Please wait a minute...
Frontiers in Energy

ISSN 2095-1701

ISSN 2095-1698(Online)

CN 11-6017/TK

Postal Subscription Code 80-972

2018 Impact Factor: 1.701

Front. Energy    2023, Vol. 17 Issue (1) : 123-133    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-022-0849-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Exploration of the oxygen transport behavior in non-precious metal catalyst-based cathode catalyst layer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells
Shiqu CHEN1, Silei XIANG2, Zehao TAN1, Huiyuan LI1, Xiaohui YAN1, Jiewei YIN1, Shuiyun SHEN1(), Junliang ZHANG1
1. Institute of Fuel Cells School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2. School of Vehicle and Mobility, State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
 Download: PDF(1676 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

High cost has undoubtedly become the biggest obstacle to the commercialization of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), in which Pt-based catalysts employed in the cathodic catalyst layer (CCL) account for the major portion of the cost. Although non-precious metal catalysts (NPMCs) show appreciable activity and stability in the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), the performance of fuel cells based on NPMCs remains unsatisfactory compared to those using Pt-based CCL. Therefore, most studies on NPMC-based fuel cells focus on developing highly active catalysts rather than facilitating oxygen transport. In this work, the oxygen transport behavior in CCLs based on highly active Fe-N-C catalysts is comprehensively explored through the elaborate design of two types of membrane electrode structures, one containing low-Pt-based CCL and NPMC-based dummy catalyst layer (DCL) and the other containing only the NPMC-based CCL. Using Zn-N-C based DCLs of different thickness, the bulk oxygen transport resistance at the unit thickness in NPMC-based CCL was quantified via the limiting current method combined with linear fitting analysis. Then, the local and bulk resistances in NPMC-based CCLs were quantified via the limiting current method and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. Results show that the ratios of local and bulk oxygen transport resistances in NPMC-based CCL are 80% and 20%, respectively, and that an enhancement of local oxygen transport is critical to greatly improve the performance of NPMC-based PEMFCs. Furthermore, the activity of active sites per unit in NPMC-based CCLs was determined to be lower than that in the Pt-based CCL, thus explaining worse cell performance of NPMC-based membrane electrode assemblys (MEAs). It is believed that the development of NPMC-based PEMFCs should proceed not only through the design of catalysts with higher activity but also through the improvement of oxygen transport in the CCL.

Keywords proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs)      non-precious metal catalyst (NPMC)      cathode catalyst layer (CCL)      local and bulk oxygen transport resistance     
Corresponding Author(s): Shuiyun SHEN   
Online First Date: 18 November 2022    Issue Date: 29 March 2023
 Cite this article:   
Shiqu CHEN,Silei XIANG,Zehao TAN, et al. Exploration of the oxygen transport behavior in non-precious metal catalyst-based cathode catalyst layer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Front. Energy, 2023, 17(1): 123-133.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/10.1007/s11708-022-0849-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fie/EN/Y2023/V17/I1/123
Catalyst typeRef.Catalyst loading/ (mg·cm ?2)Pressure/ barPeak power density/ (mW·cm?2)Voltage/ V
PmPDA-GR-Fe[21]2.000.536300.55
Fe-N-C[22]2.002.5011800.47
[23]3.002.009000.45
[24]3.501.5011000.40
[25]4.002.007000.35
[26]4.001.408600.39
[27]3.001.006300.41
(Fe,Co)/N-C[28]0.771.508500.40
Co-N-C[29]3.002.008260.40
Mn-N-C[30]4.001.504600.30
Tab.1  Performance of recently reported NPMC-based MEAs
Fig.1  Schematic of MEA.
Fig.2  Introduction to the experimental method used to determine local and bulk oxygen transport resistance.
Fig.3  Limiting current test of MEA with Pt-based CCL and Zn-N-C DCL.
Fig.4  Limiting current test results for MEAs with different DCL thicknesses.
Fig.5  SEM images for accurate thickness measurement.
SampleDCL thickness/μmStandard deviation of DCL thicknessilim/ (A·cm?2)Standard deviation of ilim1/ilim/ (cm2·A?1)
DCL15.390.3760.0800.0011312.500
DCL28.850.2570.0710.0018514.164
DCL317.080.9430.0550.0008218.293
DCL422.530.4790.0490.0015520.228
Tab.2  Data summary of electrochemical tests and SEM characterization results
Fig.6  Plot of Eq. (3), which illustrates the relationship between 1/ilim and DCL thickness.
Fig.7  Polarization curves and peak power densities of MEA optimization.
Fig.8  MEA with optimal loading tested at 1% and 4% oxygen concentrations.
Fig.9  SEM image of the NPMC-based MEA with optimal loading.
AEmpirical parameter A
aHalf the width of the flow field
BEmpirical parameter B
cO2channelConcentration of oxygen in flow channel
dDepth of flow channel
217DO2CHOxygen diffusion coefficient in flow channel
FFaraday’s constant
ilimLimiting current density
LLength of flow channel
NNumber of flow channel
PGas pressure in flow channel
P0Atmospheric pressure
pchannelFlow channel pressure
PwWater vapor partial pressure
QdryTotal gas flow
Rgas constant
rbulk,DCLBulk oxygen transport resistance of DCL per unit thickness
Rlocal,CCLLocal oxygen transport resistance of CCL
RchannelOxygen transport resistance of flow channel
RCCLOxygen transport resistance of CCL
RGDLOxygen transport resistance of gas diffusion layer
RtotalTotal oxygen transport resistance
SlopeFitted curve slope
TReaction temperature
xO2Mole fraction of oxygen
δCCLThickness of CCL
δCCLeffEffective thickness of CCL
δDCLThickness of DCL
  
1 S Liu, L Kang, S C Jun. Challenges and strategies toward cathode materials for rechargeable potassium-ion batteries. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(47): 2004689
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202004689
2 X Luo, Y Guo, H Zhou. et al.. Thermal annealing synthesis of double-shell truncated octahedral Pt-Ni alloys for oxygen reduction reaction of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Frontiers in Energy, 2020, 14(4): 767–777
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0667-2
3 M Shao, Q Chang, J P Dodelet. et al.. Recent advances in electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Chemical Reviews, 2016, 116(6): 3594–3657
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462
4 A Kongkanand, M F Mathias. The priority and challenge of high-power performance of low-platinum proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2016, 7(7): 1127–1137
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216
5 J Xue, Y Li, J Hu. Nanoporous bimetallic Zn/Fe-N-C for efficient oxygen reduction in acidic and alkaline media. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2020, 8(15): 7145–7157
https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA13471A
6 Y Chao, D Tsai, A Wu. et al.. Cobalt selenide electrocatalyst supported by nitrogen-doped carbon and its stable activity toward oxygen reduction reaction. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(14): 5655–5664
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.006
7 S Jing, L Luo, S Yin. et al.. Tungsten nitride decorated carbon nanotubes hybrid as efficient catalyst supports for oxygen reduction reaction. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2014, 147: 897–903
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.10.026
8 A Ishihara, K Lee, S Doi. et al.. Tantalum oxynitride for a novel cathode of PEFC. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 2005, 8(4): A201
https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1865612
9 L LiC FuS Shen, et al.. Influence of Fe on electrocatalytic activity of iron-nitrogen-doped carbon materials toward oxygen reduction reaction. Frontiers in Energy, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0669-0
10 L Li, S Shen, X Li. et al.. A derivative of mesoporous oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts from citric acid and dicyandiamide. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(11): 6563–6572
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.205
11 G Wu, K L More, C M Johnston. et al.. High-performance electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction derived from polyaniline, iron, and cobalt. Science, 2011, 332(6028): 443–447
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200832
12 P Yin, T Yao, Y Wu. et al.. Single cobalt atoms with precise N-coordination as superior oxygen reduction reaction catalysts. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016, 55(36): 10800–10805
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201604802
13 W Xia, J Tang, J Li. et al.. Defect-rich graphene nanomesh produced by thermal exfoliation of metal–organic frameworks for the oxygen reduction reaction. Angewandte Chemie, 2019, 131(38): 13488–13493
https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201906870
14 H Tan, Y Li, J Kim. et al.. Sub-50 nm iron–nitrogen-doped hollow carbon sphere-encapsulated iron carbide nanoparticles as efficient oxygen reduction catalysts. Advancement of Science, 2018, 5(7): 1800120
15 H Tan, J Tang, J Henzie. et al.. Assembly of hollow carbon nanospheres on graphene nanosheets and creation of iron–nitrogen-doped porous carbon for oxygen reduction. ACS Nano, 2018, 12(6): 5674–5683
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b01502
16 Y Guo, J Tang, J Henzie. et al.. Assembly of hollow mesoporous nanoarchitectures composed of ultrafine Mo2C nanoparticles on N-doped carbon nanosheets for efficient electrocatalytic reduction of oxygen. Materials Horizons, 2017, 4(6): 1171–1177
https://doi.org/10.1039/C7MH00586E
17 H Shen, H Jiang, Y Liu. et al.. Cobalt@cobalt carbide supported on nitrogen and sulfur co-doped carbon: an efficient non-precious metal electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2017, 33(9): 1811–1821
18 Q Wang, D Liu, X He. Metal-organic framework-derived Fe-N-C nanohybrids as highly-efficient oxygen reduction catalysts. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(7): 740–748
19 S Shen, Z Ren, S Xiang. et al.. The development of a highly durable Fe-N-C electrocatalyst with favorable CNT structures for the oxygen reduction in PEMFCs. Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage, 2022, 19(1): 010905
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050725
20 G Zhang, R Chenitz, M Lefèvre. et al.. Is iron involved in the lack of stability of Fe/N/C electrocatalysts used to reduce oxygen at the cathode of PEM fuel cells?. Nano Energy, 2016, 29: 111–125
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.038
21 T Wang, J Wang, X Wang. et al.. Graphene-templated synthesis of sandwich-like porous carbon nanosheets for efficient oxygen reduction reaction in both alkaline and acidic media. Science China Materials, 2018, 61(7): 915–925
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-017-9191-5
22 X Wan, X Liu, Y Li. et al.. Fe-N-C electrocatalyst with dense active sites and efficient mass transport for high-performance proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature Catalysis, 2019, 2(3): 259–268
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0237-3
23 J Shui, C Chen, L Grabstanowicz. et al.. Highly efficient nonprecious metal catalyst prepared with metal–organic framework in a continuous carbon nanofibrous network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(34): 10629–10634
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1507159112
24 J Chen, X Yan, C Fu. et al.. Insight into the rapid degradation behavior of nonprecious metal Fe-N-C electrocatalyst-based proton exchange membrane fuel cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(41): 37779–37786
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b13474
25 N Zhang, T Zhou, M Chen. et al.. High-purity pyrrole-type FeN4 sites as a superior oxygen reduction electrocatalyst. Energy & Environmental Science, 2020, 13(1): 111–118
https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EE03027A
26 X Fu, N Li, B Ren. et al.. Tailoring FeN4 sites with edge enrichment for boosted oxygen reduction performance in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Advanced Energy Materials, 2019, 9(11): 1803737
https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201803737
27 Y Zhan, H Zeng, F Xie. et al.. Templated growth of Fe/N/C catalyst on hierarchically porous carbon for oxygen reduction reaction in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 2019, 431: 31–39
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.051
28 J Wang, Z Huang, W Liu. et al.. Design of N-coordinated dual-metal sites: a stable and active Pt-free catalyst for acidic oxygen reduction reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2017, 139(48): 17281–17284
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b10385
29 L Chen, X Liu, L Zheng. et al.. Insights into the role of active site density in the fuel cell performance of Co-N-C catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2019, 256: 117849
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117849
30 J Li, M Chen, D A Cullen. et al.. Atomically dispersed manganese catalysts for oxygen reduction in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature Catalysis, 2018, 1(12): 935–945
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0164-8
31 J P Owejan, J E Owejan, W Gu. et al.. Water transport mechanisms in PEMFC gas diffusion layers. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2010, 157(10): 1456–1464
https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3468615
32 M L Perry, J Newman, E J Cairns. Mass transport in gas-diffusion electrodes: a diagnostic tool for fuel-cell cathodes. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1998, 145(1): 5–15
https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1838202
33 N Nonoyama, S Okazaki, A Z Weber. et al.. Analysis of oxygen-transport diffusion resistance in proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2011, 158(4): B416
https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3546038
34 T Schuler, A Chowdhury, A T Freiberg. et al.. Fuel-cell catalyst-layer resistance via hydrogen limiting-current measurements. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2019, 166(7): F3020–F3031
https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0031907jes
35 C Wang, X Cheng, J Lu. et al.. The experimental measurement of local and bulk oxygen transport resistances in the catalyst layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2017, 8(23): 5848–5852
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02580
36 L Kang, X Wang, S Liu. et al.. Bio-inspired interface engineering of Ag2O rooted on Au, Ni-modified filter paper for highly robust Zn–Ag2O batteries. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2022, 623: 744–751
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.05.106
37 Y Ono, A Ohma, K Shinohara. et al.. Influence of equivalent eeight of ionomer on local oxygen transport resistance in cathode catalyst layers. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2013, 160(8): 779–787
https://doi.org/10.1149/2.040308jes
38 D R Baker, D A Caulk, K C Neyerlin. et al.. Measurement of oxygen transport resistance in PEM fuel cells by limiting current methods. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2009, 156(9): 991–1003
https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3152226
39 X Cheng, G Wei, C Wang. et al.. Experimental probing of effects of carbon support on bulk and local oxygen transport resistance in ultra-low Pt PEMFCs. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 164: 120549
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120549
40 S Liu, L Kang, J Zhang. et al.. Carbonaceous anode materials for non-aqueous sodium- and potassium-ion hybrid capacitors. ACS Energy Letters, 2021, 6(11): 4127–4154
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01855
[1] FEP-22035-OF-CSQ_suppl_1 Download
[1] Yanyan GAO, Ming HOU, Manman QI, Liang HE, Haiping CHEN, Wenzhe LUO, Zhigang SHAO. New insight into effect of potential on degradation of Fe-N-C catalyst for ORR[J]. Front. Energy, 2021, 15(2): 421-430.
[2] Junliang ZHANG. Recent advances in cathode electrocatalysts for PEM fuel cells[J]. Front Energ, 2011, 5(2): 137-148.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed