Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

Postal Subscription Code 80-972

2018 Impact Factor: 1.701

Front Energ    2011, Vol. 5 Issue (3) : 322-329    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-011-0158-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Emission components characteristics of a bi-fuel vehicle at idling condition
Sameh M. METWALLEY(), Shawki A. ABOUEL-SEOUD, Abdelfattah M. FARAHAT
Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
 Download: PDF(262 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Natural gas (NG) represents today a promising alternative to conventional fuels for road vehicles propulsion, since it is characterized by a relatively low cost, better geopolitical distribution than oil, and lower environmental impact. This explains the current spreading of compressed natural gas (CNG) fuelled spark ignition (SI) engine, above all in the bi-fuel version, which is able to run either with gasoline or with NG. However, the aim of the present investigation is to evaluate the emission characteristics at idling condition. The vehicle engine was converted to bi-fueling system from a gasoline engine, and operated separately either with gasoline or CNG. Two different fuel injection systems (i.e., multi-point injection (MPI)-sequential and closed-loop venturi-continuous) are used, and their influences on the formation of emissions at different operating conditions are examined. A detailed comparative analysis of the engine exhaust emissions using gasoline and CNG is made. The results indicate that the CNG shows low air index and lower emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), and total hydrocarbon (THC) compared to gasoline.

Keywords road vehicle engine      fuel injection systems      carbon monoxide (CO)      carbon dioxide (CO2)      total hydrocarbon (THC)      vehicle idle conditions      air index     
Corresponding Author(s): METWALLEY Sameh M.,Email:metwalley1965@hotmail.com   
Issue Date: 05 September 2011
 Cite this article:   
Sameh M. METWALLEY,Shawki A. ABOUEL-SEOUD,Abdelfattah M. FARAHAT. Emission components characteristics of a bi-fuel vehicle at idling condition[J]. Front Energ, 2011, 5(3): 322-329.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/10.1007/s11708-011-0158-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/Y2011/V5/I3/322
Fig.1  Vehicle engine emission gas analyzer
Fig.2  Exhaust probe inside the exhaust tailpipe
S/No.ParametersValues
1TypeSOHC, 4 cyl, 4 stroke
2Fuel typeGasoline/CNG
3Swept volume/cm31598
4Valves per cylinder4
5Compression ratio10∶1
6Fuel supplyMulti–point injection (MPI)/Closed loop (venturi)
7Ignition systemElectronic
8Exhaust systemCatalytic Converter
9Maximum power106 HP @ 4300 r/min
10Maximum torque143 N.m @ 3000 r/min
11CoolantWater, low swirl design
Tab.1  Technical data for engine used in the experiment
No.Injection systemFuel
1Multi-point (MPI-sequential)Gasoline
CNG
2Closed-loop(venturi-continuous)(CNG)
Tab.2  Types of fuel injection system
Fig.3  CO in gasoline MP-injection
Fig.4  CO in CNG MP-injection
Fig.5  CO in CNG closed loop (venturi) injection system
Fig.6  Comparison between MPI-CNG and MPI-gasoline
Fig.7  Comparison between MPI and closed-loop (venturi) systems in CNG
Fig.8  CO in gasoline MPI
Fig.9  CO in CNG MPI
Fig.10  CO in CNG closed loop (venturi) injection system
Fig.11  Comparison between MPI and closed-loop (venturi) systems in CNG
Fig.12  Comparison between MPI-CNG and MPI-gasoline
Fig.13  THC in gasoline MPI
Fig.14  THC in CNG MP-injection
Fig.15  THC in CNG closed loop injection system
Fig.16  Comparison between MPI and closed-loop (venturi) systems
Fig.17  Comparison between CNG MPI-CNG and MPI-gasoline
Fig.18  Vehicle engine in gasoline MP-injection
Fig.19  Vehicle engine in CNG MP-injection
Fig.20  Vehicle engine in closed loop-Venturi injection
Fig.21  Comparison between MPI- CNG and MPI-gasoline
Fig.22  Comparison between MPI- CNG and closed-loop CNG
1 Mage D, Zali O. Motor Vehicle Air Pollution: Public Health Impact and Control Measures. WHO Report, Geneva , 1992
2 Das L M, Gulati R, Gupta P K. A comparative evaluation of the performance characteristics of a spark ignition engine using hydrogen and compressed natural gas as alternative fuels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , 2000, 25(8): 783-793
doi: 10.1016/S0360-3199(99)00103-2
3 Nylund N O, Laurikko J, Ikonen M. Pathways for Natural Gas into Advanced Vehicles. IANGV (International Association for Natural Gas Vehicle) Report , 2002
4 Aslam M U, Masjuki H H, Maleque M A, Kalam M A, Mahlia T M IZainon Z, Amalina M A, Abdesselam H. Introduction of natural gas fueled automotive in Malaysia. In: Proceedings of TECHPOS’03, UM, Malaysia , 2003, 156-161
5 Heywood J B. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1988
6 Kalam M A, Masjuki H H, Maleque M A. Gasoline engine operated on compressed natural gas. In: Proceedings of Advances in Malaysian Energy Research (AMER), Malaysia , 2001, 307-316
7 Beck N J, Barkhimer R L, Johnson W P, Wong H C, Gebert K. Evolution heavy duty natural gas engines-stiochiometric, carbureted and spark ignited to lean of burn, fuel injected and micro-pilot. SAE Technical Paper Series , 1997, 972665
doi: 10.4271/972665
8 Aslam M U, Masjuki H H, Maleque M A, Kalam M A. Prospect of CNG as an automotive fuel instead of gasoline. In: Proceedings of 7th APISCEU, Hong Kong , 2004, 15-17
9 Bach C, Lammle C, Bill R, Soltic P, Dyntar D, Janner P, Boulouchos K, Onder C, Landenfeld T, Kercher L , Seel O, Baronick J D. Clean engine vehicle-A natural gas driven Euro-4/SULEV with 30% reduced CO2-emissions. SAE Technical Paper Series , 2004, 010645
doi: 10.4271/2004-01-0645
10 Thomas F, Staunton R H. What fuel economy improvement technologies could aid the competitiveness of light-duty natural gas vehicles. SAE Technical Paper Series , 1999, 01-1511
doi: 10.4271/1999-01-1511
11 Nagayama I. Effects of swirl and squish on SI engine combustion and emission. SAE Technical Paper Series , 1977, 770217
doi: 10.4271/770217
12 Kent J C. Observations on the Effects of intake-generated swirl and tumble on combustion duration. SAE Technical Paper Series , 1989, 892096
doi: 10.4271/892096
13 Haddad O, Denbratt I. Turbulence characteristics of tumbling air motion in four-valve SI engines and their correlation with combustion parameters. SAE Technical Paper Series , 1991, 910478
doi: 10.4271/910478
14 Sakurai T. Basic research on combustion chambers for lean burn gas engines. SAE Technical Paper Series , 1993, 932710
doi: 10.4271/932710
15 Evans R L. Combustion chamber design for a lean-burn SI engine. SAE Technical Paper Series , 1992, 921545
doi: 10.4271/921545
[1] Arun Kumar NANDA,C K PANIGRAHI. A state-of-the-art review of solar passive building system for heating or cooling purpose[J]. Front. Energy, 2016, 10(3): 347-354.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed