Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Law in China

ISSN 1673-3428

ISSN 1673-3541(Online)

CN 11-5742/D

Postal Subscription Code 80-981

Front Law Chin    2011, Vol. 6 Issue (3) : 403-417    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-011-0136-2
research-article
Dilemma of Confidentiality in International Commercial Arbitration
Donggen Xu1(), Huiyuan Shi2()
1. KoGuan Law School, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China; 2. Shanghai Volkswagen Automotive Co., Ltd, Shanghai 201805, China
 Download: PDF(573 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Arbitration is universally used in the settlement of international commercial disputes largely due to its inherent confidentiality. However, the expedient element of the confidentiality is encountering challenges mostly owing to public interest or other reasons. This article not only discusses the grounds of confidentiality in arbitration, but also the effective way of its helping those people who wish to respect the confidentiality in international commercial arbitration.

Keywords confidentiality      international commercial arbitration      international commercial disputes      public interest     
Corresponding Author(s): Donggen Xu,Email:xudonggen@sjtu.edu.cn; Huiyuan Shi,Email:shihuiyuan@hotmail.com   
Issue Date: 05 September 2011
 Cite this article:   
Donggen Xu,Huiyuan Shi. Dilemma of Confidentiality in International Commercial Arbitration[J]. Front Law Chin, 2011, 6(3): 403-417.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/10.1007/s11463-011-0136-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/Y2011/V6/I3/403
[1] GAO Junjie. The Government’s Regulatory Obligations to Public Utilities Franchise[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(3): 335-359.
[2] LI Guohai. Research of the theory of public interest of the drafted Anti-monopoly Law of China[J]. Front Law Chin, 2008, 3(4): 525-539.
[3] JIANG Bixin , LIANG Fengyun. Some issues related to administrative law in the Real Right Law of China[J]. Front. Law China, 2008, 3(2): 165-180.
[4] ZHAO Xiuwen. On the legal place of arbitration and its determination[J]. Front. Law China, 2007, 2(4): 634-646.
[5] ZHANG Qianfan. Transcending the dilemma of “public interest” —on the meaning of the taking clause in the U.S. Constitution and its signifi cance for China[J]. Front. Law China, 2007, 2(1): 23-43.
[6] WU Handong. Fundamental principles of the international protection system of intellectual property rights and the applications[J]. Front. Law China, 2006, 1(3): 329-348.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed