Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mathematics in China

ISSN 1673-3452

ISSN 1673-3576(Online)

CN 11-5739/O1

Postal Subscription Code 80-964

2018 Impact Factor: 0.565

Front. Math. China    2017, Vol. 12 Issue (3) : 583-596    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11464-016-0601-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Koszulity and Koszul modules of dual extension algebras
Huanhuan LI1, Yunge XU2()
1. School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
2. Faculty of Mathematics and Statistics, Hubei Key Laboratory of Applied Mathematics, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
 Download: PDF(177 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Let Aand Bbe algebras, and let T be the dual extension algebra of A and B. We provide a different method to prove that Tis Koszul if and only if both A and B are Koszul. Furthermore, we prove that an algebra is Koszul if and only if one of its iterated dual extension algebras is Koszul, if and only if all its iterated dual extension algebras are Koszul. Finally, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for a dual extension algebra to have the property that all linearly presented modules are Koszul modules, which provides an effective way to construct algebras with such a property.

Keywords Dual extension      linearly presented      Koszul algebra      Koszul module     
Corresponding Author(s): Yunge XU   
Issue Date: 20 April 2017
 Cite this article:   
Huanhuan LI,Yunge XU. Koszulity and Koszul modules of dual extension algebras[J]. Front. Math. China, 2017, 12(3): 583-596.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmc/EN/10.1007/s11464-016-0601-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmc/EN/Y2017/V12/I3/583
1 AquinoR M, GreenE L. On modules with linear presentations over Koszul algebras. Comm Algebra, 2005, 33(1): 19–36
https://doi.org/10.1081/AGB-200036765
2 AuslanderM, ReitenI, SmaløS O. Representation Theory of Artin Algebras. Cambridge Stud Adv Math, Vol 36. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press, 1995
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623608
3 BackelinJ, FrobergR. Veronese subrings, Koszul algebras and rings with linear resolutions. Rev Roumaine Math Pures Appl, 1985, 30: 85–97
4 BeilinsonA, GinszburgV, SoergelW. Koszul duality patterns in representation theory. J Amer Math Soc, 1996, 9: 473–525
https://doi.org/10.1090/S0894-0347-96-00192-0
5 BianN, YeY, ZhangP. Generalized d-Koszul modules. Math Res Lett, 2011, 18(2): 191–200
https://doi.org/10.4310/MRL.2011.v18.n2.a1
6 ClineE, ParshallB, ScottL. Finite dimensional algebras and highest weight categories. J Reine Angew Math, 1988, 391: 85–99
7 DengB M. A Construction of algebras with arbitrary finite global dimensions. Comm Algebra, 1998, 26(9): 2959–2965
https://doi.org/10.1080/00927879808826320
8 FrobergR. Koszul algebras. In: Advances in Commutative Ring Theory (Fez, 1997). Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl Math, Vol 205. New York: Dekker, 1999, 337–350
9 GreenE L. Remarks on projective resolutions. In: Dlab V, Gabriel P, eds. Representation Theory II: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Representations of Algebras, Ottawa, Carleton University, August 13–25, 1979. Lecture Notes in Math, Vol 832. Berlin: Springer, 1980, 259–279
https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0088468
10 GreenE L, MarcosE, ZhangP. Koszul modules and modules with linear presentations. Comm Algebra, 2003, 31(6): 2745–2770
https://doi.org/10.1081/AGB-120021891
11 GreenE L, Martinez-VillaR. Koszul and Yoneda algebras. In: Representation Theory of Algebras (Cocoyoc, 1994). CMS Conference Proceedings, Vol 18. Providence: Amer Math Soc, 1996, 247–297
12 GreenE L, Martinez-VillaR, ReitenI, SolbergF, ZachariaD. On modules with linear presentations. J Algebra, 1998, 205: 578–604
https://doi.org/10.1006/jabr.1997.7402
13 HappelD. A family of algebras with two simple modules and Fibonacci numbers. Arch Math, 1991, 57: 133–139
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189999
14 ManinY I. Some remarks on Koszul algebras and quantum groups. Ann Inst Fourier, 1987, 37: 191–205
https://doi.org/10.5802/aif.1117
15 Martinez-VillaR, Montano-BermudezG. Triangular matrix and Koszul algebras. Int J Algebra, 2007, 1(10): 441–467
https://doi.org/10.12988/ija.2007.07049
16 Membrillo-Hern�andezF H. Quasi-hereditary algebras with two simple modules and Fibonacci numbers. Comm Algebra, 1994, 22(11): 4499–4509
https://doi.org/10.1080/00927879408825083
17 PolishchukA, PositselskiL. Quadratic Algebras. Univ Lecture Ser, Vol 37. Providence: Amer Math Soc, 2006
18 PriddyS B. Koszul resolutions. Trans Amer Math Soc, 1970, 152: 39–60
https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1970-0265437-8
19 XiC C. Quasi-hereditary algebras with a duality. J Reine Angew Math, 1994, 449: 201–215
20 XiC C. Global dimensions of dual extension algebras. Manuscripta Math, 1995, 88(1): 25–31
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02567802
21 ZhaoD, HanY. Koszul algebras and finite Galois coverings. Sci China, Ser A, 2009, 52(10): 2145–2153
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-009-0082-y
[1] Zhi CHENG. Trivial extension of Koszul algebras[J]. Front. Math. China, 2017, 12(5): 1045-1056.
[2] Jiafeng LÜ,Junling ZHENG. Koszul property of a class of graded algebras with nonpure resolutions[J]. Front. Math. China, 2016, 11(4): 985-1002.
[3] Bo HOU, Jinmei FAN. Hochschild cohomology of ?n-Galois coverings of an algebra[J]. Front Math Chin, 2012, 7(6): 1113-1128.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed