Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Law in China

ISSN 1673-3428

ISSN 1673-3541(Online)

CN 11-5742/D

Postal Subscription Code 80-981

Front. Law China    2010, Vol. 5 Issue (1) : 56-76    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-010-0003-6
Research articles
Study of Issues over Public Hearing in Death Penalty Cases
Yuguan Yang ,
Research Center of Procedural Laws, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China;
 Download: PDF(421 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract The death penalty is involved in the most severe criminal offenses. Holding public hearing in these cases seems to be the best way to guarantee judicial fairness. A public hearing in death penalty cases is of important significance in safeguarding judicial fairness and protecting human rights, which has attracted a high level of attention domestically and internationally. This paper interprets the requirements of the United Nations’ related agencies for the public hearing of death penalty cases, defines the nature of public hearing in the aspects of rights and obligations, analyzes the special nature of the requirements for the public hearing of death penalty cases, introduces some practices and issues of the public hearing of death penalty cases in foreign countries, analyzes China’s present practice of the pubic hearing of death penalty cases and puts forward some suggestions and channels to realize it.
Keywords death penalty cases      public hearing      international standard      China’s practice      
Issue Date: 05 March 2010
 Cite this article:   
Yuguan Yang. Study of Issues over Public Hearing in Death Penalty Cases[J]. Front. Law China, 2010, 5(1): 56-76.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/10.1007/s11463-010-0003-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/Y2010/V5/I1/56
[1] Marius Olivier. SOCIAL PROTECTION INNOVATION AND CHALLENGES IN CHINA AND AFRICA: SELECTED COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(3): 429-472.
[2] YU Minyou, . WTO disputes settlement —China’s performance and proposals on its improvement[J]. Front. Law China, 2009, 4(4): 601-632.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed