Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

Postal Subscription Code 80-972

2018 Impact Factor: 1.701

Front. Energy    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (4) : 854-859    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-021-0729-0
SHORT COMMUNICATION
An old issue and a new challenge for nuclear reactor safety
F. D’AURIA()
University of Pisa, DESTEC/GRNSPG – L.go L. Lazzarino 2, 56100 Pisa, Italy
 Download: PDF(250 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Nuclear reactor safety (NRS) and the branch accident analysis (AA) constitute proven technologies: these are based on, among the other things, long lasting research and operational experience in the area of water cooled nuclear reactors (WCNR). Large break loss of coolant accident (LBLOCA) has been, so far, the orienting scenario within AA and a basis for the design of reactors. An incomplete vision for those technologies during the last few years is as follows: Progress in fundamentals was stagnant, namely in those countries where the WCNR were designed. Weaknesses became evident, noticeably in relation to nuclear fuel under high burn-up. Best estimate plus uncertainty (BEPU) techniques were perfected and available for application. Electronic and informatics systems were in extensive use and their impact in case of accident becomes more and more un-checked (however, quite irrelevant in case of LBLOCA). The time delay between technological discoveries and applications was becoming longer. The present paper deals with the LBLOCA that is inserted into the above context. Key conclusion is that regulations need suitable modification, rather than lowering the importance and the role of LBLOCA. Moreover, strengths of emergency core cooling system (ECCS) and containment need a tight link.

Keywords large break loss of coolant accident (LBLOCA)      nuclear reactor safety (NRS)      licensing perspectives      basis for design of water cooled nuclear reactors (WCNR)     
Corresponding Author(s): F. D’AURIA   
Online First Date: 22 March 2021    Issue Date: 04 January 2022
 Cite this article:   
F. D’AURIA. An old issue and a new challenge for nuclear reactor safety[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(4): 854-859.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/10.1007/s11708-021-0729-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/Y2021/V15/I4/854
Fig.1  LOCA related parameters in RPV design.
Fig.2  A view for LOCA and possible (proposed) regulatory framework.
1 F D’Auria. Nuclear fission: from E. Fermi to Adm. Rickover, to industrial exploitation, to nowadays challenges. Journal of Advancement in Scientific and Engineering Research, 2019, 4(1): 17–30
2 US AEC. Interim Acceptance Criteria (IAC) for ECCS. Washington D.C., USA, 1971
3 USNRC. Reactor safety study-an assessment of accident risk in U.S. commercial nuclear power plants, WASH-1400, NUREG-75/014, Washington. D.C., USA, 1975
4 IAEA. Deterministic safety analysis for nuclear power plants, SSG-2-rev1. Vienna, Austria., 2019
5 O Mazzantini, G Galassi, F D’Auria. The role of nuclear thermal-hydraulics in the licensing of Atucha-II: the LBLOCA. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2019, 351: 33–59
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.05.025
6 USNRC. Regulatory Guide 1.222–Measuring breakaway oxidation behavior. Washington. D.C., USA, 2018
7 USNRC. Regulatory Guide 1.223–Determining post quench ductility, Washington. D.C., USA, 2018
8 USNRC. Regulatory Guide 1.224–Preliminary draft (Draft was issued as DG-1263, dated March 2014), establishing analytical limits for zirconium-Alloy cladding material. Washington. D.C., USA, 2018
9 F D’Auria, N Debrecin, H Glaeser. Strengthening nuclear reactor safety and analysis. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2017, 324: 209–219
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.09.008
10 F D’Auria, N Debrecin, H Glaeser. The technological challenge for current generation nuclear reactors. Nuclear Energy and Technology, 2019, 5(3): 183–199
https://doi.org/10.3897/nucet.5.38117
11 J Zhang, C Schneidesch. Application of BEPU safety analysis methods to quantify margins in Belgian nuclear power plants. In: OECD/NEA/CSNI specialists meeting on transient thermal- hydraulics in water cooled nuclear reactors (SM-TH), Madrid, Spain, 2020
12 J Kim, S Cho, J K Park, et al. Experimental study to assess effects of ballooning and fuel relocation on the coolability of fuel rod bundle. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2018, 332: 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.03.013
13 T Glantz, T Taurines, O De Luze, et al. DRACCAR: a multi-physics code for computational analysis of multi-rod ballooning, coolability and fuel relocation during LOCA transients part one: general modeling description. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2018, 339: 269–285
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.06.022
14 T Glantz, T Taurines, S Belon, et al. DRACCAR: a multi-physics code for computational analysis of multi-rod ballooning, coolability and fuel relocation during LOCA transients. Part Two: overview of modeling capabilities for LOCA. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2018, 339: 202–214
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.08.031
15 F D’Auria. Best estimate plus uncertainty (BEPU): status and perspective. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2019, 352: 110190
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110190
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed