Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

邮发代号 80-975

2019 Impact Factor: 2.448

Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering  2024, Vol. 19 Issue (2): 12   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-024-0783-5
  本期目录
Design methodology, synthesis, and control strategy of the high-speed planetary rover
Renchao LU, Haibo GAO, Zhen LIU(), Runze YUAN, Zongquan DENG
State Key Laboratory of Robotics and Systems, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
 全文: PDF(3179 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The planned missions to explore the surfaces of the Moon and Mars require high exploration efficiency, thus imposing new demands on the mobility system of planetary rovers. In this paper, a design method for a high-speed planetary rover (HPR) is proposed, and the representative configurations are modeled and simulated. First, the influence of the planetary surface environment on the design of HPRs is analyzed, and the design factors for HPRs are determined by studying a single-wheel suspension. Second, a design methodology for HPRs is proposed. The adaptive suspension mechanisms of a four-wheeled rover are synthesized using the all-wheel-attachment condition and position and orientation characteristics theory, which are expressed in the form of a graph theory for the increase in elastic components and active joints. Finally, a dynamic model is built, and a simulation is carried out for the proposed rover. The validity of the proposed method and rover is verified, thus highlighting their potential application in future planetary exploration.

Key wordsdesign methodology    spectrum analysis    high-speed    planetary rover    type synthesis
收稿日期: 2023-10-12      出版日期: 2024-05-30
Corresponding Author(s): Zhen LIU   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 19(2): 12.
Renchao LU, Haibo GAO, Zhen LIU, Runze YUAN, Zongquan DENG. Design methodology, synthesis, and control strategy of the high-speed planetary rover. Front. Mech. Eng., 2024, 19(2): 12.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/CN/10.1007/s11465-024-0783-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/CN/Y2024/V19/I2/12
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
v n Form SLC structure
1 4 Plane -R-R-R-R-, -R-P-R-R-, -P-R-R-R-, -R-P-P-R-
1 4 Spatial -R-S-S-R-, -R-S-U-R-, -P-S-U-P-, -R-S-U-P-
Tab.1  
v n Form SLC structure Second SOC structure
2 6 Plane -R-R-R-R-, -R-P-R-R-, -R-P-P-R-, -R-R-R-P- -R-R-R-, -R-P-R-, -R-P-P-
2 5 Spatial -R-S-S-R-, -R-S-S-P-, -P-S-S-P- -S-U-
2 6 Spatial -R-U-S-R-, -R-U-S-P- -R-U-S-
Tab.2  
v n Form SLC structure
3 7 -R-S-S-S-R-, -R-S-S-S-P-, -P-S-S-S-P- -R-S-, -P-S-
3 8 -R-S-U-R-, -P-S-U-R-, -P-S-U-P- -R-S-U-, -P-S-U-
Tab.3  
v n Form SLC structure
3 7 -R-S-S-S-, -P-S-S-S- -R-R-S-, -R-U-U-, -P-R-S-
3 8 -R-U-S-R-, -R-U-S-P-, -P-U-S-P- -R-U-S-, -P-U-S-
Tab.4  
v n Form SLC structure
5 12 -R-U-S-R-, -P-U-S-P-, -P-U-S-R- -R-S-S-, -R-U-S-, -P-U-S-
5 12 -R-U-S-R-, -P-U-S-R-, -P-U-S-P- -R-R-R-R- (SOC2 plane); -R-U-S-R- (SOC3); -R-U-S- (SOC4); -R-U-S- (SOC5)
Tab.5  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Parameter Symbol Value Unit
Mass of body ms 100 kg
Mass of wheel mw 4 kg
Pitch inertia of body Iφ 12 kg? m2
Roll inertia of body Iθ 15 kg? m2
Stiffness of spring ks 16800 N·m
Damping of damper cs 1680 N·m/s
Half of wheel-track B 0.53 m
Half of distance of ipsilateral swing arm l1 0.2 m
Initial angle of the swing arm β 10 degree
Length of swing arm l2 0.4 m
Velocity of rover U 5 km/h
Radius of wheel R 0.2 m
Linkage ratio r0 4
Static friction coefficient μs 0.25
Dynamic friction coefficient μd 0.15
Tab.6  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
Abbreviations
DOF Degree of freedom
ESM Electronic supplementary material
HPR High-speed planetary rover
POC Position and orientation characteristics
SLC Single loop chain
SOC Single open chain
Variables
Ai (k) k wheels connected to the base through i DOFs
Ak Amplitude of the cosine wave
B Half of wheel track
Cj j constraints between t movable connections
f Amplitude–frequency characteristic
fi DOF of every joint
fs (ω), fu (ω) Fourier transforms of active force at about xs and xu
fz, fφ, fθ Amplitude frequency characteristics of vertical acceleration, pitch acceleration, and roll acceleration
F System DOF
Fa Active force of suspension
Fi Partial DOF
Fp, Fa Expressions of ground input and active force
g Gravitational constant
G (nk) Power spectral density function
H (jω) Frequency response function
Iφ, Iθ, Iγ Pitch, roll inertia of the rover, and inertia of synchronization-link
kpz, k, k Coefficient of proportional control
ks, cs Stiffness and damping of soft suspension
kt Stiffness of the wheel
l1 Half of distance of the ipsilateral swing arm
l2 Length of the swing arm
m Number of joints
ms Sprung mass
mw Mass of the wheel
M Number of DOFs of suspension
Mbi POC set of the ith branch
Mv, Cv, Kv Coefficient matrices of mass, damping, and kiffness
n Number of components
nk Frequency within the interval [nmin, nmax]
nmax Maximum of the frequency
nmin Minimum of the frequency
N Number of wheels
Nc Contact force in single suspension
Ni (i = 1,2,3,4) Contact force of four wheels
p Number of terms used to build up the road surface
r0 Linkage ratio
r (x) Road surface roughness
r¨(t) Acceleration excitation of the ground
R Radius of wheel
u Speed of rover
U Velocity of rover
v Independent loops
x Global coordinate measured from the left end of a stretch
x Vector representing the generalized coordinates of the system
xr, xu, xs Vertical displacement of road, wheel, and sprung mass
xwfl,x wfr, xwrl, xwrr, x˙wfl,x˙wfr, x˙wrl,x˙wrr Displacement input and velocity input of the road at four wheels
x¨w1, x¨w2, x¨w3, x¨w4 Acceleration of four wheels
z, φ, θ Vertical displacement, pitch, and roll of the body
γ Angle of the synchronization-link
αi (i = 1,2,3,4) Angle of the swing arm
β Initial angle of the swing arm
θk Random phase angle with uniform probability
ω0 Natural frequency of system
ωz, ωφ, ωθ, ωγ Natural frequency of heave, pitch, roll, and warp
τ Time delay
τi (i = 1,2,3,4) Active force of joints
μd Dynamic friction coefficient
μs Static friction coefficient
ξLi Independent motion equation number
ξ Lj Independent motion equation number of the jth independent SOC
ξz, ξφ ,ξθ ,ξγ Damping ratio of heave, pitch, roll, and warp
  
1 J P Grotzinger, J Crisp, A R Vasavada, R C Anderson, C J Baker, R Barry, D F Blake, P Conrad, K S Edgett, B Ferdowski, R Gellert, J B Gilbert, M Golombek, J Gómez-Elvira, D M Hassler, L Jandura, M Litvak, P Mahaffy, J Maki, M Meyer, M C Malin, I Mitrofanov, J J Simmonds, D Vaniman, R V Welch, R C Wiens. Mars science laboratory mission and science investigation. Space Science Reviews, 2012, 170(1–4): 5–56
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-012-9892-2
2 M G A Lapotre, R C Ewing, M P Lamb, W W Fischer, J P Grotzinger, D M Rubin, K W Lewis, M J Ballard, M Day, S Gupta, S G Banham, N T Bridges, D J Des Marais, A A Fraeman, J A Grant, K E Herkenhoff, D W Ming, M A Mischna, M S Rice, D Y Sumner, A R Vasavada, R A Yingst. Large wind ripples on Mars: a record of atmospheric evolution. Science, 2016, 353(6294): 55–58
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf3206
3 Z R Luo, J Z Shang, G W Wei, L Ren. Module-based structure design of wheeled mobile robot. Mechanical Sciences, 2018, 9(1): 103–121
https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-9-103-2018
4 B Ghotbi, F González, J Kövecses, J Angeles. A novel concept for analysis and performance evaluation of wheeled rovers. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2015, 83: 137–151
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2014.08.017
5 R BauerW LeungT Barfoot. Experimental and simulation results of wheel-soil interaction for planetary rovers. In: Proceedings of 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Edmonton: IEEE, 2005, 586–591
6 R VolpeE BaumgartnerP ScheakerS Hayati. Technology development and testing for enhanced mars rover sample return operations. In: Proceedings of 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky: IEEE, 2000, 247–257
7 R A LindemannC J Voorhees. Mars exploration rover mobility assembly design, test and performance. In: Proceedings of 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Waikoloa: IEEE, 2005, 450–455
8 R A Lindemann, D B Bickler, B D Harrington, G M Ortiz, C J Voothees. Mars exploration rover mobility development. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2006, 13(2): 19–26
https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2006.1638012
9 E S Steenstra, D J P Martin, F E McDonald, S Paisarnsombat, C Venturino, S O’Hara, A Calzada-Diaz, S Bottoms, M K Leader, K K Klaus, Westrenen W van, D H Needham, D A Kring. Analyses of robotic traverses and sample sites in the schrödinger basin for the heracles human-assisted sample return mission concept. Advances in Space Research, 2016, 58(6): 1050–1065
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.05.041
10 N J Potts, A L Gullikson, N M Curran, J K Dhaliwal, M K Leader, R N Rege, K K Klaus, D A Kring. Robotic traverse and sample return strategies for a lunar farside mission to the schrödinger basin. Advances in Space Research, 2015, 55(4): 1241–1254
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.11.028
11 Merlo A, Larranaga J, Falkner P. Sample fetching rover (SFR) for MSR. In: Proceedings of the 12th Symposium on Advanced Space Technologies in Robotics and Automation. Paris: European Space Agency, 2013
12 Vulpi F, Milella A, Cordes F, Domínguez R, Reina G. Deep terrain estimation for planetary rovers. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence Robotics and Automation in Space. Washington DC: University Space Research Association, 2020, 5084
13 D Rodríguez-Martínez, Winnendael M Van, K Yoshida. High-speed mobility on planetary surfaces: a technical review. Journal of Field Robotics, 2019, 36(8): 1436–1455
https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21912
14 D A HarrisonR AmbroseB BluethmannL Junkin. Next generation rover for lunar exploration. In: Proceedings of 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky: IEEE, 2008, 1–14
15 S SerianiL ScaleraA GasparettoP Gallina. Preloaded structures for space exploration vehicles. In: Gasparetto A, Ceccarelli M, eds. Mechanism Design for Robotics. Cham: Springer, 2019, 129–137
16 S SerianiP GallinaA Wedler. Dynamics of a tethered rover on rough terrain. In: Boschetti G, Gasparetto A, eds. Advances in Italian Mechanism Science. Cham: Springer, 2017, 355–361
17 F Cordes, F Kirchner, A Babu. Design and field testing of a rover with an actively articulated suspension system in a Mars analog terrain. Journal of Field Robotics, 2018, 35(7): 1149–1181
https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21808
18 M J Schuster, S G Brunner, K Bussmann, S Büttner, A Dömel, M Hellerer, H Lehner, P Lehner, O Porges, J Reill, S Riedel, M Vayugundla, B Vodermayer, T Bodenmüller, C Brand, W Friedl, I Grixa, H Hirschmüller, M Kaßecker, Z C Márton, C Nissler, F Ruess, M Suppa, A Wedler. Towards autonomous planetary exploration. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2019, 93(3–4): 461–494
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0680-9
19 N Patel, R Slade, J Clemmet. The ExoMars rover locomotion subsystem. Journal of Terramechanics, 2010, 47(4): 227–242
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2010.02.004
20 M Heverly. A wheel-on-limb rover for lunar operations. In: Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence Robotics and Automation for Space, Los Angeles: NASA, 2007
21 V G Dovgan, A A Moisheev. First space robotic systems (on the 50th anniversary of lunokhod 1). Solar System Research, 2021, 55(7): 772–780
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0038094621070066
22 M Caruso, L Bregant, P Gallina, S Seriani. Design and multi-body dynamic analysis of the archimede space exploration rover. Acta Astronautica, 2022, 194: 229–241
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.02.003
23 M I Malenkov, V A Volov. Comparative analysis and synthesis of schemes of balanced suspension of planetary rovers with autonomous control. Russian Engineering Research, 2019, 39: 211–219
https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X19030171
24 A Bouton, C Grand, F Benamar. Design and control of a compliant wheel-on-leg rover which conforms to uneven terrain. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2020, 25(5): 2354–2363
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2020.2973752
25 G Reina, M Foglia. On the mobility of all-terrain rovers. Industrial Robot, 2013, 40(2): 121–131
https://doi.org/10.1108/01439911311297720
26 H Jiang, G Y Xu, W Zeng, F Gao. Design and kinematic modeling of a passively-actively transformable mobile robot. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2019, 142: 103591
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.103591
27 H B Gao, R C Lu, Z Q Deng, Z Liu, R Z Yuan. One necessary condition for passive all-wheel attachment of a wheeled planetary rover. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2023, 182: 105226
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.105226
28 Z Q Deng, P Zhang, H B Gao, M Hu. Configuration synthesis and performance evaluation metrics of lunar rover locomotion systems. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2009, 15(3): 193–200
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-009-0034-1
29 Hu S F, Wang G X, Tao J G. Design of six-wheeled planetary rover with a novel hybrid suspension. In: Proceedings of 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. Sanya: IEEE, 2021, 386–391
30 L Sun, R J Cui, W J Yang, Z Z Ye, Y Z Zhou, C Y Wu. Automatic synthesis of the complete set of contracted graphs for planar kinematic chains with up to seven independent loops. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2021, 156: 104144
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.104144
31 Y F Fang, L W Tsai. Enumeration of a class of overconstrained mechanisms using the theory of reciprocal screws. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2004, 39(11): 1175–1187
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2004.06.003
32 C C Lee, J M Hervé. Parallel mechanisms generating 3-DOF finite translation and (2 or 1)-DOF infinitesimal rotation. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2012, 51: 185–194
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2012.01.005
33 J Z Zhang, Z L Jin, H B Feng. Type synthesis of a 3-mixed-DOF protectable leg mechanism of a firefighting multi-legged robot based on GF set theory. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2018, 130: 567–584
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.08.026
34 F Gao, J L Yang, Q D J Ge. Type synthesis of parallel mechanisms having the second class GF sets and two dimensional rotations. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2010, 3(1): 011003
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002697
35 T L YangA X LiuH P ShenL B HangY F Luo Q Jin. Topology Design of Robot Mechanisms. Singapore: Springer, 2018
36 N C CostesJ E FarmerE B George. Mobility performance of the lunar roving vehicle: terrestrial studies. Apollo 15 results. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of the International Society for Terrain-Vehicle Systems. Stockholm and Kiruna: NASA, 1972
37 W Schiehlen, B Hu. Spectral simulation and shock absorber identification. International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics, 2003, 38(2): 161–171
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7462(01)00053-1
38 F T K Au, Y S Cheng, Y K Cheung. Effects of random road surface roughness and long-term deflection of prestressed concrete girder and cable-stayed bridges on impact due to moving vehicles. Computers & Structures, 2001, 79(8): 853–872
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00180-2
39 Y M LiX Y ZhengK W Li. Prescribed-time adaptive intelligent formation controller for nonlinear multi-agent systems based on time-domain mapping. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 1–12
40 Y K Lu. Adaptive-fuzzy control compensation design for direct adaptive fuzzy control. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 26(6): 3222–3231
https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2815552
41 Y M Li, S C Tong. Bumpless transfer distributed adaptive backstepping control of nonlinear multi-agent systems with circular filtering under dos attacks. Automatica, 2023, 157: 111250
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2023.111250
42 J P Humaloja, M Kurula, L Paunonen. Approximate robust output regulation of boundary control systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2019, 64(6): 2210–2223
https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2018.2884676
[1] FME-24003-OF-LR_suppl_1 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed