DIGITAL BORDER CONTROLS

doi:10.3868/s050-007-018-0032-4

Front. Law China

2018, Vol. 13

Issue (3) : 428-440 https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-007-018-0032-4

Orginal Article

DIGITAL BORDER CONTROLS

Walther Michl(

)

Faculty of Law, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; LL.M., School of Law, King’s College London, London, UK; Postdoc. (Akademischer Rat a.Z.), Faculty of Law, LMU Munich, Munich 80539, Germany

Download: PDF(251 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

The article examines to what extent territory plays a role in internet regulation, especially whether an equivalent to physical border controls for cyberspace already exists in Germany, i.e. digital border controls. To that end, both the abstract relevance of the territorial principle and specific examples of legal commands that cause the free flow of data to be interrupted or modified along state boundaries are scrutinized.

Keywords internet territory regulation blocking take-down

Issue Date: 09 October 2018

Cite this article:

Walther Michl. DIGITAL BORDER CONTROLS[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(3): 428-440.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/10.3868/s050-007-018-0032-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/Y2018/V13/I3/428

[1]	GUO Rui, John S. Baker, Jr.. The Natural Law Foundation of the Market[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(4): 409-430.
[2]	QU Bo, HUO Changxu. Privacy, National Security, and Internet Economy: An Explanation of China's Personal Information Protection Legislation[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(3): 339-366.
[3]	ZHENG Weiwei. Comparative Study on the Legal Regulation of a Cross-Border Flow of Personal Data and Its Inspiration to China[J]. Front. Law China, 2020, 15(3): 280-312.
[4]	GAO Junjie. The Government’s Regulatory Obligations to Public Utilities Franchise[J]. Front. Law China, 2019, 14(3): 335-359.
[5]	Laura Münkler. SPACE AS PARADIGM OF INTERNET REGULATION[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(3): 412-427.
[6]	Christoph Krönke. DATA REGULATION IN THE INTERNET OF THINGS[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(3): 367-379.
[7]	CHEN Xuan. BOUNDARY OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS — A LESSON FROM THE QVOD CASE[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(3): 357-366.
[8]	YU Wenguang. INTERNET INTERMEDIARIES’ LIABILITY FOR ONLINE ILLEGAL HATE SPEECH[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(3): 342-356.
[9]	Michael W. Müller. MAPPING PARADIGMS OF EUROPEAN INTERNET REGULATION: THE EXAMPLE OF INTERNET CONTENT CONTROL[J]. Front. Law China, 2018, 13(3): 329-341.
[10]	HUANG Tao, HE Weiping. INVESTOR PROTECTION IN CHINA’S SECURITIES MARKETS: MARGINALIZATION OF THE JUDICIARY AND UTILIZATION OF POLITICAL RESOURCES[J]. Front. Law China, 2017, 12(3): 473-495.
[11]	Qiping Tang. The US Financial Regulatory Reform, Causes of Financial Crisis and Its Enlightenment on China[J]. Front Law Chin, 2011, 6(4): 553-576.
[12]	Jin Sun. Study on the Financial Supervision and Anti-Monopoly Regulation of Integration of Industry and Finance - in View of Confronting Global Financial Crisis and Mitigating Domestic Financial Risks[J]. Front Law Chin, 2011, 6(2): 284-315.
[13]	. On corporate social responsibility “beyond law” in China[J]. Front. Law China, 2009, 4(3): 457-473.
[14]	. Comments on the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China[J]. Front. Law China, 2009, 4(3): 343-375.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed