Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Medicine

ISSN 2095-0217

ISSN 2095-0225(Online)

CN 11-5983/R

邮发代号 80-967

2019 Impact Factor: 3.421

Frontiers of Medicine  2012, Vol. 6 Issue (4): 440-443   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-012-0222-6
  CASE REPORT 本期目录
A giant Müllerian duct cyst in the perineum: a case report
A giant Müllerian duct cyst in the perineum: a case report
Xianghu Meng1, Jihong Liu1(), Xiao Yu1, Shaogang Wang1, Cong Liu2, Zhangqun Ye1
1. Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; 2. Department of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
 全文: PDF(240 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The authors present a case report of a giant Müllerian duct cyst in the perineum. A 37-year-old man presented with a mass with the size of 50 cm×40 cm×30 cm in the perineum. Computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis and perineum found a huge multilocular cystic mass. X-ray film of the pelvis showed a giant soft-tissue shadow of high density in the perineum. Voiding cystourethrogram did not show any cyst interlinked to posterior urethra. After related examinations, the patient underwent open surgical resection of the cyst. Pathologic examination confirmed the presence of a Müllerian duct cyst. Huge Müllerian duct cyst is uncommon in clinic. Treatments of Müllerian duct cysts depend on their sizes and symptoms.

Key wordsMüllerian duct cyst    clinical symptoms    diagnosis
收稿日期: 2012-03-16      出版日期: 2012-12-05
Corresponding Author(s): Liu Jihong,Email:jhliu@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn   
 引用本文:   
. A giant Müllerian duct cyst in the perineum: a case report[J]. Frontiers of Medicine, 2012, 6(4): 440-443.
Xianghu Meng, Jihong Liu, Xiao Yu, Shaogang Wang, Cong Liu, Zhangqun Ye. A giant Müllerian duct cyst in the perineum: a case report. Front Med, 2012, 6(4): 440-443.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/CN/10.1007/s11684-012-0222-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/CN/Y2012/V6/I4/440
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
1 Aminsharifi A, Afsar F, Pakbaz S. Laparoscopic management of Müllerian duct cysts in infants. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46(9): 1859–1864
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.04.008 pmid:21930005
2 Coppens L, Bonnet P, Andrianne R, de Leval J. Adult Müllerian duct or utricle cyst: clinical significance and therapeutic management of 65 cases. J Urol 2002; 167(4): 1740–1744
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65190-7 pmid:11912400
3 Desautel MG, Stock J, Hanna MK. Müllerian duct remnants: surgical management and fertility issues. J Urol 1999; 162(3 Pt 2): 1008–1013, discussion 1014
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68050-9 pmid:10458422
4 Luo JH, Chen W, Sun JJ, Xie D, Mo JC, Zhou L, Lu J. Laparoscopic management of Müllerian duct remnants: four case reports and review of the literature. J Androl 2008; 29(6): 638–642
doi: 10.2164/jandrol.108.005496 pmid:18599884
5 Warmann SW, Vogel M, Wehrmann M, Scheel-Walter HG, Artlich A, Pereira PL, Fuchs J. Giant mullerian duct cyst with malignant transformation in 15-year-old boy. Urology 2006; 67(2): 424.e3–424.e6
6 Jaidane M, Hidoussi A, Slama A, Hmida W, Sorba NB, Mosbah F. An acute urinary retention in an old man caused by a giant Müllerian duct cyst: a case report. Cases J 2009; 2(1): 203
doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-2-203 pmid:19946447
7 Hong YK, Onal B, Diamond DA, Retik AB, Cendron M, Nguyen HT. Robot-assisted laparoscopic excision of symptomatic retrovesical cysts in boys and young adults. J Urol 2011; 186(6): 2372–2378
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.113 pmid:22014819
8 Lima M, Aquino A, Dòmini M, Ruggeri G, Libri M, Cimador M, Pelusi G. Laparoscopic removal of Müllerian duct remnants in boys. J Urol 2004; 171(1): 364–368
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000102321.54818.53 pmid:14665932
9 Krsti? ZD, Smoljani? Z, Mi?ovi? Z, Vukadinovi? V, Sretenovi? A, Varinac D. Surgical treatment of the Müllerian duct remnants. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36(6): 870–876
doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.23958 pmid:11381415
10 Okur H, Gough DC. Management of Müllerian duct remnants. Urology 2003; 61(3): 634–637, discussion 637
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02418-4 pmid:12639661
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed