Analysis on essential attributes of criminals
in China

doi:10.1007/s11463-009-0023-2

Front. Law China

2009, Vol. 4

Issue (3) : 436-456 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-009-0023-2

Research articles

Analysis on essential attributes of criminals in China

Download: PDF(262 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract The difference between criminals and non-criminals has always been a topic for criminal psychologists. It is easy to describe the features of offences by their social and legal attributes, while it is still difficult to find any significant difference of the features from ontological perspective of criminals. To get to know criminals from the point of personality, we may discover the essential features of criminals. However, while acknowledging the role of personality, the variables such as situations, moods and social relationships can not be neglected. Meanwhile, it is also necessary to study the personality mechanism of criminals.

Keywords human nature criminal attribute personality situation

Issue Date: 05 September 2009

Cite this article:

. Analysis on essential attributes of criminals in China[J]. Front. Law China,2009, 4(3): 436-456.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/10.1007/s11463-009-0023-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/Y2009/V4/I3/436

[1]	NA Heya. Between Tradition and Modernity: The Re-trial System of the Beiyang Period in the Early Republic of China (1912-1928)[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(1): 59-83.
[2]	Thomas Buoye. Ideology and the Legislative Turn in Eighteenth-Century Chinese Criminal Justice[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(1): 20-37.
[3]	BIAN Jianlin, XIE Shu. Forty Years of Reform and Opening Up: The Birth and Development of China’s Criminal Justice System[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(1): 73-85.
[4]	ZHAO Bingzhi, YUAN Bin. FOUR DECADES OF CRIMINAL LAW RESEARCH: PATHS OF DEVELOPMENT AND KNOWLEDGE TRANSFORMATION[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(4): 538-558.
[5]	CHEN Xuan. BOUNDARY OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS — A LESSON FROM THE QVOD CASE[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(3): 357-366.
[6]	ZHANG Shoudong. CHINESE NATURAL LAW TRADITION AND ITS MODERN APPLICATION: A RESPONSE TO HON . ROLLIN A. VAN BROEKHOVEN[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(1): 86-114.
[7]	WANG Zhuhao, HUANG Yanni. THE ADMISSIBILITY OF PRE-TRIAL TESTIMONIAL TRANSCRIPTS: A DISCUSSION OF PRACTICE IN CHINA AND IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNALS[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(1): 67-85.
[8]	Paul Roberts. THE FORENSIC CHALLENGE[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(1): 43-66.
[9]	ZHENG Weiwei. AN EXAMINATION OF LEGAL REGULATIONS FOR INSIDER DEALING IN THE UK AND THE LESSONS FOR CHINA[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(4): 524-560.
[10]	FU Xin. DOING FIELDWORK ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN CHINA[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(1): 114-137.
[11]	SONG Lianbin,YANG Xiaoqiang. A CRITIQUE OF THE CRIME OF DELIBERATELY RENDERING AN ARBITRAL AWARD IN VIOLATION OF LAW[J]. Front. Law China, 2016, 11(4): 718-734.
[12]	Xingliang Chen. Chinese Criminal Jurisprudence (1979–2009)[J]. Front Law Chin, 2010, 5(4): 485-509.
[13]	Weidong Chen. Retrospection and Perspective: Chinese Criminal Procedure Law (1979–2009)[J]. Front Law Chin, 2010, 5(4): 510-531.
[14]	Xiaofeng Wu , . Understanding of Criminal Reconciliation in Ancient China[J]. Front. Law China, 2010, 5(1): 91-114.
[15]	HE Xiaoyong. Sino-US disputes over “criminal threshold” of intellectual property rights[J]. Front Law Chin, 2009, 4(2): 163-177.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed