|
|
THE FORM OF REFORM: REVISITING THE CHOICE AMONG A CREED, A CODE, AND A CATALOGUE |
Edward Imwinkelried() |
J. D. University of San Francisco, San Francisco, USA; Professor, University of California, Davis School of Law, Davis, California 95616. |
|
|
Abstract In the past, international Evidence law reformers have focused primarily on substantive evidentiary doctrines. However, for reforms to be effective, the courts and legislatures must state the revised doctrines in a form that promotes the overall objectives of the legal system. The basic choice facing reformers is among a creed identifying broad goals, a code stating flexible principles, and a catalogue prescribing detailed rules. In the past, especially in the United States, there was a consensus among Evidence scholars that the code format is preferable. However, if a key objective of a national legal system is to encourage pretrial disposition of cases, the courts and legislatures should give serious thought to utilizing a catalogue format. That format is especially attractive in the doctrinal areas such as privilege in which evidentiary rules are intended to affect primary behavior outside the courtroom.
|
Keywords
evidence reform
evidence legislation
evidence rules
creed
code
catalogue
|
Issue Date: 23 April 2018
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|