Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

Postal Subscription Code 80-975

2018 Impact Factor: 0.989

Front. Mech. Eng.    2022, Vol. 17 Issue (2) : 19    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-022-0675-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A zone-layered trimming method for ceramic core of aero-engine blade based on an advanced reconfigurable laser processing system
Xiaodong WANG1,2, Dongxiang HOU3, Bin LIU1,2, Xuesong MEI1,2(), Xintian WANG1,2, Renhan LIAN1,2
1. State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Intelligent Robots, Xi’an 710049, China
3. Artificial Intelligence Department, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
 Download: PDF(11960 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Ceramic structural parts are one of the most widely utilized structural parts in the industry. However, they usually contain defects following the pressing process, such as burrs. Therefore, additional trimming is usually required, despite the deformation challenges and difficulty in positioning. This paper proposes an ultrafast laser processing system for trimming complex ceramic structural parts. Opto-electromechanical cooperative control software is developed to control the laser processing system. The trimming problem of the ceramic cores used in aero engines is studied. The regional registration method is introduced based on the iterative closest point algorithm to register the path extracted from the computer-aided design model with the deformed ceramic core. A zonal and layering processing method for three-dimensional contours on complex surfaces is proposed to generate the working data of high-speed scanning galvanometer and the computer numerical control machine tool, respectively. The results show that the laser system and the method proposed in this paper are suitable for trimming complex non-datum parts such as ceramic cores. Compared with the results of manual trimming, the method proposed in this paper has higher accuracy, efficiency, and yield. The method mentioned above has been used in practical application with satisfactory results.

Keywords ceramic parts trimming      computer-aided laser manufacturing      3D vision      reconfigurable laser processing system     
Corresponding Author(s): Xuesong MEI   
About author:

Tongcan Cui and Yizhe Hou contributed equally to this work.

Just Accepted Date: 01 March 2022   Issue Date: 10 June 2022
 Cite this article:   
Xiaodong WANG,Dongxiang HOU,Bin LIU, et al. A zone-layered trimming method for ceramic core of aero-engine blade based on an advanced reconfigurable laser processing system[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2022, 17(2): 19.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/10.1007/s11465-022-0675-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/Y2022/V17/I2/19
Fig.1  Defects such as burrs and blockage of the ceramic core: (a) turbine blade and ceramic core and (b) burrs and blockage on the ceramic core.
Fig.2  Laser beam quality measurement: (a) measuring device and (b) beam quality.
Fig.3  Laser energy distribution near the laser focus (a) for different radii on the focal plane near the focus and (b) maximum energy density at different locations.
Fig.4  Effect of laser incident angle on the shape and size of the spot.
Fig.5  Change of the laser spot size with the angle of incidence: (a) r min /r and (b) rmax/r.
Fig.6  Grooving experiment device under different laser incident angles: (a) experimental equipment and (b) experimental material.
Fig.7  Width of the groove near the focus.
Fig.8  Width of the groove at different incidence angles under the microscope 1000 times magnification: (a) θ= 0, (b) θ =1, (c) θ=2, (d) θ =3, (e) θ=4, and (f) θ=5.
Fig.9  Edges of the ceramic core designated for trimming.
Fig.10  Contour clusters extracted by CAM software of the ceramic core designated for trimming.
Fig.11  k-means clustering results: (a) normalized processing; (b) non-normalized processing.
Cluster number Feature vector of cluster (x, y, z, u, v, w) Included angles/(° )
1 (18.900, 13.328, 91.963, 0.980, 0.002, 0.187) 0.7926
2 (20.407, 9.027, 55.203, 0.752, ?0.644, 0.136) 2.1245
3 (14.876, 4.870, 62.983, 0.607, ?0.788, 0.092) 2.6773
4 (13.510, 6.862, 90.157, 0.665, ?0.742, 0.082) 3.1366
5 (15.849, 3.973, 49.748, 0.559, ?0.822, 0.104) 0.8989
6 (16.909, 10.216, 90.34, 0.780, ?0.617, 0.100) 0.5320
7 (22.774, 12.273, 56.966, 0.994, ?0.044, 0.098) 1.4632
8 (14.129, 5.896, 76.977, 0.647, ?0.756, 0.088) 3.0762
9 (18.472, 9.572, 72.676, 0.770, ?0.626, 0.116) 1.3031
10 (20.952, 13.396, 76.144, 0.991, ?0.010, 0.127) 2.8984
Tab.1  Clustering centers after k-means clustering
Fig.12  Schematic diagram of WCS and LCS.
Fig.13  LCS results of the contour cluster.
Fig.14  Schematic representation of layering and projection of the contour cluster: (a) Contour 2, (b) Contour 3, and (c) Contour 1.
Fig.15  Layering and projection results of the contour clusters in LCS: (a) 3D data after layering of cluster 2, (b) 2D projection data in LCS of cluster 2, (c) 3D data after layering of cluster 10, (d) 2D projection data in LCS of cluster 10, (e) 3D data after layering of cluster 8, and (f) 2D projection data in LCS of cluster 8.
Fig.16  Five-axis ultrafast laser processing system.
Fig.17  Hardware integration scheme of the five-axis ultra-fast laser processing system.
Fig.18  Ceramic core trimming process.
Fig.19  Registration process between CAD extracted trajectory and the edges of the measured point cloud.
Fig.20  Online measurement of the ceramic core via stereo vision: (a) online measurement and (b) point cloud model.
Fig.21  Template trajectory registration: (a) before registration and (b) after registration.
Fig.22  Optical system: (a) laser side and (b) laser processing head side.
Fig.23  Laser scanning trajectory: (a) contour cluster 2, (b) cluster 10, and (c) cluster 8.
Fig.24  Trimming results of the ceramic core: (a) ceramic core before trimming, (b) burr and hole blockage of long groove, (c) burr and hole blockage of hole, (d) ceramic core after laser trimming, (e) long groove after laser trimming, (f) hole after laser trimming, (g) ceramic core after manual trimming, (h) long groove after manual trimming, and (i) hole after manual trimming.
Abbreviations
2D Two-dimensional
CAD Computer-aided design
CAM Computer-aided manufacturing
CNC Computer numerical control
ICP Iterative closest point
LCS Local coordinate system
LPL Laser focus processing length
OEMCC Opto-electromechanical cooperative control
WCS Workpiece coordinate system
Variables
cj Coordinate of the cluster center
C( i) ( OWL(i),ZL(i )) Center of the ith cluster
D Diameter of the laser beam
E Single pulse energy
f Focal length of the field lens
floor(x) Downward rounding of the variable x
h Repetition frequency
H(i) Transformation matrix from WCS OW to LCS OL (i)
ΔH Layering distance
I0 Energy density at the center of the spot
I th Ablation threshold of the material
J Objective function
k Preset number of categories
M2 Mode parameter that characterizes the beam quality
n Number of feature vectors
N layer Layer number of the current cluster
OL(i ) ith LCS
OW Workpiece coordinate system
OWL(i) Coordinate of the coordinate origin OL (i) of LCS in WCS OW
P Laser power
Pm(i ) Positioning coordinates of the mth layer of the ith contour cluster
r Laser spot radius
rmax Radius size along the ellipse’s major axis
rmin Radius size along the ellipse’s minor axis
V WZ Unit vector along the Z-axis in WCS
w0 Radius of the laser beam at the waist
w( z) Radius at various positions along the optical axis
x^i Normalization of xi
xi(j )(xi,yi,zi, ui,vi,wi) Six-dimensional data representing the feature vector
x^i( x^i, y^i,z^i,ui,vi,wi) Normalization data
xmax Maximum values of xi
xW(i ) Data of the ith cluster in WCS
xL(i ) Data in LCS after the coordinate transformation of xW(i )
XL(i ) Unit vector along the X-axis in the ith LCS
y^i Normalization of yi
ymax Maximum values of yi
YL(i ) Unit vector along the Y-axis in the ith LCS
z Distance to the center of the focus along the optical axis
z^i Normalization of zi
zmax, zmin Maximum and minimum values of zi, respectively
zR Rayleigh length
ZL(i ) Unit vector along the Z-axis in the ith LCS
λ Laser wavelength
θ Incident angle of the laser
  
1 F Wang, D X Ma, A Bührig-Polaczek. Effect of ceramic cores on the freckle formation during casting Ni-based single crystal superalloys. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, 2019, 50( 2): 804– 815
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-018-5049-6
2 W Y Li, G J Zhang, L Chen, Y Huang, Y M Rong, Z R Gao. Dimethicone-aided laser cutting of solar rolled glass. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 16( 1): 111– 121
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-020-0615-1
3 W Y Li, Y Huang, Y M Rong, L Chen, G J Zhang, Z R Gao. Analysis and comparison of laser cutting performance of solar float glass with different scanning modes. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 16( 1): 97– 110
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-020-0600-8
4 Y Q Wu, D K Mu, H Huang. Deformation and removal of semiconductor and laser single crystals at extremely small scales. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 2020, 2( 1): 012006
https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ab7a2a
5 Z Yu, J Hu, K M Li. Investigating the multiple-pulse drilling on titanium alloy in picosecond laser. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2019, 268 : 10– 17
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.12.027
6 K L Wlodarczyk, A Brunton, P Rumsby, D P Hand. Picosecond laser cutting and drilling of thin flex glass. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2016, 78 : 64– 74
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.10.001
7 Y Z Liu. Coaxial waterjet-assisted laser drilling of film cooling holes in turbine blades. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2020, 150 : 103510
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.103510
8 C Brecher, M Emonts, C J Rosen, J P Hermani. Laser-assisted milling of advanced materials. Physics Procedia, 2011, 12 : 599– 606
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.076
9 Y Ito, T Kizaki, R Shinomoto, M Ueki, N Sugita, M Mitsuishi. High-efficiency and precision cutting of glass by selective laser-assisted milling. Precision Engineering, 2017, 47 : 498– 507
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.10.005
10 W S Woo, C M Lee. A study of the machining characteristics of AISI 1045 steel and Inconel 718 with a cylindrical shape in laser-assisted milling. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 91 : 32– 42
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.08.006
11 C P Ma, Y C Guan, W Zhou. Laser polishing of additive manufactured Ti alloys. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2017, 93 : 171– 177
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2017.02.005
12 J Schanz, M Hofele, L Hitzler, M Merkel, H Riegel. Laser polishing of additive manufactured AlSi10Mg parts with an oscillating laser beam. In: Öchsner A, Altenbach H, eds. Machining, Joining and Modifications of Advanced Materials. Advanced Structured Materials, vol 61. Singapore: Springer, 2016, 61 : 159– 169
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1082-8_16
13 C Weingarten, A Schmickler, E Willenborg, K Wissenbach, R Poprawe. Laser polishing and laser shape correction of optical glass. Journal of Laser Applications, 2017, 29( 1): 011702
https://doi.org/10.2351/1.4974905
14 A Krishnan, F Z Fang. Review on mechanism and process of surface polishing using lasers. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 14( 3): 299– 319
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0535-0
15 J S Ruzankina, O S Vasiliev. Study on possibility for the improvement of corrosion resistance of metals using laser-formed oxide surface structure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2016, 735( 1): 012050
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/735/1/012050
16 E Peng, A Tsubaki, C A Zuhlke, M Y Wang, R Bell, M J Lucis, T P Anderson, D R Alexander, G Gogos, J E Shield. Micro/nanostructures formation by femtosecond laser surface processing on amorphous and polycrystalline Ni60Nb40. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 396 : 1170– 1176
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.107
17 D Rico Sierra, S P Edwardson, G Dearden. Laser surface texturing of titanium with thermal post-processing for improved wettability properties. Procedia CIRP, 2018, 74 : 362– 366
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.143
18 C Zhang, J K Zhu, H Zheng, H Li, S Liu, G J Cheng. A review on microstructures and properties of high entropy alloys manufactured by selective laser melting. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 2020, 2( 3): 032003
https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ab9ead
19 O Yilmaz, N Gindy, J Gao. A repair and overhaul methodology for aeroengine components. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2010, 26( 2): 190– 201
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2009.07.001
20 C Bremer. Adaptive strategies for manufacturing and repair of blades and blisks. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2000: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 4: Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy; Ceramics; Structures and Dynamics; Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation; Education. Munich: ASME, 2000, V004T01A010
https://doi.org/10.1115/2000-GT-0340
21 C Bremer. Automated repair and overhaul of aero-engine and industrial gas turbine components. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 2: Turbo Expo 2005. Reno: ASME, 2005, 841– 846
https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2005-68193
22 Q C Liu, R Djugum, S D Sun, K Walker, Y R Choi, M Brandt. Repair and manufacturing of military aircraft components by additive manufacturing technology. In: Proceedings of the 17th Australian International Aerospace Congress (AIAC 2017). Melbourne: Engineers Australia, Royal Aeronautical Society, 2017, 363– 368
23 J Gao, J Folkes, O Yilmaz, N Gindy. Investigation of a 3D non-contact measurement based blade repair integration system. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2005, 77( 1): 34– 41
https://doi.org/10.1108/00022660510576028
24 Z L Chen Z T Chen Z Q Zhu Y Zhang. Research on remanufacturing and repairing method of aero-engine blade based on reverse engineering. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2020, 63(23): 80– 86, 93 (in Chinese)
25 D X Hou, X S Mei, G C Wang, J Li, C J Wang, W Huang, C Chen, R Liu. An accurate 3D edge measurement method for guided precise modification. Measurement Science and Technology, 2021, 32( 2): 025006
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/abac26
26 J J Fan, L Q Ma, Z Zou. A registration method of point cloud to CAD model based on edge matching. Optik, 2020, 219 : 165223
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165223
27 R Vock, A Dieckmann, S Ochmann, R Klein. Fast template matching and pose estimation in 3D point clouds. Computers & Graphics, 2019, 79 : 36– 45
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2018.12.007
28 R Opromolla, G Fasano, G Rufino, M Grassi. A model-based 3D template matching technique for pose acquisition of an uncooperative space object. Sensors, 2015, 15( 3): 6360– 6382
https://doi.org/10.3390/s150306360
29 W L Guo, W D Hu, C Liu, T T Lu. Pose initialization of uncooperative spacecraft by template matching with sparse point cloud. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2021, 44( 9): 1707– 1720
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G005042
30 H Xie, W L Li, Z P Yin, H Ding. Variance-minimization iterative matching method for free-form surfaces—part I: theory and method. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2019, 16( 3): 1181– 1191
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2018.2875154
31 W L Li, H Xie, G Zhang, S J Yan, Z P Yin. 3-D shape matching of a blade surface in robotic grinding applications. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2016, 21( 5): 2294– 2306
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2016.2574813
32 W L Xiao, G Y Liu, G Zhao. Generating the tool path directly with point cloud for aero-engine blades repair. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2021, 235( 5): 877– 886
https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405420970915
33 K Erkorkmaz, A Alzaydi, A Elfizy, S Engin. Time-optimal trajectory generation for 5-axis on-the-fly laser drilling. CIRP Annals, 2011, 60( 1): 411– 414
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.023
34 M Jiang, X Z Wang, S H Ke, F Zhang, X Y Zeng. Large scale layering laser surface texturing system based on high speed optical scanners and gantry machine tool. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2017, 48 : 113– 120
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2017.03.005
35 G Cuccolini, L Orazi, A Fortunato. 5 axes computer aided laser milling. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2013, 51( 6): 749– 760
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.01.015
36 J F Duesing, O Suttmann, J Koch, U Stute, L Overmeyer. Ultrafast laser patterning of thin films on 3-D shaped surfaces for strain sensor applications. Journal of Laser Micro/Nanoengineering, 2012, 7( 3): 311– 315
https://doi.org/10.2961/jlmn.2012.03.0014
37 S H Ko, Y Choi, D J Hwang, C P Grigoropoulos, J Chung, D Poulikakos. Nanosecond laser ablation of gold nanoparticle films. Applied Physics Letters, 2006, 89( 14): 141126
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2360241
38 L Overmeyer, J F Duesing, O Suttmann, U Stute. Laser patterning of thin film sensors on 3-D surfaces. CIRP Annals, 2012, 61( 1): 215– 218
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.087
[1] FME-22004-OF-WX_suppl_1 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed