Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

Postal Subscription Code 80-975

2018 Impact Factor: 0.989

Front. Mech. Eng.    2018, Vol. 13 Issue (4) : 571-580    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0478-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Balancing method without trial weights for rotor systems based on similitude scale model
Ruiduo YE1,2, Liping WANG1,2, Xiaojie HOU1,2, Zhong LUO1,2(), Qingkai HAN3
1. School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
2. Key Laboratory of Vibration and Control of Aero-Propulsion System Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
3. School of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116000, China
 Download: PDF(382 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

A balancing method without trial weights based on the dynamic similitude scale model was proposed as a solution to the balancing problem of a large-scale rotor system. This method could be used to directly obtain the required coefficients for the balancing problem of the prototype system through a similarity model test without a prototype test. Thus, the weight test process of the prototype system was effectively eliminated in the proposed balancing method. First, with the rotor system as the research object, the analytical expression of the influence coefficient was derived on the basis of rotor dynamics theory. Then, through calculation and dimensional analysis methods, the similitude relationships of the rotor system and the influence coefficient were deduced on the basis of dynamic similitude theory. The correctness of the proposed similitude relationships was verified through numerical simulation and experiment. The balancing method without trial weights was proposed based on the similitude relationship of the influence coefficient. The effect of the balancing method without trial weights was compared with that of the traditional influence coefficient method through numerical simulation, and the results verified the correctness and effectiveness of the proposed balancing method. The results of this study provide theoretical supplements for the balancing method and the similitude design of the rotor system.

Keywords rotor system      dynamic similitude      balancing      without trial weights      influence coefficient     
Corresponding Author(s): Zhong LUO   
Just Accepted Date: 09 October 2017   Online First Date: 14 November 2017    Issue Date: 31 July 2018
 Cite this article:   
Ruiduo YE,Liping WANG,Xiaojie HOU, et al. Balancing method without trial weights for rotor systems based on similitude scale model[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2018, 13(4): 571-580.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/10.1007/s11465-018-0478-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/Y2018/V13/I4/571
Fig.1  Schematic of the rotor system
Dimensionkrmeωg
[T]−2000−1−2
[L]10101
[M]101000
Tab.1  Basic dimensions of the rotor system
Fig.2  Simplified structure of the rotor system
Shaft segment (from the left)Length L/mmDiameter R/mm
114918
28030
34050
484370
55850
612030
Tab.2  Prototype shaft parameters
Turntable (from the left)Diameter R/mmWidth B/mmAxial position/mm
120021354
220019538
320030786
4240351061
Tab.3  Prototype disk parameters
Shaft segment (from the left)Length L/mmDiameter R/mm
1105.49
256.615
328.325
4596.135
541.025
684.515
Tab.4  Model shaft parameters
Disk (from the left)Diameter R/mmWidth B/mmAxial position/mm
1145.66.5250.3
2145.65.9380.4
3145.69.3555.8
4173.311.3750.2
Tab.5  Model disk parameters
System typeBearing locationStiffness/(N?m1)Damping/(N·s·m1)Axial position/mm
Prototype11.50×106700189.0
22.00×1067001359.0
Model12.65×105124133.6
23.54×105124961.0
Tab.6  Supporting stiffness and damping
OrderPrototype/(r?min1)Model/(r?min1)Error/%
1BW226322700.31
1FW226422710.31
2BW395639480.20
2FW412541120.32
Tab.7  Critical speed of the prototype and model
Fig.3  Vibration mode of the prototype and model. (a) The first-order and (b) second-order modes of the prototype; (c) the first-order and (d) second-order modes of the model
Rotating speed/(r?min1)Sensor locationPlane 1/(mm∠(° ))Plane 2/(mm∠(° ))Plane 3/(mm∠(° ))Plane 4/(mm∠(° ))
180013.8×1058.83.4×1059.52.6×1059.11.6×1059.1
21.7×1055.52.2×1054.32.8×1052.93.2×1051.7
320013.3×10510.23.0×106178.95.1×105171.69.6×105171.3
28.9×105 174.86.5×105179.62.9×105156.03.1×10546.6
Tab.8  Influence coefficients of the prototype rotor system
Rotating speed/(r?min1)Sensor locationPlane 1/(mm∠(° ))Plane 2/(mm∠(° ))Plane 3/(mm∠(° ))Plane 4/(mm∠(° ))
180012.2×1049.51.9×1049.41.5×1049.59.2×1059.5
29.7×1056.51.2×1044.51.6×1042.91.8×1041.7
320012.0×10410.21.7×105174.72.8×104171.65.3×104171.2
25.2×104174.93.7×104179.81.7×104157.61.7×10446.8
Tab.9  Influence coefficients of the model rotor system
Rotating speed/(r?min1)Sensor locationError/(%∠(° ))
Plane 1Plane 2Plane 3Plane 4
180010.950.620.170.051.310.431.650.44
20.870.990.360.201.510.050.540.08
320014.990.000.174.204.330.072.770.10
22.290.100.630.222.411.522.490.12
Tab.10  Prediction error of the influence coefficient
Fig.4  Comparison of the influence coefficients of the prototype and prototype prediction. (a) Plane 1; (b) Plane 2; (c) Plane 3; (d) Plane 4
Fig.5  Prototype and model rotor test systems. (a) Prototype rotor system; (b) model rotor system
System type Shaft segment numberl/mmd/mm
Prototype14224
24034
353538
4 (disk)40200
553538
64734
Model13012
22817
337819
4 (disk)16142
537819
63317
Tab.11  Structural parameters of the prototype and model rotor systems
Rotating speed/(r?min1)Prototype/(μm∠(° ))Model/(μm∠(° ))Prototype prediction/(μm∠(° ))Prediction error/(%∠(° ))
10000.011476.480.048267.180.008567.1825.269.30
12000.025182.890.101473.880.017973.8828.599.01
14000.045686.230.185575.920.032875.9228.0910.31
Tab.12  Prediction error of the influence coefficients
Fig.6  Frequency response of the prototype and model. (a) Prototype system; (b) model system
Fig.7  Dynamic balancing effect of the rotor system. (a) Plane 2; (b) Plane 3
1 Foiles W C, Allaire P E, Gunter E J. Review: Rotor balancing. Shock and Vibration, 1998, 5(5–6): 325–336
https://doi.org/10.1155/1998/648518
2 Zhang S, Zhang Z. Design of an active dynamic balancing head for rotor and its balancing error analysis. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design Systems & Manufacturing, 2015, 9(1): JAMDSM0001
https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2015jamdsm0001
3 Han P, Huang S, He G, et al. Experiment based method to evaluate the quality of influential coefficient in rotor dynamic balancing. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2003, 22(2): 81–85 (in Chinese)
4 Li X, Zheng L, Liu Z. Balancing of flexible rotors without trial weights based on finite element modal analysis. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2013, 19(3): 461–470
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546311433916
5 Wang W, Gao J, Jiang Z, et al. Principle and application of no trial weight field balancing for a rotating machinery. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2010, 29(2): 212–215 (in Chinese)
6 Bin G, Yao J, Jiang Z, et al. A method of influence coefficient for rotor dynamic balancing based on the finite element model. Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis, 2013, 33(6): 998–1002 (in Chinese)
7 Luo Z, Zhao X, Zhu Y, et al. Determination method of the structure size interval of dynamic similar models for predicting vibration characteristics of the isotropic sandwich plates. Journal of Vibroengineering, 2014, 16(2): 608–622
8 Coutinho C P, Baptista A J, Dias Rodrigues J. Reduced scale models based on similitude theory: A review up to 2015. Engineering Structures, 2016, 119: 81–94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.016
9 Zhu Y, Wang Y, Luo Z, et al. Similitude design for the vibration problems of plates and shells: A review. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 12(2): 253–264
10 De Rosa S, Franco F, Polito T. Structural similitudes for the dynamic response of plates and assemblies of plates. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2011, 25(3): 969–980
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.10.004
11 Zhao J, Wang F, Yu B, et al. Experimental study on the ride comfort of a crawler power chassis scale model based on the similitude theory. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 28(3): 496–503
https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2015.0306.024
12 Wu J. Prediction of lateral vibration characteristics of a full-size rotor-bearing system by using those of its scale models. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2007, 43(10): 803–816
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2007.05.001
13 Baxi C B, Telengator A, Razvi J. Rotor scale model tests for power conversion unit of GT-MHR. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2012, 251(699): 344–348
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.09.060
14 Hu P. The model experiment analysis of bending vibration of the large rotor system. Mechanical Research Application, 1998, 11(3): 36–38 (in Chinese)
15 Luo Z, Yan Y, Han Q, et al. Analysis of dynamic similarity of the rotor-bearing system and its effects of bearing parameters. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(Suppl): 12–16 (in Chinese)
16 Zhong Y, He Y, Wang Z. Rotor Dynamics. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1987, 3–7 (in Chinese)
17 Kang Y, Lin T W, Chang Y J, et al. Optimal balancing of flexible rotors by minimizing the condition number of influence coefficients. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2008, 43(7): 891–908
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2007.06.005
18 Li Z. Similarity and Modeling. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1982, 27–52 (in Chinese)
19 Yao M H, Zhang W. Using the extended Melnikov method to study multi-pulse chaotic motions of a rectangular thin plate. International Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2014, 2(3): 365–385
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-013-0031-z
20 Qin Z Y, Han Q K, Chu F L. Analytical model of bolted disk-drum joints and its application to dynamic analysis of jointed rotor. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2014, 228(4): 646–663
https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406213489084
21 Zhang D, Fu J, Zhang Q, et al. An effective numerical method for calculating nonlinear dynamics of structures with dry friction: Application to predict the vibration response of blades with underplatform dampers. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2017, 88(1): 223–237
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3239-6
22 Jalan A K, Mohanty A R. Model based fault diagnosis of a rotor-bearing system for misalignment and unbalance under steady-state condition. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2009, 327(3–5): 604–622
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2009.07.014
23 Yang X D, Zhang W. Nonlinear dynamics of axially moving beam with coupled longitudinal-transversal vibrations. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2014, 78(4): 2547–2556
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1609-5
[1] Xiaokun DUAN, Bo WU, Youmin HU, Jie LIU, Jing XIONG. An improved artificial bee colony algorithm with MaxTF heuristic rule for two-sided assembly line balancing problem[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 241-253.
[2] Giuseppe QUAGLIA,Zhe YIN. Static balancing of planar articulated robots[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2015, 10(4): 326-343.
[3] Thiago ANTONINI ALVES,Paulo H. D. SANTOS,Murilo A. BARBUR. An invariant descriptor for conjugate forced convection-conduction cooling of 3D protruding heaters in channel flow[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2015, 10(3): 263-276.
[4] Ullah SAIF,Zailin GUAN,Baoxi WANG,Jahanzeb MIRZA. Pareto lexicographic α-robust approach and its application in robust multi objective assembly line balancing problem[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2014, 9(3): 257-264.
[5] Ullah SAIF,Zailin GUAN,Baoxi WANG,Jahanzeb MIRZA,Shiyang HUANG. A survey on assembly lines and its types[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2014, 9(2): 95-105.
[6] V. van der WIJK. Shaking-moment balancing of mechanisms with principal vectors and momentum[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2013, 8(1): 10-16.
[7] Hao WU, Jianwen WANG, Qi AN. Vibratory behaviors of Jeffcott system on cylindrical roller bearings[J]. Front Mech Eng Chin, 2009, 4(3): 305-309.
[8] LU Yanjun, HEI Di, WANG Yuan, DAI Rong, LU Yanjun, LIU Heng, YU Lie. Stability and coupling dynamic behavior of nonlinear journal active electromagnetic bearing rotor system[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2008, 3(2): 193-199.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed