Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Law in China

ISSN 1673-3428

ISSN 1673-3541(Online)

CN 11-5742/D

Postal Subscription Code 80-981

Front Law Chin    2008, Vol. 3 Issue (4) : 556-582    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-008-0027-3
research-article
On property with personality interests
YI Jiming , ZHOU Qiong
Law School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
 Download: PDF(289 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The traditional theory of property and tort law generally denies personality interests in property. In recent years, legislative and judicial practices at home and abroad have turned to care for personality interests in property and to protect it. The property with personality interests can be classified into four categories, namely, (a) property with personality symbolism, (b) property with specific human emotion, (c) property originated from specific human body, and (d) intellectual property from specific human wisdom, the first two of which internalize external matters and the last two externalize the inherent self. Comparing with fungible property, the property with personality interests on the basic of facts and law shall be more protected in legislative and judicial practices.

Keywords property      personality interests      personality property      fungible property     
Corresponding Author(s): YI Jiming,Email:yijiming@263.net; ZHOU Qiong,Email:zhouqiong00@126.com   
Issue Date: 05 December 2008
 Cite this article:   
YI Jiming,ZHOU Qiong. On property with personality interests[J]. Front Law Chin, 2008, 3(4): 556-582.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/10.1007/s11463-008-0027-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/Y2008/V3/I4/556
[1] Christoph Krönke. DATA REGULATION IN THE INTERNET OF THINGS[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(3): 367-379.
[2] Michael Blakeney. GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(2): 162-173.
[3] Joshua C. Tate. MAGNA CARTA AND THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS[J]. Front. Law China, 2016, 11(2): 236-242.
[4] HE Xiaoyong. Sino-US disputes over “criminal threshold” of intellectual property rights[J]. Front Law Chin, 2009, 4(2): 163-177.
[5] LIANG Huixing. Some opinions and suggestions on the draft of real property law[J]. Front. Law China, 2007, 2(2): 198-223.
[6] CHENG Jie. The injustice and reconstruction of procedures in eminent domain and land acquisition[J]. Front. Law China, 2007, 2(1): 65-97.
[7] WANG Guanxi, LI Xiaoping. Intellectual property laws integrated with the national development policies in China[J]. Front. Law China, 2007, 2(1): 71-91.
[8] WU Handong. Fundamental principles of the international protection system of intellectual property rights and the applications[J]. Front. Law China, 2006, 1(3): 329-348.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed