Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Law in China

ISSN 1673-3428

ISSN 1673-3541(Online)

CN 11-5742/D

Postal Subscription Code 80-981

Front Law Chin    2011, Vol. 6 Issue (3) : 496-523    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-011-0141-5
research-article
Interdisciplinary Research on International Relations Theory and International Law in China over the Past 10 Years
Zhiyun Liu()
School of Law, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
 Download: PDF(557 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

From the origin, there has been a strong connection between international relations and international law. In the development of the history of different academic subjects, the research on international relations and international law are interdependently promoting each other. As a result, the realization of interdisciplinary research on international legal theory and the study of international law is inevitable. As a matter of fact, even though the interdisciplinary research of the two subjects has been separated for almost half a century, the need for the development of the subject and the changing world political and economical status give them a new chance for reunification. Recently, the interdisciplinary research on international relations theory and international law by the Western academic is becoming the order of the day, which has become the latest shining point of the recent development of the two subjects, which is even regarded as the new revolution of international relations theory and the study of international law. In this context, the past ten years is a period of emergence of Chinese international relations and the interdisciplinary research of international law. In the past ten years, some scholars have overcome “the difficulty of interdisciplinary research,” “the prejudice within the subject” and “the gap among different subjects,” and made pioneering research in the field of “systematic connection” and “issues in overlapping field.” Moreover, they gradually make the interdisciplinary research to be a popular method and a common recognition. Based on the current studies, interdisciplinary research will have a broad future in the fields such as “the interchange of concepts,” “the exchange of method,” and “the mutual assistance of materials,” which will provide scholars in this area with a broad space for research.

Keywords international relations theory      international law      interdisciplinary research      review      prospect     
Corresponding Author(s): Zhiyun Liu,Email:liuzy420@xmu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 September 2011
 Cite this article:   
Zhiyun Liu. Interdisciplinary Research on International Relations Theory and International Law in China over the Past 10 Years[J]. Front Law Chin, 2011, 6(3): 496-523.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/10.1007/s11463-011-0141-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/Y2011/V6/I3/496
[1] ZHANG Naigen. Institutionalization of a Human Community with a Shared Future and Principles of International Law[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(1): 84-106.
[2] Suzannah Linton. TOWARDS A GLOBAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE HUMANE TREATMENT OF CAPTURED ENEMY FIGHTERS[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(2): 217-277.
[3] Zhiyun Liu. The Perspective of “Justice” of International Law in the Global Context[J]. Front Law Chin, 2011, 6(4): 589-608.
[4] Xia Feng. Impacts of the Internet on Traditional Jurisdictional Principles in International Civil and Commercial Cases[J]. Front Law Chin, 2011, 6(3): 387-402.
[5] Haiyan Wang. Research on the Judicial Review and Variation of Sentence for the Death Penalty with a Suspension of Execution in Chinese Criminal Law[J]. Front Law Chin, 2011, 6(2): 316-331.
[6] Duojun Qi. The Review of the Development of Legal Science in China (1949–2009)[J]. Front Law Chin, 2011, 6(2): 180-191.
[7] Zhiyun Liu. Assumptions of Gain Preference and Choice of Action by States in International Legislation: From the Perspective of International Relations[J]. Front Law Chin, 2010, 5(3): 342-375.
[8] Qisheng He. China’s Private International Law (1978–2008)[J]. Front Law Chin, 2010, 5(2): 188-214.
[9] Ming Jin , . The “Waiver of Right” Issue in Chinese Civil Claims for War Reparations from Japan—Review of the Two Judgments of the Supreme Court of Japan on April 27, 2007 —Review of the Two Judgments of the Supreme Court of Japan on April 27, 2007 [J]. Front. Law China, 2010, 5(1): 1-26.
[10] LIU Zhiyun, . “Legitimacy” of international law: The source, development and the paths to overcome crisis —Analysis from the perspective of international institutional theory[J]. Front. Law China, 2009, 4(4): 543-567.
[11] LI Jianwei. Standardization of compensation for senior executives and limited intervention of law[J]. Front Law Chin, 2009, 4(2): 236-257.
[12] ZENG Lingliang. Interactions between China’s peaceful development and international law[J]. Front. Law China, 2008, 3(1): 15-34.
[13] LONG Zongzhi. The problems of taking back the power of judicial review for death sentences by the Supreme Court of China and the solutions related[J]. Front. Law China, 2008, 3(1): 35-50.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed