Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Literary Studies in China

ISSN 1673-7318

ISSN 1673-7423(Online)

CN 11-5745/I

Postal Subscription Code 80-982

Front. Lit. Stud. China    2016, Vol. 10 Issue (4) : 561-597    https://doi.org/10.3868/s010-005-016-0035-9
Orginal Article
The Machiavellian, the Philistine, the Romantic: Rereading Human, Ah, Human!
Jun XIE()
Department of East Asian Studies, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
 Download: PDF(525 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Within the few years of its first publication in 1980, Dai Houying’s most popular and controversial novel Human, Ah, Human! drew significant attention from literary scholars throughout Chinese and English world and was often interpreted by the liberal humanist discourse as the representative work of the “thaw literature” or as the plea to revive the “human.” Recently, such appropriations of the notions of “the human” have raised suspicions among some critics both from the Beijing‐based “revisiting the 1980s (重返八 十年代) group” and some Western critical scholars, who begin to reevaluate Marxist humanism in the 1980s China. This paper, however, attempts to utilize several post‐humanist critical theories that have been persistently on guard against the theoretical limits of both liberal and Marxist humanism to reinterpret this novel. Here, the novel Human, Ah! Human, is able to encompass both the contradiction and reconciliation of various kinds of “human” voices. This paper will revisit its theatrical setting where the newborn “human” figures encounter and contend with one another. Rather than the sudden emergence of a humanist hero, or a Marxist humanist hero, it is the encounter of the Machiavellian wild individual, the philistines who pursue earthly happiness, and the romantics, that offer the untrodden path to approach the historical “real.” This paper will exhibit their combinations, permutation, and rehearsal in the fictional structure.

Keywords Dai Houying      Cultural Revolution      revisiting the 1980s      humanism      individual     
Issue Date: 13 February 2017
 Cite this article:   
Jun XIE. The Machiavellian, the Philistine, the Romantic: Rereading Human, Ah, Human![J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2016, 10(4): 561-597.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flsc/EN/10.3868/s010-005-016-0035-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/flsc/EN/Y2016/V10/I4/561
[1] Veronica Hollinger. Anxiety and Utopia in the Anthropocene[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2018, 12(4): 565-582.
[2] Liang LUO. Writing Green Snake, Dancing White Snake, and the Cultural Revolution as Memory and Imagination—Centered on Yan Geling’sBaishe[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2017, 11(1): 7-37.
[3] HE Guimei,Hangping XU. “The Specter of the Nineteenth Century”: Reconsidering Currents of Humanism (rendaozhuyi sichao ) in 1980s China1[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2016, 10(4): 535-560.
[4] FAN Yilun. The Identity Vacillation of a Technological Elite: The Tension between Poetry and Technology in Liu Cixin’s “The Poetry Cloud” (Shi yun)[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2015, 9(3): 417-435.
[5] Mabel Lee. Zhang Taiyan: Daoist Individualism and Political Reality[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2013, 7(3): 346-366.
[6] Weiming Tu. Confucian Humanism in Perspective[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2013, 7(3): 333-338.
[7] Pu Wang. Ren, Geren and Renmin: The Prehistory of the New Man and Guo Moruo’s Conception of “the People”[J]. Front Liter Stud Chin, 2012, 6(1): 78-94.
[8] ZHAO Minli. Refl ections on “literary awareness in Wei and Jin Dynasties”[J]. Front. Lit. Stud. China, 2007, 1(3): 351-377.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed