Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Literary Studies in China

ISSN 1673-7318

ISSN 1673-7423(Online)

CN 11-5745/I

Postal Subscription Code 80-982

Front Liter Stud Chin    2012, Vol. 6 Issue (3) : 374-392    https://doi.org/10.3868/s010-001-012-0022-5
research-article
Between Human and Animal: A Study of New Year’s Sacrifice, Kong Yiji, and Diary of a Madman
Todd Foley()
Department of East Asian Studies, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
 Download: PDF(245 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

A subtle aspect of Lu Xun’s writing, running through several of his works of fiction, is his animalistic portrayal of some of his most well-known characters. Scraping away their humanity as he writes, Lu Xun depicts Kong Yiji, Xianglin Sao, and the infamous Madman crawling on their hands and knees, working like draught animals, and abandoning all rational thought. In short, all three end up occupying an ambiguous space between the realms of human and animal. This paper attempts to examine how Lu Xun’s description and situation of these characters suggests, aside from the standard agendas of May Fourth writing in general, a certain, shared metaphysical conundrum. Drawing on the work of Giorgio Agamben to take the hiatus between human and animal as an occasion for ontological possibility, I will investigate how the dehumanized portrayal of these characters situates them at the threshold of a new becoming: one which has not yet been realized, but which is also rendered impossible either through the character’s death or return to health. Examining Lu Xun’s works in this way not only recognizes his major emphasis on social critique, but suggests both that his thought on Chinese society pierces through to the level of metaphysical inquiry, and that the relationship between human and animal marks a productive entry point for this sort of questioning.

Keywords Lu Xun      animality      Agamben      metaphysics      Kong Yiji      Xianglin Sao      Madman     
Corresponding Author(s): Todd Foley,Email:twf218@nyu.edu   
Issue Date: 05 September 2012
 Cite this article:   
Todd Foley. Between Human and Animal: A Study of New Year’s Sacrifice, Kong Yiji, and Diary of a Madman[J]. Front Liter Stud Chin, 2012, 6(3): 374-392.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flsc/EN/10.3868/s010-001-012-0022-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flsc/EN/Y2012/V6/I3/374
[1] JI Jianqing. In Search of “Voices”: Linguistic Choice and Construction of Subjectivity in Lu Xun’s Early Translations and Writings[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2020, 14(4): 605-639.
[2] LI Jikai, SUN Xu. On Lu Xun’s “Memes”—Taking the Example of the Tie between Lu Xun and Shaanxi[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2020, 14(1): 134-156.
[3] HONG Seuk-pyo. The Shaping of Lu Xun’s Public Image and His Portrait Images[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2019, 13(4): 584-629.
[4] Satoru Hashimoto. Science, History, Fiction: The Facetious Mediality of Lu Xun’s Old Stories Retold[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2019, 13(3): 385-404.
[5] Xudong ZHANG. Agonistic Memory, Compound Temporality and Expansion of Literary Space in Lu Xun[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2019, 13(2): 200-261.
[6] Jon Eugene von Kowallis. Understanding Wild Grass by Talking to Oneself: Lu Xun’s Yecao through the Lens of Ziyan Ziyu and the Prism of the Past[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2019, 13(2): 171-199.
[7] Jon Eugene von Kowallis. Re-Contextualizing Lu Xun’s Early Thought and Poetics in the Journal Henan [J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2018, 12(3): 388-423.
[8] Jerry D. Schmidt. Li Ruqian, the Lu Xun of the Nineteenth Century[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2018, 12(2): 217-253.
[9] G. Andrew Stuckey. Female Relations: Voiceless Women in “Liuyi jie” and “Zhufu”[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2017, 11(3): 488-509.
[10] Qin WANG. How Not to Have Nostalgia for the Future: A Reading of Lu Xun’s “Hometown”[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2016, 10(3): 461-473.
[11] Clint Capehart. The Animal Kingdom in the Legacy of Modern Chinese Literature: Lu Xun’s Writings on Animals and Bio-Politics in the Republican Era[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2016, 10(3): 430-460.
[12] WU Jun. A Study on the Basic Theory of Lu Xun’s Literary Translation: “Everything Is an Intermediate Object”[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2016, 10(3): 408-429.
[13] Chiu-yee Cheung. Who Invited Lu Xun to Hong Kong?: An Examination of Two Accounts and Some New Materials[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2016, 10(3): 392-407.
[14] Jon Eugene von Kowallis. Collisions of the Past with the Present: Translation, Texts, and History[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2015, 9(4): 581-615.
[15] Shakhar Rahav. Blade of Remembrance: Memory, Objects, and Redemption in Lu Xun[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2015, 9(3): 453-477.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed