Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Literary Studies in China

ISSN 1673-7318

ISSN 1673-7423(Online)

CN 11-5745/I

Postal Subscription Code 80-982

Front. Lit. Stud. China    2013, Vol. 7 Issue (3) : 483-493    https://doi.org/10.3868/s010-002-013-0027-4
Orginal Article
Lu Xun in the Rhetoric of the Sino-Soviet Split: A View from Contemporary Russia
Olga Medvedeva()
Department of AHKR, University of Bergen, Postbox 7805, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway
 Download: PDF(230 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The historical role of the prominent Chinese writer, social activist and thinker Lu Xun (1881–1936), is difficult to overestimate. His works influenced social change within China and became recognized internationally. For these and other reasons, he was of particular interest in the Soviet Union. Since 1932, his works have been published in numerous editions in Russian and have received a great deal of scholarly attention in the Soviet Union. Such unprecedented attention was initially based on the idea that he held similar revolutionary sentiments to those prevailing in the Soviet Union. Later, from the second half of the 1960s to the early 1970s, the ideological disagreements between the Soviet Union and China influenced the direction of Lu Xun studies in the Soviet Union. Soviet leader Khrushchev called for peaceful coexistence with the capitalist West, while Mao Zedong stressed the universal character of the proletarian revolution. Lu Xun was highly respected in both the USSR and China, and thus became an influential tool in this polemic. But, for Soviet scholars, this renewed focus on Lu Xun offered an opportunity to provide a new perspective on the writer’s works. This paper analyzes how the Sino-Soviet split influenced Russian academics’ positions on Lu Xun. The focus is on the three main points of contention in the ideological disagreements between the PRC and the USSR. First, Soviet critics focused on the psychological aspects and individualism in the Lu Xun’s works. Second, a special focus on humanistic elements in the writer’s ideas can be seen as a result of the Soviet disagreement with the Cultural Revolution’s period. Third, by pointing to the internationalist aspects of Lu Xun’s writings, Soviet scholars attempted to expose the Sinocentric political attitudes of the ruling circles in China.

Keywords Lu Xun      Sino-Soviet split      Russian intellectual history     
Issue Date: 05 September 2013
 Cite this article:   
Olga Medvedeva. Lu Xun in the Rhetoric of the Sino-Soviet Split: A View from Contemporary Russia[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2013, 7(3): 483-493.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flsc/EN/10.3868/s010-002-013-0027-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flsc/EN/Y2013/V7/I3/483
[1] JI Jianqing. In Search of “Voices”: Linguistic Choice and Construction of Subjectivity in Lu Xun’s Early Translations and Writings[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2020, 14(4): 605-639.
[2] LI Jikai, SUN Xu. On Lu Xun’s “Memes”—Taking the Example of the Tie between Lu Xun and Shaanxi[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2020, 14(1): 134-156.
[3] HONG Seuk-pyo. The Shaping of Lu Xun’s Public Image and His Portrait Images[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2019, 13(4): 584-629.
[4] Satoru Hashimoto. Science, History, Fiction: The Facetious Mediality of Lu Xun’s Old Stories Retold[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2019, 13(3): 385-404.
[5] Jon Eugene von Kowallis. Understanding Wild Grass by Talking to Oneself: Lu Xun’s Yecao through the Lens of Ziyan Ziyu and the Prism of the Past[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2019, 13(2): 171-199.
[6] Jon Eugene von Kowallis. Re-Contextualizing Lu Xun’s Early Thought and Poetics in the Journal Henan [J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2018, 12(3): 388-423.
[7] Jerry D. Schmidt. Li Ruqian, the Lu Xun of the Nineteenth Century[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2018, 12(2): 217-253.
[8] G. Andrew Stuckey. Female Relations: Voiceless Women in “Liuyi jie” and “Zhufu”[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2017, 11(3): 488-509.
[9] Qin WANG. How Not to Have Nostalgia for the Future: A Reading of Lu Xun’s “Hometown”[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2016, 10(3): 461-473.
[10] Clint Capehart. The Animal Kingdom in the Legacy of Modern Chinese Literature: Lu Xun’s Writings on Animals and Bio-Politics in the Republican Era[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2016, 10(3): 430-460.
[11] WU Jun. A Study on the Basic Theory of Lu Xun’s Literary Translation: “Everything Is an Intermediate Object”[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2016, 10(3): 408-429.
[12] Chiu-yee Cheung. Who Invited Lu Xun to Hong Kong?: An Examination of Two Accounts and Some New Materials[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2016, 10(3): 392-407.
[13] Jon Eugene von Kowallis. Collisions of the Past with the Present: Translation, Texts, and History[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2015, 9(4): 581-615.
[14] Shakhar Rahav. Blade of Remembrance: Memory, Objects, and Redemption in Lu Xun[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2015, 9(3): 453-477.
[15] Marián GáLIK. Archer Hou Yi According to Julius Zeyer (1841–1901) and Lu Xun (1881–1936): Changing Perceptions of Ancient Myths in Modern Literature[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2014, 8(3): 359-373.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed