Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Law in China

ISSN 1673-3428

ISSN 1673-3541(Online)

CN 11-5742/D

Postal Subscription Code 80-981

Front Law Chin    2008, Vol. 3 Issue (4) : 494-506    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-008-0023-7
research-article
Analysis on the legal nature of malicious withdrawal from a defected ATM
FU Liqing
Law School, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China;
 Download: PDF(212 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Malicious withdrawal from ATM constitutes offence of theft and belongs to “theft from financial institutions”. In case of “extremely huge amount”, according to China’s Criminal Law, the minimum statutory penalty for the accused is life imprisonment, which is undoubtedly too severe. So far as judiciaries are concerned, reflection should be made with respect to the relevant legislative provisions. In handling individual cases, the wisest practice for judiciaries is to refer to the provision of clause 2 of article 63 of the Criminal Law, hence submitting them to the examination and approval by the Supreme Court for mitigation of penalties.

Keywords malicious withdrawal      theft      financial institution     
Corresponding Author(s): FU Liqing,Email:fuliqingpku@yahoo.com.cn   
Issue Date: 05 December 2008
 Cite this article:   
FU Liqing. Analysis on the legal nature of malicious withdrawal from a defected ATM[J]. Front Law Chin, 2008, 3(4): 494-506.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/10.1007/s11463-008-0023-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/Y2008/V3/I4/494
[1] Mingxiang Liu. Credit Card Fraud under Chinese Criminal Law[J]. Front Law Chin, 2011, 6(3): 369-386.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed