Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Medicine

ISSN 2095-0217

ISSN 2095-0225(Online)

CN 11-5983/R

邮发代号 80-967

2019 Impact Factor: 3.421

Frontiers of Medicine  2011, Vol. 5 Issue (1): 106-110   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-011-0113-2
  RESEARCH ARTICLE 本期目录
A better way to do small-for-size liver transplantation in rats
A better way to do small-for-size liver transplantation in rats
Jiang LI1, Yu HOU2, Jing LIU3, Bin LIU1(), Li LI3
1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical College, Kunming 650032, China; 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical College, Kunming 650181, China; 3. First Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ganmeit Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical College, Kunming 650031, China
 全文: PDF(381 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Establishing a model for small-for-size liver transplantation is the basis for this study of partial and living donor graft liver transplantation. This study aims to explore a simpler and more effective way of establishing a 30% small-for-size liver transplantation in rats. Sprague-Dawley rats were selected as the donors and recipients. Small-for-size orthotopic liver transplantation was performed using Kamada’s two-cuff method. The donor’s liver was flushed via the abdominal aorta and hepatectomy was performed in situ. The animals were divided into three groups depending on the graft selected, with 40 pairs of rats in each group. In group I, the median lobe of the liver was used as graft; in group II, the right half of the median lobe and the right lobe were used as graft; and in group III, the median and right lobes were used as graft. In groups I and II, the bodyweights of donors were the same as those of recipients; however, in group III the bodyweights of donors were 100–120 g less than those of the recipients. The duration needed for transplantation, the 7-day survival rates, and the technical complication rates were compared among these three groups. The time required for hepatectomy was shorter in group III compared with groups I and II (8.8?±?0.7 min vs. 11.5?±?1.1 min and 10.1?±?1.0 min, P = 0.001). The cold ischemia time for the grafts, the anhepatic times, and the transplantation times for the recipients were not significantly different among the three groups. Compared with groups I and II, the incidence of bleeding, bile leakage, and inferior vena caval strictures were significantly decreased in group III (P<0.05). No significant differences between the three groups were found based on other complications after the operation (P>0.05). Group III had better 7-day survival rates and longer median survival times but the differences were not statistically significant. The method of small for donor bodyweight using the median and right lobes for grafting may be a more effective and simpler way of establishing a 30% small-for-size liver transplantation in rats, as shown by the shorter hepatectomy time and the occurrence of fewer complications after the operation.

Key wordsliver transplantation    small-for-size    rats
收稿日期: 2010-11-23      出版日期: 2011-03-05
Corresponding Author(s): LIU Bin,Email:liubin597088@yahoo.com.cn   
 引用本文:   
. A better way to do small-for-size liver transplantation in rats[J]. Frontiers of Medicine, 2011, 5(1): 106-110.
Jiang LI, Yu HOU, Jing LIU, Bin LIU, Li LI. A better way to do small-for-size liver transplantation in rats. Front Med, 2011, 5(1): 106-110.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/CN/10.1007/s11684-011-0113-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/CN/Y2011/V5/I1/106
GroupIGroupIIGroupIII
Donor bodyweight (g)281.7±17.3267.8±14.3234.4±18.1
Recipient bodyweight (g)290.0±22.1283.5±19.4347.6±21.7
Graft weight (g)3.03±0.362.66±0.243.27±0.33
Recipient liver weight (g)9.96±1.968.79±0.8012.57±1.27
Graft weight ratio (%)30.92±3.6130.93±2.0925.93±2.22
Graft-to-bodyweight ratio (%)1.04±0.090.94±0.060.93±0.06
Tab.1  
GroupALT (IU/L)TB (μmol/L)AMON (μmol/L)
Day 1Day 7Day 1Day 7Day 1Day 7
I354.2±29.1180.4±13.622.0±5.916.2±5.9318.4±15.3150.0±30.7
II346.0±29.4174.0±24.323.2±6.617.8±5.8323.8±49.4152.8±33.2
III314.6±33.7159.0±14.617.8±3.312.8±4.1275.8±50.0114.2±26.2
Tab.2  
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
1 Deshpande R R, Rela M, Girlanda R, Bowles M J, Muiesan P, Dhawan A, Mieli-Vergani G, Heaton N D. Long-term outcome of liver retransplantation in children. Transplantation , 2002, 74(8): 1124–1130
doi: 10.1097/00007890-200210270-00012 pmid:12438958
2 Millis J M, Cronin D C, Brady L M, Newell K A, Woodle E S, Bruce D S, Thistlethwaite J R, Broelsch C E. Primary living-donor liver transplantation at the University of Chicago: technical aspects of the first 104 recipients. Ann Surg , 2000, 232(1): 104–111
doi: 10.1097/00000658-200007000-00015 pmid:10862202
3 Jain A, Reyes J, Kashyap R, Dodson S F, Demetris A J, Ruppert K, Abu-Elmagd K, Marsh W, Madariaga J, Mazariegos G, Geller D, Bonham C A, Gayowski T, Cacciarelli T, Fontes P, Starzl T E, Fung J J. Long-term survival after liver transplantation in 4,000 consecutive patients at a single center. Ann Surg , 2000, 232(4): 490–500
doi: 10.1097/00000658-200010000-00004 pmid:10998647
4 Mao L, Qiu Y D, Fang S, Wu Y F, Liu H, Ding Y T. Liver progenitor cells activated after 30% small-for-size liver transplantation in rats: a preliminary study. Transplant Proc , 2008, 40(5): 1635–1640
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.133 pmid:18589164
5 Liu J, Li J, Zhang S N. Modified model of reduced-size liver transplantation in rats. J Clin Rehabil Tissue Eng Res , 2010, 14(18): 3252–3257
6 Kamada N, Calne R Y. A surgical experience with five hundred thirty liver transplants in the rat. Surgery , 1983, 93(1 Pt 1): 64–69
pmid:6336859
7 Schleimer K, Stippel D L, Kasper H U, Allwissner R, Yavuzyasar S, H?lscher A H, Beckurts K T. Competition between native liver and graft in auxiliary liver transplantation in a rat model. Transplant Proc , 2008, 40(4): 967–970
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.030 pmid:18555091
8 Zhang P, Du X, Sun Z, Xu L. Expression of redox factor-1 in early injury period after liver transplantation in rat model. Cell Mol Immunol , 2009, 6(4): 309–313
doi: 10.1038/cmi.2009.41 pmid:19728933
9 Xue F, Chen W, Wang X G, Liang L, Bai X L, Wang L Y, Wang H P, Liang T B. Establishment of an acute graft-versus-host disease model following liver transplantation in donor-dominant one-way major histocompatibility complex matching rats. Transplant Proc , 2009, 41(5): 1914–1920
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.11.008 pmid:19545756
10 Man K, Lee T K, Liang T B, Lo C M, Fung P C, Tsui S H, Li X L, Ng K T, Fan S T. FK 409 ameliorates small-for-size liver graft injury by attenuation of portal hypertension and down-regulation of Egr-1 pathway. Ann Surg , 2004, 240(1): 159–168
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000129673.13552.c0 pmid:15213632
11 Glanemann M, Eipel C, Nussler A K, Vollmar B, Neuhaus P. Hyperperfusion syndrome in small-for-size livers. Eur Surg Res , 2005, 37(6): 335–341
doi: 10.1159/000090333 pmid:16465057
12 Xu H S, Pruett T L, Jones R S. Study of donor-recipient liver size match for transplantation. Ann Surg , 1994, 219(1): 46–50
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199401000-00008 pmid:8297176
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed