 58, 60, 63, 67, 73, 751, 19, 20, 27, 33, 48, 50, 57, 61, 63, 73, 75
Tab.2  
Fig.7  
No.Bus nameNo.Bus nameNo.Bus name
84Kasarkode92Trichur100Sabarigiri
85Nallalm93Palakkad101Kayamkulam
86Kaniampet94Periyar102Edamom
87Taliparambu95Idukki103Kundara
88Kanjikode96Bramhapuram104Pothencode
89Areakode97Kalamassery105Trivandrum
90Shornur98Pallom
91Malapparamba99New Pallom
Tab.3  
Fig.8  
SlTest systemPMU locations for complete observabilityPMU locations for depth of one un-observability
1Kerala5, 6, 9, 12, 16, 205, 12, 17, 20
Tab.4  
Fig.9  
No.Bus nameNo.Bus nameNo.Bus nameNo.Bus name
106Nirmal125Kakinada CC145Muddannur165Sedam
107Ramagundam126Vemagiri146Arantapur166Humnabad
108Dichpally127Vijayawada147Hindupur167Gulbarga
109Minpur128Bommur148AP3168Y.Mailaram
110Hyderabad129Nidadavolu149AP1169Barsur
111Karimnagar130Bhimadole150Cuddapah170Balimela
112Siddipet131S.Lbph151AP4171AP5
113Bhongir132Kurnool152Chittoor174Tiruvalam
114Khammam133N’Sagar153Ranigunta175Nellore
115Kothagudem134Not used154Sulurpet176Haveri
116Manuguru135Mehboob Ngr155Munirabad177Davangere
117L.Sileru136Raichur156L’Sugur178Kalinadi
118U.Sileru137Gooty157Hubli179Alamanthi
119Gazuwaka139Krishnapatanam158A’wadi180TN 130
120Pendurthi140Warangal159Narendra181Kolar
121Garividi141Siddipet161Ml.Pur
122Vizag142Sri Sailam162Almati
123Simhadri 2143Ongole163BB. Vadi
124Simhadri 3144S.Palli164Shahabad
Tab.5  
Fig.10  
SlTest systemPMU locations for complete observabilityPMU locations for depth of one un-observability
1Andhra Pradesh2, 5, 7, 10, 16, 17, 22, 23, 27, 29, 30, 31, 40, 42, 45, 52, 54, 58, 60, 64, 65, 66, 74, 75, 77, 78, 79, 802, 9, 14, 23, 32, 45, 49, 52, 58, 63
Tab.6  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
No.Bus nameNo.Bus nameNo.Bus nameNo.Bus name
182Not used189C.Durga196Kemar203KA2
183Kadra190KA1197Mangalore204KA3
184Karwar191Talaguppa198Kudre Mukh205TK Halli
185Kaiga192Tail Race199Tiptur206H Halli
186Sirsi193Honali200Hassan207TN 7
187Sharavathi194Shimoga201Mysore208TN4
188Davangere 2195Varahi138Bangalore
Tab.7  
Fig.13  
SlTest systemPMU locations for complete observabilityPMU locations for depth of one un-observability
1Karnataka1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 11, 16, 21, 325, 8, 16, 23, 32
Tab.8  
SlTest systemTotal number of busesNo. of PMUs for complete observabilityNo. of PMUs for the depth of one un-observability
1APKA983411
2APTN1553915
3APKL943514
4KATN1092114
5KAKL48137
6KLTN105189
Tab.9  
Fig.14  
SlTest systemPMU locations for the complete observability
1SRIPG1, 9, 10, 12, 22, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33, 47, 48, 50, 54, 58, 60, 63, 65, 73, 75, 76, 88, 89, 93, 95, 99, 104, 107, 110, 112, 115, 121, 122, 127, 128, 132, 135, 138, 145, 147, 152, 154, 157, 159, 163, 165, 167, 169, 170, 171, 181, 182, 185, 188, 192, 196, 201, 203
Tab.10  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
Fig.17  
1 India Smart Grid Task Force. An initiative of Ministry of Power, Government of India. 2012, http://www.cseb.gov.in/cspdcl/rapdrp/SCADA-DMS/RFP%20for%20SIA_05-12-2012.pdf
2 India Smart Grid Forum. An initiative of Ministry of Power, Government of India. 2012, http://173.201.177.176/isgf/
3 Tim T, Marina O. Network management for smart grids. ABB review. 2009–03, http://www05.abb.com/global/scot/scot271.nsf/veritydisplay/461c2ae39130ceafc125762d0047f01f/$file/45-49%203M901_ENG72dpi.pdf
4 Phadke A G, Thorp J S, Adamiak M G. A new measurement technique for tracking voltage phasors, local system frequency, and rate of change of frequency. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems , 1983, PAS-102(5): 1025–1038
doi: 10.1109/TPAS.1983.318043
5 Reynaldo F N, Padhke A G. Phasor measurement unit placement techniques for complete and incomplete observability. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery , 2005, 20(4): 2381–2388
doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2005.855457
6 Gou B. Generalized integer linear programming formulation for optimal PMU placement. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , 2008, 23(3): 1099–1104
doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2008.926475
7 Abur A, Magnago F H. Optimal meter placement for maintaining observability during single branch outages. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , 1999, 14(4): 1273–1278
doi: 10.1109/59.801884
8 Mar?n F J, Garc?a-Lagos F, Joya G, Sandoval F. Genetic algorithms for optimal placement of phasor measurement units in electric networks. Electronics Letters , 2003, 39(19): 1403–1405
doi: 10.1049/el:20030919
9 Peng J N, Sun Y Z, Wang H F. Optimal PMU placement for full network observability using Tabu search algorithm. Electric Power Systems Research , 2006, 28(4): 223–231
doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2005.05.005
10 Mohammadi-Ivatloo B. Optimal placement of PMUs for power system observability using topology based formulated algorithms. Journal of Applied Sciences , 2009, 9(13): 2463–2468
doi: 10.3923/jas.2009.2463.2468
11 Schulze M A. Linear programming for optimization. 1998, http://www.markschulze.net/LinearProgramming.pdf
12 Xu B, Abur A. Observability analysis and measurement placement for systemswith PMUs. In: Proceedings of IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition . New York, USA, 2004. 943–946
13 Phadke A G, Thorp J S, Karimi K J. Real time voltage phasor measurements for static state estimation. IEEE Transactions on PAS , 1985, 104(11): 3098–3106
14 Phadke A G, Thorp J S, Nuqui R F, Zhou M. Recent developments in state estimation with phasor measurements. In: Proceedings of Power Systems Conference and Exposition (PSCE '09) . Seattle, USA, 2009, 1–7
15 Xu B, Abur A.Optimal placement of Phasor Measurement Units for State Estimation. Final Project Report PSERC publications 05-58 . 2005
16 Phadke A G. Synchronized phasor measurement in power systems. IEEE Computer Applications in Power , 1993, 6(2): 10–15
doi: 10.1109/67.207465
17 Klimstra J, Hotakainen M. Smart Power Generation. Helsinki: Avain Publishers, 2011
18 Baldwin T L, Mili L, Boisen M B, Adapa R. Power system observability with minimal phasor measurement placement. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , 1993, 8(2): 707–715
doi: 10.1109/59.260810
19 Sinha A, Neogi S, Lahiri R N, Chowdhury S, Chowdhury S P, Chakraborty N. Smart grid initiative for power distribution utility in India. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting . San Diego, USA, 2011: 1–8
20 Aryadevi Remanidevi D, Maneesha Vinodoni R. Wireless smart grid design for monitoring and optimizing electric transmission in India. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Fourth International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications . Venice, Italy, 2010, 637–640
21 Balijepalli V S K M, Khaparde S A, Gupta R P. Towards Indian smart grids. In: Proceedings of IEEE Region 10 Conference TENCON 2009 . Singapore, 2009, 1–7
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed