Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

邮发代号 80-972

2019 Impact Factor: 2.657

Frontiers in Energy  2016, Vol. 10 Issue (4): 466-472   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-016-0417-7
  本期目录
Comparison of different energy saving lights using solar panel
Huzaifa MUBARAK(), Saad Bin Abul KASHEM
Sarawak Campus, Swinburne University of Technology, Kuching 93350, Malaysia
 全文: PDF(316 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The recent trend in light emitting diode or LED lighting applications and their claimed energy saving capabilities together with their overall attractiveness has us all convinced that they really are a greener alternative to the compact fluorescent lights or CFL. As convincing as it seems, the actual energy saving capabilities of LEDs are yet to be proven scientifically or at the least, on an empirical level when compared to CFLs. This paper tackles the issue with the use of a solar cell by evaluating the photovoltaic current and voltage generated by the solar cell subjected to each lighting system. Graphical representations are drawn and a conclusion is then reached based on the amount of power generation in the solar cells in order to determine the energy saving capabilities of each lighting system and its efficiency. From the result, it has been found that an LED is 3.7 times more power efficient than a CFL based light source of equal wattage.

Key wordsCFL    LED    empirical    solar    lumens    energy saving    fluorescent
收稿日期: 2015-12-24      出版日期: 2016-11-17
Corresponding Author(s): Huzaifa MUBARAK   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2016, 10(4): 466-472.
Huzaifa MUBARAK, Saad Bin Abul KASHEM. Comparison of different energy saving lights using solar panel. Front. Energy, 2016, 10(4): 466-472.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/10.1007/s11708-016-0417-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/CN/Y2016/V10/I4/466
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
No. Type Color rendering Diameter/mm Equivalent wattage /W Shape Luminosity/lm Voltage rating/V Wattage/W
1 CFL 80 39.0 30 Candle 330 220–240 7.0
2 LED 80 36.5 20 Candle 330 220–240 5.5
3 Incandescent 80 55 - Globe - 220–240 100.0
4 CFL 80 45 22 Round 200 220–240 5.0
5 LED 80 60 77 Globe 1100 220–240 12.0
6 CFL 80 56 52 Round 625 220–240 12.0
Tab.1  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Light source Wattage/W I-p power/W O-p power/W Power efficiency/%
5 12 12 0.370 3.08
6 12 12 0.100 0.83
Tab.2  
1 T Kramer. Seeing the Light. Evonik Magazine. 2010-12-19
2 T Kim, W Wang, Q Li. Advancement in materials for energy-saving lighting devices. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2012, 6(1): 13–26
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-011-1168-y
3 W Harris. How CFL bulbs work. 2015-07-09
4 M S Shur, R Zukauskas. Solid-state lighting: toward superior illumination. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2005, 93(10): 1691–1703
https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2005.853537
5 H Johson. Light bulb showdown: LED vs. CFL vs. incandescent. 2015-04-29
6 J M Jr Amrine, A B York . Diffusers for led-based lights. United States Patent 9285084. 2014
7 Anonymous. Today, CFLs. tomorrow, LEDs? 2008-06-08
8 S Nakamura, M Senoh, N Iwasa, S Nagahama. High-brightness ingan blue, green and yellow light-emitting-diodes with quantum-well structures. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 1995, 34 (Part 2, No. 7A): L797–L799
https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.34.L797
9 S Nakamura. III–V nitride based light-emitting devices. Solid State Communications, 1997, 102(2-3): 237–248
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-1098(96)00722-3
10 G Y Yun, H Jung, J T Kim. Energy-saving potential of LED lighting systems. Indoor and Built Environment, 2013, 22(1): 235–241
https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X12470298
11 Power Electronics. LEDs beat fluorescent efficiency? Not so fast. 2011-10-24
12 U. S. Department of Energy. Solid-state lighting technology fact sheet. 2013
13 R E Uthe . Shedding light on the inverse-square law. Science Teacher (Normal, Ill.), 2004, 71: 44–47
14 S A Bersiek. Solar Spectrum Panel. US patent. Patent application number 20140096812. 2014-04-23
15 Anonymous.What are lumens? 2015-07-11
16 A Pattanaphol, S Khomfoi , P Paisuwanna. Z-source grid-connected inverter for solving the photovoltaic cell shading problem. In: 2010 International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics Computer Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON). Chiang Mai, Thailand, 2010, 823–827
17 W T Xie, Y J Dai , R Z Wang, K Sumathy. Concentrated solar energy applications using Fresnel lenses: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(6): 2588–2606
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.03.031
18 Y Li, N J Grabham, S P Beeby, M J Tudor. The effect of the type of illumination on the energy harvesting performance of solar cells. Solar Energy, 2015, 111: 21–29
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.10.024
19 K Lunau. The incandescent light bulb. Maclean’s. 122. 2013-12-30
20 C Moloney. LED vs CFL: which has a better ROI for an energy efficient lighting retrofit? 2015-07-14
21 P Sharma, N Malhotra. Solar tracking system using microcontroller. In:The1st International Conference on Non Conventional Energy (ICONCE).West Bengal, India, 2014: 77–79
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed