Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Law in China

ISSN 1673-3428

ISSN 1673-3541(Online)

CN 11-5742/D

Postal Subscription Code 80-981

Front Law Chin    2012, Vol. 7 Issue (2) : 314-328    https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-001-012-0017-1
research-article
INTERVENTION VS. CO-OPERATION: LEGITIMACY OF THE EBRD CONDITIONALITY
Yin Liu()
Faculty of Law, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, China
 Download: PDF(202 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The EBRD is a “political bank.” “Multiparty democracy, pluralism and market economies” are the conditions (termed as “conditionality”) to get financial resources. The EBRD conditionality is coercive and intrusive. In sense of its nature, it is political rather than economic. Since it is purposed to foster the transition of open market, it is legitimate. In essence, it is believed to be a form of good international co-operation rather than that of willful or arbitrary intervention.

Corresponding Author(s): Yin Liu,Email:liuyin@hqu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 June 2012
 Cite this article:   
Yin Liu. INTERVENTION VS. CO-OPERATION: LEGITIMACY OF THE EBRD CONDITIONALITY[J]. Front Law Chin, 2012, 7(2): 314-328.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/10.3868/s050-001-012-0017-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/Y2012/V7/I2/314
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed